The Official RAZZIE® Forum : 2003 RAZZIEŽ Nominees & "Winners" http://www.razzies.com/forum/ This is an XML content feed of; The Official RAZZIE® Forum : Entire RAZZIE® History, Year-by-Year: 1980-2012 : 2003 RAZZIEŽ Nominees & "Winners" Sat, 18 May 2013 14:46:59 +0000 Mon, 13 May 2013 21:51:58 +0000 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss Web Wiz Forums 9.70 360 www.razzies.com/forum/RSS_post_feed.asp?TID=353 The Official RAZZIE® Forum http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_images/RazzieLogo02.gif http://www.razzies.com/forum/ 2003 RAZZIEŽ Nominees & "Winners" : Apparently yes VITS lol weird... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=353&PID=54450#54450 Author: moviecritic1994
Subject: 353
Posted: May 13 2013 at 9:51pm

Apparently yes VITS lol weird but true. ]]> Mon, 13 May 2013 21:51:58 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=353&PID=54450#54450 2003 RAZZIEŽ Nominees & "Winners" : I haven't seen that one either.... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=353&PID=54430#54430 Author: Vits
Subject: 353
Posted: May 13 2013 at 4:09pm

I haven't seen that one either. Damn!

OK, so pre-2000 J-Lo is a good actress, and post-2000 is a bad one?
]]> Mon, 13 May 2013 16:09:15 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=353&PID=54430#54430 2003 RAZZIEŽ Nominees & "Winners" : I've heard people say Jennifer... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=353&PID=54406#54406 Author: oiram
Subject: 353
Posted: May 12 2013 at 7:32pm

I've heard people say Jennifer Lopez was good in Out of Sight.]]> Sun, 12 May 2013 19:32:47 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=353&PID=54406#54406 2003 RAZZIEŽ Nominees & "Winners" : I'm sure most people will... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=353&PID=54405#54405 Author: Vits
Subject: 353
Posted: May 12 2013 at 7:30pm

I'm sure most people will tell you that they prefer GRINCH over CAT. While Carrey didn't play the character like he was in the books (which is the script writers' fault), he still did a good job overall. Unlike Myers, who has a hard time coming out of his comfort zone and basically played the same character he always plays.
Originally posted by moviecritic1994

VITS, though I do agree J LO has hardly any acting talent, I thought she did "okay" in that biopic of Selena. Is that worth anything? LOL
I haven't seen it. Maybe it could change my opinion on her?
]]> Sun, 12 May 2013 19:30:04 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=353&PID=54405#54405 2003 RAZZIEŽ Nominees & "Winners" : VITS, though I do agree J LO has... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=353&PID=54398#54398 Author: moviecritic1994
Subject: 353
Posted: May 12 2013 at 6:18pm

VITS, though I do agree J LO has hardly any acting talent, I thought she did "okay" in that biopic of Selena. Is that worth anything? LOL]]> Sun, 12 May 2013 18:18:01 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=353&PID=54398#54398 2003 RAZZIEŽ Nominees & "Winners" : Originally posted by HeadRAZZBerry<font... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=353&PID=54397#54397 Author: moviecritic1994
Subject: 353
Posted: May 12 2013 at 6:15pm

Originally posted by HeadRAZZBerry

<font size="4" face="Times New Roman, Times, serif">RESPONSE from Head RAZZberry: While it may still suck, there's almost no way an animated remake of CAT IN THE HAT could be worse than the live action Mike Meyers version, which I consider one of the worst book-to-film adaptations ever made...  



I actually had a question about the two adaptations for "Cat in the Hat" and "How the Grinch Stole Christmas". I have seen both films, I do agree with you that Cat in the Hat was an awful film. Even though I didn't love How the Grinch Stole Christmas, I thought it was "okay". I believe it did get some Razzie consideration back when it was realized. HeadRazz and anybody who wants to answer this, which do you think of the two films is the worst?
]]> Sun, 12 May 2013 18:15:04 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=353&PID=54397#54397 2003 RAZZIEŽ Nominees & "Winners" : Originally posted by moviecritic1994I... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=353&PID=54390#54390 Author: Vits
Subject: 353
Posted: May 12 2013 at 2:26pm

Originally posted by moviecritic1994

I have a theory: The only reason Gigli was even made was to promote "Bennifer," since everyone in the tabloids talked about those two constantly back at that time.
You're sort of right. The movie was originally going to be a crime thriller, but when they hired Affleck & Lopez, the studio demanded that the script was re-written into a rom-com.
Originally posted by moviecritic1994

Question is, well Jennifer Lopez ever find a way to forget about Gigli as well? I highly doubt it, especially with her 2013 co-starring role in Parker.
Considering how many times she's been nominated since 2003 (including Worst Actress of the Decade) for different types of movies, I think it's fair to say that if she had any acting talents she would've displayed them by now.
]]> Sun, 12 May 2013 14:26:02 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=353&PID=54390#54390 2003 RAZZIEŽ Nominees & "Winners" : RESPONSE from Head RAZZberry:... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=353&PID=54377#54377 Author: HeadRAZZBerry
Subject: 353
Posted: May 12 2013 at 10:51am

RESPONSE from Head RAZZberry: While it may still suck, there's almost no way an animated remake of CAT IN THE HAT could be worse than the live action Mike Meyers version, which I consider one of the worst book-to-film adaptations ever made...  


]]> Sun, 12 May 2013 10:51:13 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=353&PID=54377#54377 2003 RAZZIEŽ Nominees & "Winners" : I have a theory: The only reason... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=353&PID=54375#54375 Author: moviecritic1994
Subject: 353
Posted: May 12 2013 at 10:33am

I have a theory: The only reason Gigli was even made was to promote "Bennifer," since everyone in the tabloids talked about those two constantly back at that time. Just like The Hottie and the Nottie pretty much is a Paris Hilton "infomercial." Luckily for Ben Affleck, he has the Oscar for Argo to help him forget this dreadful film. Question is, well Jennifer Lopez ever find a way to forget about Gigli as well? I highly doubt it, especially with her 2013 co-starring role in Parker.

Side note: I hear they are doing an animated adaptation of "Cat in the Hat". Do you guys think it will be better or worse than the Mike Myers version? ]]> Sun, 12 May 2013 10:33:47 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=353&PID=54375#54375 2003 RAZZIEŽ Nominees & "Winners" : On this episode, I compare Worst... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=353&PID=54111#54111 Author: Vits
Subject: 353
Posted: April 06 2013 at 1:06pm

On this episode, I compare Worst Actor nominee DAREDEVIL to ELEKTRA (skip to 01:56).

[TUBE]QgVNRe84RM4[/TUBE]

Any thoughts?
]]> Sat, 06 Apr 2013 13:06:51 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=353&PID=54111#54111 2003 RAZZIEŽ Nominees & "Winners" : On this episode, I compare Worst... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=353&PID=53808#53808 Author: Vits
Subject: 353
Posted: March 02 2013 at 2:00pm

On this episode, I compare Worst Supp. Actor winner SPY KIDS 3D to the other installments (Skip to 01:20):

[TUBE]ljFE6ermZr4[/TUBE]
]]> Sat, 02 Mar 2013 14:00:27 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=353&PID=53808#53808 2003 RAZZIEŽ Nominees & "Winners" : Originally posted by HeadRAZZBerryWORST... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=353&PID=52512#52512 Author: Vits
Subject: 353
Posted: October 13 2012 at 12:31pm

Originally posted by HeadRAZZBerry

WORST PICTURE


THE REAL CANCUN (New Line)


WORST EXCUSE for an ACTUAL MOVIE (All Concept/No Content!) (New Category)

THE REAL CANCUN

Skip to 06:28.

[TUBE]l-sy1acnSOM[/TUBE]

Any thoughts?

]]> Sat, 13 Oct 2012 12:31:56 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=353&PID=52512#52512 2003 RAZZIEŽ Nominees & "Winners" : 2003. Agent 003&#039;s body... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=353&PID=52453#52453 Author: GTAHater767
Subject: 353
Posted: October 07 2012 at 1:27am

2003. Agent 003's body was found in the arctic with a microchip with Zorin's calling card on it. Here's my take on the Year of the Chilled Microchip, Two Double-O-Three:
 
Films that should've been RAZZed, but didn't: 4
House of the Dead
The Haunted Mansion
View From the Top
Jeepers Creepers 2
 
Films that got RAZZed, but shouldn't have: 2
The Matrix Reloaded
Radio
 
Films that got RAZZed to the wrong degree: 3
Dumb and Dumber'er: When Harry Met Lloyd (Not RAZZed enough)
Kangaroo Jack (Not RAZZed enough)
Boat Trip (Not RAZZed enough)
 
Worst Trends/Events of 2003:
V. All the lousy dark-of-night thrillers (Cold Creek Manor, Dreamcatcher, The Hunted, Bulletproof Monk)
IV. Superhero themed films dipping in quality (Ex. HULK, Daredevil)
III. Ben Affleck, his 3 strikes, and his crumbling relationship with J-Lo
II. Underachievers trying to dance in an American Idol champ's unbearable crossover (The badly-executed Choreography of From Justin to Kelly made the RAZZIES governor HeadRAZZBerry intervene with a special award!)
I. Unusual concepts, content-free nonsense (There's a difference between the Special Category and Worst Picture. Worst Picture just means the most infamously bad overall. Worst Excuse For an Actual Movie takes aim at films with unorthodox concepts, that when they actually made them into films, they just came out nonsensical and content-free)
]]> Sun, 07 Oct 2012 01:27:50 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=353&PID=52453#52453 2003 RAZZIEŽ Nominees & "Winners" : Because I saw it when I was... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=353&PID=50386#50386 Author: Vits
Subject: 353
Posted: March 24 2012 at 9:14am

Because I saw it when I was 13, I decided to re-watch the MATRIX trilogy. It deserved both its Oscar wins and Razzie nominations.

Of course that I was blown away by the style of THE MATRIX. And while I also liked the phylosophical themes, I didn't really like the story. Best Performance? Hugo Weaving (he was over-the-top in a good way). Worst Performance? Keanu Reeves. He only showed true emotions during the fights, and being angry at your adversary isn't really an emotion, right?

Of course that the story couldn't support a sequel, and let alone 2. And it didn't. THE MATRIX RELOADED consisted on mostly talking, and I only cared about it when they referenced those phylosofical themes, nothing else. The fights started to feel obviously choreographed, and the action sequences were too long and tedious.

THE MATRIX REVOLUTIONS was less boring, but I just didn't care about the characters. And the story got too convoluted. Most of the acting sucked, including Weaving who got over-the-top in a bad way. As for the ending... I didn't care that it was ambigious, it was how they presented it. It felt like they ran out of reel.

I give them 7/10, 1/10 and 1/10 respectively.
]]> Sat, 24 Mar 2012 09:14:33 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=353&PID=50386#50386 2003 RAZZIEŽ Nominees & "Winners" : Since it takes all of 4.5... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=353&PID=40248#40248 Author: leeyn
Subject: 353
Posted: March 26 2011 at 9:00pm

Since it takes all of 4.5 minutes to read the book, of course they had to stretch out and elaborate on the original material to make a feature length film -- But in doing so, I would argue, they completely disrespected their source.。。。LOL]]> Sat, 26 Mar 2011 21:00:35 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=353&PID=40248#40248 2003 RAZZIEŽ Nominees & "Winners" : I just saw PAYCHECK. John Woo&#039;s... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=353&PID=40146#40146 Author: Vits
Subject: 353
Posted: March 17 2011 at 8:41am

I just saw PAYCHECK.
 
John Woo's directing was a step up from FACE/OFF in terms of action.But it was a step down in terms of handling the script.At first it's very intriguing.But halfway through the movie you see where it's going,and how it will end,and the action scenes somehow become boring.
 
This won "Worst Actor".Ben Affleck's performance was weak.Aaron Eckhart was alright.Uma Thurman...nothing worth mentioning.Paul Giamatti...I don't know if he was a star back then,but he deserves more than being the comic relief who barely appears.At least the funny sidekick who's with the hero in every scene!
 
I give it 5/10.
]]> Thu, 17 Mar 2011 08:41:54 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=353&PID=40146#40146 2003 RAZZIEŽ Nominees & "Winners" : I just saw DUPLEX.Drew Barrymore... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=353&PID=39292#39292 Author: Vits
Subject: 353
Posted: February 09 2011 at 11:32am

I just saw DUPLEX.Drew Barrymore was a little lazy but she didn't deserve "Worst Actress".I found the R.T. concensus unfair:"It was funnier when it was called THROW "MOMMA" FROM THE TRAIN".I give it 3/10.]]> Wed, 09 Feb 2011 11:32:03 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=353&PID=39292#39292 2003 RAZZIEŽ Nominees & "Winners" : 1)I think it was because GIGLI... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=353&PID=38343#38343 Author: Vits
Subject: 353
Posted: January 16 2011 at 4:14pm

1)I think it was because GIGLI wasn't meant to be a rom-com until those 2 were cast, and the Razzies wanted to say F.U. to the studios for thinking people are that dumb. As for Piper...you're right. She spent more time with Ashton than Tara. But I guess it's because they weren't a good couple on purpose? 

2)The directing was the worst part of BOAT TRIP. If anything McG deserved a nom. for TERMINATOR 4.
]]> Sun, 16 Jan 2011 16:14:08 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=353&PID=38343#38343 2003 RAZZIEŽ Nominees & "Winners" : OK, two things. 1: Why just... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=353&PID=38338#38338 Author: oiram
Subject: 353
Posted: January 16 2011 at 1:37pm

OK, two things.
 
1: Why just Ben with Lopez? Why not let it be Ben Affleck and either Jennifer Lopez in Gigli, Jennifer Gardner in Daredevil or Uma Thurman in Paycheck? By extension, why not also have Piper Perabo from Cheaper By the Dozen up there with Tara and Brittany(Rest in Peace) against Ashton?
 
2: Why Mort Nathan as worst director? What's so special about him? Shouldn't that nom be McG for Charlie's Angels: Full Throttle?
]]> Sun, 16 Jan 2011 13:37:51 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=353&PID=38338#38338 2003 RAZZIEŽ Nominees & "Winners" : &#034;Isn&#039;t an adaptation... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=353&PID=37552#37552 Author: BurnHollywoodBurn
Subject: 353
Posted: December 26 2010 at 4:40pm

"Isn't an adaptation a remake?" -- Not unless you count the direct-to-VHS, animated short that was based on the book.]]> Sun, 26 Dec 2010 16:40:17 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=353&PID=37552#37552 2003 RAZZIEŽ Nominees & "Winners" : I know cameos have been nominated... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=353&PID=37537#37537 Author: Vits
Subject: 353
Posted: December 26 2010 at 1:35pm

I know cameos have been nominated in the past, because some actors can suck within a few minutes. But Paris appeared for literally 2 seconds IN CAT IN THE HAT, and didn't speak at all.]]> Sun, 26 Dec 2010 13:35:39 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=353&PID=37537#37537 2003 RAZZIEŽ Nominees & "Winners" : Didn&#039;t you read HeadRazz&#039;s... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=353&PID=37528#37528 Author: oiram
Subject: 353
Posted: December 26 2010 at 9:00am

Didn't you read HeadRazz's response? He said that Hilton had a cameo in Cat in the Hat.]]> Sun, 26 Dec 2010 09:00:25 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=353&PID=37528#37528 2003 RAZZIEŽ Nominees & "Winners" : Isn&#039;t an &#034;adaptation&#034;... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=353&PID=37522#37522 Author: Vits
Subject: 353
Posted: December 26 2010 at 7:50am

Isn't an "adaptation" a remake?  

I know I said I didn't hate CAT IN THE HAT, but the main reason I thought it was bad anyway (and most of the people did) is because it had barely anything to do with the book. It deserved to win this! 

Originally posted by oiram

Paris Hilton should've been nominated for worst supporting actress instead of Kelly Preston.
 

For what?  
]]> Sun, 26 Dec 2010 07:50:55 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=353&PID=37522#37522 2003 RAZZIEŽ Nominees & "Winners" : Paris Hilton should&#039;ve been... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=353&PID=37517#37517 Author: oiram
Subject: 353
Posted: December 26 2010 at 3:40am

Paris Hilton should've been nominated for worst supporting actress instead of Kelly Preston.]]> Sun, 26 Dec 2010 03:40:23 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=353&PID=37517#37517 2003 RAZZIEŽ Nominees & "Winners" : 1. Basically,&#034;Worst Excuse... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=353&PID=37510#37510 Author: BurnHollywoodBurn
Subject: 353
Posted: December 25 2010 at 10:50pm

1. Basically, "Worst Excuse for an Actual Movie" was for stupid ideas that went horribly wrong because they were stupid ideas. Or as the subtitle says, "all concept without any actual content."   

2. Not really, since it was an adaptation (if you can even call it that), not a remake or sequel to an original movie.
]]> Sat, 25 Dec 2010 22:50:51 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=353&PID=37510#37510 2003 RAZZIEŽ Nominees & "Winners" : 1) What does the category &#034;Worst... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=353&PID=37497#37497 Author: Vits
Subject: 353
Posted: December 25 2010 at 10:41am

1) What does the category "Worst Excuse for an Actual Movie" mean?

2) Shouldn't THE CAT IN THE HAT be listed as a Remake/Sequel too?

]]> Sat, 25 Dec 2010 10:41:15 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=353&PID=37497#37497 2003 RAZZIEŽ Nominees & "Winners" : Yes, you are right to some... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=353&PID=37485#37485 Author: Jennifar
Subject: 353
Posted: December 25 2010 at 4:33am

Yes, you are right to some extent...  



]]> Sat, 25 Dec 2010 04:33:59 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=353&PID=37485#37485 2003 RAZZIEŽ Nominees & "Winners" : Yeah, but Kutcher &amp; Murphy... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=353&PID=35380#35380 Author: BurnHollywoodBurn
Subject: 353
Posted: October 20 2010 at 5:26pm

Yeah, but Kutcher & Murphy were annoying, and had little to work with in this crappy script.
]]> Wed, 20 Oct 2010 17:26:13 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=353&PID=35380#35380 2003 RAZZIEŽ Nominees & "Winners" : Brittany Murphy relied too much... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=353&PID=35379#35379 Author: Vits
Subject: 353
Posted: October 20 2010 at 9:43am

Brittany Murphy relied too much on the "Whisper when sad" technique, which became her trademark. Did she deserve the nomination? Well,she wasn't awful. But "Worst Couple"? The two had chemistry!

JUST MARRIED is very funny,but it's an insult to the intelligence. I know sh*t about relationships, but I know more than the script writer. It's true that arguments and fights aren't the same thing, and that married couples argue a lot but don't fight a lot. In the movie the characters fight, then they make it seem like arguments, and that's it.

I give it 5/10.
]]> Wed, 20 Oct 2010 09:43:35 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=353&PID=35379#35379 2003 RAZZIEŽ Nominees & "Winners" : Yeah, nothing was going to top... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=353&PID=34511#34511 Author: BurnHollywoodBurn
Subject: 353
Posted: September 14 2010 at 9:49am

Yeah, nothing was going to top "Gigli" in 2003. Between the overhype about the romance of "Bennifer" (and the fact that their movie was stupid on every level) "My Boss's Daughter" didn't stand a chance!  ]]> Tue, 14 Sep 2010 09:49:32 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=353&PID=34511#34511