The Official RAZZIE® Forum : 2005 Nominations http://www.razzies.com/forum/ This is an XML content feed of; The Official RAZZIE® Forum : 2005 Nominations : Last 10 Posts Wed, 19 Jun 2013 22:45:50 +0000 Sun, 04 Mar 2007 09:17:14 +0000 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss Web Wiz Forums 9.70 30 www.razzies.com/forum/RSS_topic_feed.asp?FID=83 The Official RAZZIE® Forum http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_images/RazzieLogo02.gif http://www.razzies.com/forum/ 2005 Nominations : 2005 Nominees http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=546&PID=11182#11182 Author: moviewizguy
Subject: 2005 Nominees
Posted: March 04 2007 at 9:17am

House of Wax and Paris Hilton should have never been nominated in the first place. First of all, millions on people hate House of Wax only because of Paris Hilton. Second of all, Paris Hilton was fine with her acting. It wasn't the best but it was fine. Why do you guys keep picking on her? House of Wax was even an above-average slasher flick with great scares and the look fo the film was fantastic. I don't see why people could've been any harsher to this film and person. House of Wax is what you expect in a horror movie. It's everything you have ever wanted in a horror movie and it gives tons more.]]> Sun, 04 Mar 2007 09:17:14 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=546&PID=11182#11182 2005 Nominations : 2005 Nominees http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=546&PID=3769#3769 Author: Robertin
Subject: 2005 Nominees
Posted: February 24 2006 at 10:07am

Thatīs because eMpTyV knows nothing about movies and/or cinema arts in general.]]> Fri, 24 Feb 2006 10:07:35 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=546&PID=3769#3769 2005 Nominations : 2005 Nominees http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=546&PID=3761#3761 Author: chan_beat
Subject: 2005 Nominees
Posted: February 24 2006 at 1:08am

Tom Cruise was not good in that movie but other actors deserved that spot more than him like Ashton Kutcher, Vince Vaugh etc.

There should have been a worst original song categorie.

So bad the 4some Brangelina & Jeniifer Aniston/Vince Vaugh didn't make it to the Most tiresome tabloid target.

Recently i heard on TRL, Vanessa hated the razzies. She said that all the "actresses" nominated like Jlo, Simpsons Sisters...were actually good then she and Su Chin Pak screamed about the fact that Tom Cruise got a nimanations! (*) anyway, MTV always advertise ofr the worst movies and actors!

]]> Fri, 24 Feb 2006 01:08:41 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=546&PID=3761#3761 2005 Nominations : 2005 Nominees http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=546&PID=3390#3390 Author: FeetOfClay
Subject: 2005 Nominees
Posted: February 09 2006 at 5:01pm

When are the ballots mailed out?]]> Thu, 09 Feb 2006 17:01:15 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=546&PID=3390#3390 2005 Nominations : 3 THINGS http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=562&PID=3230#3230 Author: HDIsenior
Subject: 3 THINGS
Posted: February 05 2006 at 9:34am

thanks for agreeing with number 1, by the way my favourite movie of 2005 is munich.

]]> Sun, 05 Feb 2006 09:34:35 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=562&PID=3230#3230 2005 Nominations : 2005 Nominees http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=546&PID=3211#3211 Author: Robertin
Subject: 2005 Nominees
Posted: February 05 2006 at 5:34am

Still, I found all three prequel not convincing]]> Sun, 05 Feb 2006 05:34:18 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=546&PID=3211#3211 2005 Nominations : 3 THINGS http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=562&PID=3203#3203 Author: skater_gurl14
Subject: 3 THINGS
Posted: February 05 2006 at 4:00am

1. I agree that Catwoman and Alexander were crap. And i also agree that Tom cruise wasn't that horrible in War of the Worlds and there were many better choices to be made.

2. I think War of the Worlds was a kickass movie

3. Harry Potter was also a kickass movie!!!


]]> Sun, 05 Feb 2006 04:00:43 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=562&PID=3203#3203 2005 Nominations : 2005 Nominees http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=546&PID=3146#3146 Author: sportsartist24
Subject: 2005 Nominees
Posted: February 04 2006 at 1:28pm

well, at least STAR WARS: EPISODE III: THE SITH HITZ THE FANS didn't get Worst Picture or Worst Director nominees. George Lucas did a better job on directing the third prequel than he did on the first two prequels (Both were nominated for Worst Picture and Worst Director).]]> Sat, 04 Feb 2006 13:28:32 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=546&PID=3146#3146 2005 Nominations : 3 THINGS http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=562&PID=3134#3134 Author: HDIsenior
Subject: 3 THINGS
Posted: February 04 2006 at 11:14am

1. I cheered last year when Catwoman and Alexander were among Razzie's worst of the year, I thought sb cares, but Razzie humiliated itself this year by nominating Tom Cruise while there were many better choices. It proves that it's all a joke rather than serious but guess what, It's not funny. 

2. I agree that Tom's performance in War of the worlds is disappointing but it's one of the most successful movies in his career and it's better to blame Spielberg for it, Tom only did as he said.

3. Snd as for IMDB's best and worst movies of 2005. there, Harry Potter is the Best Picture, and is also among the Worst Pictures. Same goes for Daniel Radcliffe ??!!! How can it be a good reference?

 

 

]]> Sat, 04 Feb 2006 11:14:08 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=562&PID=3134#3134 2005 Nominations : 2005 Nominees http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=546&PID=3065#3065 Author: Engineer Boy
Subject: 2005 Nominees
Posted: February 03 2006 at 1:41pm

It's just great to see that some of the nominations for "WORST" are just as controversial as some of the non-nominations for "BEST" on the other awards shows.

I just can't wait to see the Hollywood machines get behind their stars and films with full page ads trying to convince the Razzie voters that they really weren't that bad. 

 

 

]]> Fri, 03 Feb 2006 13:41:17 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=546&PID=3065#3065