Tom Cruise was not good in that movie but other actors deserved that spot more than him like Ashton Kutcher, Vince Vaugh etc.

There should have been a worst original song categorie.

So bad the 4some Brangelina & Jeniifer Aniston/Vince Vaugh didn't make it to the Most tiresome tabloid target.

Recently i heard on TRL, Vanessa hated the razzies. She said that all the "actresses" nominated like Jlo, Simpsons Sisters...were actually good then she and Su Chin Pak screamed about the fact that Tom Cruise got a nimanations! (*) anyway, MTV always advertise ofr the worst movies and actors!

It's just great to see that some of the nominations for "WORST" are just as controversial as some of the non-nominations for "BEST" on the other awards shows.

I just can't wait to see the Hollywood machines get behind their stars and films with full page ads trying to convince the Razzie voters that they really weren't that bad. 

Bewitched, house of wax should not have been nominated.

Tom Cruise and Katie Holmes should not have been nominated either

Dear Haroon:

I believe that here in this forum we´re all able to read the normal letter of it, so please spare us the headache of reading such overwhelming font you´re using, we´ll get your point with or without it.

Dear KewlKid:

It´s not that we don´t see that she is not talented, it´s that there´s nothing to see because she´s not talented.

Thanks

Tom Cruise should not be nominated as worst actor and jennifer lopez better win that award cause shes a horrible actress.. shes only known cause or her ass... and as for hilary duff.. truthfully (if thats a word) i dont want her to win this award cause she has a hot ass and i love her for that

well thanks for reading my opinion darlings

bye

let's make a new list---people we don't want to be cloned!

Three cheers for Paris Hilton, Tom Cruise (unless we get a sofa for him to jump on) and any actor in The Brady Bunch.

I'm SO SICK Tom Cruise's "acting"! It's overwhelmingly terrible and way, way overdone. Every dramatic scene goes like this: his hair shakes, his eyebrows simulate "angry/worried/whatever," yelling or oddly emphasized voice tone ensues, shaking extends to other limbs and then to the whole body, shaking contaminates costar within grasp (Run, Dakota Fanning, RUN!), and if he's really into the character, we might even get an extra, super-special-cos-he-really-cares eye twitch (see "Magnolia").

For the most part, the nominations are fair and correct, as we all have seen during our time in the forums. The Cruise nomination, however, has to be checked, since we have some others who deserved that spot better (Slater, Kutcher et al).

It´s somehow satisfying to see the nominees for worst actress, both lead and supporting, since all of them did real bad in their respective films, we´re going to have real excitement with these ladies. The competition is tough!!!!!!!!

I'm not saying Tom didn't deserve a nomination, but the IMDB polls have little merit. They usually vote for someone that they don't like as a person, rather than as an actor. In 2003 Colin Farrell finished fifth for worst supporting actor for Daredevil, which he was not only nominated for Best Villain for, but gave the film's only good performance in. This year William Hurt, early on, was on both the best and worst list for his ( Oscar nominated, New York film critics and Los Angeles critics award winning, as well as at least three different online critics nominated) role in a History of Violence. He didn't make either list, but still, he was great in that role. And there Best list is sometimes weird too, Johnny Depp, who was on our ballot finished sixth for Best  actor, while Daniel Radcliffe finished ahead of Philip Seymour Hoffman (!!!) for Best actor

I was sorry to see Nick's (Lachey) name on most tiresome tabloid target - I wish it would have included (BIG DADDY) Joe instead....

But I do understand the tabloid's are relentless -

next year - BRANGELINA & baby! ! ! !