How did House of Wax get nominated for worst picture and not Alone in the Dark?

House of Wax looks cheesy bad (maybe even a little creepy), but Alone in the Dark is bad, bad, bad, bad.

I have not seen Paris Hilton in House of Wax but she must be really bad if she beat Jessica Simpson in The Dukes of Hazzard. 

"If I had a tumour I'd name it..."  Tom Crui$e.

Eyes Wide Shut was a truly awful movie, and Cruise's performance in it certainly didn't help matters. But I think it might be going a step too far to blame him for ruining it. EWS would have been a terrible movie regardless of who starred.

Amen to that! I still haven't figured out why everyone seems to think his "Born on the Fourth of July" performance was great acting. Ugh. It was essentially a bad, bad remake/ripoff of "Coming Home"....only much more ably acted and directed. Tom Cruise is a joke.

From SATURNWATCHER: "Fear not. I'd say the odds are pretty good that Tom will make another run this time next year, with the release of Mission Impossible III looming like a threatening storm cloud over the horizon".

Thank you for your consoling words. Crui$e should name all his movies "Mission Impossible" since his mission most impossible seems to be good acting. I think, Crui$e is a terrible actor. He deserved so many razzies, I believe, he should be given a life-time-non-achieving razzie. Just remember, how he ruined "Eyes Wide Shut". In case you thought he had done well in "Eyes Wide Shut": Imagine Malkovich or Irons or Nicholson in that role... So sad...

Fear not. I'd say the odds are pretty good that Tom will make another run this time next year, with the release of Mission Impossible III looming like a threatening storm cloud over the horizon.

All and all, I was pleased with the ultimate slate of winners. In fact, I voted for the winners in all but one category. There were no undeserving winners, no undeserving nominees, and yes, 2005 produced a galaxy of stars and films that easily COULD have been nominated, but there are a limited number of spots on the ballot.

So on to 2006, and it already looks like another promising year is at hand.

I'm pretty upset Tom Crui$e didn't win as worst actor. Not only for "war of the worlds" but also for his leading role in "TomKat".
This man imposed his private life upon the whole world (Kitten Holmes, $cientology...) like he was suffering from some  brain-dysentery... Maybe you guys could have stopped him from insulting his colleagues or journalists or from his brain-farting in general for some time and make him spend his time taking acting lessons for a change...

PUKES OF HAZZARD SHOULD HAVE WON THEM ALL....TOM CRUISE AND KAITE HOLMES NEED A NOMINATION FOR WORST COUPLE EVER IN THE HISTORY OF COUPLES!! They make my bad relationships look like Will and Jada...

Dukes of Hazzard... so many nominations... and NO wins!?!?!
It deserved all of them!

I voted that the worst re-make was wrongly awarded, as this Dukes "re-make" is terrible!

Even Ben Jones, The ORIGINAL Cooter, just read the script at one point and hasn't even bothered watching it! He said:

(quote) "It was a miserable movie" (unquote)

Actually, Adams was working on A script when he died.  Someone else completed it based off of his alleged notes, but great play was made about how he was supposed to have written MOST of it and how all the touches most of the DA enthusiasts hated (the new material with John Malkovich and the Arthur/Trillian romance) were his ideas.

Of course only the most incorigible DA fan will not say he never had bad ideas or wrote bad things.  Or if they do, they ignore Mostly Harmless...

God bless you.....I *loved* HGTTG and I thought this "movie" was an absolute mess on toast. Ugh. I highly recommend anyone going out and either renting or buying the British TV versions. *Much* better adaptation.

And Adams was supposed to have endorsed that script before he died?!? I find that hard to believe. Deplorable.

The awards, in my humble opinion, were fairly given. Considering the sorry state of mainstream cinema in 2005, the choices were not easy.

While itīs true that "Dukes of Hazzard" deserved a greater share of awards, i must admit that something as ludicrous as "Dirty Love" must never go unnoticed.

I am still shocked and appalled that "Hitchhikers Guide To The Galaxy" didn't score a nomination for Worst Picture.  I haven't seen an audience so bored since Batman and Robin. 

More impressively, it pulled off the impossible feat of being incomprehensible to Douglas Adams neophytes (FAR too many in-jokes) while still changing so much from the spirit and humor of the books as to make the movie intolerable for Douglas Adams fans.

I am a little upset about Hayden... Thanks  a lot, Razzie, for not making him Worst leading actor - I see that if you can't give him a break with you wooden sense of humour you have  at least enough brains to be not so bad for him    Thanks ALOT!