Actually, I DID see Sandra Bullock's performance in All About Steve, and it was a horrible character in a horrible movie that should not have been made.  Just because she portrayed the character right doesn't mean that she SHOULD have.  Some characters, or more to the point, some movies need to be sent back to screenwriters for one hell of a re-write.  One of the things that counts towards a "worst" nom is clout; does this person have the clout to get this movie changed into something at least halfway decent if not good?  It was Bullock's production. 

 

As bad as Obsessed was, Beyoncé was not the worst thing about it.  It was her co-star, Ali Larter, who was HORRIBLE.  No, in this year's Worst Actress category, the real horse race was between Megan Fox, who looks great in photos but should not be allowed to move or say lines, and Sandra Bullock.  I can't speak for the other members, but I was already leaning towards Sandra (because she KNOWS better) when she made that announcement.  After that, I said why think about it any further.

 

No, as much as I would enjoy Sandra Bullock buying me and all the other Razzie members a drink, no, she deserved the award.  Again, she KNOWS better than to make a movie that bad.

 

Originally posted by robmosva I have to say that maybe you should watch the film first so you can slam it... if heard the reviews are mixed not like the ones of Showgirls o even last year Nine!!!   Well i only hope to see worth-bad performances nominated for the RAZZIE not the mixed perfomances played by more KNOW artist. Please guys you should give the RAZZIE to horrible performances like Beyonce''s OBSESSED or SJParker's Did u Heard.. instead of Sandra's All about STEVE which u probably didn't see, as well WILL FERRELL for LAND OF LOST (another horrible perf.) instead of Jo Bros Concert Movie or SHARON STONE in Catwoman (which i truly hated) instead of Britney Spears interview. Really guys give the razzie to the bad perfomances that deserves it.!

]]> Sun, 28 Nov 2010 13:55:11 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4669&PID=36540#36540 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4669&PID=36539#36539 Author: robmosva
Subject: 4669
Posted: November 28 2010 at 1:02pm

I have to say that maybe you should watch the film first before you can slam it... I heard the reviews are mixed not like the ones of Showgirls, or even last year's Nine!!!  

 

Well i only hope to see worthy bad performances nominated for the RAZZIE, not the mixed perfomances played by more KNOWN artists. Please guys, you should give the RAZZIE to horrible performances like Beyonce''s OBSESSED or SJParker's Did u Hear.. instead of Sandra's All about STEVE which u probably didn't see, as well WILL FERRELL for LAND OF LOST (another horrible perf.) instead of Jo Bros Concert Movie or SHARON STONE in Catwoman (which i truly hated) instead of Britney Spears interview. 

Really guys give the razzie to the bad perfomances that deserves it!  

 

]]> Sun, 28 Nov 2010 13:02:27 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4669&PID=36539#36539 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4669&PID=36532#36532 Author: BurnHollywoodBurn
Subject: 4669
Posted: November 27 2010 at 5:29pm

Yeah, if I were you, I would limit that focusing to "Last Airbender" only, because getting voters to vote for "Alice" is going to be a really hard sell considering the other contenders to choose from!  

Originally posted by rburton I take back everything I ever said about Burlesque.  It was delightful, campy, and the most fun I've had at the movies in ages.  Even Aguilera is acceptable in it.  I'm refocusing my all my energy on The Last Airbender and Alice and Wonderland.

]]> Sat, 27 Nov 2010 17:29:07 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4669&PID=36532#36532 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4669&PID=36526#36526 Author: rburton
Subject: 4669
Posted: November 27 2010 at 2:50pm

I take back everything I ever said about Burlesque.  It was delightful, campy, and the most fun I've had at the movies in ages.  Even Aguilera is acceptable in it.  I'm refocusing my all my energy on The Last Airbender and Alice and Wonderland.
]]> Sat, 27 Nov 2010 14:50:20 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4669&PID=36526#36526 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4669&PID=36525#36525 Author: Vits
Subject: 4669
Posted: November 27 2010 at 9:43am

That's right.]]> Sat, 27 Nov 2010 09:43:56 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4669&PID=36525#36525 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4669&PID=36520#36520 Author: GTAHater767
Subject: 4669
Posted: November 26 2010 at 5:38pm

Repeating what? That it reminds us of Chicago, Showgirls, and Glitter? I hope you don't want it to get nominated, because this movie is merely below average and doesn't deserve much of our attention at all.

]]> Fri, 26 Nov 2010 17:38:30 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4669&PID=36520#36520 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4669&PID=36515#36515 Author: Vits
Subject: 4669
Posted: November 26 2010 at 4:26pm

I don't want it to get nominated because I haven't seen it.I'm just repeating what others have said.]]> Fri, 26 Nov 2010 16:26:33 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4669&PID=36515#36515 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4669&PID=36510#36510 Author: Razziedent Evil
Subject: 4669
Posted: November 26 2010 at 3:07pm

LOL why do you want this movie to be nominated no matter what? The reviews are already in, it has 51/100 on MetaCritic and it also seems to be doing very well at the box office (at least judging from Wednesday-Thursday numbers) so I realy don't see this being a Razzie contender. Unless people are just mad they were wrong painting this as the next Showgirls trainwreck so they want it nominated to avoid admitting their mistake.  

Originally posted by Vits Originally posted by BurnHollywoodBurn And 45% is still very Razzie worthy. Remember, RT rating is only ONE of many factors in choosing contenders. I meant that if a movie has 40-49% in R.T. and/or Metacritic is average to bad,but if it has 0-10% it's awful.I'm sure BURLESQUE will be bad,but we need to wait to the last second to see how bad it is...specially to see if it's a Razzie contender.Although even if it has good reviews it can still be nominated in acting categories.

Originally posted by Vits Originally posted by GTAHater767 If they should lead in what information we use, thenif the reviews get worse, we can give it just one suggestion on thenominations ballot for Worst Screenplay. I'mpossitive that this has more chances of being up for "Remake OrRip-off" for being considered a rip-off of CHICAGO and SHOWGIRLS.

There are other factors, like being a box office bomb. Add that to sub-par reviews and we may have a contender! We'll know soon enough.