The Official RAZZIE® Forum http://www.razzies.com/forum/ This is an XML content feed of; The Official RAZZIE® Forum : Last 10 Posts Thu, 23 May 2013 10:45:17 +0000 Thu, 23 May 2013 10:32:58 +0000 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss Web Wiz Forums 9.70 30 www.razzies.com/forum/RSS_topic_feed.asp The Official RAZZIE® Forum http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_images/RazzieLogo02.gif http://www.razzies.com/forum/ HANGOVER III : Forum Members' Discussion of HANGOVER: 3...AUDS: 1 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=6173&PID=54602#54602 Author: Vits
Subject: Forum Members' Discussion of HANGOVER: 3...AUDS: 1
Posted: May 23 2013 at 10:32am

Originally posted by HeadRAZZBerry

I was suggesting that the very existence of this film is a "rip-off," as in: The idea of doing a third HANGOVER movie, when the second one sucked and a third one would exist only to take movie-goers' money, is inherently a "rip-off."

Then wouldn't every bad movie be considered a rip-off?
]]> Thu, 23 May 2013 10:32:58 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=6173&PID=54602#54602 GENERAL DISCUSSION of 2013 RELEASES... : Member Discussion of 2013 LIST... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=6066&PID=54601#54601 Author: oiram
Subject: Member Discussion of 2013 LIST...
Posted: May 23 2013 at 10:25am

Trailer for the new Jennifer Aniston movie We're the Millers:

[TUBE]0Vsy5KzsieQ[/TUBE]]]> Thu, 23 May 2013 10:25:02 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=6066&PID=54601#54601 HANGOVER III : Forum Members' Discussion of HANGOVER: 3...AUDS: 1 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=6173&PID=54600#54600 Author: HeadRAZZBerry
Subject: Forum Members' Discussion of HANGOVER: 3...AUDS: 1
Posted: May 23 2013 at 6:02am

RESPONSE from Head RAZZberry: I was suggesting that the very existence of this film is a "rip-off," as in: The idea of doing a third HANGOVER movie, when the second one sucked and a third one would exist only to take movie-goers' money, is inherently a "rip-off." 

As if further evidence were needed, here's the LINK to read today's L.A. Times review of HANGOVER III, which declares "the comedy has left the building," and which (in the print edition) has a sub-headline that refers to the film as "dismal"...




]]> Thu, 23 May 2013 06:02:11 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=6173&PID=54600#54600 HANGOVER III : Forum Members' Discussion of HANGOVER: 3...AUDS: 1 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=6173&PID=54599#54599 Author: oiram
Subject: Forum Members' Discussion of HANGOVER: 3...AUDS: 1
Posted: May 23 2013 at 3:16am

Wait a minute, HeadRazz. The trailers for the movie make it clear it's more of a thriller/heist type of thing, AND there is NO actual Hangover this time. Therefore, I'd argue we cannot call this a rip-off of the first movie again (Unless you think it is ripping-off something else. If that's the case, please explain)...

 


]]> Thu, 23 May 2013 03:16:22 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=6173&PID=54599#54599 GENERAL DISCUSSION of 2013 RELEASES... : Member Discussion of 2013 LIST... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=6066&PID=54598#54598 Author: Vheid
Subject: Member Discussion of 2013 LIST...
Posted: May 22 2013 at 11:41pm

I am not talking about Tree of Life being "booed," I am talking about the fact that the first 30 something reviews were almost exclusively negative. Even though it wasn't well-liked at Cannes, Tree of Life still received mostly positive reviews from the English-speaking critics at the festival (I heard that the French hated it).]]> Wed, 22 May 2013 23:41:11 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=6066&PID=54598#54598 HANGOVER III : Forum Members' Discussion of HANGOVER: 3...AUDS: 1 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=6173&PID=54597#54597 Author: moviecritic1994
Subject: Forum Members' Discussion of HANGOVER: 3...AUDS: 1
Posted: May 22 2013 at 9:39pm

I haven't seen the film yet but hope to soon. Have you seen it Head Razz? ]]> Wed, 22 May 2013 21:39:41 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=6173&PID=54597#54597 HANGOVER III : Forum Members' Discussion of HANGOVER: 3...AUDS: 1 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=6173&PID=54596#54596 Author: HeadRAZZBerry
Subject: Forum Members' Discussion of HANGOVER: 3...AUDS: 1
Posted: May 22 2013 at 9:15pm

RESPONSE from Head RAZZberry: I'd say it's a definite for our 34th Annual Nominating Ballot as Worst Remake/Rip-Off/Sequel -- Since it technically qualifies as all three...]]> Wed, 22 May 2013 21:15:01 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=6173&PID=54596#54596 GENERAL DISCUSSION of 2013 RELEASES... : Member Discussion of 2013 LIST... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=6066&PID=54595#54595 Author: oiram
Subject: Member Discussion of 2013 LIST...
Posted: May 22 2013 at 6:52pm

Here's the LINK for the Member-Started Forum on Parker --  Actually, I thought it was a remake/rip-off of Payback and Point Blank. 

]]> Wed, 22 May 2013 18:52:43 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=6066&PID=54595#54595 HANGOVER III : Forum Members' Discussion of HANGOVER: 3...AUDS: 1 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=6173&PID=54594#54594 Author: moviecritic1994
Subject: Forum Members' Discussion of HANGOVER: 3...AUDS: 1
Posted: May 22 2013 at 6:27pm

So do you think that Hangover 3 can officially be considered "one of ours"?? ]]> Wed, 22 May 2013 18:27:23 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=6173&PID=54594#54594 GENERAL DISCUSSION of 2013 RELEASES... : Member Discussion of 2013 LIST... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=6066&PID=54593#54593 Author: moviecritic1994
Subject: Member Discussion of 2013 LIST...
Posted: May 22 2013 at 6:26pm

I know this might be way off topic, but do you guys think "Parker" should be a Razzie contender? It does seem like a 2013 Remake/Rip-Off of "Gigli" ]]> Wed, 22 May 2013 18:26:13 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=6066&PID=54593#54593