The Official RAZZIE® Forum : BACK-TALK on OUR 30th ANNUAL NOMz & "WINNERS" http://www.razzies.com/forum/ This is an XML content feed of; The Official RAZZIE® Forum : WHATCHA THINK of OUR 30th Annual NOMz & "Winners"??? : BACK-TALK on OUR 30th ANNUAL NOMz & "WINNERS" Wed, 19 Jun 2013 01:20:00 +0000 Sun, 17 Apr 2011 21:09:36 +0000 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss Web Wiz Forums 9.70 360 www.razzies.com/forum/RSS_post_feed.asp?TID=4103 The Official RAZZIE® Forum http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_images/RazzieLogo02.gif http://www.razzies.com/forum/ BACK-TALK on OUR 30th ANNUAL NOMz & "WINNERS" : Creating your own movie awards,... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4103&PID=40906#40906 Author: Michaels
Subject: 4103
Posted: April 17 2011 at 9:09pm

Creating your own movie awards, posting detailed movie reviews, writing in the same font as professional screenplays ... well, I guess some people take their passion for movies to a whole other level.]]> Sun, 17 Apr 2011 21:09:36 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4103&PID=40906#40906 BACK-TALK on OUR 30th ANNUAL NOMz & "WINNERS" : Yep. http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4103&PID=40893#40893 Author: Vits
Subject: 4103
Posted: April 17 2011 at 2:50pm

Yep.]]> Sun, 17 Apr 2011 14:50:55 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4103&PID=40893#40893 BACK-TALK on OUR 30th ANNUAL NOMz & "WINNERS" : Originally posted by Vits I... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4103&PID=40890#40890 Author: Michaels
Subject: 4103
Posted: April 17 2011 at 2:44pm

Originally posted by Vits

I now try to write with Courier ev'rytime I can,'cuz that the font you use for scripts.What's wrong with it?
Because these are forum posts, not screenplays. Oh wait, you're going for a theme kinda thing, aren't you?]]> Sun, 17 Apr 2011 14:44:50 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4103&PID=40890#40890 BACK-TALK on OUR 30th ANNUAL NOMz & "WINNERS" : G.I. JOE should've wonWorst... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4103&PID=40884#40884 Author: Vits
Subject: 4103
Posted: April 17 2011 at 2:18pm

G.I. JOE should've won Worst Picture,Screenplay and Remake Or Sequel.]]> Sun, 17 Apr 2011 14:18:28 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4103&PID=40884#40884 BACK-TALK on OUR 30th ANNUAL NOMz & "WINNERS" : Originally posted by saturnwatcher Originally... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4103&PID=30577#30577 Author: BurnHollywoodBurn
Subject: 4103
Posted: March 28 2010 at 8:19am

Originally posted by saturnwatcher

Originally posted by PopcornAvenger

How did Uma Thurman's Motherhood slip past us last year?
 A (reportedly) $5 million movie that made about 50K box office - and did even worse in the UK.
Rather simple answer actually...this movie did $93,000 domestic and about $600,000 foreign. It only played in 48 theaters and was pulled after just 4 weeks in release. Not only did none of us see it...the bet here is that up until now, nobody here even heard of it. With a domestic gross that low, it is reasonable to assume that the only people that paid to see it were either in it, or relatives of people who were in it.LOL
I saw the poster for it in the window of a Blockbuster's and thought it was a straight to DVD flick. Based on this news, it SHOULD have been.]]> Sun, 28 Mar 2010 08:19:00 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4103&PID=30577#30577 BACK-TALK on OUR 30th ANNUAL NOMz & "WINNERS" : Originally posted by PopcornAvengerHow... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4103&PID=30566#30566 Author: saturnwatcher
Subject: 4103
Posted: March 27 2010 at 9:09pm

Originally posted by PopcornAvenger

How did Uma Thurman's Motherhood slip past us last year?
 
A (reportedly) $5 million movie that made about 50K box office - and did even worse in the UK.
Rather simple answer actually...this movie did $93,000 domestic and about $600,000 foreign. It only played in 48 theaters and was pulled after just 4 weeks in release. Not only did none of us see it...the bet here is that up until now, nobody here even heard of it. With a domestic gross that low, it is reasonable to assume that the only people that paid to see it were either in it, or relatives of people who were in it.LOL]]> Sat, 27 Mar 2010 21:09:08 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4103&PID=30566#30566 BACK-TALK on OUR 30th ANNUAL NOMz & "WINNERS" : How did Uma Thurman's Motherhood... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4103&PID=30564#30564 Author: PopcornAvenger
Subject: 4103
Posted: March 27 2010 at 4:16pm

How did Uma Thurman's Motherhood slip past us last year?
http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/motherhood/
 
A (reportedly) $5 million movie that made about 50K box office - and did even worse in the UK.
]]> Sat, 27 Mar 2010 16:16:14 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4103&PID=30564#30564 BACK-TALK on OUR 30th ANNUAL NOMz & "WINNERS" : Like what?¿Como que? http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4103&PID=30187#30187 Author: Vits
Subject: 4103
Posted: March 16 2010 at 6:56am

Like what?

¿Como que?
]]> Tue, 16 Mar 2010 06:56:25 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4103&PID=30187#30187 BACK-TALK on OUR 30th ANNUAL NOMz & "WINNERS" : It's just that you seem to... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4103&PID=30184#30184 Author: dEd Grimley
Subject: 4103
Posted: March 16 2010 at 6:27am

It's just that you seem to be missing some things that I'm telling you.

Es que me parece que te pierdes unas cosas que te digo.]]> Tue, 16 Mar 2010 06:27:04 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4103&PID=30184#30184 BACK-TALK on OUR 30th ANNUAL NOMz & "WINNERS" : But they wouldn't understand... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4103&PID=30181#30181 Author: Vits
Subject: 4103
Posted: March 16 2010 at 6:12am

But they wouldn't understand us.

Pero no nos entenderian.
]]> Tue, 16 Mar 2010 06:12:05 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4103&PID=30181#30181 BACK-TALK on OUR 30th ANNUAL NOMz & "WINNERS" : Lol... In case you didn't... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4103&PID=30168#30168 Author: dEd Grimley
Subject: 4103
Posted: March 15 2010 at 3:57pm

Lol... In case you didn't notice, I pointed out that I was well aware you were doing that on purpose.

Seria mejor si hablara en español contigo, guey... o....que?]]> Mon, 15 Mar 2010 15:57:35 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4103&PID=30168#30168 BACK-TALK on OUR 30th ANNUAL NOMz & "WINNERS" : I put in gigantic letter on purpose.That's... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4103&PID=30166#30166 Author: Vits
Subject: 4103
Posted: March 15 2010 at 3:52pm

I put in gigantic letter on purpose.That's what I don't like from here.No one can fully understand when you're bein'sarcastic.]]> Mon, 15 Mar 2010 15:52:08 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4103&PID=30166#30166 BACK-TALK on OUR 30th ANNUAL NOMz & "WINNERS" : It's the size that's... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4103&PID=30161#30161 Author: dEd Grimley
Subject: 4103
Posted: March 15 2010 at 3:41pm

It's the size that's the problem. Now it's huge. But something tells me you're aware of all of this. If you want to have an internet argument with someone, it doesn't do you any good to have an illegible font, or to use overly large letters, but yea... Something tells me you're just going to do whatever you want, so I wouldn't be surprised to find people to just start ignoring you. Which would be a shame if you were to offer important insight on something.]]> Mon, 15 Mar 2010 15:41:13 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4103&PID=30161#30161 BACK-TALK on OUR 30th ANNUAL NOMz & "WINNERS" : I now try to write with Courier... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4103&PID=30155#30155 Author: Vits
Subject: 4103
Posted: March 15 2010 at 3:19pm

I now try to write with Courier ev'rytime I can,'cuz that the font you use for scripts.What's wrong with it?
]]> Mon, 15 Mar 2010 15:19:14 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4103&PID=30155#30155 BACK-TALK on OUR 30th ANNUAL NOMz & "WINNERS" : Can you please attempt to do something... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4103&PID=30152#30152 Author: dEd Grimley
Subject: 4103
Posted: March 15 2010 at 3:02pm

Can you please attempt to do something about your fontsize, Vits? It's like trying to hold a conversation with someone who's whispering and looking the other way. My eyes hurt trying to read your posts.]]> Mon, 15 Mar 2010 15:02:33 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4103&PID=30152#30152 BACK-TALK on OUR 30th ANNUAL NOMz & "WINNERS" : I should've known Eddie Murhpy... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4103&PID=30142#30142 Author: Vits
Subject: 4103
Posted: March 15 2010 at 12:51pm

I should've known Eddie Murhpy was gon'na win.After his Oscar nom. in 2007(finally!),he got a Razzie nom. in 2008,2009 and 2010.
]]> Mon, 15 Mar 2010 12:51:18 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4103&PID=30142#30142 BACK-TALK on OUR 30th ANNUAL NOMz & "WINNERS" : Once again, another great point... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4103&PID=29797#29797 Author: BurnHollywoodBurn
Subject: 4103
Posted: March 08 2010 at 6:36pm

Once again, another great point by saturnwatcher. As I said myself, giving non-acting celebrities Razzies is a way of telling them "stick to your day jobs". Look at Kim Kardashian. After getting a nod for "Disaster Movie," she hasn't starred in any movie since. Could it be we helped her get a clue?? ]]> Mon, 08 Mar 2010 18:36:01 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4103&PID=29797#29797 BACK-TALK on OUR 30th ANNUAL NOMz & "WINNERS" : The most effective way to make... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4103&PID=29773#29773 Author: saturnwatcher
Subject: 4103
Posted: March 08 2010 at 6:55am

The most effective way to make this wildly uninteresting would be to "consider only actors." Let us suppose for a moment that, say, Donald Trump had a major supporting role in a movie this year and stunk it up deliciously. Should we ignore that performance just because Jim Carrey turns in a performance that is also bad, but not as bad  because he does it for a living? 

Ostensibly, we are here to reward the worst movies and performances. There may be times when the voting membershp may stretch the boundries a bit to make a point, as we did a few years ago when George W. Bush was selected Worst Actor in a leading role for his appearance in Fahrenheit 911. I think most of us that cast that vote did so to make a relevant point....our country was being run by a retarted chimp. But the bottom line for me is that I, for one, am not going to ignore a Razzie-worthy performance just because it is turned in my someone who doesn't happen to have a SAG card in his/her wallet.
]]> Mon, 08 Mar 2010 06:55:13 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4103&PID=29773#29773 BACK-TALK on OUR 30th ANNUAL NOMz & "WINNERS" : Oh, and I'd raise your bet... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4103&PID=29771#29771 Author: PopcornAvenger
Subject: 4103
Posted: March 08 2010 at 6:47am

Oh, and I'd raise your bet of Gigli by countering with Bewitched  Dead ]]> Mon, 08 Mar 2010 06:47:57 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4103&PID=29771#29771 BACK-TALK on OUR 30th ANNUAL NOMz & "WINNERS" : I'm not sure I disagree with... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4103&PID=29770#29770 Author: PopcornAvenger
Subject: 4103
Posted: March 08 2010 at 6:29am

I'm not sure I disagree with you. I too feel as if these individuals "steal" well deserved Razzies from notable actors and movie stars. . . . people who do it for a living, and aren't simply crossovers, celebrities, teen idols, etc. Problem is the line is very blurry. We're a junkyard dog protecting our turf - cinema - by gobbling up pretenders that climb over that fence into our domain. Especially those wearing pork chops around their neck like Paris Hilton.
 
I don't have HeadRazz's lines of demarcation memorized, but I do believe that one is drawn between movies that actually make it into a theatre, and those that go straight to DvD. Paris and her ilk often sink back into that mode, disappear from our theatres, and thus drop off our radar. So we can eventually "reward" those more notable individuals - the "actors" - for their missteps.
 
The fact is that Paris fired a shot across our bow with "The Hottie and the Nottie" and we had to sink her battleship.
]]> Mon, 08 Mar 2010 06:29:32 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4103&PID=29770#29770 BACK-TALK on OUR 30th ANNUAL NOMz & "WINNERS" : Oh , come on!The Jonas Bros?... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4103&PID=29767#29767 Author: Effie
Subject: 4103
Posted: March 08 2010 at 12:50am

Oh , come on! 
The Jonas Bros? Paris Hilton? Please consider only real actors to make your awards more interesting.
It's a given that these clowns (and their pop movies) are always cheesy and guaranteed
to be a joke. I want to hear about viable actors that you think failed. 

BTW: My vote for Worst Picture of the Decade would've gone to Gigli.

RESPONSE from Head RAZZberry: Aren't you kinda belying your own argument when you choose GIGLI as Worst Picture of the Decade, since it stars another example of what you consider "non-actors," Jennifer Lopez??  
]]> Mon, 08 Mar 2010 00:50:56 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4103&PID=29767#29767 BACK-TALK on OUR 30th ANNUAL NOMz & "WINNERS" : It's not about screen time.It's... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4103&PID=29740#29740 Author: Vits
Subject: 4103
Posted: March 07 2010 at 2:14pm

It's not about screen time.It's about the fact that the story is more focused on BELLA.

It's like people didn't know if HANNAH was lead or supporting in THE READER.
]]> Sun, 07 Mar 2010 14:14:26 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4103&PID=29740#29740 BACK-TALK on OUR 30th ANNUAL NOMz & "WINNERS" : And from what I understand, he... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4103&PID=29734#29734 Author: dEd Grimley
Subject: 4103
Posted: March 07 2010 at 12:26pm

And from what I understand, he was rightly nominated for SUPPORTING, rather than lead, because he was barely in New Moon. ]]> Sun, 07 Mar 2010 12:26:44 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4103&PID=29734#29734 BACK-TALK on OUR 30th ANNUAL NOMz & "WINNERS" : Originally posted by mikesnvgirlHow... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4103&PID=29716#29716 Author: BurnHollywoodBurn
Subject: 4103
Posted: March 07 2010 at 9:25am

Originally posted by mikesnvgirl

How did Robert Pattinson NOT get at least nominated for worst actor.  He's terrible, has no emotions, no facial expressions, NOTHING!  Dead
He was up for Worst Supporting Actor, but lost to Bill Ray Cryus, riding his daugther's coattails.]]> Sun, 07 Mar 2010 09:25:16 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4103&PID=29716#29716 BACK-TALK on OUR 30th ANNUAL NOMz & "WINNERS" : How did Robert Pattinson NOT... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4103&PID=29713#29713 Author: mikesnvgirl
Subject: 4103
Posted: March 07 2010 at 9:10am

How did Robert Pattinson NOT get at least nominated for worst actor.  He's terrible, has no emotions, no facial expressions, NOTHING!  Dead   

RESPONSE from Head RAZZberry: Maybe you should have looked over our list of nominees more closely -- Pattinson was nominated, but we relegated him to Worst Supporting Actor (since his character is gone for half or more of the movie). This decision drove Twi-Hards nutz, but should please you and Pattinson Poo-Poo-ers everywhere...

]]> Sun, 07 Mar 2010 09:10:58 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4103&PID=29713#29713 BACK-TALK on OUR 30th ANNUAL NOMz & "WINNERS" : My point exactly.They failed on... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4103&PID=29662#29662 Author: Vits
Subject: 4103
Posted: March 06 2010 at 4:45pm

My point exactly.They failed on both missions.They're bad.]]> Sat, 06 Mar 2010 16:45:01 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4103&PID=29662#29662 BACK-TALK on OUR 30th ANNUAL NOMz & "WINNERS" : Originally posted by VitsSo... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4103&PID=29659#29659 Author: BurnHollywoodBurn
Subject: 4103
Posted: March 06 2010 at 4:33pm

Originally posted by Vits

So you still don't believe me.

How'bout this:The nominees for "Worst Picture Of The Decade" deserve that title,'cuz they were flops,but on they years they were only nominated for "Worst Picture",the other 4 nominees weren't all flops.

AND they all had universally bad reviews from each and every critic that saw them.
]]> Sat, 06 Mar 2010 16:33:01 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4103&PID=29659#29659 BACK-TALK on OUR 30th ANNUAL NOMz & "WINNERS" : So you still don't believe... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4103&PID=29654#29654 Author: Vits
Subject: 4103
Posted: March 06 2010 at 4:22pm

So you still don't believe me.

How'bout this:The nominees for "Worst Picture Of The Decade" deserve that title,'cuz they were flops,but on they years they were only nominated for "Worst Picture",the other 4 nominees weren't all flops.]]> Sat, 06 Mar 2010 16:22:16 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4103&PID=29654#29654 BACK-TALK on OUR 30th ANNUAL NOMz & "WINNERS" : Originally posted by VitsRegardless... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4103&PID=29650#29650 Author: BurnHollywoodBurn
Subject: 4103
Posted: March 06 2010 at 4:12pm

Originally posted by Vits


Regardless of how not well done COP OUT is,a bad movie can't go up in the b.o. like that.Therefor,it's entertainin'.It succeeded in one it's missions,although it's not the main one.

Ah, but it's now in its second week of release. Now we'll see how much staying power it has, if it doesn't drop way down the charts.
]]> Sat, 06 Mar 2010 16:12:21 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4103&PID=29650#29650 BACK-TALK on OUR 30th ANNUAL NOMz & "WINNERS" : Yes it can. I believe it's... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4103&PID=29638#29638 Author: dEd Grimley
Subject: 4103
Posted: March 06 2010 at 2:28pm

Yes it can. I believe it's just proved that it can. I've only heard about how stupid it was, and yet...]]> Sat, 06 Mar 2010 14:28:21 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4103&PID=29638#29638