Be careful, though --  That also means that, if a studio knows it has a dud on their hands, all they have to do is put it on pay-per-view for a day and they can avoid qualifying for a Razzie... 

Worst Picture: The pacing of the movie seems rushed. As the movie progresses it seems to accelerate. Had this movie been a theme park ride the highest speed would have been at the very end. 

Worst Actor: Robert Pattinson is still worthy of a Razzie. He fails to get out the right emotions for his role, just like in those stupid 'Twilight' movies. This failure makes it difficult to like Pattinson's protagonist (part of me wished the female characters would strike him below the belt-line). 

Worst Supporting Actress: Uma Thurman was unconvincing as a nineteenth-century person. She sounded and acted like a time-traveller from our time. 

Worst Supporting Actor: Colm Meaney was also unsuitable for his role. His words and mannerisms did not give the impression of a person of privilege. Meaney seemed more like a factory worker pretending to be an upper-class snob. 

Worst Prequel, Remake, Rip-off or Sequel: As mentioned before the novel has been adapted several time before. Since it is worthy of a Worst Picture nomination it also qualifies it for this category. 

Worst Director: Declan Donnellan and Nick Ormerod did a poor job of putting together this movie, especially its pacing. 

Worst Screenplay: Rachel Bennette's script was dull and that is putting it lightly. 

Worst Screen Couple: The main cast have been miscast. So any combination of them is worthy of a nomination, especially with alleged vampire Robert Pattinson. 

Worst Screen Ensemble: As with the previous category the miscast actors make the group deserving of getting nominated.