The Official RAZZIE® Forum : CITIZEN KANE http://www.razzies.com/forum/ This is an XML content feed of; The Official RAZZIE® Forum : POLL: Is CITIZEN KANE Really The #1 BEST Movie of ALL Time?? : CITIZEN KANE Tue, 18 Jun 2013 21:56:41 +0000 Thu, 17 Nov 2011 18:36:03 +0000 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss Web Wiz Forums 9.70 360 www.razzies.com/forum/RSS_post_feed.asp?TID=5365 The Official RAZZIE® Forum http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_images/RazzieLogo02.gif http://www.razzies.com/forum/ CITIZEN KANE : My guess here is that if you are... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5365&PID=47932#47932 Author: saturnwatcher
Subject: 5365
Posted: November 17 2011 at 6:36pm

My guess here is that if you are that excited about Breaking Wind, you probably aren't going to be particularly bowled over by Citizen Kane. ]]> Thu, 17 Nov 2011 18:36:03 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5365&PID=47932#47932 CITIZEN KANE : I have not seen this movie.... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5365&PID=47918#47918 Author: atk2tonogan
Subject: 5365
Posted: November 17 2011 at 3:41am

I have not seen this movie. But I am very very very excited to see Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn, Part 1... ]]> Thu, 17 Nov 2011 03:41:04 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5365&PID=47918#47918 CITIZEN KANE : Yes, Citizen Kane is the best... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5365&PID=47686#47686 Author: jetbrav
Subject: 5365
Posted: November 06 2011 at 1:27am

Yes, Citizen Kane is the best movie of all time!!!]]> Sun, 06 Nov 2011 01:27:14 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5365&PID=47686#47686 CITIZEN KANE : Welcome Francessam. Are you... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5365&PID=47603#47603 Author: Vits
Subject: 5365
Posted: October 31 2011 at 11:17am

Welcome Francessam. Are you by any chance the president of the AFI? LOL]]> Mon, 31 Oct 2011 11:17:13 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5365&PID=47603#47603 CITIZEN KANE : Citizen Kane was a really good... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5365&PID=47601#47601 Author: francessam
Subject: 5365
Posted: October 30 2011 at 9:17pm

Citizen Kane was a really good movie and I"m not surprised why it was chosen as the #1 Best movie of all time. I liked Citizen Kane but it's not really my favorite to be in the no.1 spot. My most favorite is Casablanca. It was a truly great classic movie. I also loved Gone with The Wind and The Godfather.   ]]> Sun, 30 Oct 2011 21:17:23 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5365&PID=47601#47601 CITIZEN KANE : I don't think it SHAKESPEARE... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5365&PID=47008#47008 Author: Lord Naseby
Subject: 5365
Posted: September 29 2011 at 10:28am

I don't think it SHAKESPEARE a satire at all. Satire uses ironic sarcasm to make a statement, something SIL lacked. It was an homage film. Plus the references were anything but subtle. The priest saying "A plague on both of your houses," not subtle. In another year I might not have minded (although I don't know which). My big problem is that Harvey Weinstein lied his butt off about what kind of film PRIVATE RYAN was. 'Historically Inaccurate?!?' Give me a break! SIL had even less that was actually accurate about it. Not to mention that it managed to take other Oscars away from people who gave performances of a lifetime (such as Cait Blanchett in Elizabeth, who kicked the ever- loving crap out of Gwyneth Paltrow in terms of performance).

Weinstein controls the Academy like a puppet master. Not to mention that the Academy has always hated Spielberg's guts. When you combine the two, Private Ryan loses and Weinstein gets to go home with another Oscar.


RESPONSE from Head RAZZberry: Don't even know where to start trying to respond to this diatribe -- If the AMPAS "has always hated Spielberg's guts," how do you explain that he's been Oscar-nominated 13 TIMES (IMDb LINK) and has not only won THREE TIMES, but one of his wins was as Best Director...for PRIVATE RYAN! 

As for SHAKESPEARE being "historically inaccurate," it did not represent itself as being about actual history but instead was clearly a romantic fable, merely "riffing" on the works and legends of Shakespeare and his times.  

Sounds to me like you're buying into the "Spielberg is God/Fanboy" folklore too readily available on the 'Net...  


]]> Thu, 29 Sep 2011 10:28:48 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5365&PID=47008#47008 CITIZEN KANE : Actually I would vote for Forest... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5365&PID=47007#47007 Author: maxxxpower
Subject: 5365
Posted: September 29 2011 at 10:02am

Actually I would vote for Forest Gump as my best ever -- That is a great movie!  ]]> Thu, 29 Sep 2011 10:02:49 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5365&PID=47007#47007 CITIZEN KANE : I don't know, notevery SuperBowlmakes... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5365&PID=46818#46818 Author: SuperTeenTopia
Subject: 5365
Posted: September 21 2011 at 7:56pm

I don't know, not every SuperBowl makes for a great showing for all teams. There's the odd chance you get that 33-3 game that should have ended after the second quarter...  

Originally posted by saturnwatcher

I agree that the Oscars are the Super Bowl of the movie industry, but the NFL doesn't have to look back on several of their past champions with a degree of embarrassed throat clearing. I don't think anyone who played for the Green Bay Packers in the '97 Super Bowl would speak of the accomplishment with anything but pride. But seriously, would you ever come out and publicly admit that you were one of the guys who voted for Forrest Gump?
 
.]]> Wed, 21 Sep 2011 19:56:51 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5365&PID=46818#46818 CITIZEN KANE : I was in a rush when I posted... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5365&PID=46803#46803 Author: SchumacherH8ter
Subject: 5365
Posted: September 21 2011 at 12:17pm

I was in a rush when I posted that. I re-checked the source and it didn't say they paid them, but implied it. There's no links, so I can't verify it. Sorry for the confusion.
 
Link: http://www.cracked.com/article_18460_5-reasons-oscars-matter-even-less-than-you-thought_p2.html (Scroll down to number 1)
]]> Wed, 21 Sep 2011 12:17:22 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5365&PID=46803#46803 CITIZEN KANE : I think Shakespeare in Love is... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5365&PID=46801#46801 Author: moviewizguy
Subject: 5365
Posted: September 21 2011 at 10:10am

I think Shakespeare in Love is a brilliant film. Considering the fact that I downright loathed the story of Romeo and Juliet and every film adaptation I've seen, I was blown away by how great the movie was. Saving Private Ryan is good too, but I've seen better war films -- like Full Metal Jacket and Letters to Iwo Jima.  

Originally posted by Head RAZZberry

Gotta disagree with you about SHAKESPEARE IN LOVE vs SAVING RYAN's PRIVATES -- I have seen both films multiple times and, while RYAN is one of the best war films ever made, SHAKESPEARE is a brilliant satire that actually expects its audience to be educated enough to get subtle references to several of Shakespeare's classic plays and favorite plot devices. While RYAN is indeed a fine film, SHAKESPEARE is a movie that respects audiences enough not to talk down to us -- an all too rare vote of confidence in movie-goers' intelligence in an age when most of Hollywood thinks we're all complete cretins!


]]> Wed, 21 Sep 2011 10:10:44 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5365&PID=46801#46801 CITIZEN KANE : I think the reason over... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5365&PID=46792#46792 Author: SchumacherH8ter
Subject: 5365
Posted: September 21 2011 at 3:54am

I think the reason over the Shakespeare In Love backlash is less with the film itself and more with Harvey Weinstein's rumored tactics. Specifically, paying off journalists to claim that Private Ryan was historically inaccurate!  


RESPONSE from Head RAZZberry: Even though this is only an open Forum, and nothing here is technically "published," I feel compelled to point out that, while opinions are most welcome, the posting of accusations, allegations and other "actionable remarks" here is both inappropriate and unwelcome. I bring this up because I just now edited the above post to include the word "rumored" -- I think it's reasonable to assume that, had evidence of the accusations against Weinstein existed, Spielberg and the makers of PRIVATE RYAN would have sought legal recourse. The fact that they did not, while not exactly proving the accusations untrue, certainly lends credence to their being an example of "Urban Folklore." 

In future, let's try to stay focused on what each of us thinks about the subjects at hand, rather than posting rumor, innuendo and other material that could be considered "actionable remarks" on our part... 




]]> Wed, 21 Sep 2011 03:54:42 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5365&PID=46792#46792 CITIZEN KANE : Ah yes the '97 Superbowl... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5365&PID=46775#46775 Author: Lord Naseby
Subject: 5365
Posted: September 20 2011 at 9:45pm

Ah yes the '97 Superbowl one of the bigger upsets in Superbowl history. As a fan of the winning team, the Broncos, I can say that it is indeed better to have gone and lost than not gone at all. Not so much with the Oscars. The Superbowl is actually based off of talent. the winning team worked their butts off to get there. With the Oscars, a few simple payoffs and a giant smear campaign and you will have it regardless of whether or not you deserve it. case and point, Shakespeare in Love over Saving Private Ryan which is widely regarded as one of the biggest f*** ups in Oscar history.   


RESPONSE from Head RAZZberry: Gotta disagree with you about SHAKESPEARE IN LOVE vs SAVING RYAN's PRIVATES -- I have seen both films multiple times and, while RYAN is one of the best war films ever made, SHAKESPEARE is a brilliant satire that actually expects its audience to be educated enough to get subtle references to several of Shakespeare's classic plays and favorite plot devices. While RYAN is indeed a fine film, SHAKESPEARE is a movie that respects audiences enough not to talk down to us -- an all too rare vote of confidence in movie-goers' intelligence in an age when most of Hollywood thinks we're all complete cretins!  



]]> Tue, 20 Sep 2011 21:45:42 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5365&PID=46775#46775 CITIZEN KANE : I agree that the Oscars are the... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5365&PID=46774#46774 Author: saturnwatcher
Subject: 5365
Posted: September 20 2011 at 9:07pm

I agree that the Oscars are the Super Bowl of the movie industry, but the NFL doesn't have to look back on several of their past champions with a degree of embarrassed throat clearing. I don't think anyone who played for the Green Bay Packers in the '97 Super Bowl would speak of the accomplishment with anything but pride. But seriously, would you ever come out and publicly admit that you were one of the guys who voted for Forrest Gump?]]> Tue, 20 Sep 2011 21:07:26 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5365&PID=46774#46774 CITIZEN KANE : well 1990 would be a do-over because... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5365&PID=46769#46769 Author: Lord Naseby
Subject: 5365
Posted: September 20 2011 at 7:50pm

well 1990 would be a do-over because Goodfellas has aged so much better than DWW so is the second half of your list films that most people feel shouldn't have won that you agree with the win?]]> Tue, 20 Sep 2011 19:50:29 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5365&PID=46769#46769 CITIZEN KANE : I would also add to the "Oscar... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5365&PID=46767#46767 Author: SchumacherH8ter
Subject: 5365
Posted: September 20 2011 at 6:10pm

I would also add to the "Oscar re-do years" list: 1956 and 1981.  
 
Also, 1990 being on your list amuses me because I have Dances With Wolves on my counter. Let's see if it winds up in the same company as Around The World In 80 Days/Chariots Of Fire/Crash or it ranks with Cimarron/Forrest Gump/My Fair Lady.
]]> Tue, 20 Sep 2011 18:10:41 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5365&PID=46767#46767 CITIZEN KANE : They should poll a bunch of film... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5365&PID=46677#46677 Author: Lord Naseby
Subject: 5365
Posted: September 18 2011 at 5:11pm

They should poll a bunch of film critics for years to redo. I'm sure 1998 would be at the top of the list as well as 1941, 1952, 1979, 1980, and 1990 to start with. ]]> Sun, 18 Sep 2011 17:11:15 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5365&PID=46677#46677 CITIZEN KANE : The Oscars are to Hollywood... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5365&PID=46676#46676 Author: SuperTeenTopia
Subject: 5365
Posted: September 18 2011 at 4:39pm

The Oscars are to Hollywood what the SuperBowl is to American football. When the industry is not obsessed with plugging tentpole movies, it's obsessed with winning Oscars ... and so are people outside of the industry. Thousands of office pools are based on the results, studios create "buzz" for their movies with them, many people go into the movie business just to win one, and we get months' worth of hype leading up to the award show ... in other words, it's an even bigger event than those so-called "movie events of the summer!" The Oscars are so ingrained in the movie and entertainment business, it would be impossible to have them on a "once every four/five years basis." So, yeah, your idea is just wishful thinking.

]]> Sun, 18 Sep 2011 16:39:45 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5365&PID=46676#46676 CITIZEN KANE : I wouldn't disagree that... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5365&PID=46671#46671 Author: saturnwatcher
Subject: 5365
Posted: September 18 2011 at 11:40am

I wouldn't disagree that The Godfather was deserving of Best Picture that year. In any one of many other years, Cabaret probably would have won. I've always thought that giving out a Best Picture every year might be a mistake. Perhaps the Oscars should only be held once every 5 years, and they could honor the 5 Best movies, performances etc etc for that time period. There are years when there truly are more than one really worthy movie followed by periods of 2 or 3 years where nothing is deserving. That is one good thing about the Razzies...we always have at least one truly deserving movie every year. LOL]]> Sun, 18 Sep 2011 11:40:05 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5365&PID=46671#46671 CITIZEN KANE : Well there are lists with films... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5365&PID=46669#46669 Author: Lord Naseby
Subject: 5365
Posted: September 18 2011 at 7:24am

Well there are lists with films like that. The main list with Kane at the top is the American Film Institute list which deals only with American films. ]]> Sun, 18 Sep 2011 07:24:40 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5365&PID=46669#46669 CITIZEN KANE : I found some time to visit the... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5365&PID=46665#46665 Author: Vheid
Subject: 5365
Posted: September 18 2011 at 2:31am

I found some time to visit the forum, school is busy but I am enjoying myself (I love art so many times more then film to be honoust)...

I have to admit that I didn't read the entire discussion (because it's seven pages long), but I wanted to throw in two arguments that I hope havn't been said yet... Mainly because I want to hear your thoughts on the subjects...

1. I've noticed that a lot of "BEST FILM EVER"-lists not only list Citizan Kane, Casablanca and The Godfather near the top... They also seem to exlude any non-American (or foreign language) film... Shouldn't a REAL best film also include films like La Strada, The Bicycle Thieves, Rashomon, Der Himmel Über Berlin, any Sergei Eisenstein-film and many others (a lot of which I probably never saw)? It's one of the reasons why I never trust those lists... I always had an idea that there is a cultural bias in favor of American films (not only in America)... Image if Citizen Kane was made in the Czechoslovakia instead of the States... Would people still put it in their top 10 or 100 if this were the case....

2. I believe that Hearst wasn't the only factor why the film did so badly at the box office... It was simply the right movie made in the wrong time period.... I heard somewere that Kane, while being succesfull in the big cities, attracted little visitors in the more rural areas.... and who can blame them... My grandfather (at age 90 now) was still living in poverty caused by the great depression around that time (of course it didn't help that Holland was recently invaded by Germany)... and I asume that a lot of Americans also were slowly recovering from it... I might be wrong but I don't think these people would have wanted to see a movie about the rich and privileged around that time (no matter how good the movie was)..... Any disagreements?
]]> Sun, 18 Sep 2011 02:31:23 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5365&PID=46665#46665 CITIZEN KANE : Also, On Golden Pond and Raiders... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5365&PID=46649#46649 Author: Lord Naseby
Subject: 5365
Posted: September 17 2011 at 2:12pm

Also, On Golden Pond and Raiders of the Lost Ark are vastly different movies, so it would be hard to compare the two. ]]> Sat, 17 Sep 2011 14:12:37 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5365&PID=46649#46649 CITIZEN KANE : For Pacino, that's the joke... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5365&PID=46648#46648 Author: Lord Naseby
Subject: 5365
Posted: September 17 2011 at 2:11pm

For Pacino, that's the joke for sure. He lost for so many masterpiece roles to people who hadn't won before so 'it was their time.' Ironically he won for the same reason. ]]> Sat, 17 Sep 2011 14:11:39 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5365&PID=46648#46648 CITIZEN KANE : I just thought of something: a... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5365&PID=46646#46646 Author: SchumacherH8ter
Subject: 5365
Posted: September 17 2011 at 11:50am

I just thought of something: a lot of people think that Pacino over-acts in his movies because he won his Oscar for an over-the-top performance. If he won for The Godfather, would he still be giving quiet, quality performances?
 
Also, I just rented On Golden Pond from the Le Moyne library. I don't think I'll like it as much as Raiders, but I'm 1000% sure that it'll be better than Chariots Of Fire! (And that third zero was intentional!)
]]> Sat, 17 Sep 2011 11:50:07 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5365&PID=46646#46646 CITIZEN KANE : Oh I'm not saying he was... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5365&PID=46645#46645 Author: Lord Naseby
Subject: 5365
Posted: September 17 2011 at 11:14am

Oh I'm not saying he was bad by ay means. He was a great character to watch. And I know all about the Oscar history between the two films that year. But just because a film wins a lot of Oscars doesn't mean they deserve them *Cough cough* SHAKESPEARE IN LOVE *cough cough*. One could argue that any one of the actors nominated in The Godfather did a lot to drive the show. They had a lot of excellent character development and emotional depth. Were they overshadowed by Brando? well that's just an inevitability. You gotta agree that The Godfather deserved Best Picture though.
]]> Sat, 17 Sep 2011 11:14:55 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5365&PID=46645#46645 CITIZEN KANE : I would have to side with HeadRazz... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5365&PID=46644#46644 Author: saturnwatcher
Subject: 5365
Posted: September 17 2011 at 9:36am

I would have to side with HeadRazz on the Joel Grey debate. His onscreen time was not extensive, but he gave the film its atmosphere and power. The impact this movie had really sets it in a different class than the typical Hollywood musical. ]]> Sat, 17 Sep 2011 09:36:03 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5365&PID=46644#46644 CITIZEN KANE : You're probably right.... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5365&PID=46638#46638 Author: Lord Naseby
Subject: 5365
Posted: September 17 2011 at 12:03am

You're probably right. Anyone from The Godfather was leaps and bounds ahead of Joel Grey. No contest really.  


RESPONSE from Head RAZZberry: Gotta disagree with you on Joel Grey's Oscar win for CABARET -- The M.C. character is the driving force of the film, and though most of what he did was "musical" rather than "dramatic," I consider his one of the great performances in all of movie musical history. It is also an interesting footnote to any discussion of CABARET that it holds the dubious distinction of being the film that won the most Oscars without winning Best Picture -- CABARET got 8 (including Best Director for Bob Fosse - IMDb LINK) while that year's Best Picture winner, THE GODFATHER, took only 3 (Best Picture, Actor and Adapted Screenplay - IMDb LINK)...  


]]> Sat, 17 Sep 2011 00:03:52 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5365&PID=46638#46638 CITIZEN KANE : Just finished Chariots Of... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5365&PID=46635#46635 Author: SchumacherH8ter
Subject: 5365
Posted: September 16 2011 at 9:08pm

Just finished Chariots Of Fire and it was boring. The only Best Picture contender that I've seen from 81' was, obviously, Raiders, but any of them would be better than this! Also, saw Caberat and The Caine Mutiny. They were both enjoyable movies, although I'm not sure about Joel Grey's Best Supporting Actor win. He didn't seem to do much in it. Robert Duvall from The Godfather would have been a better choice.* 
 
*A lot of people think that because James Caan and Al Pacino were nominated as well, they split the vote between the three, much like people think Judy Holliday's win for Born Yesterday over Anne Baxter and Bette Davis for All About Eve was due to this.** 

**I haven't seen Born Yesterday, so it could be a great, legitimate performance. I just know that a lot of people think this.   


RESPONSE from Head RAZZberry: Since it is my #1 Favorite Movie of All Time, you will probably not be surprised to hear that I have always thought the Best Actress Oscar for 1950 should have gone not to Davis, Baxter or Holliday, but to Gloria Swanson for SUNSET BLVD. Given the sentimental overtones of finally awarding one of the original movie idols (and the Academy's tendency to always go for the sentimental choice) it's kind of surprising they didn't give it to Gloria. Then again, Academy voters often let their feelings about the overall film color their opinions about individual performances in them -- and most of Hollywood though writer/director Billy Wilder had viciously stabbed them in the back by even making SUNSET BLVD...  


]]> Fri, 16 Sep 2011 21:08:54 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5365&PID=46635#46635 CITIZEN KANE : I totally agree. Hepburn and Fonda... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5365&PID=46630#46630 Author: Lord Naseby
Subject: 5365
Posted: September 16 2011 at 5:52pm

I totally agree. Hepburn and Fonda were pretty spectacular in their roles (as per usual)]]> Fri, 16 Sep 2011 17:52:15 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5365&PID=46630#46630 CITIZEN KANE : On Golden Pond Should have picked... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5365&PID=46622#46622 Author: ITbeast
Subject: 5365
Posted: September 16 2011 at 3:21pm

On Golden Pond Should have picked up Best Picture that Year, I'm glad at least that Henry Fonda won for Best Actor.]]> Fri, 16 Sep 2011 15:21:19 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5365&PID=46622#46622 CITIZEN KANE : Don't forget that Raiders... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5365&PID=46621#46621 Author: SchumacherH8ter
Subject: 5365
Posted: September 16 2011 at 3:17pm

Don't forget that Raiders Of The Lost Ark (my favorite movie) was up for Best Picture the same year as Chariots Of Fire.]]> Fri, 16 Sep 2011 15:17:56 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5365&PID=46621#46621