The Official RAZZIE® Forum : CLASH OF THE TITANS (in FAKE 3-D!)

The Official RAZZIE® Forum : CLASH OF THE TITANS (in FAKE 3-D!) http://www.razzies.com/forum/ This is an XML content feed of; The Official RAZZIE® Forum : CLASH OF THE TITANS (in FAKE 3-D!) : Last 10 Posts Tue, 21 May 2013 20:06:41 +0000 Sun, 29 Jul 2012 14:47:17 +0000 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss Web Wiz Forums 9.70 30 www.razzies.com/forum/RSS_topic_feed.asp?FID=425 The Official RAZZIE® Forum http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_images/RazzieLogo02.gif http://www.razzies.com/forum/ CLASH OF THE TITANS (in FAKE 3-D!) : CGI Krakens?? NO THANX!!!! http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4217&PID=51760#51760 Author: Vits
Subject: CGI Krakens?? NO THANX!!!!
Posted: July 29 2012 at 2:47pm

I know I'm gonna offend a lot of people here (specially HeadRAZZ and SchumacherH8Ter), but I thought this was better than the original. Skip to 04:57.

[TUBE]CYeQFcQgDMQ[/TUBE]

Any thoughts?

Originally posted by Vits

By the way GTA I've seen 7 of your Dirty Dozen.

Now I've seen them all but ALONE IN THE DARK.

]]> Sun, 29 Jul 2012 14:47:17 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4217&PID=51760#51760 CLASH OF THE TITANS (in FAKE 3-D!) : CGI Krakens?? NO THANX!!!! http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4217&PID=47746#47746 Author: SchumacherH8ter
Subject: CGI Krakens?? NO THANX!!!!
Posted: November 09 2011 at 8:25pm

Ah Clash Of The Titans. It's a seriously dumb movie with stiff acting, but compared to the other crap I've been watching lately (specifically Rob Zombie's joyless Halloween movies) I'll take it.

The good:

The action scenes: When the film features action scenes, it gets exciting. If this featured more action and less boring scenes this film's RT score would be... a little higher, not in the fresh zone.

The (non 3D) special effects: The special effects that were ment to be in the film are really good.

Gemma Arterton's hotness: It's been a while since I've put an actress's hotness in a review. She's really hot, but her acting is... meh. Not really bad, but not good. Her performance in Prince Of Persia was pretty bad although I actually liked that one.

The bad:

Character design changes from the original: While I did like the Cthulhu-like appearance of the Kraken, the new designs aren't very good. Specifically, Calibos. In the original, he was an awesomely hideous thing. Here, he's Two-Face in a toga.

The Bubo insult: There's a brief scene where Perseus picks up Bubo, but throws him back in a chest. Bubo was awesome in the original film. He headbutted Calibos in the groin!

The ugly:

Sam Worthington: Worthington's just bad here. He's since apologized for it, but there's another reason for him being here. Read this* and find out!

The fake 3D: The fake 3D in this is an albatross around the film's neck. If this movie is brought up in a conversation, it's bound to be about bad 3D.

As you could tell from the review, I'm a big fan of the original Clash Of The Titans. I gave it a B+. Grade: B-

Next-up: P2! (Again, no reason)

*http://www.chud.com/23299/by-zeus-the-version-of-clash-of-the-titans-you-didnt-see/

]]> Wed, 09 Nov 2011 20:25:27 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4217&PID=47746#47746 CLASH OF THE TITANS (in FAKE 3-D!) : Reviews on CLASH of the TITANS in 3-D http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4216&PID=40820#40820 Author: Vits
Subject: Reviews on CLASH of the TITANS in 3-D
Posted: April 15 2011 at 2:37pm

Roger Ebert gave it ***/****:"I don't say it's good cinema,although I recognize the craftsmanship that went into it.I don't say it's good acting,when the men have so much facial hair they all look like Liam Neeson.I like the energy, the imagination,the silliness".

Richard Roeper gave it a C-:"A schlocky camp-fest with a few fun sequences where goofball clash with the actors providing plenty of ham to go with the cheesy story".]]> Fri, 15 Apr 2011 14:37:49 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4216&PID=40820#40820 CLASH OF THE TITANS (in FAKE 3-D!) : Reviews on CLASH of the TITANS in 3-D http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4216&PID=40803#40803 Author: Vits
Subject: Reviews on CLASH of the TITANS in 3-D
Posted: April 15 2011 at 7:10am

R.T. gave it 28%:"An obviously affectionate remake of the 1981 original,the film doesn't offer enough visual thrills to offset the deficiencies of its script".]]> Fri, 15 Apr 2011 07:10:08 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4216&PID=40803#40803 CLASH OF THE TITANS (in FAKE 3-D!) : Reviews on CLASH of the TITANS in 3-D http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4216&PID=40795#40795 Author: Jennifar
Subject: Reviews on CLASH of the TITANS in 3-D
Posted: April 15 2011 at 2:52am

I like provided links.]]> Fri, 15 Apr 2011 02:52:46 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4216&PID=40795#40795 CLASH OF THE TITANS (in FAKE 3-D!) : Reviews on CLASH of the TITANS in 3-D http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4216&PID=40321#40321 Author: adk6artest
Subject: Reviews on CLASH of the TITANS in 3-D
Posted: March 30 2011 at 1:02am

Many thanks for the links.

]]> Wed, 30 Mar 2011 01:02:29 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4216&PID=40321#40321 CLASH OF THE TITANS (in FAKE 3-D!) : CGI Krakens?? NO THANX!!!! http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4217&PID=38667#38667 Author: BurnHollywoodBurn
Subject: CGI Krakens?? NO THANX!!!!
Posted: January 25 2011 at 9:30pm

Originally posted by GTAHater767

Since New Year's Day 2000, have there been any successful, well-received prequels that were not considered reboots?

Nope, the list of good prequels is even shorter than the list of good sequels, because none exist! No, "Paranormal Activity 2" doesn't count, it was a mid-quel that took place before, during, and after the events of the first movie. And "Death Proof" doesn't count either because we don't know when it took place, before or during the events of "Planet Terror", although the scenes in question had NOTHING to do with the events of "PT" besides a wink-wink to the audience that the two movies exist in the same universe. "Iron Man 2" doesn't count either, again mid-quel, events happening during the same time that just so happen to be interconnected. A true prequel takes place YEARS before the events of the original movie and usually sets up events and introduces characters that will later have a major impact in the original movie. The "Star Wars" prequels fit that description ... and they sucked to high heaven. And there was that "Underworld" prequel, which was okay at best if you want a guilty pleasure to watch.]]> Tue, 25 Jan 2011 21:30:37 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4217&PID=38667#38667 CLASH OF THE TITANS (in FAKE 3-D!) : CGI Krakens?? NO THANX!!!! http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4217&PID=38664#38664 Author: Vits
Subject: CGI Krakens?? NO THANX!!!!
Posted: January 25 2011 at 8:52pm

DEATH PROOF and PARANORMAL ACTIVITY 2.The rest are either direct-to-video(not enough reviews to judge)or were only technically prequels like IRON-MAN 2 being technically a prequel to THE INCREDIBLE "HULK".

By the way GTA I've seen 7 of your Dirty Dozen.
]]> Tue, 25 Jan 2011 20:52:11 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4217&PID=38664#38664 CLASH OF THE TITANS (in FAKE 3-D!) : CGI Krakens?? NO THANX!!!! http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4217&PID=38663#38663 Author: GTAHater767
Subject: CGI Krakens?? NO THANX!!!!
Posted: January 25 2011 at 8:33pm

Was Batman Begins the only film prequel anyone's liked since 2000?

Scratch that, Batman Begins was a reboot. Since New Year's Day 2000, have there been any successful, well-received prequels that were not considered reboots? Because while sequels sometimes stand some chance of success, prequels are harder to make, and harder to avoid continuity errors and other contradictions.

By the way, I declare Clash of the Titans [remake] to be the #18 Worst Film of 2010. Horrible CGI images that are arguably lower-quality than the stop motion technology used in the 1981 original, poor plot, below-average acting, but this movie and its reviews are not as bad as those that follow.

]]> Tue, 25 Jan 2011 20:33:58 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4217&PID=38663#38663 CLASH OF THE TITANS (in FAKE 3-D!) : CGI Krakens?? NO THANX!!!! http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4217&PID=38645#38645 Author: BurnHollywoodBurn
Subject: CGI Krakens?? NO THANX!!!!
Posted: January 25 2011 at 4:41pm

Originally posted by Vits

I didn't say Lucas intended for that theory on purpose.

And I say he didn't intend ANYTHING at all. He didn't plan it all the way through, he just wanted to further cash in on his creation, plot holes be damned.]]> Tue, 25 Jan 2011 16:41:30 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4217&PID=38645#38645