Hey HeadRAZZ --
Why are the discussions for the 2005 movies still on the Forum? It's 2007 already! And where is a Forum for looking at likely Razzie contenders that will be released this year?

Response from Head RAZZberry: Our Web Master sez never to delete anything from our Forum, as someone may wish to view or respond to it at a future date. Also, they form a kind of "archive" of our recent RAZZIE past, thus our 2005 discussions remain. As for 2007 titles, we have already started discussing them -- here's a LINK to see what's already been posted there...

Update on "Broken Bridges" and "One Night with the King", they make their debuts on broadcast TV THIS month, both will be released on DVD within the next two months.

If anyone wants to check 'em out (and see if they qualify for Razzie consideration), here you guys go, LINKS below:

Broken Bridges
One Night with the King

Response from Head RAZZberry: Here, also, is a LINK to the IMDb page for ONE NIGHT WITH THE KING (which, from the title, I assumed was some kind of Elvis movie). Although both films did receive brief (and apparently limited) theatrical release in 2006, I'm not sure either of them were widely enough seen to get attention from our Voting Members. Thanks for the hedz-up, though!

Here are film critic Michael Medved's worst reviewed movies this year:

1. Jack*ss: Number Two (zero out of four stars)

2. Van Wilder: The Rise of Taj (one out of four)

3. Deck the Halls (one out of four)

4. Larry the Cable Guy: Health Inspector (one out of four)

5. The Hills Have Eyes (one out of four)

I don't think that it will be nominated for worst picture, but I think that Jack*ss: Number Two should get nominated in its own special  category, whatever it may be. Maybe the "worst excuse for an actual movie" category should be brought back. It could include nominess such as Jack*ss:Number Two, The Fast and the Furious: Tokyo drift, Date Movie and Little Man. 

If one accepts Sturgeon's Law, that 95% of everything is crap, Hollywood has already released 438 Razzable movies this year.

To the Head Razzberry-

I forgot to mention that from my list on Imdb, I (accidentally) saw one of them: Date Movie

I won't go into how awful it is, I'll just say that it badly deserves a worst screenplay nomination, if nothing else. It is one of the poorest written scripts I have ever read.

I think Date Movie will compete with Little Man for a slot in the five worst picture nominees (I have heard that both of them are bad in a similar way).

Let the members of IMDb speak, Head Razzberry...
As of December 5th, eight 2006 movie titles are on the bottom 100. They are:

1. Material Girls
2. Zoom
3. Phat Girlz
4. Larry the Cable Guy: Health Inspector
5. Doogal
6. Little Man
7. Bloodrayne
8. Date Movie

I noticed that Material Girls and Phat Girls have spent some time in the worst movie ever made slot (#1) on the list, so you should pay special attention to those two. 

Response from Head RAZZberry: I am fairly certain that MATERIAL GIRLS will end up with a RAZZIE nomination or two (at this time, the Duff sisters are likely to be jointly listed on our Nominating Ballot for both Worst Actress and Worst Screen Couple). PHAT GIRLZ, I'm not so sure about. According to B.O. MoJo, it grossed about $7 million, and was rated "D" -- But by a mere 96 people. On Rotten Tomatoes, it is currently getting a 23% Approval Rate, which is in RAZZIE range, but not down there with BLOODRAYNE (5%) or ZOOM (0%). As I find myself pointing out every year, even we cannot possibly RAZZ every deservingly bad movie Hollywood makes...