The Official RAZZIE® Forum : DISCUSSION of 1999 RAZZIE® Nominees & "Winners" http://www.razzies.com/forum/ This is an XML content feed of; The Official RAZZIE® Forum : Entire RAZZIE® History, Year-by-Year: 1980-2012 : DISCUSSION of 1999 RAZZIE® Nominees & "Winners" Sun, 19 May 2013 19:15:42 +0000 Sat, 13 Oct 2012 12:22:37 +0000 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss Web Wiz Forums 9.70 360 www.razzies.com/forum/RSS_post_feed.asp?TID=349 The Official RAZZIE® Forum http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_images/RazzieLogo02.gif http://www.razzies.com/forum/ DISCUSSION of 1999 RAZZIE® Nominees & "Winners" : Originally posted by VitsYesterday... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=349&PID=52509#52509 Author: Vits
Subject: 349
Posted: October 13 2012 at 12:22pm

Originally posted by Vits

Yesterday I saw THE OTHER SISTER. Why was Juliette Lewis nominated for Worst Supp. Actress if she was the lead?
Nobody? Oh, well...

Skip to 01:12.

[TUBE]l-sy1acnSOM[/TUBE]

Any thoughts?
]]> Sat, 13 Oct 2012 12:22:37 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=349&PID=52509#52509 DISCUSSION of 1999 RAZZIE® Nominees & "Winners" : Yesterday I saw THE OTHER SISTER.... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=349&PID=52012#52012 Author: Vits
Subject: 349
Posted: August 23 2012 at 7:15am

Yesterday I saw THE OTHER SISTER. Why was Juliette Lewis nominated for Worst Supp. Actress if she was the lead?]]> Thu, 23 Aug 2012 07:15:38 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=349&PID=52012#52012 DISCUSSION of 1999 RAZZIE® Nominees & "Winners" : Originally posted by GTAHater767I... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=349&PID=44111#44111 Author: Michaels
Subject: 349
Posted: July 15 2011 at 9:14pm

Originally posted by GTAHater767

I just think they were easy to underpass. I often wonder why Star Wars Episode II: Attack of the Clones got nominated instead of The Master of Disguise. And Star Wars Episode III: Revenge of the Sith, Kicking & Screaming, and War of the Worlds were part of what watered down the 2005 Awards. Those 3 movies had middle-of-the-road reviews and were nominated simply because they were more seen, but they robbed A Sound of Thunder, Michael Bay's The Island, and Elektra!
Again, it all comes down to which movies the Razzie voters actually saw that year. Like 90% of the movie going public, I doubt any voters saw "Master of Disguise" or "Sound of Thunder". That, and who wouldn't want to Razz the shell of its former self that "Star Wars" had become?!]]> Fri, 15 Jul 2011 21:14:36 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=349&PID=44111#44111 DISCUSSION of 1999 RAZZIE® Nominees & "Winners" : Master Of Disguise makes Attack... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=349&PID=44104#44104 Author: SchumacherH8ter
Subject: 349
Posted: July 15 2011 at 1:21pm

Master Of Disguise makes Attack Of The Clones look like Empire Strikes Back.]]> Fri, 15 Jul 2011 13:21:26 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=349&PID=44104#44104 DISCUSSION of 1999 RAZZIE® Nominees & "Winners" : Originally posted by MichaelsAll... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=349&PID=44103#44103 Author: GTAHater767
Subject: 349
Posted: July 15 2011 at 12:47pm

Originally posted by Michaels

All I gotta say to anyone who complains about the "Star Wars" prequels having Razzie nods or wins (mostly because you're probably under the age of 20 and didn't grow up with the original trilogy), I don't care how pretty the CGI looked, ALL THE OTHER ASPECTS OF FILMMAKING SUCKED TO HIGH HEAVEN. Yeah, the original movies may looked dated because they are from 30 years ago, but at least they were well made movies.
I don't disagree with nominations for the Star Wars Prequels because I did or didn't like them, let alone because of the eye-candy CGI. I just think they were easy to underpass. I often wonder why Star Wars Episode II: Attack of the Clones got nominated instead of The Master of Disguise. And Star Wars Episode III: Revenge of the Sith, Kicking & Screaming, and War of the Worlds were part of what watered down the 2005 Awards. Those 3 movies had middle-of-the-road reviews and were nominated simply because they were more seen, but they robbed A Sound of Thunder, Michael Bay's The Island, and Elektra! In fact, Revenge of the Sith is the only one of the prequels I'd ever defend. It was a decent movie, though not a great one, and it's by far the least of 3 evils! For a Star Wars movie, it was okay, but not really good.]]> Fri, 15 Jul 2011 12:47:11 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=349&PID=44103#44103 DISCUSSION of 1999 RAZZIE® Nominees & "Winners" : Originally posted by GTAHater767In... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=349&PID=44101#44101 Author: Vits
Subject: 349
Posted: July 15 2011 at 10:57am

Originally posted by GTAHater767

In March 2003, the Simpsons made fun of Star Wars episodes I and II in the episode "C E D'oh." Carl Carlson brandishes a green carbon rod as a lightsaber. He says, "I think The Phantom Menace sucked more." Lenny Leonard counters, clashing his carbon rod, then says, "I think Attack of the Clones sucked more!"
I thought you only quoted SOUTH PARK.Oh,well.
]]> Fri, 15 Jul 2011 10:57:32 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=349&PID=44101#44101 DISCUSSION of 1999 RAZZIE® Nominees & "Winners" : All I gotta say to anyone who... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=349&PID=44099#44099 Author: Michaels
Subject: 349
Posted: July 15 2011 at 8:25am

All I gotta say to anyone who complains about the "Star Wars" prequels having Razzie nods or wins (mostly because you're probably under the age of 20 and didn't grow up with the original trilogy), I don't care how pretty the CGI looked, ALL THE OTHER ASPECTS OF FILMMAKING SUCKED TO HIGH HEAVEN. Yeah, the original movies may looked dated because they are from 30 years ago, but at least they were well made movies.]]> Fri, 15 Jul 2011 08:25:30 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=349&PID=44099#44099 DISCUSSION of 1999 RAZZIE® Nominees & "Winners" : I agree that Wild Wild West deserved... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=349&PID=44094#44094 Author: GTAHater767
Subject: 349
Posted: July 14 2011 at 10:34pm

I agree that Wild Wild West deserved Worst Picture for 1999. The Haunting was the most deserving runner up. Nominations for The Phantom Menace were okay, because it and Attack of the Clones are tied for worst Star Wars film of the hexilogy.
 
In March 2003, the Simpsons made fun of Star Wars episodes I and II in the episode "C E D'oh." Carl Carlson brandishes a green carbon rod as a lightsaber. He says, "I think The Phantom Menace sucked more." Lenny Leonard counters, clashing his carbon rod, then says, "I think Attack of the Clones sucked more!"
 
But I digress. I don't know if people always thought Big Daddy was average, or if it grew on people in certain ways that it how has 56% at Rotten T, give or take 4%.
 
And if The Blair Witch Project got nominated for Worst Picture, there surely was nothing to choose from for 1999. The problem with that was the backlash it raised when an urban horror legend alleged that it was based on a real incident of 3 student filmmakers mysteriously vanishing in a New England forest.
 
Personally, I think they should've nominated End of Days and Entrapment instead. And perhaps replace The Phantom Menace with Message in a Bottle.
]]> Thu, 14 Jul 2011 22:34:29 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=349&PID=44094#44094 DISCUSSION of 1999 RAZZIE® Nominees & "Winners" : Man! I'm so sick of people... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=349&PID=44092#44092 Author: Vits
Subject: 349
Posted: July 14 2011 at 7:06pm

Man! I'm so sick of people disliking those movies. The R.T. concensus always say things like "If you don't watch the show or play the games, you won't like this movie". If that's your case, then why would you want to watch the movie in the first place?!]]> Thu, 14 Jul 2011 19:06:31 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=349&PID=44092#44092 DISCUSSION of 1999 RAZZIE® Nominees & "Winners" : Wow... that sounded a bit... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=349&PID=44091#44091 Author: Vheid
Subject: 349
Posted: July 14 2011 at 6:19pm

Wow... that sounded a bit harsh... I wasn't attacking the Razzies or the way this origanisation works... If that's what you thought?

The only reason... why i posted it, was because everyone keeps saying that they weren't enough bad reviewed movies in 1999... And I kind of wanted to bring the movie up as a counter argument...

By the way... If were not allowed to question past discissions of the Razzies... What is the function then of these Forums for the past Razzie-years?

update: Sorry, about that... I have a very low tolerance towards people who look down on me and I sometimes experience it a situation as such when people aren't doing it (I am already seeing someone for these problems)... If you don't like it that I bring up films that didn't make the Razzies, You could have just said it to me politely instead of using these denigrating remarks (even if you're the moderater of this site). I would have respected that a lot more and would have stopped doing it.

Another update: That previous apology, wasn't really a apology. So here I try again. Sorry about all of this...
]]> Thu, 14 Jul 2011 18:19:50 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=349&PID=44091#44091 DISCUSSION of 1999 RAZZIE® Nominees & "Winners" : RESPONSE from Head RAZZberry:... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=349&PID=44090#44090 Author: HeadRAZZBerry
Subject: 349
Posted: July 14 2011 at 6:09pm

RESPONSE from Head RAZZberry: Because we don't have many Voting Members under 10 years old (the target audience of the animated films you cited above)...   

Seriously, though, as I keep having to say over-and-over on this Forum --We cannot possibly nominate every bad movie that's released, and each year's list of nominated films and "achievements" is subject to the whims (and viewing patterns) of that year's Voting Membership...  


]]> Thu, 14 Jul 2011 18:09:48 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=349&PID=44090#44090 DISCUSSION of 1999 RAZZIE® Nominees & "Winners" : After watching (and mocking)... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=349&PID=44079#44079 Author: Vheid
Subject: 349
Posted: July 14 2011 at 1:33pm

After watching (and mocking) Yu-Gi-Oh: The Movie yesterday with my little brother. I became curious about the RT-rating of the first Pokémon-movie...

It currently is at 14% on RT... So I was wondering why wasn't it part of the Worst Picture-race in 1999? It's a terrible movie with some of the worst writing I've ever seen, even in an animated movie (like the scene were Ash is brought to life by the Pokémons tears) and was much worse-reviewed than a lot of the actual nominees? 

So why was Pokémon: The Movie (and it's sequels) snubbed by the Razzies?   

]]> Thu, 14 Jul 2011 13:33:45 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=349&PID=44079#44079 DISCUSSION of 1999 RAZZIE® Nominees & "Winners" : 1999 was a pretty good year... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=349&PID=41874#41874 Author: Michaels
Subject: 349
Posted: May 19 2011 at 1:31pm

1999 was a pretty good year for movies, so it's hard to think of one off the top of my head to replace "Blair Witch." However, I think "Blair Witch" was very worthy of a Razzie -- All that hype, and the movie was nothing but a bunch college students running around in the forest with a camera. Half the time, you couldn't see or hear what was going on, and yet the movie made millions -- and even spawned a sequel! 

Never underestimate the power of clever marketing!  


RESPONSE from Head RAZZberry: I think Michaels pretty much said it all. Once the initial audiences had seen BLAIR WITCH and over-hyped it to everyone else, the film was bound to be a disappointment, which our Voting Members that year apparently found it to be. As the first "Internet/Virally-Marketed" movie, though, the original BLAIR WITCH was worthy of Oscar consideration for Best Snow Job. The movie itself blew, but the selling of it was brilliant...  


]]> Thu, 19 May 2011 13:31:16 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=349&PID=41874#41874 DISCUSSION of 1999 RAZZIE® Nominees & "Winners" : What was the motivation behind... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=349&PID=41841#41841 Author: Vheid
Subject: 349
Posted: May 19 2011 at 1:08am

What was the motivation behind nominating The Blair Witch Project for Worst Picture? I'll admit it was gimmicky but it was also very positively reviewed, I mean, weren't there any more deserving movies that could have taken it's place? 

Just wondering....  


]]> Thu, 19 May 2011 01:08:04 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=349&PID=41841#41841 DISCUSSION of 1999 RAZZIE® Nominees & "Winners" : The bright side(for you)is that... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=349&PID=38383#38383 Author: Vits
Subject: 349
Posted: January 18 2011 at 12:26pm

The bright side(for you)is that it didn't go empty-handed.]]> Tue, 18 Jan 2011 12:26:24 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=349&PID=38383#38383 DISCUSSION of 1999 RAZZIE® Nominees & "Winners" : Wild Wild West deserved worst... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=349&PID=38367#38367 Author: Razzilla
Subject: 349
Posted: January 17 2011 at 3:02pm

Wild Wild West deserved worst picture...but I has hoping that Star Wars Ep I would have at least TIED with it...]]> Mon, 17 Jan 2011 15:02:23 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=349&PID=38367#38367 DISCUSSION of 1999 RAZZIE® Nominees & "Winners" : Well...the JoBlo Movie Hotties... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=349&PID=38354#38354 Author: Vits
Subject: 349
Posted: January 17 2011 at 6:42am

Well...the JoBlo Movie Hotties Awards gave her the R.I.P. Career Award.]]> Mon, 17 Jan 2011 06:42:46 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=349&PID=38354#38354 DISCUSSION of 1999 RAZZIE® Nominees & "Winners" : Originally posted by VitsLet's... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=349&PID=38345#38345 Author: BurnHollywoodBurn
Subject: 349
Posted: January 16 2011 at 7:06pm

Originally posted by Vits

Let's say she was bad...You nominate her for "Worst Of The Decade" for 1 movie?
It really was THAT bad of a performance, and it will be the performance she will be remembered for the rest of her career and maybe even the rest of her life.]]> Sun, 16 Jan 2011 19:06:56 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=349&PID=38345#38345 DISCUSSION of 1999 RAZZIE® Nominees & "Winners" : Let's say she was bad...You... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=349&PID=38340#38340 Author: Vits
Subject: 349
Posted: January 16 2011 at 3:58pm

Let's say she was bad...You nominate her for "Worst Of The Decade" for 1 movie?]]> Sun, 16 Jan 2011 15:58:30 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=349&PID=38340#38340 DISCUSSION of 1999 RAZZIE® Nominees & "Winners" : Originally posted by VitsSeriously?Elizabeth... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=349&PID=38296#38296 Author: BurnHollywoodBurn
Subject: 349
Posted: January 14 2011 at 1:14pm

Originally posted by Vits

Seriously?Elizabeth Berkley?
Did you not see "Showgirls"? She played the role of her character as if she had bipolar disorder! It's both painful and funny at the same time. 
]]> Fri, 14 Jan 2011 13:14:02 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=349&PID=38296#38296 DISCUSSION of 1999 RAZZIE® Nominees & "Winners" : I am amused by this. Originally... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=349&PID=38295#38295 Author: Vheid
Subject: 349
Posted: January 14 2011 at 12:02pm

I am amused by this.

Originally posted by HeadRAZZBerry


The A**hole Formerly Known as Prince/ GRAFFITI BRIDGE, UNDER THE CHERRY MOON, Etc.
]]> Fri, 14 Jan 2011 12:02:46 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=349&PID=38295#38295 DISCUSSION of 1999 RAZZIE® Nominees & "Winners" : Seriously?Elizabeth Berkley? http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=349&PID=38293#38293 Author: Vits
Subject: 349
Posted: January 14 2011 at 11:55am

Seriously?Elizabeth Berkley?]]> Fri, 14 Jan 2011 11:55:23 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=349&PID=38293#38293 DISCUSSION of 1999 RAZZIE® Nominees & "Winners" : Originally posted by VitsI have... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=349&PID=32884#32884 Author: BurnHollywoodBurn
Subject: 349
Posted: July 09 2010 at 3:22pm

Originally posted by Vits

I have a theory:People thought the world was gonna end in 1/1/2000,right?So they told themselves "For once let's do the best we can!".They used all the good ideas and talent in those movies and they ran out of it.
Yeah, I think I mentioned a theory like that, in which after the world didn't end in 2000, studio heads realized they didn't stock pile any good scripts, so they just recycled old ones, hence all the rehashed s*** that we are dealing with right now at the movies.]]> Fri, 09 Jul 2010 15:22:09 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=349&PID=32884#32884 DISCUSSION of 1999 RAZZIE® Nominees & "Winners" : I have a theory:People thought... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=349&PID=32882#32882 Author: Vits
Subject: 349
Posted: July 09 2010 at 1:07pm

I have a theory:People thought the world was gonna end in 1/1/2000,right?So they told themselves "For once let's do the best we can!".They used all the good ideas and talent in those movies and they ran out of it.]]> Fri, 09 Jul 2010 13:07:16 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=349&PID=32882#32882 DISCUSSION of 1999 RAZZIE® Nominees & "Winners" : Originally posted by Vits1999... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=349&PID=32863#32863 Author: BurnHollywoodBurn
Subject: 349
Posted: July 08 2010 at 2:15pm

Originally posted by Vits

1999 is considered to be the best year for movies since The Golden Age.
I know ... what the f*** happened since then?!]]> Thu, 08 Jul 2010 14:15:54 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=349&PID=32863#32863 DISCUSSION of 1999 RAZZIE® Nominees & "Winners" : Originally posted by GTAHater767I... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=349&PID=32860#32860 Author: Vits
Subject: 349
Posted: July 08 2010 at 1:30pm

Originally posted by GTAHater767

I believe you got 18 movies this year, including The Blair Witch Project and Gloria! Was there so little competition for the worst of '999?
1999 is considered to be the best year for movies since The Golden Age.
Originally posted by BurnHollywoodBurn

Originally posted by Vits

DI JONTIN shoul've won everything.And you should've nominated Lili Teilor instead of Katherin Seta-Yons.
Have you seen "Wild, Wild West"? It's pretty bad. I mean really, really, really bad. It deserved everything it won.
I haven't and I'm not planning to since I'm not into the show.And yes,I know the movie won for not being like the show,but still.
 
Anyway,did you see DI JONTIN?It wasn't that bad,but Lili Teilor was!
]]> Thu, 08 Jul 2010 13:30:50 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=349&PID=32860#32860 DISCUSSION of 1999 RAZZIE® Nominees & "Winners" : Originally posted by VitsDI... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=349&PID=32833#32833 Author: BurnHollywoodBurn
Subject: 349
Posted: July 07 2010 at 6:21pm

Originally posted by Vits

DI JONTIN shoul've won everything.And you should've nominated Lili Teilor instead of Katherin Seta-Yons.
Have you seen "Wild, Wild West"? It's pretty bad. I mean really, really, really bad. It deserved everything it won.]]> Wed, 07 Jul 2010 18:21:21 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=349&PID=32833#32833 DISCUSSION of 1999 RAZZIE® Nominees & "Winners" : I believe you got 18 movies this... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=349&PID=32815#32815 Author: GTAHater767
Subject: 349
Posted: July 07 2010 at 4:04pm

I believe you got 18 movies this year, including The Blair Witch Project and Gloria! Was there so little competition for the worst of '999?]]> Wed, 07 Jul 2010 16:04:22 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=349&PID=32815#32815 DISCUSSION of 1999 RAZZIE® Nominees & "Winners" : You should've nominated Lili... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=349&PID=32802#32802 Author: Vits
Subject: 349
Posted: July 07 2010 at 3:26pm

You should've nominated Lili Tailor instead of Katherin Zeta-Jones. ]]> Wed, 07 Jul 2010 15:26:24 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=349&PID=32802#32802 DISCUSSION of 1999 RAZZIE® Nominees & "Winners" : TO SEE the COMPLETE LIST... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=349&PID=1620#1620 Author: HeadRAZZBerry
Subject: 349
Posted: December 04 2005 at 3:41pm

TO SEE the COMPLETE LIST of 1999 WORST ACHIEVEMENT in FILM NOMINEES and "WINNERS," CLICK HERE. 

IF YOU'D LIKE to OFFER YOUR FEEDBACK on OUR CHOICES, FEEL FREE to POST BELOW...  



]]> Sun, 04 Dec 2005 15:41:30 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=349&PID=1620#1620