The Official RAZZIE® Forum : DISCUSSION of 2004 RAZZIE® Nominees & "Winners" http://www.razzies.com/forum/ This is an XML content feed of; The Official RAZZIE® Forum : Entire RAZZIE® History, Year-by-Year: 1980-2012 : DISCUSSION of 2004 RAZZIE® Nominees & "Winners" Tue, 21 May 2013 17:45:05 +0000 Sun, 12 May 2013 00:39:12 +0000 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss Web Wiz Forums 9.70 360 www.razzies.com/forum/RSS_post_feed.asp?TID=354 The Official RAZZIE® Forum http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_images/RazzieLogo02.gif http://www.razzies.com/forum/ DISCUSSION of 2004 RAZZIE® Nominees & "Winners" : Thanks for the Welcome! :) ... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=354&PID=54359#54359 Author: moviecritic1994
Subject: 354
Posted: May 12 2013 at 12:39am

Thanks for the Welcome!   :) ]]> Sun, 12 May 2013 00:39:12 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=354&PID=54359#54359 DISCUSSION of 2004 RAZZIE® Nominees & "Winners" : Welcome MovieCritic1994. LITTLE... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=354&PID=54352#54352 Author: Vits
Subject: 354
Posted: May 11 2013 at 7:08pm

Welcome MovieCritic1994. LITTLE MAN did win a few of our awards, but WHITE CHICKS didn't win any of the Razzies it was up for.]]> Sat, 11 May 2013 19:08:02 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=354&PID=54352#54352 DISCUSSION of 2004 RAZZIE® Nominees & "Winners" : The thing with White Chicks... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=354&PID=54349#54349 Author: moviecritic1994
Subject: 354
Posted: May 11 2013 at 6:17pm

The thing with White Chicks was that it was almost unbelievably offensive to a lot of people. As for me, I just thought it was stupid, with no real purpose whatsoever. However, out of all the Wayans brothers films, "Little Man" is probably the most idiotic -- Nothing funny or clever anywhere in that film. I believe it even won a few Razzies?]]> Sat, 11 May 2013 18:17:04 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=354&PID=54349#54349 DISCUSSION of 2004 RAZZIE® Nominees & "Winners" : I Watched "Catwoman"... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=354&PID=54348#54348 Author: moviecritic1994
Subject: 354
Posted: May 11 2013 at 6:09pm

I Watched "Catwoman" on Cable (I Believe it was the Oxygen Network). Anyway, I wanted to keep an open mind and see what this film was all about it. I can honestly say after seating through the entire movie I can say it deserves all 4 Razzie Awards that it got. Here are it's faults:

Sharon Stone is a villain, yet she has no real reason poisoning women with facial cream. (Yeah I felt stupid saying it too).

Why in the world does Catwoman look like a dominatrix with a Cat Fetish? I know the character is known for being sexy but they over did it. There is more to Catwoman than being seductive and sexy.

And Finally, that ridiculous and weird Basketball scene.... enough said there. My Rating for Catwoman is... 2/10. I might as well give Pitof points for trying... I think. ]]> Sat, 11 May 2013 18:09:43 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=354&PID=54348#54348 DISCUSSION of 2004 RAZZIE® Nominees & "Winners" : Originally posted by Vits I... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=354&PID=53812#53812 Author: Vits
Subject: 354
Posted: March 02 2013 at 2:06pm

Originally posted by Vits

I gave CATWOMAN 3/10. It deserved to "win" Worst Picture, Director and Screenplay. But the performances were passable, and I didn't see anything wrong with Halle and Benjamin as a couple, and Halle and Sharon weren't even a "couple" (I know you really meant "on-screen match"). Why wasn't it nominated for "Remake Or Sequel"? Because of the same reason why it's bad: it has nothing to do with the comics?
My review, along with the rest of the BATMAN franchise (skip to 02:07):

[TUBE]ljFE6ermZr4[/TUBE]

Any thoughts?
]]> Sat, 02 Mar 2013 14:06:46 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=354&PID=53812#53812 DISCUSSION of 2004 RAZZIE® Nominees & "Winners" : Originally posted by HeadRAZZBerryWORST... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=354&PID=52705#52705 Author: Vits
Subject: 354
Posted: November 03 2012 at 1:56pm

Originally posted by HeadRAZZBerry

WORST PICTURE

SUPERBABIES: BABY GENIUSES 2 (Triumph Films)

WORST SUPPORTING ACTOR

Jon Voight / SUPERBABIES: BABY GENIUSES 2

WORST DIRECTOR

Bob Clark / SUPERBABIES: BABY GENIUSES 2

WORST SCREENPLAY

SUPERBABIES: BABY GENIUSES 2, Written by Steven Paul and Gregory Poppen
Skip to 01:11.

[TUBE]BBp_zdCqeuQ[/TUBE]

Any thoughts?
]]> Sat, 03 Nov 2012 13:56:22 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=354&PID=52705#52705 DISCUSSION of 2004 RAZZIE® Nominees & "Winners" : 2004. Tragically, Agent 004 died... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=354&PID=52455#52455 Author: GTAHater767
Subject: 354
Posted: October 07 2012 at 1:41am

2004. Tragically, Agent 004 died in a training session in Beirut. Georgi Koskov severed his climbing tether and sent him plunging to his death. The Russian words "Smiert Spionam" ("Death to Spies") was found spraypainted on the rockface. Here's my take on the Year of Smiert Spionam:
 
Films that should've been RAZZed, but didn't: 5
Thunderbirds
Christmas With the Kranks //This proves that films making tons of money and sucking to high heaven aren't new to 2009
After the Sunset
The Alamo [remake]
You Got Served
 
Films that got RAZZed, but shouldn't have: 3
Starsky & Hutch
Anchorman
Dodgeball
 
Films that got RAZZed to the wrong degree: 3
Exorcist 4: The Beginning (Not RAZZed enough)
Around the World in 80 Days [remake] (Not RAZZed enough)
Fahrenheit 9/11 (RAZZed too much) //It should've settled for 3 runner-up nominations for Dubya, Condoleezza, and Rumsfeld. No wins, no Spears, no Pet Goat.
 
Worst Trends/Events of 2004:
V. A generic street dancing film becomes Episode 805, but luckily one of the best of South Park Season 8 (You Got Served)
IV. The Passion raises controversy and divides America along sectarian lines (Maybe not to the degree that Episode 804, The Passion of the Jew, suggests, but it still caused discord between Christianity and Judaism)
III. Inaccurate, comical period pieces and historical dramas (Ex. King Arthur, Alexander, The Alamo [remake])
II. Jinx Johnson was the frying pan, Catwoman is the fire. (You thought Halle Berry's role in Die Another Day was the worst? Less than 2 years later, things got so bad she accepted her RAZZIES!)
I. The "Dubya" administration vs Britney Spears, Michael Moore, and Roland Emmerich's ice age (Fahrenheit 9/11 was apparently RAZZed so much in order to make a statement against how out-of-control the Bush Jr. administration had spiraled after 3 1/2 years in office, while the scientific community rejected The Day After Tomorrow because it was SO loosely based in reality, and despite the debate over global warming and climate change, planetary ice ages and global cooling became a fad in the mid 00-Agents' decade.)]]> Sun, 07 Oct 2012 01:41:47 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=354&PID=52455#52455 DISCUSSION of 2004 RAZZIE® Nominees & "Winners" : Originally posted by VitsI... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=354&PID=44929#44929 Author: Vits
Subject: 354
Posted: August 10 2011 at 6:07pm

Originally posted by Vits

I just saw the saga of THE EXORCIST.I'll write a conjoined review of the 5 movies soon.The 4th movie deserved it's nomination and more.
Click here:
http://www.razzies.com/forum/topic5208_post44927.html#44927
]]> Wed, 10 Aug 2011 18:07:09 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=354&PID=44929#44929 DISCUSSION of 2004 RAZZIE® Nominees & "Winners" : I'm thinking, why White... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=354&PID=44720#44720 Author: Yingchun
Subject: 354
Posted: August 04 2011 at 1:37am

I'm thinking, why White Chicks? Why not Alien Vs Predator or Envy or Around the World in 80 Days?


]]> Thu, 04 Aug 2011 01:37:57 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=354&PID=44720#44720 DISCUSSION of 2004 RAZZIE® Nominees & "Winners" : I just saw the saga of THE EXORCIST.I'll... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=354&PID=44518#44518 Author: Vits
Subject: 354
Posted: July 29 2011 at 1:31pm

I just saw the saga of THE EXORCIST.I'll write a conjoined review of the 5 movies soon.The 4th movie deserved it's nomination and more.
]]> Fri, 29 Jul 2011 13:31:47 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=354&PID=44518#44518 DISCUSSION of 2004 RAZZIE® Nominees & "Winners" : Nothing, it just made a bad movie... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=354&PID=38482#38482 Author: BurnHollywoodBurn
Subject: 354
Posted: January 23 2011 at 9:04am

Nothing, it just made a bad movie worse.  

Originally posted by Vits

Originally posted by BurnHollywoodBurn

And don't get me started on the cartoon sound effects and the 150+ bad puns.

What does that have to do with the visuals?
]]> Sun, 23 Jan 2011 09:04:41 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=354&PID=38482#38482 DISCUSSION of 2004 RAZZIE® Nominees & "Winners" : I repeat: The style wasn't... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=354&PID=38468#38468 Author: Vits
Subject: 354
Posted: January 23 2011 at 6:44am

I repeat: The style wasn't appropiate for that specific movie.

Originally posted by BurnHollywoodBurn

Gotham City is not suppose to be full of statues of naked men!


What do these have to do with the visuals?  

Originally posted by BurnHollywoodBurn

And don't get me started on the cartoon sound effects and the 150+ bad puns.


]]> Sun, 23 Jan 2011 06:44:58 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=354&PID=38468#38468 DISCUSSION of 2004 RAZZIE® Nominees & "Winners" : The visuals in "Batman &... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=354&PID=38451#38451 Author: BurnHollywoodBurn
Subject: 354
Posted: January 22 2011 at 4:21pm

The visuals in "Batman & Robin"?! Gotham City were not supposed to be full of statues of naked men! And don't get me started on the cartoon sound effects and the 150+ bad puns.  

Originally posted by Vits

I just saw THE PHANTOM OF THE OPERA '04 and gave it 4/10.It deserved to be at least nominated for "Worst Director".I didn't see BATMAN & ROBIN but I don't think it's that bad because of it's visuals.They didn't match what BATMAN represents,true.But how many directors have their own style?I liked that Joel Schumacher at least tried to put it into the movie.But in this movie his style is so different from the play that it reduces impact.Also there were major pacing issues.
 

]]> Sat, 22 Jan 2011 16:21:28 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=354&PID=38451#38451 DISCUSSION of 2004 RAZZIE® Nominees & "Winners" : I just saw THE PHANTOM OF THE... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=354&PID=38439#38439 Author: Vits
Subject: 354
Posted: January 21 2011 at 6:51pm

I just saw THE PHANTOM OF THE OPERA '04 and gave it 4/10.It deserved to be at least nominated for "Worst Director".I didn't see BATMAN & ROBIN but I don't think it's that bad because of it's visuals.They didn't match what BATMAN represents,true.But how many directors have their own style?I liked that Joel Schumacher at least tried to put it into the movie.But in this movie his style is so different from the play that it reduces impact.Also there were major pacing issues.
]]> Fri, 21 Jan 2011 18:51:18 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=354&PID=38439#38439 DISCUSSION of 2004 RAZZIE® Nominees & "Winners" : Yes I am agree with you that One... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=354&PID=38189#38189 Author: Jennifar
Subject: 354
Posted: January 10 2011 at 9:44am

Yes I am agree with you that One of three movies that wasn't bad enough to get nominated for the Worst of 2004, even if it did star Ben Stiller.]]> Mon, 10 Jan 2011 09:44:45 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=354&PID=38189#38189 DISCUSSION of 2004 RAZZIE® Nominees & "Winners" : Originally posted by JennifarStilller... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=354&PID=37945#37945 Author: Vits
Subject: 354
Posted: January 04 2011 at 12:50pm

Originally posted by Jennifar

Stilller was good in along came polly, and in anchorman he was just a cameo. But there are some others as well.
How come he was nominated for 2 good movies,a good movie in which he only had a cameo,and not for MEET THE FOCKERS?I loved that movie but no one else did so...
Originally posted by Jennifar

It was the worst excuse for a movie that year. If that is what a major movie studio thinks counts as a blockbuster adaptation (of a product that they own, no less!) then they have no right to make another.
Which movie are you talking about?
]]> Tue, 04 Jan 2011 12:50:48 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=354&PID=37945#37945 DISCUSSION of 2004 RAZZIE® Nominees & "Winners" : It was the worst excuse for a... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=354&PID=37931#37931 Author: Jennifar
Subject: 354
Posted: January 04 2011 at 10:01am

It was the worst excuse for a movie that year. If that is what a majormovie studio thinks counts as a blockbuster adaptation (of a productthat they own, no less!) then they have no right to make another.]]> Tue, 04 Jan 2011 10:01:49 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=354&PID=37931#37931 DISCUSSION of 2004 RAZZIE® Nominees & "Winners" : Stilller was good in along came... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=354&PID=37927#37927 Author: Jennifar
Subject: 354
Posted: January 04 2011 at 9:55am

Stilller was good in along came polly, and in anchorman he was just a cameo. But there are some others as well.]]> Tue, 04 Jan 2011 09:55:52 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=354&PID=37927#37927 DISCUSSION of 2004 RAZZIE® Nominees & "Winners" : In order for you to get the joke... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=354&PID=37587#37587 Author: Vits
Subject: 354
Posted: December 27 2010 at 10:27am

In order for you to get the joke I should've wrote Keenen Aybori Wayanz...or something.]]> Mon, 27 Dec 2010 10:27:59 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=354&PID=37587#37587 DISCUSSION of 2004 RAZZIE® Nominees & "Winners" : Yeah, well...that "in joke"... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=354&PID=37556#37556 Author: BurnHollywoodBurn
Subject: 354
Posted: December 26 2010 at 4:51pm

Yeah, well...that "in joke" went right over everyone's head.]]> Sun, 26 Dec 2010 16:51:25 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=354&PID=37556#37556 DISCUSSION of 2004 RAZZIE® Nominees & "Winners" : Jaja! I hoped someone would... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=354&PID=37536#37536 Author: Vits
Subject: 354
Posted: December 26 2010 at 1:34pm

Jaja! I hoped someone would understand. It's "Keenen Ivory Wayans" how it would be spelled in Spanish, in order to be pronounced the same way...  


]]> Sun, 26 Dec 2010 13:34:18 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=354&PID=37536#37536 DISCUSSION of 2004 RAZZIE® Nominees & "Winners" : Vits, What is Quinin Aibori Uallans?... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=354&PID=37527#37527 Author: Vheid
Subject: 354
Posted: December 26 2010 at 8:59am

Vits, What is Quinin Aibori Uallans?  

I googled it and it just directs me back here!!  

Originally posted by Vits

 Quinin Aibori Uallans should've won,
]]> Sun, 26 Dec 2010 08:59:59 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=354&PID=37527#37527 DISCUSSION of 2004 RAZZIE® Nominees & "Winners" : Not only for a single point but... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=354&PID=37487#37487 Author: Jennifar
Subject: 354
Posted: December 25 2010 at 4:36am

Not only for a single point but some other aspect are also there.]]> Sat, 25 Dec 2010 04:36:30 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=354&PID=37487#37487 DISCUSSION of 2004 RAZZIE® Nominees & "Winners" : "Envy" was pretty bad... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=354&PID=35229#35229 Author: BurnHollywoodBurn
Subject: 354
Posted: October 13 2010 at 7:00pm

"Envy" was pretty bad and unfunny, but "Catwoman" was just an unwatchable mess from start to finish.]]> Wed, 13 Oct 2010 19:00:17 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=354&PID=35229#35229 DISCUSSION of 2004 RAZZIE® Nominees & "Winners" : Actually ENVY deserved "Worst... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=354&PID=35228#35228 Author: Vits
Subject: 354
Posted: October 13 2010 at 6:20pm

Actually ENVY deserved "Worst Picture".]]> Wed, 13 Oct 2010 18:20:45 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=354&PID=35228#35228 DISCUSSION of 2004 RAZZIE® Nominees & "Winners" : I'm talking, why White Chicks?... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=354&PID=35224#35224 Author: GTAHater767
Subject: 354
Posted: October 13 2010 at 5:15pm

I'm talking, why White Chicks? Why not Alien Vs Predator or Envy or Around the World in 80 Days? ]]> Wed, 13 Oct 2010 17:15:22 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=354&PID=35224#35224 DISCUSSION of 2004 RAZZIE® Nominees & "Winners" : Sure, critics and the Razzies... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=354&PID=35223#35223 Author: BurnHollywoodBurn
Subject: 354
Posted: October 13 2010 at 5:12pm

Sure, critics and the Razzies have standards...the rest of America doesn't!]]> Wed, 13 Oct 2010 17:12:16 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=354&PID=35223#35223 DISCUSSION of 2004 RAZZIE® Nominees & "Winners" : I was always puzzled as to... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=354&PID=35220#35220 Author: GTAHater767
Subject: 354
Posted: October 13 2010 at 4:07pm

I was always puzzled as to why pro critics and the RAZZIES hated White Chicks, but everyone else in America adored it. Can the negative professional and positive reader reviews be explained?  

RESPONSE from Head RAZZberry: First of all, where did you get the idea that "everyone else in America adored" WHITE CHICKS? Here's a B.O. MoJo LINK, showing that, while the film didn't bomb, its $70 million domestic gross hardly qualifies it as a runaway audience favorite. It should also be noted that audience ratings for the film (found at the bottom right of its MoJo page) show that over 40% of those voting gave it a D or an F. In fact, on the yearly chart for 2004 (LINK) CHICKS only ranks 41st, just above the all-but-forgotten HIDALGO and the aptly titled THE FORGOTTEN. As for reviews on the film, they were 85% negative (R.T. LINK) not quite as bad as the eventual Worst Picture "winner" CATWOMAN (R.T. LINK) but close. 

I think it's fair to say that a few movie-goers actually "adored" WHITE CHICKS, while an overwhelming majority of movie critics (and apparently RAZZIE® Voters) loathed it...  

]]> Wed, 13 Oct 2010 16:07:35 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=354&PID=35220#35220 DISCUSSION of 2004 RAZZIE® Nominees & "Winners" : No, no it doesn't. To me,... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=354&PID=35219#35219 Author: BurnHollywoodBurn
Subject: 354
Posted: October 13 2010 at 3:50pm

No, no it doesn't. To me, being slightly entertaining doesn't earn a movie more than a single point, not 3 or 4...  

]]> Wed, 13 Oct 2010 15:50:27 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=354&PID=35219#35219 DISCUSSION of 2004 RAZZIE® Nominees & "Winners" : Did you not read the rest of... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=354&PID=35209#35209 Author: Vits
Subject: 354
Posted: October 13 2010 at 3:31pm

Did you not read the rest of my post?  

A few laughs here and there would make a movie worth or 3 maybe 4. But I thought WHITE CHICKS had a lot of funny jokes!  
]]> Wed, 13 Oct 2010 15:31:13 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=354&PID=35209#35209