<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="RSS_xslt_style.asp" version="1.0" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:WebWizForums="http://syndication.webwiz.co.uk/rss_namespace/">
 <channel>
  <title>The Official RAZZIE&#174; Forum : DISCUSSION of 2008 RAZZIEŽ &quot;WINNERS&quot;</title>
  <link>http://www.razzies.com/forum/</link>
  <description>This is an XML content feed of; The Official RAZZIE&#174; Forum : Entire RAZZIE&#174; History, Year-by-Year: 1980-2012                                                                                              : DISCUSSION of 2008 RAZZIEŽ &quot;WINNERS&quot;</description>
  <pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 02:54:47 +0000</pubDate>
  <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 May 2013 10:25:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
  <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
  <generator>Web Wiz Forums 9.70</generator>
  <ttl>360</ttl>
  <WebWizForums:feedURL>www.razzies.com/forum/RSS_post_feed.asp?TID=3551</WebWizForums:feedURL>
  
  <item>
   <title>DISCUSSION of 2008 RAZZIEŽ &quot;WINNERS&quot; : While &amp;#034;Grown ups&amp;#034; only...</title>
   <link>http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=3551&amp;PID=54471#54471</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.razzies.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=139188">moviecritic1994</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 3551<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> May 14 2013 at 10:25am<br /><br />While "Grown ups" only got nominated for Worst Supporting Actor (Rob Schinder) the sequel looks worse than the first. Comedy that is over the top like in Grown Ups or Jack and Jill is really idiotic and stupid. I don't even want to imagine what "Candyland" will be like .]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2013 10:25:32 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=3551&amp;PID=54471#54471</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>DISCUSSION of 2008 RAZZIEŽ &quot;WINNERS&quot; : He doesn&amp;#039;t see the difference...</title>
   <link>http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=3551&amp;PID=54470#54470</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.razzies.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=8803">Vits</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 3551<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> May 14 2013 at 9:49am<br /><br /><font size="3" face="Courier New, Courier, mono">He doesn't see the difference between them. When <b>JACK </b>&amp; <b>JILL </b>and THAT'S MY BOY underperformed at the box office, I was like "Great! Now he'll understand!". But he still won some public voting awards for them. He still thinks his movies are what the people wants.</font>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2013 09:49:50 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=3551&amp;PID=54470#54470</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>DISCUSSION of 2008 RAZZIEŽ &quot;WINNERS&quot; : Well what I meant is those three...</title>
   <link>http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=3551&amp;PID=54466#54466</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.razzies.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=139188">moviecritic1994</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 3551<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> May 14 2013 at 9:05am<br /><br />Well what I meant is those three titles were the worst of the worst of Adam Sandler's work. That's all. ]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2013 09:05:31 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=3551&amp;PID=54466#54466</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>DISCUSSION of 2008 RAZZIEŽ &quot;WINNERS&quot; : You&amp;#039;re saying that like those...</title>
   <link>http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=3551&amp;PID=54464#54464</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.razzies.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=8803">Vits</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 3551<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> May 14 2013 at 8:52am<br /><br /><font size="3" face="Courier New, Courier, mono">You're saying that like those 3 movies were the first bad movies he ever made.</font>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2013 08:52:36 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=3551&amp;PID=54464#54464</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>DISCUSSION of 2008 RAZZIEŽ &quot;WINNERS&quot; : I still don&amp;#039;t really understand...</title>
   <link>http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=3551&amp;PID=54449#54449</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.razzies.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=139188">moviecritic1994</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 3551<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> May 13 2013 at 9:50pm<br /><br />I still don't really understand why Adam Sandler even has a career after two horribly made films. Granted, I thought Just Go With It was okay, I didn't like it or love it but it was okay. However, the additions of "Jack and Jill" "Bucky Larson, Born to be a Star" and "That's my Boy" seemed like nails to his career coffin. However, he's going to be in "Grown ups 2" and possibly a Candy land film. ]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2013 21:50:20 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=3551&amp;PID=54449#54449</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>DISCUSSION of 2008 RAZZIEŽ &quot;WINNERS&quot; :  Originally posted by moviecritic1994&amp;#034;The...</title>
   <link>http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=3551&amp;PID=54432#54432</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.razzies.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=8803">Vits</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 3551<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> May 13 2013 at 4:22pm<br /><br /><div><div style=": rgb233, 219, 177; margin-left: 1px; margin-top: 1px; margin-right: 1px; margin-bottom: 1px; font-family: Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; color: rgb0, 0, 0; font-weight: normal; font-size: 12px; line-height: 1.4; border-top-width: 0px; border-right-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px; border-style: initial; border-color: initial; -: n&#111;ne; "><table width="99%"><tr><td class="BBquote"><strong><em>Originally posted by moviecritic1994</strong></em><br /><br />"The Hottie and the Nottie" really didn't affect Paris Hilton's career at all. She is still an heiress that is selfish, egotistical and mostly we haven't really seen her in awhile in film or on the tabloids as of late.</td></tr></table></div></div><div><font ="Apple-style-span" size="3" face="'Courier New', Courier, mono">Are you sure? I mean, around 2003 and 2004, she started to appear in a movie per year. THE HOTTIE &amp; THE NOTTIE and REPO! were her last theatrical releases. Since then, she's been producing a bunch of reality shows. But my point is that she was kind of "big" at one time.</font></div><table width="99%"><tr><td class="BBquote"><strong><em>Originally posted by moviecritic1994</strong></em><br /><br />I hate to say it but "The Love Guru" was the film that pretty much killed Mike Myer's career.</td></tr></table><div><font ="Apple-style-span" size="3" face="'Courier New', Courier, mono">You're right. When it came out, it became official than him, <b>Eddie Murphy</b> and <b>Cameron Diaz</b> needed the <b>SHREK</b> franchise, because their live-action movies weren't very good.</font></div><div><div style=": rgb233, 219, 177; margin-left: 1px; margin-top: 1px; margin-right: 1px; margin-bottom: 1px; font-family: Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; color: rgb0, 0, 0; font-weight: normal; font-size: 12px; line-height: 1.4; border-top-width: 0px; border-right-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px; border-style: initial; border-color: initial; -: n&#111;ne; "><table width="99%"><tr><td class="BBquote"><strong><em>Originally posted by oiram</strong></em><br /><br />You forgot Inglourious Basterds.</td></tr></table></div></div><div style=": rgb233, 219, 177; margin-left: 1px; margin-top: 1px; margin-right: 1px; margin-bottom: 1px; color: rgb0, 0, 0; font-weight: normal; line-height: 1.4; border-top-width: 0px; border-right-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px; border-style: initial; border-color: initial; -: n&#111;ne; "><font ="Apple-style-span" size="3" face="'Courier New', Courier, mono">Even though he was included in the Best Ensemble awards the film won, it was an extended cameo that doesn't proof he can have his career back.</font></div>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2013 16:22:28 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=3551&amp;PID=54432#54432</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>DISCUSSION of 2008 RAZZIEŽ &quot;WINNERS&quot; :  Okay, sorry -- I&amp;#039;ve never...</title>
   <link>http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=3551&amp;PID=54415#54415</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.razzies.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=139188">moviecritic1994</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 3551<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> May 13 2013 at 4:07am<br /><br />Okay, sorry -- I've never seen that film. Thanks for reminding me. ]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2013 04:07:51 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=3551&amp;PID=54415#54415</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>DISCUSSION of 2008 RAZZIEŽ &quot;WINNERS&quot; :  Originally posted by moviecritic1994Besides...</title>
   <link>http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=3551&amp;PID=54414#54414</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.razzies.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=8992">oiram</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 3551<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> May 13 2013 at 4:00am<br /><br /> <table width="99%"><tr><td class="BBquote"><strong><em>Originally posted by moviecritic1994</strong></em><br /><br />Besides that film and the final Shrek installment, we haven't seen him in film.</td></tr></table> <br /><br />You forgot Inglourious Basterds.]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2013 04:00:46 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=3551&amp;PID=54414#54414</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>DISCUSSION of 2008 RAZZIEŽ &quot;WINNERS&quot; : Surprisingly, I will not talk...</title>
   <link>http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=3551&amp;PID=54410#54410</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.razzies.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=139188">moviecritic1994</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 3551<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> May 12 2013 at 9:31pm<br /><br />Surprisingly, I will not talk about Indy and the crystal skull. But I will give my overall thought about the 29th Annual Razzie Awards. <br /><br />At first, I was kind of surprised (but not really) that "The Love Guru" won Worst Picture and Worst Screenplay. I actually thought "The Hottie and The Nottie" was far worse. But then I really started to think about it. "The Hottie and the Nottie" really didn't affect Paris Hilton's career at all. She is still an heiress that is selfish, egotistical and mostly we haven't really seen her in awhile in film or on the tabloids as of late. But "The Love Guru" was different in two ways. First a lot more people saw this film than "The Hottie and the Nottie". So a lot more people knew how bad it really was. Also, I hate to say it but "The Love Guru" was the film that pretty much killed Mike Myer's career. Besides that film and the final Shrek installment, we haven't seen him in film. There are rumors he might be in a possible 4th Austin Powers film, but again those are just rumors. So yeah, I fully agree with "The Love Guru" winning the 3 Razzie Awards it got. ]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Sun, 12 May 2013 21:31:26 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=3551&amp;PID=54410#54410</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>DISCUSSION of 2008 RAZZIEŽ &quot;WINNERS&quot; : 2008. The only 00-Agent to act...</title>
   <link>http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=3551&amp;PID=52459#52459</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.razzies.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=8230">GTAHater767</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 3551<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> October 07 2012 at 2:25am<br /><br /><P><FONT>2<FONT color=#ff0000>008</FONT>. The only 00-Agent to act consecutively with James Bond instead of concurrently was Agent 008. Starting in <EM>Goldfinger</EM>, if Bond&nbsp;weren't to&nbsp;report into MI6, Agent 008 would replace him. Here's my take on the Year of the Successor to Bond:</P><DIV></DIV><DIV></DIV>Films that should've been RAZZed, but didn't: 4 <DIV></DIV><EM>Strange Wilderness</EM> <DIV></DIV><EM>Superhero Movie</EM> <DIV></DIV><EM>Babylon AD</EM> <DIV></DIV><EM>Bangkok Dangerous <DIV></EM>&nbsp;</DIV><DIV><DIV></DIV><DIV>Films that got RAZZed, but shouldn't have: 3</DIV><DIV><EM>The Wackness</EM></DIV><DIV><EM>Mamma Mia!</EM></DIV><DIV><EM>Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull </EM></FONT>//I call it the "Predecessor's Shadow Parameter". If a film has decent reviews and would block out far worse films from getting RAZZed, it can <strong>still</strong> get nominated for Worst PSRR just for being in the shadow of its predecessor.</DIV><DIV>&nbsp;</DIV><DIV>Films that got RAZZed to the wrong degree: 0</DIV><DIV>&nbsp;</DIV><DIV>Worst Trends/Events of 2<FONT color=#ff0000>008</FONT>:</DIV><DIV>V. Long-dormant franchises revived into empty shells of sequels (Ex. <EM>Crystal Skull</EM>, <EM>Rambo IV</EM>. Not that they should've been nominated or, in the case of <EM>Crystal Skull</EM>, deserved to be, but it's been happening a lot since 2<FONT color=#ff0000>008</FONT>. They haven't had a new installment since the 80's or thereabout, and over 2 decades later, they get some of the most un-asked-for sequels ever!)<BR>IV. Pierce and Paris pierce our ears with their singing (<EM>Repo! The Genetic Opera</EM> and <EM>Mamma Mia!</EM>)<BR>III. Bollywood comes to America, and Mike Myers ruins it all (<EM>The Love Guru</EM> was FAR more offensive to India than <EM>Slumdog Millionaire</EM>, and that's saying a lot, because <EM>Slumdog</EM> made India look like&nbsp;a total ****hole!)<BR>II. Seltzer and Friedberg, we've had enough of your F****** B*******!!! (The only year so far in which Seltzerberg struck twice, and even we were complaining!)<BR>I. A German Ed Wood leads the spike in video game films (<EM>In the Name of the King</EM>, <EM>Postal, 1968 Tunnel Rats, Max Payne</EM>. More video game movies than any other year, and it'll be pretty tough to exceed, even with how bad Hollywood's gotten this millennium.<EM>)</EM></DIV></DIV>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Sun, 07 Oct 2012 02:25:36 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=3551&amp;PID=52459#52459</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>DISCUSSION of 2008 RAZZIEŽ &quot;WINNERS&quot; :       Originally posted...</title>
   <link>http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=3551&amp;PID=48914#48914</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.razzies.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=137115">moonlina</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 3551<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> December 27 2011 at 5:38pm<br /><br /><table width="99%"><tr><td class="BBquote"><strong><em>Originally posted by BurnHollywoodBurn</strong></em><br /><br /><table width="99%"><tr><td class="BBquote"><strong><em>Originally posted by Vits</strong></em><br /><br /><span style="FONT-SIZE: medium" ="apple-style-span"=""><font ="apple-style-span"="" face="'Courier New', Courier, mono">I mispoke.Whenever I bash you for awarding INDY 4 it's not just me talking.It's also audiences and critics.As for the ratings...yeah,I have a history like that.</font></span></td></tr></table> <div></div>Critics and audiences only liked "Indy 4" because it was a throw back to their childhoods, but once the childhood memories pass, you realize the movies sucks compared to the original 3. I don't care if people don't like that choice, but it was the right choice because the movie was a big let down. Take a note from How It Should Have Ended:<div>&nbsp;<br><br>http://www.lalinguaarabapertutti.com<br><br><span style="FONT-SIZE: medium"></span></td></tr></table> <br><br>very nice thanks alot<br></div><a href="" target="_blank"></a>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Tue, 27 Dec 2011 17:38:03 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=3551&amp;PID=48914#48914</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>DISCUSSION of 2008 RAZZIEŽ &quot;WINNERS&quot; : I&amp;#039;m guided by R.T., Metacritic,...</title>
   <link>http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=3551&amp;PID=48058#48058</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.razzies.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=8803">Vits</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 3551<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> November 22 2011 at 5:58am<br /><br /><div><span ="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: 'Courier New', Courier, mono; line-height: 22px; font-size: medium; ">I'm guided by R.T., Metacritic, etc. So I'm not simply assuming. &nbsp;</span></div><div><br></div><table width="99%"><tr><td class="BBquote"><strong><em>Originally posted by razelfragel</strong></em><br /><br />Vits, me and the rest of the world would really appreciate it if you stopped speaking for us. Don't be so egotistical to think you can assume what EVERYONE, EVERYWHERE thought of Indy 4.</td></tr></table><br><font ="Apple-style-span" face="'Courier New', Courier, mono" size="3"><span ="Apple-style-span" style="line-height: 22px;"><br></span></font><span ="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: 'Courier New', Courier, mono; line-height: 22px; font-size: medium; ">Now&nbsp;</span><u style="font-family: 'Courier New', Courier, mono; line-height: 22px; font-size: medium; ">you</u><span ="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: 'Courier New', Courier, mono; line-height: 22px; font-size: medium; ">&nbsp;are assuming the number of critics paid off... and assuming they were paid off at all.</span><br><div><br></div><div><table width="99%"><tr><td class="BBquote"><strong><em>Originally posted by razelfragel</strong></em><br /><br />Personally I have yet to meet a single person who liked that movie, andit's received plenty of negative criticism from movie critics (the oneswho weren't paid off by Lucas I bet).</td></tr></table><br><font ="Apple-style-span" face="'Courier New', Courier, mono" size="3"><span ="Apple-style-span" style="line-height: 22px;"><br></span></font><table width="99%"><tr><td class="BBquote"><strong><em>Originally posted by razelfragel</strong></em><br /><br />George Lucas originally wantedthe movie to be called "Indiana Jones and the Saucer Men" for god'ssake, just to give you an idea of the staggering level of incompetenceput into this film.</td></tr></table><br><font face="Courier New, Courier, mono" size="3">I'm not a fan of his. I actually think he takes the artistic value away every time he so-called "fixes" a movie.&nbsp;</font></div><div><font ="Apple-style-span" face="'Courier New', Courier, mono" size="3"><span ="Apple-style-span" style="line-height: 22px;"><br></span></font><table width="99%"><tr><td class="BBquote"><strong><em>Originally posted by razelfragel</strong></em><br /><br />For true fans of the original Indiana Jones moviesit was the biggest disappointment of the year and I believe it trulydeserved its razzie.</td></tr></table><br><font face="Courier New, Courier, mono" size="3"><br></font></div><div><font face="Courier New, Courier, mono" size="3">I would agree with you if there was a concensus on whether the Worst Remake/Sequel category is for movies that could have been good, but still disappointed compared to the original. But a lot of people vote based on simply bad movies that just happened to have adapted scripts.&nbsp;</font><br></div>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2011 05:58:26 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=3551&amp;PID=48058#48058</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>DISCUSSION of 2008 RAZZIEŽ &quot;WINNERS&quot; : Vits, me and the rest of the world...</title>
   <link>http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=3551&amp;PID=48041#48041</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.razzies.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=135224">razelfragel</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 3551<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> November 21 2011 at 10:07pm<br /><br />Vits, me and the rest of the world would really appreciate it if you stopped speaking for us. Don't be so egotistical to think you can assume what EVERYONE, EVERYWHERE thought of Indy 4. Personally I have yet to meet a single person who liked that movie, and it's received plenty of negative criticism from movie critics (the ones who weren't paid off by Lucas I bet). George Lucas originally wanted the movie to be called "Indiana Jones and the Saucer Men" for god's sake, just to give you an idea of the staggering level of incompetence put into this film. For true fans of the original Indiana Jones movies it was the biggest disappointment of the year and I believe it truly deserved its razzie.]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2011 22:07:42 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=3551&amp;PID=48041#48041</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>DISCUSSION of 2008 RAZZIEŽ &quot;WINNERS&quot; :  Originally posted by Jennifaryou...</title>
   <link>http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=3551&amp;PID=38208#38208</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.razzies.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=8839">BurnHollywoodBurn</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 3551<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> January 10 2011 at 1:37pm<br /><br /><table width="99%"><tr><td class="BBquote"><strong><em>Originally posted by Jennifar</strong></em><br /><br />you realize the movies sucks compared to the original 3. I don't care if people don't like that choice, but it was the right choice because the movie was a big let down.</td></tr></table> <DIV></DIV>THANK YOU! That's the point we've been trying to make about "Indy Jones 4"!]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Mon, 10 Jan 2011 13:37:22 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=3551&amp;PID=38208#38208</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>DISCUSSION of 2008 RAZZIEŽ &quot;WINNERS&quot; : you realize the movies sucks compared...</title>
   <link>http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=3551&amp;PID=38190#38190</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.razzies.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=9136">Jennifar</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 3551<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> January 10 2011 at 9:45am<br /><br />you realize the movies sucks compared to the original 3. I don't careif people don't like that choice, but it was the right choice becausethe movie was a big let down.]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Mon, 10 Jan 2011 09:45:08 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=3551&amp;PID=38190#38190</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>DISCUSSION of 2008 RAZZIEŽ &quot;WINNERS&quot; : Ah, yes, the &amp;#034;Let&amp;#039;s...</title>
   <link>http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=3551&amp;PID=38073#38073</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.razzies.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=8839">BurnHollywoodBurn</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 3551<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> January 06 2011 at 7:49pm<br /><br />Ah, yes, the "Let's All Speak in Montone Like Keanu Does" movie.&nbsp;<div><br></div><div>Yeah, it was bad, but I guess Indiana Jones fans outnumber the "TDTESS" fans. &nbsp;&nbsp;<div><br></div><div><table width="99%"><tr><td class="BBquote"><strong><em>Originally posted by oiram</strong></em><br /><br />I think the award should have gone to The Day the Earth Stood Still 08. Now THAT was terrible!</td></tr></table></div></div>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Thu, 06 Jan 2011 19:49:33 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=3551&amp;PID=38073#38073</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>DISCUSSION of 2008 RAZZIEŽ &quot;WINNERS&quot; :  True! Not only it was bad, it...</title>
   <link>http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=3551&amp;PID=38047#38047</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.razzies.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=8803">Vits</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 3551<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> January 06 2011 at 6:32am<br /><br /><span ="apple-style-span"="" style="font-size: medium;"><font ="apple-style-span"="" face="'Courier New', Courier, mono">True! Not only it was bad, it ruined the original.</font></span>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Thu, 06 Jan 2011 06:32:28 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=3551&amp;PID=38047#38047</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>DISCUSSION of 2008 RAZZIEŽ &quot;WINNERS&quot; :  While Crystal Skull was a big...</title>
   <link>http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=3551&amp;PID=38042#38042</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.razzies.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=8992">oiram</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 3551<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> January 06 2011 at 5:36am<br /><br />While Crystal Skull <i>was</i> a big disappointment, I think the Worst Remake/Sequel award should have gone to The Day the Earth Stood Still '08. Now THAT was terrible! ]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Thu, 06 Jan 2011 05:36:51 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=3551&amp;PID=38042#38042</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>DISCUSSION of 2008 RAZZIEŽ &quot;WINNERS&quot; : No, EVERYTHING about Boll&amp;#039;s...</title>
   <link>http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=3551&amp;PID=37699#37699</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.razzies.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=8839">BurnHollywoodBurn</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 3551<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> December 29 2010 at 4:00pm<br /><br />No, EVERYTHING about Boll's movie was a problem. Most of the cast (not all, but most) have proven they could do better in the past, but with Boll at the helm, well, everyone&nbsp;went down with the ship!&nbsp;<div><br></div><div><table width="99%"><tr><td class="BBquote"><strong><em>Originally posted by Vits</strong></em><br /><br /><span ="apple-style-span"="" style="font-size: medium; "><font face="'Courier New', Courier, mono" ="apple-style-span"="">&nbsp;I don't think Uwe Boll should've won. His directing was bad, but it was the smallest problem in&nbsp;</font></span><a href="http://www.razzies.com/forum/in-the-name-of-the-king-a-dunge&#111;n-siege-tale_forum246.html" target="_blank"><span ="apple-style-span"="" style="font-size: medium; "><font face="'Courier New', Courier, mono" ="apple-style-span"="">IN THE NAME OF THE KING</font></span></a><span ="apple-style-span"="" style="font-size: medium; "><font face="'Courier New', Courier, mono" ="apple-style-span"="">. Besides, against Selzerberg...</font></span></td></tr></table></div>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Wed, 29 Dec 2010 16:00:07 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=3551&amp;PID=37699#37699</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>DISCUSSION of 2008 RAZZIEŽ &quot;WINNERS&quot; :  Seltzerberg wouldn&amp;#039;t have...</title>
   <link>http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=3551&amp;PID=37698#37698</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.razzies.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=8230">GTAHater767</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 3551<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> December 29 2010 at 3:58pm<br /><br />Seltzerberg wouldn't have been a better choice, if you ask me. Their intent is to create the worst movie possible by ripping off everything from pop culture. Besides, Uwe Boll wasn't quite as obscure, and his video game adaptation movies had more bad substance to them, than the spoof movies.]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Wed, 29 Dec 2010 15:58:40 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=3551&amp;PID=37698#37698</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>DISCUSSION of 2008 RAZZIEŽ &quot;WINNERS&quot; :   I don&amp;#039;t think Uwe Boll...</title>
   <link>http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=3551&amp;PID=37692#37692</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.razzies.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=8803">Vits</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 3551<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> December 29 2010 at 3:39pm<br /><br /><span ="apple-style-span"="" style="font-size: medium;"><font ="apple-style-span"="" face="'Courier New', Courier, mono">I don't think Uwe Boll should've won. His directing was bad, but it was the smallest problem in&nbsp;</font></span><a href="http://www.razzies.com/forum/in-the-name-of-the-king-a-dunge&#111;n-siege-tale_forum246.html" target="_blank"><span ="apple-style-span"="" style="font-size: medium;"><font ="apple-style-span"="" face="'Courier New', Courier, mono">IN THE NAME OF THE KING</font></span></a><span ="apple-style-span"="" style="font-size: medium;"><font ="apple-style-span"="" face="'Courier New', Courier, mono">. Besides, against Selzerberg...</font></span>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Wed, 29 Dec 2010 15:39:36 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=3551&amp;PID=37692#37692</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>DISCUSSION of 2008 RAZZIEŽ &quot;WINNERS&quot; : Yes every body knows about the...</title>
   <link>http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=3551&amp;PID=37486#37486</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.razzies.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=9136">Jennifar</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 3551<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> December 25 2010 at 4:35am<br /><br />Yes every body knows about the award of that film.]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Sat, 25 Dec 2010 04:35:01 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=3551&amp;PID=37486#37486</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>DISCUSSION of 2008 RAZZIEŽ &quot;WINNERS&quot; :  Originally posted by VitsThat...</title>
   <link>http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=3551&amp;PID=35327#35327</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.razzies.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=8839">BurnHollywoodBurn</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 3551<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> October 17 2010 at 5:49pm<br /><br /><table width="99%"><tr><td class="BBquote"><strong><em>Originally posted by Vits</strong></em><br /><br /><SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: medium" ="Apple-style-span"><FONT face="'Courier New', Courier, mono" ="Apple-style-span">That doesn't sound very fair.</FONT></SPAN></td></tr></table> <DIV></DIV>Well, as I said before, if&nbsp;people don't like the choices the Razzies make, they should shell out $20 and become voting memebers so that the "right" movies&nbsp;(or at least the right ones in their minds)&nbsp;get razzed.]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Sun, 17 Oct 2010 17:49:02 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=3551&amp;PID=35327#35327</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>DISCUSSION of 2008 RAZZIEŽ &quot;WINNERS&quot; : That doesn&amp;#039;t sound very fair....</title>
   <link>http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=3551&amp;PID=35318#35318</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.razzies.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=8803">Vits</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 3551<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> October 17 2010 at 2:35pm<br /><br /><span ="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: medium;"><font ="Apple-style-span" face="'Courier New', Courier, mono">That doesn't sound very fair.</font></span>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Sun, 17 Oct 2010 14:35:07 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=3551&amp;PID=35318#35318</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>DISCUSSION of 2008 RAZZIEŽ &quot;WINNERS&quot; :  Originally posted by VitsWith...</title>
   <link>http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=3551&amp;PID=35313#35313</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.razzies.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=8839">BurnHollywoodBurn</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 3551<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> October 17 2010 at 10:27am<br /><br /><table width="99%"><tr><td class="BBquote"><strong><em>Originally posted by Vits</strong></em><br /><br /><SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: medium" ="Apple-style-span"><FONT face="'Courier New', Courier, mono" ="Apple-style-span">With "Majority" I meant the whole world.</FONT></SPAN></td></tr></table> <DIV></DIV>I know, but the whole didn't vote for the Razzies, only the 700 members who hated the movie.]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Sun, 17 Oct 2010 10:27:32 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=3551&amp;PID=35313#35313</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>DISCUSSION of 2008 RAZZIEŽ &quot;WINNERS&quot; : With &amp;#034;Majority&amp;#034; I meant...</title>
   <link>http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=3551&amp;PID=35310#35310</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.razzies.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=8803">Vits</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 3551<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> October 17 2010 at 8:59am<br /><br /><span ="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: medium;"><font ="Apple-style-span" face="'Courier New', Courier, mono">With "Majority" I meant the whole world.</font></span>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Sun, 17 Oct 2010 08:59:22 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=3551&amp;PID=35310#35310</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>DISCUSSION of 2008 RAZZIEŽ &quot;WINNERS&quot; :  Originally posted by VitsIs...</title>
   <link>http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=3551&amp;PID=35298#35298</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.razzies.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=8839">BurnHollywoodBurn</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 3551<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> October 16 2010 at 4:33pm<br /><br /><table width="99%"><tr><td class="BBquote"><strong><em>Originally posted by Vits</strong></em><br /><br /><SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: medium" ="Apple-style-span"><FONT face="'Courier New', Courier, mono" ="Apple-style-span">Is it that hard for you to even consider maybe INDY 4 was a good movie?Not excellent,and far from as good as the other ones,but good.</FONT></SPAN></td></tr></table> <DIV></DIV>A fun movie? Sure. An entertaining movie? Yeah. A good movie? No. In the end, the only majority that mattered was the votes of the Razzie members.]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Sat, 16 Oct 2010 16:33:24 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=3551&amp;PID=35298#35298</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>DISCUSSION of 2008 RAZZIEŽ &quot;WINNERS&quot; : &amp;#034;Easily sold&amp;#034;?Is it...</title>
   <link>http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=3551&amp;PID=35297#35297</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.razzies.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=8803">Vits</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 3551<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> October 16 2010 at 4:13pm<br /><br /><span ="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: medium;"><font ="Apple-style-span" face="'Courier New', Courier, mono">"Easily sold"?Is it that hard for you to even consider maybe INDY 4 was a good movie?Not excellent,and far from as good as the other ones,but good?I'm asking because you keep coming up with reasons that start to sound to me more like excuses.I mean isn't what the majority thinks what matters?</font></span><div><div><span ="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: medium;"><font ="Apple-style-span" face="'Courier New', Courier, mono">Good reviews+good box office=good movie</font></span></div><div><span ="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: medium;"><font ="Apple-style-span" face="'Courier New', Courier, mono"><br></font></span></div><div><span ="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: medium;"><font ="Apple-style-span" face="'Courier New', Courier, mono">I know the movie was already awarded,but what do you think this forums of past years are for?</font></span></div></div>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Sat, 16 Oct 2010 16:13:06 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=3551&amp;PID=35297#35297</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>DISCUSSION of 2008 RAZZIEŽ &quot;WINNERS&quot; :  Originally posted by GTAHater767Mr....</title>
   <link>http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=3551&amp;PID=35292#35292</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.razzies.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=8839">BurnHollywoodBurn</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 3551<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> October 16 2010 at 4:02pm<br /><br /><table width="99%"><tr><td class="BBquote"><strong><em>Originally posted by GTAHater767</strong></em><br /><br />Mr. Burn, I don't know if Kingdom of the&nbsp;Crystal Skull still has between 60 and 80% at Rotten Tomatoes, but with how bad you think it is, are you implying that those critics were patently lying?</td></tr></table> <DIV></DIV>All I'm saying is that unlike the critics and other movie goers, the Razzie voters were not so easily sold to.]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Sat, 16 Oct 2010 16:02:45 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=3551&amp;PID=35292#35292</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>DISCUSSION of 2008 RAZZIEŽ &quot;WINNERS&quot; : Mr. Burn, I don&amp;#039;t know if...</title>
   <link>http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=3551&amp;PID=35286#35286</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.razzies.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=8230">GTAHater767</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 3551<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> October 16 2010 at 11:47am<br /><br /><P>Mr. Burn, I don't know if Kingdom of the&nbsp;Crystal Skull still has between 60 and 80% at Rotten Tomatoes, but with how bad you think it is, are you implying that those critics were patently lying?</P>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Sat, 16 Oct 2010 11:47:15 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=3551&amp;PID=35286#35286</guid>
  </item> 
 </channel>
</rss>