<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="RSS_xslt_style.asp" version="1.0" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:WebWizForums="http://syndication.webwiz.co.uk/rss_namespace/">
 <channel>
  <title>The Official RAZZIE&#174; Forum : DISCUSSION: WORST REMAKE/RIP-OFF/SEQUEL</title>
  <link>http://www.razzies.com/forum/</link>
  <description>This is an XML content feed of; The Official RAZZIE&#174; Forum : POLLS &amp; DISCUSSIONS on 2011 RAZZIE&#174; CHOICES...                                                                                               : DISCUSSION: WORST REMAKE/RIP-OFF/SEQUEL</description>
  <pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 07:03:13 +0000</pubDate>
  <lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Dec 2011 22:31:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
  <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
  <generator>Web Wiz Forums 9.70</generator>
  <ttl>360</ttl>
  <WebWizForums:feedURL>www.razzies.com/forum/RSS_post_feed.asp?TID=5569</WebWizForums:feedURL>
  
  <item>
   <title>DISCUSSION: WORST REMAKE/RIP-OFF/SEQUEL : my picks for worst remake rip-off...</title>
   <link>http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5569&amp;PID=49083#49083</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.razzies.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=9156">travis112096</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 5569<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> December 31 2011 at 10:31pm<br /><br />my picks for worst remake rip-off preguel or sequel<br />alvin and the chipchunks 3 never chipwrecked<br />breaking wind part 1<br />bucky larson why was he born to be a star<br />the hangover part 2<br />jack and jill<br />]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Sat, 31 Dec 2011 22:31:35 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5569&amp;PID=49083#49083</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>DISCUSSION: WORST REMAKE/RIP-OFF/SEQUEL : My list, including some choices...</title>
   <link>http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5569&amp;PID=48998#48998</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.razzies.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=137149">AndP</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 5569<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> December 29 2011 at 8:44pm<br /><br />My list, including some choices that haven't been mentioned yet: &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<br><div>&nbsp;</div><div>Alvin and the Chipmunks: Chipwrecked&nbsp;</div><div>Arthur&nbsp;</div><div>Big Mommas, Like Father, Like Son&nbsp;</div><div>Conan the Barbarian&nbsp;</div><div>The Hangover Part II&nbsp;</div><div>Just Go With It&nbsp;</div><div>Red Riding Hood&nbsp;</div><div>The Roommate&nbsp;</div><div>The Sitter&nbsp;</div><div>Spy Kids 4D&nbsp;</div><div>Straw Dogs&nbsp;</div><div>The Thing&nbsp;</div><div>Transformers 3&nbsp;</div><div>The Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn Part 1&nbsp;</div><div><br></div>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Thu, 29 Dec 2011 20:44:43 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5569&amp;PID=48998#48998</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>DISCUSSION: WORST REMAKE/RIP-OFF/SEQUEL : I want to add PUSS IN BOOTS as...</title>
   <link>http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5569&amp;PID=48987#48987</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.razzies.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=8803">Vits</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 5569<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> December 29 2011 at 5:37pm<br /><br /><font ="Apple-style-span" size="3" face="'Courier New', Courier, mono">I want to add <b>PUSS IN BOOTS</b> as a frontrunner. No, I'm not joking.</font>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Thu, 29 Dec 2011 17:37:31 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5569&amp;PID=48987#48987</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>DISCUSSION: WORST REMAKE/RIP-OFF/SEQUEL :   Originally posted by #1-Movie-Fan!Mostly...</title>
   <link>http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5569&amp;PID=48898#48898</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.razzies.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=9426">billingsley</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 5569<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> December 26 2011 at 10:14pm<br /><br /><table width="99%"><tr><td class="BBquote"><strong><em>Originally posted by #1-Movie-Fan!</strong></em><br /><br />Mostly berry good selection, but there are at least 3 titles I would expect to see listed here that are not: Red Riding Hood, Pirates #4 and Final Destination 5.&nbsp;<br></td></tr></table><div><br></div><div>Final Destination 5 was rotten, but it served it's purpose. Plenty of gore. Probably one of the worst scripts ever written, same for direction. But the violence was hilarious in its&nbsp;implausibility. It was bad, but it accomplished it's mission. As a film it was dreadful, but as a gore-filled popcorn film for die hard fans, it did its thing, with unintentional comedy to boot.&nbsp;</div><div>Of course the 3D was worthless, just like every other 3D film. Def consider it for Worst Eye Gouging Misuse of 3D if they're doing that category this year.</div>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Mon, 26 Dec 2011 22:14:42 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5569&amp;PID=48898#48898</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>DISCUSSION: WORST REMAKE/RIP-OFF/SEQUEL :  My dishonorable mentions for...</title>
   <link>http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5569&amp;PID=48893#48893</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.razzies.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=9426">billingsley</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 5569<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> December 26 2011 at 6:49pm<br /><br />My dishonorable mentions for Worst Sequel/Remake/Rip Off: &nbsp;<div><br></div><div><br></div><div><ul><li>Bucky Larson&nbsp;</li><li>Jack and Jill&nbsp;</li><li>Smurfs&nbsp;</li><li>Trannies 3D&nbsp;</li><li>Beastly&nbsp;</li><li>Big Mommas: Like Father, Like Son&nbsp;</li></ul><div><br></div></div><div>My five nominees / top choices:&nbsp;</div><div><br></div><div><ul><li>Pirates of the Caribbean: On Stranger Tides presented in Disney Digital 3D&nbsp;</li><li>The Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn Part 1&nbsp;</li><li>Tyler Perry's Madea's Big Happy Family&nbsp;</li><li>Green Lantern&nbsp;</li></ul><div>and my "winner" is... &nbsp;</div></div><div><font size="5">The Hangover Part II &nbsp;</font></div><div><font size="5"><br></font></div>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Mon, 26 Dec 2011 18:49:21 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5569&amp;PID=48893#48893</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>DISCUSSION: WORST REMAKE/RIP-OFF/SEQUEL :  New addition to my list: ALVIN...</title>
   <link>http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5569&amp;PID=48830#48830</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.razzies.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=8803">Vits</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 5569<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> December 24 2011 at 6:32am<br /><br /><font ="apple-style-span"="" size="3" face="'Courier New', Courier, mono">New addition to my list: <b>ALVIN &amp; THE CHIPMUNKS</b> <b>3</b>&nbsp;is now my front-runner.</font>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Sat, 24 Dec 2011 06:32:22 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5569&amp;PID=48830#48830</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>DISCUSSION: WORST REMAKE/RIP-OFF/SEQUEL : Er, no. The story of A Star is...</title>
   <link>http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5569&amp;PID=48637#48637</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.razzies.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=8992">oiram</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 5569<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> December 18 2011 at 7:04am<br /><br /><div><div>Er, no. The story of A Star is Born is usually Man is successful, Man meets Unknown Woman, Man lets Unknown Woman play lead along with him, Woman becomes popular, Man starts to lose popularity, mainly do to alcohol, Woman tries to save him, Man might die or might not die, Woman either sad or happy respectively.</div><div>&nbsp;</div><div>Bucky Larson does not have that plotline. If anything, The Artist rips-off A Star is Born. &nbsp;</div></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><font size="4" face="'Times New Roman', Times, serif"><b><font color="#cc0033">RESPONSE from Head RAZZberry</font></b>: So you're choosing to ignore the obvious -- that the title BUCKY LARSON: BORN TO BE A STAR is clearly ripped-off from A STAR IS BORN -- and lecture us all on your knowledge of old movie plotz?? Among the elements that BUCKY <i>does</i> take from all previous versions of BORN is the core idea of a small-town innocent heading &nbsp;out to become a STAR. As far as I'm concerned, the title and that plot device are enough to argue that LARSON <i>is</i> larcenously playing off of STAR IS BORN, and therefor <i>does</i> qualify as either a Remake or a Rip-Off...&nbsp;</font></div><div><font size="4" face="'Times New Roman', Times, serif"><br></font></div><div><br></div><table width="99%"><tr><td class="BBquote"><strong><em>Originally posted by oiram</strong></em><br /><br />I thought someone said Bucky's a ripoff of Boogie Nights? &nbsp;<div><br></div><div><font size="4" face="'Times New Roman', Times, serif"><b><font color="#cc0033">RESPONSE from Head RAZZberry: </font></b>While there may be elements of BOOGIE NIGHTS in it, the complete title (BUCKY LARSON: BORN TO BE A STAR) makes it clear the main "inspiration" for this hideous film is A STAR IS BORN...</font></td></tr></table></div><div><font size="4" face="'Times New Roman', Times, serif"><br></font></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Sun, 18 Dec 2011 07:04:11 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5569&amp;PID=48637#48637</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>DISCUSSION: WORST REMAKE/RIP-OFF/SEQUEL : I&amp;#039;m really, really missing...</title>
   <link>http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5569&amp;PID=48612#48612</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.razzies.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=9505">mbh</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 5569<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> December 17 2011 at 10:40am<br /><br />I'm really, really missing Red Riding Hood on this list. HeadRazz, I know you've already made a statement about that, but I was reading through the reviews of RRH, 90% compare it to the first Twilight. RRH takes so many elements from that movie that it should be considered a "rip-off", and it's a remake of the Grimm's story anyways.<br>Apart from that this was a sh*t movie, and I don't want it to get away with no punishment, considering with just 11% on RT, it could be a winner in this category.]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Sat, 17 Dec 2011 10:40:16 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5569&amp;PID=48612#48612</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>DISCUSSION: WORST REMAKE/RIP-OFF/SEQUEL : I want to add another runner-up:...</title>
   <link>http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5569&amp;PID=48598#48598</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.razzies.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=8803">Vits</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 5569<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> December 16 2011 at 1:08pm<br /><br /><font ="Apple-style-span" size="3" face="'Courier New', Courier, mono">I want to add another runner-up: HAPPY FEET 2. While it wasn't the worst of the year, it was bad enough to ruin the first one.</font>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2011 13:08:50 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5569&amp;PID=48598#48598</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>DISCUSSION: WORST REMAKE/RIP-OFF/SEQUEL : I know there are a lot of body...</title>
   <link>http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5569&amp;PID=48330#48330</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.razzies.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=8803">Vits</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 5569<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> December 08 2011 at 9:59am<br /><br /><font ="Apple-style-span" size="3" face="'Courier New', Courier, mono">I know there are a lot of body swap movies, but is THE CHANGE UP a direct rip-off of one in particular? If so, it's another runner-up for this category.</font>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2011 09:59:26 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5569&amp;PID=48330#48330</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>DISCUSSION: WORST REMAKE/RIP-OFF/SEQUEL : Just watched Jack and Jill and...</title>
   <link>http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5569&amp;PID=48219#48219</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.razzies.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=135009">Dun-Ida</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 5569<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> December 01 2011 at 1:59pm<br /><br />Just watched Jack and Jill and it's only now that I've regained the strength to make comments on this film (the film was torture to watch). It's painfully unfunny from beginning to end.&nbsp;<div><br></div><div>This pile of s**! deserves to get nominated for Worst Picture. Here are the reasons:&nbsp;</div><div><br></div><div>1) Adam Sandler gives his usual bad (and unfunny) performance as the male lead. He deserves a nomination for Worst Actor.&nbsp;</div><div><br></div><div>2) As the "female" lead Sandler also deserves a Worst Actress nomination. His over-acting playing Jill contributed to the torture.</div><div>&nbsp;</div><div>3) Nick Swardson is worthy for Worst Supporting Actor nomination for his dull performance in this movie as well as for his irritating acting in 'Just Go With It'.&nbsp;</div><div><br></div><div>4) David Spade (as Monica) deserves Worst Supporting Actress nomination for his appalling attempt as Jill's equally unpleasant enemy. A Worst Supporting Actress nomination should also go to Katie Holmes. Holmes's acting 'ability' makes no contribution to entertainment.&nbsp;</div><div><br></div><div>5) Jack and Jill seems to rip-off other (and better) movies where the male lead is disguised as a woman. So a Worst Prequel, Remake, Rip-off or Sequel for this trash makes sense.&nbsp;</div><div><br></div><div>6) Dennis Dugan deserves a Worst Director nod for this $((! as well as for 'Just Go With It'.&nbsp;</div><div><br></div><div>7) Adam Sandler and Steve Koren should also be acknowledged in the Worst Screenplay category. The script was not funny and the biggest contribution to the torture I endured.&nbsp;</div><div><br></div><div>8) A Worst Screen Couple/Ensemble should go to to Adam Sandler for playing a pair of unlikable twins.&nbsp;</div>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2011 13:59:27 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5569&amp;PID=48219#48219</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>DISCUSSION: WORST REMAKE/RIP-OFF/SEQUEL :  Please, there are just some...</title>
   <link>http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5569&amp;PID=48204#48204</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.razzies.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=22">JoeBacon</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 5569<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> November 30 2011 at 8:11pm<br /><br />Please, there are just some movies that are beneath even RAZZIE consideration -- and I consider Human Centipede II as one of those!]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2011 20:11:02 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5569&amp;PID=48204#48204</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>DISCUSSION: WORST REMAKE/RIP-OFF/SEQUEL : Here&amp;#039;s my Worst Director...</title>
   <link>http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5569&amp;PID=48171#48171</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.razzies.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=1568">SchumacherH8ter</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 5569<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> November 29 2011 at 7:33am<br /><br />Here's my Worst Director picks. For ones that aren't on Leo's list above, I'll add what they're up for: Michael Bay, Martin Campbell, DJ Caruso for I Am Dumber For Watching This, Bill Condon, Frank Coraci for Zookeeper, Dennis Dugan, Luke Greenfield for Something Borrowed, Catherine Hardwicke, Paul Johansson for Asshole Chugged, Marcus Nispel for Conan 2011, History's Greatest Monster, Tom Six for Human Centipede II, Zack Snyder, and John Whitesell.]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2011 07:33:11 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5569&amp;PID=48171#48171</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>DISCUSSION: WORST REMAKE/RIP-OFF/SEQUEL :  There are so many choices for...</title>
   <link>http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5569&amp;PID=48170#48170</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.razzies.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=2">Guests</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 5569<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> November 29 2011 at 5:53am<br /><br />There are so many choices for Friday's Worst Director poll, but I am just going to take a guess as to who would make the list: &nbsp;<div><br></div><div>Paul W.S. Anderson - <i>The Three Musketeers &nbsp;</i></div><div>Michael Bay - <i>Transformers: Dark of the Moon &nbsp;</i></div><div>Tom Brady - <i>Bucky Larson: Born to Be a Star &nbsp;</i></div><div>Martin Campbell -<i>&nbsp;Green Lantern &nbsp;</i></div><div>Bill Condon - <i>The Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn Part 1&nbsp;</i></div><div>Dennis Dugan -<i>&nbsp;Jack &amp; Jill</i>&nbsp;/ <i>Just Go With It &nbsp;</i></div><div>Raja Gosnell -<i>&nbsp;The Smurfs &nbsp;</i></div><div>Catherine Hardwicke -<i>&nbsp;Red Riding Hood &nbsp;</i></div><div>Ron Howard -<i>&nbsp;The Dilemma &nbsp;</i></div><div>Todd Phillips -<i>&nbsp;The Hangover Part II &nbsp;</i></div><div>Joel Schumacher -<i>&nbsp;Trespass &nbsp;</i></div><div>Dominic Sena -<i>&nbsp;Season of the Witch &nbsp;</i></div><div>Jim Sheridan -<i>&nbsp;Dream House &nbsp;</i></div><div>John Singleton -<i>&nbsp;Abduction &nbsp;</i></div><div>Zack Snyder -<i>&nbsp;Sucker Punch &nbsp;</i></div><div>John Whitesell - <i>Big Mommas: Like Father Like Son</i></div>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2011 05:53:02 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5569&amp;PID=48170#48170</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>DISCUSSION: WORST REMAKE/RIP-OFF/SEQUEL :    Originally posted by Vits  Originally...</title>
   <link>http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5569&amp;PID=48161#48161</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.razzies.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=8992">oiram</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 5569<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> November 28 2011 at 3:10pm<br /><br /><table width="99%"><tr><td class="BBquote"><strong><em>Originally posted by Vits</strong></em><br /><br /><table width="99%"><tr><td class="BBquote"><strong><em>Originally posted by oiram</strong></em><br /><br />Soooo....... Where's the next Poll?</td></tr></table><br><font size="3" face="Courier New, Courier, mono">What's the hurry?</font><br></td></tr></table>HeadRazz said every week, there'll be a new poll.<div>&nbsp;</div><div><table width="99%"><tr><td class="BBquote"><strong><em>Originally posted by oiram</strong></em><br /><br />Soooo....... Where's the next Poll?  <div><br></div><div><br></div><div><font size="4" face="'Times New Roman', Times, serif"><b><font color="#cc0033">RESPONSE from Head RAZZberry:</font></b> Our next poll will cover 2011 choices for <i>Worst Director</i>, and will be up-and-running by this coming Friday, December 2... </font></div><div><font size="4" face="'Times New Roman', Times, serif"><br></font></div></td></tr></table></div><div>Really? Well you better not forget Catherine Hardwicke for Red Riding Hood. We need atleast one female director in the running.</div>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2011 15:10:02 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5569&amp;PID=48161#48161</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>DISCUSSION: WORST REMAKE/RIP-OFF/SEQUEL : BREAKING DAWN PART 1 is another...</title>
   <link>http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5569&amp;PID=48157#48157</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.razzies.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=8803">Vits</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 5569<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> November 28 2011 at 11:50am<br /><br /><font face="Courier New, Courier, mono" size="3">BREAKING DAWN PART 1 is another one of my runner-ups for this category, but not one of my front-runners.</font>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2011 11:50:41 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5569&amp;PID=48157#48157</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>DISCUSSION: WORST REMAKE/RIP-OFF/SEQUEL : What&amp;#039;s the hurry?   Originally...</title>
   <link>http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5569&amp;PID=48155#48155</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.razzies.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=8803">Vits</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 5569<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> November 28 2011 at 11:20am<br /><br /><font face="Courier New, Courier, mono" size="3">What's the hurry? &nbsp;</font><br><div><font face="Courier New, Courier, mono" size="3"><br></font></div><div><table width="99%"><tr><td class="BBquote"><strong><em>Originally posted by oiram</strong></em><br /><br />Soooo....... Where's the next Poll?</td></tr></table></div>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2011 11:20:19 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5569&amp;PID=48155#48155</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>DISCUSSION: WORST REMAKE/RIP-OFF/SEQUEL : Maybe it&amp;#039;s just me, but MY...</title>
   <link>http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5569&amp;PID=48154#48154</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.razzies.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=9179">The Larch</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 5569<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> November 28 2011 at 10:39am<br /><br /><p>Maybe it's just me, but MY idea of a "rip-off" would be something like Glee: The 3D Concert Movie (which thankfully few people shelled out money for what they could see on TV for free), which should be represented in a few categories in the nomination ballot...</p>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2011 10:39:55 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5569&amp;PID=48154#48154</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>DISCUSSION: WORST REMAKE/RIP-OFF/SEQUEL :     Soooo....... Where&amp;#039;s...</title>
   <link>http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5569&amp;PID=48153#48153</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.razzies.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=8992">oiram</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 5569<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> November 28 2011 at 10:33am<br /><br />Soooo....... Where's the next Poll? &nbsp;<div><br></div><div><br></div><div><font ="apple-style-span"="" size="4" face="'Times New Roman', Times, serif"><b><font ="Apple-style-span" color="#cc0033">RESPONSE from Head RAZZberry:</font></b> Our next poll will cover 2011 choices for <i>Worst Director</i>, and will be up-and-running by this coming Friday, December 2...&nbsp;</font></div><div><font ="apple-style-span"="" size="4" face="'Times New Roman', Times, serif"><br></font></div><div><font ="apple-style-span"="" size="4" face="'Times New Roman', Times, serif"><br></font></div>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2011 10:33:51 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5569&amp;PID=48153#48153</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>DISCUSSION: WORST REMAKE/RIP-OFF/SEQUEL : Head Razz, I think BUCKY is more...</title>
   <link>http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5569&amp;PID=48139#48139</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.razzies.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=22">JoeBacon</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 5569<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> November 26 2011 at 6:17pm<br /><br /><div><span ="Apple-style-span" style=": rgb244, 242, 191; ">Head Razz, I think <b>BUCKY</b> is more like...</span><b style="text-align: left; : rgb244, 242, 191; ">A STAR IS PORN&nbsp;<img src="http://www.razzies.com/forum/smileys/smiley11.gif" border="0" alt="Dead" title="Dead" /></b></div><div><br></div>And, having "survived" <b>JackASS and Jill</b>, it's head and shoulders (and falsies with butt pads) above anything else!<div><br></div><div>And, yes <b>IT IS </b>a WORST REMAKE/RIPOFF/SEQUEL to Glen or Glenda! &nbsp;</div>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Sat, 26 Nov 2011 18:17:23 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5569&amp;PID=48139#48139</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>DISCUSSION: WORST REMAKE/RIP-OFF/SEQUEL : While there is a lot of unoriginality...</title>
   <link>http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5569&amp;PID=48135#48135</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.razzies.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=8803">Vits</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 5569<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> November 26 2011 at 8:45am<br /><br /><font ="Apple-style-span" size="3" face="'Courier New', Courier, mono">While there is a lot of unoriginality in movies these days, there are movies were detailed elements from the script (even the premise sometimes) are taken from another specific movie.</font>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Sat, 26 Nov 2011 08:45:24 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5569&amp;PID=48135#48135</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>DISCUSSION: WORST REMAKE/RIP-OFF/SEQUEL :  I&amp;#039;m okay with Razzing Worst...</title>
   <link>http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5569&amp;PID=48127#48127</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.razzies.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=9179">The Larch</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 5569<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> November 25 2011 at 6:42pm<br /><br />I'm okay with Razzing Worst Sequels and Remakes, but is including "Rip-offs" really necessary ? Couldn't EVERY bad/unsatisfactory movie be considered a Rip-off? &nbsp;<div><br></div><div><br></div><div><font ="Apple-style-span" size="4" face="'Times New Roman', Times, serif"><b><font ="Apple-style-span" color="#cc0033">RESPONSE from Head RAZZberry:</font></b> I think you're misinterpreting our use of the term "Rip-Off." We are not referring to the fact that paying to see the film is a "rip-off," but rather that the film itself "rips off" elements from previous films...&nbsp;</font></div><div><br></div><div><br></div>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Fri, 25 Nov 2011 18:42:20 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5569&amp;PID=48127#48127</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>DISCUSSION: WORST REMAKE/RIP-OFF/SEQUEL : Don&amp;#039;t forget Orgazmo!  Originally...</title>
   <link>http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5569&amp;PID=48119#48119</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.razzies.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=8992">oiram</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 5569<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> November 25 2011 at 7:55am<br /><br />Don't forget Orgazmo! &nbsp;<div><br></div><div><table width="99%"><tr><td class="BBquote"><strong><em>Originally posted by Vits</strong></em><br /><br /><font size="3" face="Courier New, Courier, mono">By the way, I remember I KNOW WHO KILLED ME was listed as a rip-off of 2 movies and a TV show. Why can't&nbsp;<b>BUCKY LARSON</b>be listed as a rip-off of both BORN TO BE A STAR (all 3 versions?) and BOOGIE NIGHTS?</font><br></td></tr></table></div>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Fri, 25 Nov 2011 07:55:27 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5569&amp;PID=48119#48119</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>DISCUSSION: WORST REMAKE/RIP-OFF/SEQUEL :   Originally posted by VitsGuys,...</title>
   <link>http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5569&amp;PID=48118#48118</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.razzies.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=10682">whatsthepoint</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 5569<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> November 25 2011 at 6:09am<br /><br /><table width="99%"><tr><td class="BBquote"><strong><em>Originally posted by Vits</strong></em><br /><br /><font face="Courier New, Courier, mono" size="3">Guys, we've been through this. Adaptations have been nominated in this category in the past. Why should it be different now?<br><br>By the way, I remember I KNOW WHO KILLED ME was listed as a rip-off of 2 movies and a TV show. Why can't <b>BUCKY LARSON </b>be listed as a rip-off of both BORN TO BE A STAR (all 3 versions?) and BOOGIE NIGHTS?</font><br></td></tr></table><br><br>Adaptions are not remakes. <br>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Fri, 25 Nov 2011 06:09:50 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5569&amp;PID=48118#48118</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>DISCUSSION: WORST REMAKE/RIP-OFF/SEQUEL :    Originally posted by Dun-IdaHere&amp;#039;s...</title>
   <link>http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5569&amp;PID=48117#48117</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.razzies.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=10682">whatsthepoint</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 5569<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> November 25 2011 at 6:08am<br /><br /><table width="99%"><tr><td class="BBquote"><strong><em>Originally posted by Dun-Ida</strong></em><br /><br /><span ="apple-style-span"="" style=": rgb244, 242, 191; ">Here's my second updated list:&nbsp;</span><div style="text-align: left; : rgb244, 242, 191; "><br></div><div style="text-align: left; : rgb244, 242, 191; "><span ="apple-style-span"="">WARNING: POTENTIAL SPOILERS: &nbsp;</span><div><br></div><div>1) The Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn- Part I:&nbsp;</div><div>The wooden "acting" makes any amateur, children's theatrical play a work of art. The screenplay sounds like it was written someone so who makes Beavis and Butt-head sound intelligent. The director didn't seem to make an effort (then again with the terrible material I don't blame him for doing a lame effort). This sequel is definitely on top of my list.</div><div><br></div><div>2) Just Go With It:&nbsp;</div><div>Rip-off of Cactus Flower. Adam Sandler is (yet again) doing his worst. Brookly Decker should get the nomination for Worst Supporting Actress. No amount of sex appeal will hide her wooden acting. Nick Swardson deserves his nomination for Worst Supporting Actor, SO not funny. Unfunny screenplay is complemented by the poor direction. &nbsp;</div><div><br></div><div>3) Spy Kids 4D: All the Time in the World:&nbsp;</div><div>The lead "actress", Jessica Alba, does her usual performance. This only involves just displaying her pretty face, that's it. At best, the screenplay is boring (that's putting it nicely). Director Robert Rodriguez was obviously more focused on making the movie look good in "4D". Anyone with some form of intelligence will realize that the flick's "fourth dimension", perfume, was just a lame attempt to divert attention from the overall bad quality.&nbsp;</div><div><br></div><div>4) Transformers: Dark of the Moon:&nbsp;</div><div>Michael Bay is at it again. Using action and explosions to hide the movie's weak characters, paper-thin plot and overall bad direction. Shia LaBeouf puts out a lame performance. His lame acting is most obvious when his character, Sam, is supposed to upset. Rosie Huntington-Whiteley, Megan Fox's replacement, does nothing much apart from displaying her face. As a fan of the animated series this movie is very disappointing.&nbsp;</div></div><div style="text-align: left; : rgb244, 242, 191; "><br></div><div style="text-align: left; : rgb244, 242, 191; "><div>5) Green Lantern:&nbsp;</div><div>Dull effort at best. This movie suffers most from under-developed characters. Some humor might have helped this remake.&nbsp;</div></div></td></tr></table><br><br>I'm fairly positive that Just Go with it is a direct remake of Cactus Flower and not a rip-off (heck the original Screenplay and Play receive credit). Just correcting you on that.<br>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Fri, 25 Nov 2011 06:08:50 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5569&amp;PID=48117#48117</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>DISCUSSION: WORST REMAKE/RIP-OFF/SEQUEL : Guys, we&amp;#039;ve been through...</title>
   <link>http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5569&amp;PID=48116#48116</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.razzies.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=8803">Vits</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 5569<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> November 25 2011 at 4:58am<br /><br /><font face="Courier New, Courier, mono" size="3">Guys, we've been through this. Adaptations have been nominated in this category in the past. Why should it be different now?<br><br>By the way, I remember I KNOW WHO KILLED ME was listed as a rip-off of 2 movies and a TV show. Why can't <b>BUCKY LARSON </b>be listed as a rip-off of both BORN TO BE A STAR (all 3 versions?) and BOOGIE NIGHTS?</font><br>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Fri, 25 Nov 2011 04:58:56 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5569&amp;PID=48116#48116</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>DISCUSSION: WORST REMAKE/RIP-OFF/SEQUEL : Here&amp;#039;s my second updated...</title>
   <link>http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5569&amp;PID=48113#48113</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.razzies.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=135009">Dun-Ida</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 5569<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> November 24 2011 at 11:27pm<br /><br /><span ="Apple-style-span" style=": rgb244, 242, 191; ">Here's my second updated list:&nbsp;</span><div style="text-align: left; : rgb244, 242, 191; "><br></div><div style="text-align: left; : rgb244, 242, 191; "><span ="apple-style-span"="">WARNING: POTENTIAL SPOILERS: &nbsp;</span><div><br></div><div>1) The Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn- Part I:&nbsp;</div><div>The wooden "acting" makes any amateur, children's theatrical play a work of art. The screenplay sounds like it was written someone so who makes Beavis and Butt-head sound intelligent. The director didn't seem to make an effort (then again with the terrible material I don't blame him for doing a lame effort). This sequel is definitely on top of my list.</div><div><br></div><div>2) Just Go With It:&nbsp;</div><div>Rip-off of Cactus Flower. Adam Sandler is (yet again) doing his worst. Brookly Decker should get the nomination for Worst Supporting Actress. No amount of sex appeal will hide her wooden acting. Nick Swardson deserves his nomination for Worst Supporting Actor, SO not funny. Unfunny screenplay is complemented by the poor direction. &nbsp;</div><div><br></div><div>3) Spy Kids 4D: All the Time in the World:&nbsp;</div><div>The lead "actress", Jessica Alba, does her usual performance. This only involves just displaying her pretty face, that's it. At best, the screenplay is boring (that's putting it nicely). Director Robert Rodriguez was obviously more focused on making the movie look good in "4D". Anyone with some form of intelligence will realize that the flick's "fourth dimension", perfume, was just a lame attempt to divert attention from the overall bad quality.&nbsp;</div><div><br></div><div>4) Transformers: Dark of the Moon:&nbsp;</div><div>Michael Bay is at it again. Using action and explosions to hide the movie's weak characters, paper-thin plot and overall bad direction. Shia LaBeouf puts out a lame performance. His lame acting is most obvious when his character, Sam, is supposed to upset. Rosie Huntington-Whiteley, Megan Fox's replacement, does nothing much apart from displaying her face. As a fan of the animated series this movie is very disappointing.&nbsp;</div></div><div style="text-align: left; : rgb244, 242, 191; "><br></div><div style="text-align: left; : rgb244, 242, 191; "><div>5) Green Lantern:&nbsp;</div><div>Dull effort at best. This movie suffers most from under-developed characters. Some humor might have helped this remake.&nbsp;</div></div>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Thu, 24 Nov 2011 23:27:39 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5569&amp;PID=48113#48113</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>DISCUSSION: WORST REMAKE/RIP-OFF/SEQUEL : As this is my first time as a...</title>
   <link>http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5569&amp;PID=48112#48112</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.razzies.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=135009">Dun-Ida</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 5569<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> November 24 2011 at 10:38pm<br /><br />As this is my first time as a Razzie voter, what type of voting is used for the nomination process?&nbsp;<div><br></div><div>How many candidates can I nominate for each category?&nbsp;</div>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Thu, 24 Nov 2011 22:38:49 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5569&amp;PID=48112#48112</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>DISCUSSION: WORST REMAKE/RIP-OFF/SEQUEL : Here&amp;#039;s my updated list:WARNING:...</title>
   <link>http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5569&amp;PID=48111#48111</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.razzies.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=135009">Dun-Ida</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 5569<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> November 24 2011 at 10:34pm<br /><br />Here's my updated list:&nbsp;<div><br></div><div><span ="Apple-style-span" style=": rgb244, 242, 191; ">WARNING: POTENTIAL SPOILERS: &nbsp;</span><div style="text-align: left; : rgb244, 242, 191; "><br></div><div style="text-align: left; : rgb244, 242, 191; ">1) The Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn- Part I:&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: left; : rgb244, 242, 191; ">The wooden "acting" makes any amateur, children's theatrical play a work of art. The screenplay sounds like it was written someone so who makes Beavis and Butt-head sound intelligent. The director didn't seem to make an effort (then again with the terrible material I don't blame him for doing a lame effort). This sequel is definitely on top of my list.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: left; : rgb244, 242, 191; "><br></div><div style="text-align: left; : rgb244, 242, 191; ">2) Spy Kids 4D: All the Time in the World:&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: left; : rgb244, 242, 191; ">The lead "actress", Jessica Alba, does her usual performance. This only involves just displaying her pretty face, that's it. At best, the screenplay is boring (that's putting it nicely). Director Robert Rodriguez was obviously more focused on making the movie look good in "4D". Anyone with some form of intelligence will realize that the flick's "fourth dimension", perfume, was just a lame attempt to divert attention from the overall bad quality.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: left; : rgb244, 242, 191; "><br></div><div style="text-align: left; : rgb244, 242, 191; ">3) Transformers: Dark of the Moon:&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: left; : rgb244, 242, 191; ">Michael Bay is at it again. Using action and explosions to hide the movie's weak characters, paper-thin plot and overall bad direction. Shia LaBeouf puts out a lame performance. His lame acting is most obvious when his character, Sam, is supposed to upset. Rosie Huntington-Whiteley, Megan Fox's replacement, does nothing much apart from displaying her face. As a fan of the animated series this movie is very disappointing.&nbsp;</div></div><div style="text-align: left; : rgb244, 242, 191; "><br></div><div style="text-align: left; : rgb244, 242, 191; "><div>4) Green Lantern:&nbsp;</div><div>Dull effort at best. This movie suffers most from under-developed characters. Some humor might have helped this remake.&nbsp;</div></div>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Thu, 24 Nov 2011 22:34:19 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5569&amp;PID=48111#48111</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>DISCUSSION: WORST REMAKE/RIP-OFF/SEQUEL : Thanks for correcting me whatsthepoint....</title>
   <link>http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5569&amp;PID=48110#48110</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.razzies.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=135009">Dun-Ida</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 5569<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> November 24 2011 at 10:32pm<br /><br />Thanks for correcting me whatsthepoint. Mr Popper is not a remake. However it IS a bad adaption of the novel of the same name. I'll update my list very soon.&nbsp;]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Thu, 24 Nov 2011 22:32:05 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5569&amp;PID=48110#48110</guid>
  </item> 
 </channel>
</rss>