<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="RSS_xslt_style.asp" version="1.0" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:WebWizForums="http://syndication.webwiz.co.uk/rss_namespace/">
 <channel>
  <title>The Official RAZZIE&#174; Forum : DISCUSSION &amp; ADD'L INFO on SCREAM 4                                                                                                         </title>
  <link>http://www.razzies.com/forum/</link>
  <description>This is an XML content feed of; The Official RAZZIE&#174; Forum : DISCUSSION &amp; ADD'L INFO on SCREAM 4                                                                                                          : Last 10 Posts</description>
  <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 11:48:19 +0000</pubDate>
  <lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2011 10:02:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
  <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
  <generator>Web Wiz Forums 9.70</generator>
  <ttl>30</ttl>
  <WebWizForums:feedURL>www.razzies.com/forum/RSS_topic_feed.asp?FID=511</WebWizForums:feedURL>
  
  <item>
   <title>DISCUSSION &amp; ADD'L INFO on SCREAM 4                                                                                                          : Forum Members&#039; Discussion of SCREAM 4...</title>
   <link>http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4950&amp;PID=46702#46702</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.razzies.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=933">moviewizguy</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> Forum Members&#039; Discussion of SCREAM 4...<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> September 19 2011 at 10:02am<br /><br /><div><span ="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: 'Times New Roman', Times, serif; line-height: 22px; font-size: medium; ">The Scream series has always been funny. It's not&nbsp;<i>just</i>&nbsp;horror. It's a comedy/horror series that points out the conventions of other horror films. And I disagree, the opening scene was <u>genius</u>!</span></div><div><br></div><table width="99%"><tr><td class="BBquote"><strong><em>Originally posted by Vits</strong></em><br /><br /><div><span ="apple-style-span"="" style="font-family: 'Courier New', Courier, mono; line-height: 22px; font-size: medium; ">The opening scene was a major headache.To quote SOUTH PARK(sorry <b>GTA</b>)about INCEPTION "Just because an idea is very complex doesn't mean it's cool".By the end of the opening scene,I thought I was watching a spoof of SCREAM because they focus more on being cleverly funny than scary,and that remains that way the rest of the movie.</td></tr></table></span></div><div><font ="Apple-style-span" face="'Times New Roman', Times, serif" size="3"><span ="Apple-style-span" style="line-height: 22px;"><br></span></font></div><div><font ="apple-style-span"="" size="3" face="'Courier New', Courier, mono"><span ="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: 'Times New Roman', Times, serif; ">Well, I think it's a great thing. The sequels never really quite reached up the potential of the first. The whole mom plot got out of control since the third film.&nbsp;</span></font></div><div><font ="apple-style-span"="" size="3" face="'Courier New', Courier, mono"><span ="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: 'Times New Roman', Times, serif; "><br></span></font></div><div><font ="apple-style-span"="" size="3" face="'Courier New', Courier, mono"><table width="99%"><tr><td class="BBquote">The 2nd and 3rd movie tried to tie the events and the new killer to the backstory of the original movie.Here,they just talk about what we saw in the present of the 1st movie.No mentions of <b>SIDNEY</b>'s mom or anything.Is that good or bad?That's up to you.</td></tr></table></font></div><div><font ="Apple-style-span" face="'Times New Roman', Times, serif" size="3"><span ="Apple-style-span" style="line-height: 22px;"><br></span></font></div>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2011 10:02:16 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4950&amp;PID=46702#46702</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>DISCUSSION &amp; ADD'L INFO on SCREAM 4                                                                                                          : Forum Members&#039; Discussion of SCREAM 4...</title>
   <link>http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4950&amp;PID=45846#45846</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.razzies.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=22485">Lord Naseby</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> Forum Members&#039; Discussion of SCREAM 4...<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> August 29 2011 at 12:56pm<br /><br />I am a huge fan of the first two and despite its visible flaws 3 is a guilty pleasure for me. However, even critics these days are liking 4 more than 3 and it just barely missed out on a fresh rating on RT.<br>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Mon, 29 Aug 2011 12:56:02 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4950&amp;PID=45846#45846</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>DISCUSSION &amp; ADD'L INFO on SCREAM 4                                                                                                          : Forum Members&#039; Discussion of SCREAM 4...</title>
   <link>http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4950&amp;PID=45449#45449</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.razzies.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=8803">Vits</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> Forum Members&#039; Discussion of SCREAM 4...<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> August 18 2011 at 5:49pm<br /><br /><span ="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: medium;"><font ="Apple-style-span" face="'Courier New', Courier, mono">Oh...I didn't see that movie,I just assumed.</font></span>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2011 17:49:25 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4950&amp;PID=45449#45449</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>DISCUSSION &amp; ADD'L INFO on SCREAM 4                                                                                                          : Forum Members&#039; Discussion of SCREAM 4...</title>
   <link>http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4950&amp;PID=45436#45436</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.razzies.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=9186">Vheid</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> Forum Members&#039; Discussion of SCREAM 4...<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> August 18 2011 at 3:12pm<br /><br /><table width="99%"><tr><td class="BBquote"><strong><em>Originally posted by Vits</strong></em><br /><br /><table width="99%"><tr><td class="BBquote"><strong><em>Originally posted by Vheid</strong></em><br /><br />I disagree... You said it yourself "She's not really lead here"... The movie is clearly told from Neve Campbell's p.o.v. and she doesn't even nearly has as much screentime as Neve... So.. She is is deffinetly not a lead actress...</td></tr></table><div><font face="'Courier New', Courier, mono" size="3">Right,but she's the lead in the other movie.So it would make more sense if she's nominated for one lead and one semi-lead performance.</font></div></td></tr></table><br><br>Freddie Highmore is the lead in <b>The Art of Getting By</b>.... The story is clearly told from his P.O.V. .... She's (as far sa I know) just the romantic interest... She's playing the same character that she played in <b>It's Kind of a Funny Story</b>...As far as I could see from the promotion of TAOGB.... I however have to get back with you on that after I've seen the movie...<br>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2011 15:12:56 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4950&amp;PID=45436#45436</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>DISCUSSION &amp; ADD'L INFO on SCREAM 4                                                                                                          : Forum Members&#039; Discussion of SCREAM 4...</title>
   <link>http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4950&amp;PID=45434#45434</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.razzies.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=8803">Vits</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> Forum Members&#039; Discussion of SCREAM 4...<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> August 18 2011 at 2:57pm<br /><br /><table width="99%"><tr><td class="BBquote"><strong><em>Originally posted by Vheid</strong></em><br /><br />I disagree... You said it yourself "She's not really lead here"... The movie is clearly told from Neve Campbell's p.o.v. and she doesn't even nearly has as much screentime as Neve... So.. She is is deffinetly not a lead actress...</td></tr></table><div><font ="Apple-style-span" size="3" face="'Courier New', Courier, mono">Right,but she's the lead in the other movie.So it would make more sense if she's nominated for one lead and one semi-lead performance.</font></div>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2011 14:57:31 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4950&amp;PID=45434#45434</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>DISCUSSION &amp; ADD'L INFO on SCREAM 4                                                                                                          : Forum Members&#039; Discussion of SCREAM 4...</title>
   <link>http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4950&amp;PID=45432#45432</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.razzies.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=9186">Vheid</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> Forum Members&#039; Discussion of SCREAM 4...<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> August 18 2011 at 2:37pm<br /><br /><table width="99%"><tr><td class="BBquote"><strong><em>Originally posted by Vits</strong></em><br /><br /><br><font face="'Courier New', Courier, mono" size="3">,so I wouldn't like that you just nominate <b>Emma</b>,only because she was in another movie.</font><br><br><div><font face="'Courier New', Courier, mono" size="3"><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'; line-height: normal;"><div style="margin: 1px; font-family: Verdana,Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif; font-size: 12px; line-height: 1.4; border-width: 0px;"><div><font face="'Courier New', Courier, mono" size="3">What does that have to do with her acting?</font></div></div></span></font></div></td></tr></table><br><br>I won't be voting for her just because she was in another movie...<br><br>I found her acting in this movie far bellow average.... and in that scene she was just all over the top... I'll be voting for her.... If she's on the ballot... and you can do nothing to stop that... <br><br><table width="99%"><tr><td class="BBquote"><strong><em>Originally posted by Vits</strong></em><br /><br /><div><font face="'Courier New', Courier, mono" size="3"><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'; line-height: normal;"><div style="margin: 1px; font-family: Verdana,Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif; font-size: 12px; line-height: 1.4; border-width: 0px;"><font face="'Courier New', Courier, mono" size="3"><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'; line-height: normal;"><font face="'Courier New', Courier, mono" size="3">By the way,she's not really the lead here but she's very close,so if she does get nominated it should be up for Worst Actress and not Supp. Actress.</font></span></font></div></span></font></div></td></tr></table><br><br>I disagree... You said it yourself "She's not really lead here"... The movie is clearly told from Neve Campbell's p.o.v. and she doesn't even nearly has as much screentime as Neve... So.. She is is deffinetly not a lead actress...<br><br><table width="99%"><tr><td class="BBquote"><strong><em>Originally posted by Vits</strong></em><br /><br /><div><font face="'Courier New', Courier, mono" size="3"><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'; line-height: normal;"><div style="margin: 1px; font-family: Verdana,Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif; font-size: 12px; line-height: 1.4; border-width: 0px;"><div><font face="'Courier New', Courier, mono" size="3">If&nbsp;<font color="#000000">she didn't check her pulse is because...well,she forgot.She's a psycho killer,and they always make mistakes.</font></font></div></div></span></font></div></td></tr></table><br><br>That's no excuse... If she's is planning the <u>PERFECT CRIME</u> (as she said), she should have made sure that her victim is actually <u>DEAD</u>... You can't defend that... It's just an enormous gaping plot hole in the movie... and Wes Craven or Kevin Williamson should have noticed it when it was written...<br>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2011 14:37:37 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4950&amp;PID=45432#45432</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>DISCUSSION &amp; ADD'L INFO on SCREAM 4                                                                                                          : Forum Members&#039; Discussion of SCREAM 4...</title>
   <link>http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4950&amp;PID=45429#45429</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.razzies.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=8803">Vits</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> Forum Members&#039; Discussion of SCREAM 4...<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> August 18 2011 at 2:02pm<br /><br /><div><font ="Apple-style-span" size="3" face="'Courier New', Courier, mono">I just saw it.</font></div><div><font ="Apple-style-span" size="3" face="'Courier New', Courier, mono"><br></font></div><div><font ="Apple-style-span" size="3" face="'Courier New', Courier, mono">Does anyone here watches COMMUNITY?There's an episode where a character wants to make the ultimate meta movie,so he's constantly saying "we're inside a movie within a movie and we're making a movie" and stuff,and it helped me realize that being meta isn't that hard after all.The opening scene was a major headache.To quote SOUTH PARK(sorry <b>GTA</b>)about INCEPTION "Just because an idea is very complex doesn't mean it's cool".By the end of the opening scene,I thought I was watching a spoof of SCREAM because they focus more on being cleverly funny than scary,and that remains that way the rest of the movie.This is a horror movie.I'm glad it tries to be clever,but being scary and/or suspenseful it's the most important.All this movie has is the same cheap jump-scares that any bad horror movie you can mention(that wasn't mentioned in this movie).Also,I may be wrong,but here there are even more characters discussing horror movies,except they're more like statements from intelectual people.<b>Kevin Williamson</b> was talking through the characters,and all he really said was "I'm smarter than you,audience member".</font></div><div><font ="Apple-style-span" size="3" face="'Courier New', Courier, mono"><br></font></div><div><font ="Apple-style-span" size="3" face="'Courier New', Courier, mono">The 2nd and 3rd movie tried to tie the events and the new killer to the backstory of the original movie.Here,they just talk about what we saw in the present of the 1st movie.No mentions of <b>SIDNEY</b>'s mom or anything.Is that good or bad?That's up to you.</font></div><div><font ="Apple-style-span" size="3" face="'Courier New', Courier, mono"><br></font></div><div><font ="Apple-style-span" size="3" face="'Courier New', Courier, mono">The performances are...meh.They're all equal(except for <b>Neve </b>who's so uninspired),so I wouldn't like that you just nominate <b>Emma</b>,only because she was in another movie.By the way,she's not really the lead here but she's very close,so if she does get nominated it should be up for Worst Actress and not Supp. Actress.</font></div><div><font ="Apple-style-span" size="3" face="'Courier New', Courier, mono"><br></font></div><div><font ="Apple-style-span" size="3" face="'Courier New', Courier, mono">I give this 4/10.</font></div><table width="99%"><tr><td class="BBquote"><strong><em>Originally posted by GTAHater767</strong></em><br /><br /><font>Apparently, <em>Scream 3</em> was released in February of 2<font color="#999999">000</font>. It got mixed reviews, which is probably why it wasn't considered for the RAZZIES.</font></td></tr></table><div><font ="Apple-style-span" size="3" face="'Courier New', Courier, mono">It got around 35%.That's negative.</font></div><div><font ="Apple-style-span" size="3" face="'Courier New', Courier, mono"><span ="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'; line-height: normal; "><div style=": rgb233, 219, 177; margin-left: 1px; margin-top: 1px; margin-right: 1px; margin-bottom: 1px; font-family: Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; color: rgb0, 0, 0; font-size: 12px; line-height: 1.4; border-top-width: 0px; border-right-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px; border-style: initial; border-color: initial; -: n&#111;ne; "><table width="99%"><tr><td class="BBquote"><strong><em>Originally posted by Vheid</strong></em><br /><br />I want to suggest Emma Roberts for the Worst Supporting Actress-ballot.<br><font ="Apple-style-span" color="#cc0000">*spoiler*</font><br><font ="Apple-style-span" color="#ffffff">She is the killer. First of she stabs Sidney "to dead" without checking her pulse (which is plain dumb writing) and then you see 3 minutes of her cutting herself, stabbing herself and walking in to walls (so that she looks like the soul survivor) this looks extremely silly and is worth a Razzie-mention.<br></font><font ="Apple-style-span" color="#cc0000">*end of spoiler*</font></td></tr></table><div><font ="Apple-style-span" size="3" face="'Courier New', Courier, mono">What does that have to do with her acting?If&nbsp;<font ="Apple-style-span" color="#ffffff">she didn't check her pulse is because...well,she forgot.She's a psycho killer,and they always make mistakes</font>.</font></div></div></span></font></div>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2011 14:02:07 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4950&amp;PID=45429#45429</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>DISCUSSION &amp; ADD'L INFO on SCREAM 4                                                                                                          : Forum Members&#039; Discussion of SCREAM 4...</title>
   <link>http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4950&amp;PID=44062#44062</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.razzies.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=10927">dmwj80</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> Forum Members&#039; Discussion of SCREAM 4...<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> July 13 2011 at 11:09am<br /><br />All the Scary Movies are the same, so I don't like Scary Movies much... &nbsp;<div><br></div><div><br></div>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Wed, 13 Jul 2011 11:09:46 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4950&amp;PID=44062#44062</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>DISCUSSION &amp; ADD'L INFO on SCREAM 4                                                                                                          : Forum Members&#039; Discussion of SCREAM 4...</title>
   <link>http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4950&amp;PID=42045#42045</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.razzies.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=8803">Vits</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> Forum Members&#039; Discussion of SCREAM 4...<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> May 23 2011 at 12:22pm<br /><br /><font ="Apple-style-span" size="3" face="'Courier New', Courier, mono">Being meta today isn't hard.But being good at it...</font>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Mon, 23 May 2011 12:22:52 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4950&amp;PID=42045#42045</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>DISCUSSION &amp; ADD'L INFO on SCREAM 4                                                                                                          : Forum Members&#039; Discussion of SCREAM 4...</title>
   <link>http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4950&amp;PID=42002#42002</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.razzies.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=8839">BurnHollywoodBurn</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> Forum Members&#039; Discussion of SCREAM 4...<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> May 22 2011 at 4:53pm<br /><br /><table width="99%"><tr><td class="BBquote"><strong><em>Originally posted by moviewizguy</strong></em><br /><br /><DIV>You don't honestly think this is a $hit movie, do you?</DIV></td></tr></table><DIV>Uh,&nbsp;YEAH! If I wanted a bad movie that self-parodies how Hollywood is obsessed with remakes and reboots these days while not giving us anything better on it's own merits, I would wait for Seltzerberg to&nbsp;do "Remake Movie".</DIV>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Sun, 22 May 2011 16:53:08 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4950&amp;PID=42002#42002</guid>
  </item> 
 </channel>
</rss>