Yeah, Airbender is leading in the Forum Poll because of how M. Nut royally screwed that movie up! 

You're right, HeadRazz, Titans is a big vote-getter in the Forum Poll (LINK)! But the movie getting the most votes is Last Airbender. 

In fact, I predict you are going to make a Forum for Yogi Bear, the 3-D movie Christmas movie! *CoughResidentEvil:ExtinctionGotIt'sOwnPageCough*

Point is, teenagers would rather pay money to see a melodramatic take on how their favorite social website was created.

P.S: I was dragged to Clash Of The Titans, when there were better movies to see. But my brother said it was decent! (Sorry, Off Topic, in order to prove I am not MWG material! Also sorry, I'm not a good speller!) 

 

I need to check the reviews again, but I doubt they've improved.

I'm thinking the answer to the question below is "No!"  I mean, there's not going to be any mystery as to why Case 39 dies at the box office, is there? . . .   

Try watching "This Film Is Not Yet Rated". You might learn something about the movie business... 

I've suggested this to you before - how about Hot Fuzz?  

 

The first ten critics and ten spread out critics IS the same thing; all it means is that ten people liked it, the order the they came in makes NO difference whatsoever. And you're NEVER right. Here's a REAL educated guess of my own: HeadRazz, who has seen many more movies than you AND actually works in the movie business is probably going to be much more able to spot a bad movie than you can, seeing as how you have proven that you don't have a quality filter. So I'm going take his word over your's every time because he knows what he's talking about. If there's a movie listed here in the forum, there's a reason for it to be here. You, on the other hand, just say it's good because you just want to have the opposite opinion.

 

I mean going on the judgements of ten people ... do you do that with other aspects of your life? If say, you were curious about getting laser eye surgery, but you weren't sure if it is safe, are going to take the testimonies of ten strangers on a TV ad, who for all you know are just paid actors OR are you going to go with the testimonies of say, four dozen people who actually had the surgery done and their eye sight is better or worse because of it? And if you do say the ten strangers ... WOW, you really are that easily sold to! Used car salesmen must love you.

Maybe you're the one creating conspiracies that studios "hand pick" critics...

Epic fail? Not even, MWG. The logic of the Razzies buries your "logic" any day of the week and twice on Sunday. If a movie is listed in these forums, there's usually a reason for it, be it who is directing it or who is starring in it, as well as other warning signs that HeadRazz has mentioned time and time again. But then you chime in, as just be be annoying, or just to be different for the sake of being different with "oh no, it's 100% at RT", in which case we go to RT and see that 100% is due to 3 or 10 reviews. And you're like "it's a pattern ... surely it will keep going up". No, kid, it just means 10 critics liked it, it doesn't mean the other 110 critics are going to like it. Studios play tricks like that. They hand pick the 10 critics they know who, like you, lack a critical eye and thus will be soft on the movie, giving it good reviews it doesn't deserve.

 

So let's quit is with the nonsense that a movie is good based on 10 reviews, that's why I picked "Last Airbender", because it had only 10 good reviews, even if they spead out instead of being all at once. You seriously can't wait until the Friday that the said movie is being released to know for sure if the critics like it or not? That just makes you come off as being desperate for the movie to be good because you want it to be.

 

As for "Social Network" and "Let Me In", no straws being reached for there, my critical eye challenged friend. As mentioned before, yes, "Social Network" is directed by David Fincher, so the chances of it getting lower than 20% are slim to none, but there is no way it going to stay at 100%. My guess: it will drop to somewhere between 90% and 80%. As for "Let Me In", it's a horror movie remake ... we all know how good Hollywood is at those. My guess: somewhere between 80% and 70%.

 

No, MWG, as you prove time and time again, you lack any logic when it comes to judging movies. You're just easily sold to whatever ideas Hollywood comes up with, and so you cling to false hope that said movie is going to be good, even if it means using nonsense logic like "oh, but the first 10 critics liked it, it's going to be good", or "well, Ebert liked it, so that cancels out the other 109 bad reviews it got", or "here's two good reviews from two random people I found on Twitter, so it must be good". If there's ever examples of reaching for straws, those are it.