Actually, that paragraph speaks the truth about what is wrong with Seltzerberg's movies. But I'm a little confused; is moat telling himself to shut up?

Yeah, I knew that The Blair Witch project was nominated for Razzies but I never knew it won, especially for Heather winning because I thought she pulled off one of the best performances in these types of movies. Anyway, I recently saw Blair Witch and I loved it. Well, I also loved Cloverfield. I love both movie and I can't say which is better. I mean, Bliar Witch was great with critics but kinda polarized by audiences. Here's my review for it (8/10):

I finally saw this film since it came out in 1999 because I was waiting to buy the DVD for a cheap price. Well, I bought it after I saw "Cloverfield," "Diary of the Dead," and "Rec." Fortunately, that didn't ruin the film for me.

This film accomplishes a feat: It shows very little in the film, yet the film is quite scary! Like I said, very little is shown in the film. There is quite little violence and blood in the film and it's best to say everything in the film is left up to the audience's imagination, which I liked.

This film doesn't need creepy make-up effects for monster. It doesn't need violence and gore. It doesn't even need a scary soundtrack. It works the way it is. The performances by the three leads were fantastic and realistic.

Apart from it being a scary film and the true definition of a horror film, I thought the humor in the film was funny. You know, the jokes. This movie is like terror unfolding. It doesn't seem scary at first but the film slowly and expertly raises the tension and scares within each scene.

Overall, this is what I think horror films should be. It successfully scared me without showing me anything at all, which is pretty amazing, in my opinion. It doesn't need high quality special effects for some scares and it didn't need a big budget. This film is a must see if you like horror movies.

here's my review for Cloverfield (also an 8/10):

With an ingenious trailer from J.J. Abrams himself, along with clever marketing, all of us can assume that the film may not be as good as the trailer and marketing. Well, we were wrong. Not only is the film as clever as the trailer, it's also a lot of fun! It's nice to see a great film in January, don't you agree?

If you are still in doubt of seeing the film, let me continue on my review. Here's my take on the whole handy cam: Using this in the film makes it feel so realistic. During the action scenes, you feel like you're really there! I know a lot of people said this before but it really does! My only complaint is that it's sometimes annoying when the whole camera shakes around. Some might get stomach cramps.

As for the production values, they are really well done. The visual effects are amazing. The action scenes are unbelievable. What else can I say? If you're worried about not seeing the monster, don't. You'll see it. You'll see it up close. And I thought I would never say this but I really like the character development! I would never though character development could take place in a handy cam.

I'm also surprised to say, when we feel like we're there, that I actually felt scared. I had chills in my spine when something bad is happening. I laughed when characters popped up jokes. I felt sad when characters died. Also, there's no origin to this story, if you're looking for it. The performances by the unknown cast is above average. The most notable, is Lizzy Caplan, all the way.

It's just a big monster movie! So, the film is entertaining, funny, sad, scary, heart-pulsing...The handy cam was a great idea and the action great! What else would you want from a monster movie? This is the movie to see this week! Watch it now!

Oh, and [Rec] (which I explained in the Mirrors thread) is THE BEST POV camera type film. If you haven't seen it, watch that NOW! Oh, and the worst POV camera movie I've seen so far is Diary of the Dead. Now that was a horrible film with bad performances.

"The Blair Witch Project" was done poorly. I didn't feel scared once through the whole piece of crap. Heather Donahue deserved her Razzie. "Cloverfield" was great I jumped a bunch of times.

If "Disaster Movie" is as bad as I think it will be, I may have to change my name to SeltzerbergH8ter. This film only had four scenes that I found funny. 1.) Carmen reads a review this on Ain'tItCoolNews, 2.) Kevin Sorbo takes down Rocky Balboa (playing the uber-immortal) by injecting him with botox, 3.) during the end credits, Nicole Sullivan impersonates Ellen DeGenerous and says, when no one luaghes at her jokes,: "Wow, this is like the audience of 'Mr. Wrong'"., and 4.) the Dane Cook part. The reason I, especially hated this was because for those four funny parts, there was 37 failed jokes with each. The two that were most unfunny, were when the penguin attacked Leonidas, he said: "Say hello to Anna Nicole for me." and the Ghost Rider, which made me shout "What the f*ck?". This nominations for Worst Picture, Director, Supporting Actress (Nicole Sullivan), Screenplay, Screen Couple (Sean Maguire and Carmen Electra), and Remake or Rip-Off.

Seltzer and Friedberg (or as I call them, "Schumacher's Appentices") next movie will be a parody of "Superbad", "Hancock", "Sex And The City", and "The Love Guru" called "Goody Two Shoes". The link to the story is called SuperBAD Movie

Let's put it this way, this movie was barely over an hour long. It's pretty obvious they're not trying anymore, just throwing a bunch of pop culture references in the meat grinder and shilling it out to us.

I saw this for free...and it still wasn't worth it! 

I think you're thinking of another film. Any other film, really.

I'm not sure what one you're thinking of...but I'm positive that it's not this one!   

Originally posted by jennieC this movie is hilarious..

Well, I get the upper hand because here's the trailer!!!!:

http://www.slashfilm.com/2008/01/31/the-superhero-movie-trai ler/

Don't know about anyone else...but I laughed at that more than Meet the Spartans...