The Official RAZZIE® Forum : FAILURE indeed! http://www.razzies.com/forum/ This is an XML content feed of; The Official RAZZIE® Forum : FAILURE TO LAUNCH : FAILURE indeed! Wed, 22 May 2013 13:23:28 +0000 Sun, 09 Jan 2011 11:01:36 +0000 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss Web Wiz Forums 9.70 360 www.razzies.com/forum/RSS_post_feed.asp?TID=698 The Official RAZZIE® Forum http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_images/RazzieLogo02.gif http://www.razzies.com/forum/ FAILURE indeed! : I just re-watched it and I changed... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=698&PID=38160#38160 Author: Vits
Subject: 698
Posted: January 09 2011 at 11:01am

I just re-watched it and I changed my mind.The movie is definately funny,and it somehow draws you into caring for this characters and what happens to them.But it's too obsessed on the formula and it becomes more cliche as it goes along.Most important:the leads have no chemistry.

I give this 4/10.]]> Sun, 09 Jan 2011 11:01:36 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=698&PID=38160#38160 FAILURE indeed! : Originally posted by VitsI'm... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=698&PID=31838#31838 Author: BurnHollywoodBurn
Subject: 698
Posted: June 08 2010 at 5:07pm

Originally posted by Vits

I'm I the only one who liked this movie?
Once again, yes, yes you are. Chances are, if it's listed here, you (and maybe MWG) are the only ones who liked it on this forum.]]> Tue, 08 Jun 2010 17:07:36 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=698&PID=31838#31838 FAILURE indeed! : I'm I the only one who liked... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=698&PID=31832#31832 Author: Vits
Subject: 698
Posted: June 08 2010 at 3:21pm

I'm I the only one who liked this movie? ]]> Tue, 08 Jun 2010 15:21:16 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=698&PID=31832#31832 FAILURE indeed! : This movie was identical to the... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=698&PID=11618#11618 Author: SuperGlucose
Subject: 698
Posted: March 28 2007 at 5:59pm

This movie was identical to the other movie that had (I swear) the same damn couple.  What was it called?  Oh yeah, how to lose a guy in ten days.  Granted, Jessica Parker wasn't in the previous movie, but is playing the same character in the same plot.  And Matt makes me sick again.  Ugh.

And the ending?  Both sides get all righteously pissed off at each other?  Matt's been there and done that.  I swear, this is just another release of How to lose a Guy.  If you don't believe me, watch them in succession, then three hours later, tell me which one you saw first.
]]> Wed, 28 Mar 2007 17:59:14 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=698&PID=11618#11618 FAILURE indeed! : I'd have to agree with Ebert... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=698&PID=9670#9670 Author: wetbandit82
Subject: 698
Posted: November 15 2006 at 2:46am

I'd have to agree with Ebert on this one; the whole plot is rife with uncalled for sadism that in real life just might provoke someone into doing something terrible.  ]]> Wed, 15 Nov 2006 02:46:32 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=698&PID=9670#9670 FAILURE indeed! : Actually, I love Sarah Jessica... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=698&PID=9553#9553 Author: cheilea
Subject: 698
Posted: November 06 2006 at 8:13pm

Actually, I love Sarah Jessica Parker - she is adorable. I thought this movie was OK. ]]> Mon, 06 Nov 2006 20:13:16 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=698&PID=9553#9553 FAILURE indeed! : HeadRazzBerry - Thanks for the... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=698&PID=5823#5823 Author: Bookworm
Subject: 698
Posted: April 02 2006 at 3:53pm

HeadRazzBerry - Thanks for the link for the trailers.  You just saved me $10.  I'll wait for it to be on cable or on rental from the library.  I love bad movies, but this one just looks stupid.  The media continually touted this as such a career 'launch' into comedy for Sarah Jessica Parker...looks like Paramount did as well with this one as NASA does with its low-bid rockets.  ]]> Sun, 02 Apr 2006 15:53:58 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=698&PID=5823#5823 FAILURE indeed! : It wasn't that bad. Not good,... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=698&PID=5373#5373 Author: thorshammer
Subject: 698
Posted: March 20 2006 at 7:57am

It wasn't that bad.  Not good, yes, but not that bad. ]]> Mon, 20 Mar 2006 07:57:05 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=698&PID=5373#5373 FAILURE indeed! : Second on the posterior... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=698&PID=4994#4994 Author: Razzilla
Subject: 698
Posted: March 14 2006 at 5:33pm

Second on the posterior... ]]> Tue, 14 Mar 2006 17:33:42 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=698&PID=4994#4994 FAILURE indeed! : Even if this film doesn't... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=698&PID=4962#4962 Author: saturnwatcher
Subject: 698
Posted: March 14 2006 at 10:40am

Even if this film doesn't end up with a Worst Picture nomination, I think there is definitely a Worst Couple possibility here. I'd like to offer an early nomination for Terry Bradshaw's uh, nether cheeks.]]> Tue, 14 Mar 2006 10:40:56 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=698&PID=4962#4962 FAILURE indeed! : When a lame 1/2 hr sitcom script... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=698&PID=4931#4931 Author: Vidiot
Subject: 698
Posted: March 14 2006 at 8:26am

When a lame 1/2 hr sitcom script is greenlit into a full length feature you know you're in trouble.




]]> Tue, 14 Mar 2006 08:26:59 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=698&PID=4931#4931 FAILURE indeed! : This movie should come with a... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=698&PID=4590#4590 Author: saturnwatcher
Subject: 698
Posted: March 10 2006 at 3:39pm

This movie should come with a Surgeon General's warning, if not air sick bags. Any film that features not one, but TWO nude scenes featuring Terry Bradshaw's ancient anatomy definitely is worthy of Razzie consideration. But it doesn't end there...after our visual senses have been raped, our hearing is assaulted by a film closing duet featuring Bradshaw and Kathy Bates! How much more can the average movie goer endure?]]> Fri, 10 Mar 2006 15:39:05 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=698&PID=4590#4590 FAILURE indeed! : "Let's strike a match... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=698&PID=4584#4584 Author: Razzilla
Subject: 698
Posted: March 10 2006 at 2:24pm

"Let's strike a match to it and see if we can launch it from our memories altogether..."

I heard this during the birthday bash KWNR (95.5 FM) held at the Railhead inside Boulder Station... Too bad it wasn't said over the air...
]]> Fri, 10 Mar 2006 14:24:44 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=698&PID=4584#4584 FAILURE indeed! : well, no wonder they gave the... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=698&PID=4577#4577 Author: sportsartist24
Subject: 698
Posted: March 10 2006 at 9:21am

well, no wonder they gave the title to this FAILURE TO LAUNCH. It hasn't launched off really well, and true, it looks more like a failure.]]> Fri, 10 Mar 2006 09:21:50 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=698&PID=4577#4577 FAILURE indeed! : FUNNY...IT DOESN'T LOOK VERY... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=698&PID=4556#4556 Author: HeadRAZZBerry
Subject: 698
Posted: March 10 2006 at 1:34am

FUNNY...IT DOESN'T LOOK VERY ROMANTIC...

He still lives at home with his folks (are you laughing yet?) and they're so desperate to get him out of their house that they hire him a girlfriend (chuckling anyone?) but  when she gets to know him, she falls in love with him (how unexpected) then the parents' plan backfires when he asks her to move in with him -- to the parents' house (at this point, not snoring might be a compliment)...

FEEL FREE TO DISCUSS...AD NAUSEUM...

 

]]> Fri, 10 Mar 2006 01:34:44 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=698&PID=4556#4556