The Official RAZZIE® Forum : Forum Discussion & Add'l Info on HANGOVER PART II http://www.razzies.com/forum/ This is an XML content feed of; The Official RAZZIE® Forum : Forum Discussion & Add'l Info on HANGOVER PART II : Last 10 Posts Wed, 19 Jun 2013 13:52:03 +0000 Wed, 10 Aug 2011 17:49:05 +0000 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss Web Wiz Forums 9.70 30 www.razzies.com/forum/RSS_topic_feed.asp?FID=525 The Official RAZZIE® Forum http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_images/RazzieLogo02.gif http://www.razzies.com/forum/ Forum Discussion & Add'l Info on HANGOVER PART II : MEMBER DISCUSSION of HANGOVER PART II http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5083&PID=44925#44925 Author: Vits
Subject: MEMBER DISCUSSION of HANGOVER PART II
Posted: August 10 2011 at 5:49pm

A few weeks ago,I saw INSIDE THE ACTORS STUDIO with guest Bradley Cooper(this originally aired before this movie was released).At the end,he was asked "What can you tell us about THE HANGOVER PART II?",he replied "So far,I love it".I know he has to say that to promote the movie,but he was being interviewed by his acting teachers!And I think they knew the truth.
Originally posted by SchumacherH8ter

Jamie Chung's acting: Sure, she's hot, but a Real World reject an actress does not make.
Have to disgree here.Not that I think she's a good actress,but her role in this movie was so small I couldn't judge her at all.Although she might get nominated since this isn't the only contender she's in.
Originally posted by SchumacherH8ter

See, if they found Doug at the beginning of the first one, they'd still be in trouble. By not finding him first, they were able to resolve all their problems first. With this, however, if they found Teddy first, then all the broblems would be solved.
Hey...you're right.How did I miss that?
]]> Wed, 10 Aug 2011 17:49:05 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5083&PID=44925#44925 Forum Discussion & Add'l Info on HANGOVER PART II : MEMBER DISCUSSION of HANGOVER PART II http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5083&PID=44923#44923 Author: SchumacherH8ter
Subject: MEMBER DISCUSSION of HANGOVER PART II
Posted: August 10 2011 at 5:24pm

Well, time to review this one.
 
The good:
 
Ed Helms' song, "Alantown: It's one of the higlights of the movie.
 
The monkey: She was awesome.
 
The "little kid" scene: For those that ahevn't seen it, there's a scene where Alan has a flashback where he and the rest of the wolfpack (and Mr. Chow) are children. To me, this is best part of the movie.
 
The bad:
 
Jamie Chung's acting: Sure, she's hot, but a Real World reject an actress does not make.
 
The gross nudity: The first one had some gross-ness, but it doesn't compare to this. Mr. Chow's button-shaped ding-dong and the trannie strippers were the low-lights.
 
The ugly:
 
Zach and Ken's disapointing performances: They were the best parts of the first one, yet they're two of the worst parts. If they weren't two of the best parts of the first one, they'd be in the bad alongside Jamie.
 
The general rehashy-ness of the movie: I called Pirates Of The Caribbean: On Stranger Tides a half-ass cash-in, but it's got nothing on this in terms of half-assed cash-ins. There's at least one aspect that isn't a retread. That is...
 
The pointlessness: I don't mean pointless in terms of its existance, I mean in terms of story. See, if they found Doug at the beginning of the first one, they'd still be in trouble. By not finding him first, they were able to resolve all their problems first. With this, however, if they found Teddy first, then all the broblems would be solved.
 
Typing that all out changed my views of the movie. At first, I thought it was like On Stranger Tides: a half-assed cash-in that was entertaining. But, me writing all my gripes made me realize how not-good the movie is. Grade C+.
 
Next up: The Rite!
]]> Wed, 10 Aug 2011 17:24:28 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5083&PID=44923#44923 Forum Discussion & Add'l Info on HANGOVER PART II : MEMBER DISCUSSION of HANGOVER PART II http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5083&PID=43208#43208 Author: Michaels
Subject: MEMBER DISCUSSION of HANGOVER PART II
Posted: June 25 2011 at 10:40am

Originally posted by jesse685

Nic Cage playing a hitman! Comedy gold, my friend! Cage-sploitation at its best!  
Yeah, it was called "Bangkok Dangerous", which was infamous for making only $7 million on its opening weekend!
 
As for "Hangover 2" being the highest grossing R rated movie, just because something is successful, that doesn't mean it's a good product. saturnwatcher once pointed out, even pet rocks sold well back in the day, that doesn't make them a great product. And I for one, think this movie should go under Worst Remake/Rip-Off for being almost the exact same movie as the first.
]]> Sat, 25 Jun 2011 10:40:54 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5083&PID=43208#43208 Forum Discussion & Add'l Info on HANGOVER PART II : MEMBER DISCUSSION of HANGOVER PART II http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5083&PID=43194#43194 Author: whatsthepoint
Subject: MEMBER DISCUSSION of HANGOVER PART II
Posted: June 25 2011 at 7:47am

Just for the record this has become the highest grossing R rated comedy of all time.]]> Sat, 25 Jun 2011 07:47:10 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5083&PID=43194#43194 Forum Discussion & Add'l Info on HANGOVER PART II : MEMBER DISCUSSION of HANGOVER PART II http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5083&PID=43160#43160 Author: Michaels
Subject: MEMBER DISCUSSION of HANGOVER PART II
Posted: June 24 2011 at 8:15pm

Originally posted by whatsthepoint

I knew this would get bad reviews the minute I saw Todd Phillips name on the script. Plus it's basically a remake of the first one only in a different location, how wrong can you go with that? 
Um, because why pay to see a beat for beat remake when you can just as easily watch the original movie again?]]> Fri, 24 Jun 2011 20:15:12 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5083&PID=43160#43160 Forum Discussion & Add'l Info on HANGOVER PART II : MEMBER DISCUSSION of HANGOVER PART II http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5083&PID=43114#43114 Author: whatsthepoint
Subject: MEMBER DISCUSSION of HANGOVER PART II
Posted: June 24 2011 at 12:54pm

I knew this would get bad reviews the minute I saw Todd Phillips name on the script. Plus it's basically a remake of the first one only in a different location, how wrong can you go with that? ]]> Fri, 24 Jun 2011 12:54:02 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5083&PID=43114#43114 Forum Discussion & Add'l Info on HANGOVER PART II : MEMBER DISCUSSION of HANGOVER PART II http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5083&PID=43040#43040 Author: jesse685
Subject: MEMBER DISCUSSION of HANGOVER PART II
Posted: June 23 2011 at 1:55am

Nic Cage playing a hitman! Comedy gold, my friend! Cage-sploitation at its best!  

Originally posted by Michaels

If they're in Bangkok, maybe they will run into Nicolas Cage playing a hit-man?!? 
]]> Thu, 23 Jun 2011 01:55:33 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5083&PID=43040#43040 Forum Discussion & Add'l Info on HANGOVER PART II : MEMBER DISCUSSION of HANGOVER PART II http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5083&PID=43039#43039 Author: jesse685
Subject: MEMBER DISCUSSION of HANGOVER PART II
Posted: June 23 2011 at 1:50am

Oh f**k, now Hollywood's probably gonna make a s***ty Three Stooges remake (or rip-off) after reading this, and it'll sweep up lots of Razzies!    

Originally posted by BurnHollywoodBurn

You have the p***ywhipped nerd, the smartass prettyboy, and the socially awkward mental miget. It's like the Three Stooges made worse!
]]> Thu, 23 Jun 2011 01:50:32 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5083&PID=43039#43039 Forum Discussion & Add'l Info on HANGOVER PART II : MEMBER DISCUSSION of HANGOVER PART II http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5083&PID=42434#42434 Author: Michaels
Subject: MEMBER DISCUSSION of HANGOVER PART II
Posted: June 02 2011 at 2:16pm

And I have a sinking feeling that you may be completely right!
]]> Thu, 02 Jun 2011 14:16:36 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5083&PID=42434#42434 Forum Discussion & Add'l Info on HANGOVER PART II : MEMBER DISCUSSION of HANGOVER PART II http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5083&PID=42427#42427 Author: Vheid
Subject: MEMBER DISCUSSION of HANGOVER PART II
Posted: June 02 2011 at 7:44am

I fear that Hangover III will be set in Amsterdam... Not the REAL Amsterdam, but a Hookers and Drugs-filled Fairy Tale-Land named Amsterdam, like the one depicted in Deuce Bigalow: European Gigolo.  
]]> Thu, 02 Jun 2011 07:44:06 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5083&PID=42427#42427