The Official RAZZIE® Forum : Forum DISCUSSION & Add'l INFO on JACK & JILL http://www.razzies.com/forum/ This is an XML content feed of; The Official RAZZIE® Forum : Forum DISCUSSION & Add'l INFO on JACK & JILL : Last 10 Posts Mon, 20 May 2013 21:57:50 +0000 Sat, 04 Aug 2012 14:30:53 +0000 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss Web Wiz Forums 9.70 30 www.razzies.com/forum/RSS_topic_feed.asp?FID=579 The Official RAZZIE® Forum http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_images/RazzieLogo02.gif http://www.razzies.com/forum/ Forum DISCUSSION & Add'l INFO on JACK & JILL : Consider This a RAZZIEŽ Two-for-One Offer! http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5521&PID=51817#51817 Author: Vits
Subject: Consider This a RAZZIEŽ Two-for-One Offer!
Posted: August 04 2012 at 2:30pm

Skip to 06:03.

[TUBE]WnPENHr1VQU[/TUBE]

Any thoughts?
]]> Sat, 04 Aug 2012 14:30:53 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5521&PID=51817#51817 Forum DISCUSSION & Add'l INFO on JACK & JILL : Consider This a RAZZIEŽ Two-for-One Offer! http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5521&PID=50361#50361 Author: Vits
Subject: Consider This a RAZZIEŽ Two-for-One Offer!
Posted: March 20 2012 at 2:57pm

By the way, I still think GROWN UPS is his worst, and this is 2nd.]]> Tue, 20 Mar 2012 14:57:58 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5521&PID=50361#50361 Forum DISCUSSION & Add'l INFO on JACK & JILL : Consider This a RAZZIEŽ Two-for-One Offer! http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5521&PID=50360#50360 Author: Vits
Subject: Consider This a RAZZIEŽ Two-for-One Offer!
Posted: March 20 2012 at 2:30pm

Listenup, people! Do I really have everyone's attention? Well... I just saw thismovie! Unfortunately, I have a bunch of reviews in line.


If Ireally have everyone's attention, please remember everything you and I havebeen through over these past 2 years. Here it goes: I... don't... think...it... should... win Worst Picture. Whoa! Calm down. NEW YEAR'S EVE should win (I haven't seen BUCKY LARSON yet), because thisactually had reedemable qualities:

1)Forabout half the movie I thought it could get better less bad. NEW YEAR'SEVE was awful from beginning to end.

2)I knew exactly what I was getting into. With NEW YEAR'S EVER I had expectations, specially since I almost liked VALENTINE'S DAY.

3)I'm sure you've heard about Al Pacino beinggood here, but no. He saved the movie. He shouldn't even be nominated. But NEW YEAR'S EVE had 20 stars and nobody was good, which is why it should also win Worst Ensemble.


As for the other categories:

-Actor: No. Like Nicolas Cage, Sandler phoned in both of his performances, but he was nothing compared to Taylor Lautner. Besides, with ABDUCTION, he prooved that after BREAKING DAWN PART 2, his career is over.

-Actress: Yes. My frontrunner was Sarah Jessica Parker for 2 very weak performances in 2 of the worst movies of the year, but even combined they were nothing against the atrocity of Sandler in drag. Even when we're meant to feel sorry for JILL, I couldn't, because she was still annoying. She really is one of the worst characters in movie history.

-Supp. Actor: I don't know. How do you decide that when someone is up for 2 movies and you think they deserve it for only 1? Nick Swardson was just meh, but in JUST GO WITH IT he was only a few miles away from being like JILL. But I choose him anyway because nobody else is a contender in my eyes (Ihaven't seen YOUR HIGHNESS yet).

-Supp. Actress: One of the categories where I've seen every nominee. I say no to Katie Holmes, because doesn't do anything... good or bad. David Spade showed potential of deserving the award if his role had been bigger... but it wasn't, so I'm still going with Brandon T: Jackson.

-Couple: The other categorie where I've seen every nominee. Honestly... I'm indifferent with this nominees.

-Director: Smae problem with Supp. Actor. Dennis Dugan's directing here sucks as usual, but his directing in JUST GO WITH IT was his best to date.

-Screenplay; Remake/Sequel: Oh, God. Yes! Although I haven't seen ARTHUR yet.

]]> Tue, 20 Mar 2012 14:30:27 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5521&PID=50360#50360 Forum DISCUSSION & Add'l INFO on JACK & JILL : Consider This a RAZZIEŽ Two-for-One Offer! http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5521&PID=50086#50086 Author: mgeor5
Subject: Consider This a RAZZIEŽ Two-for-One Offer!
Posted: February 29 2012 at 10:50am

Who is this guy Sandler paying to be able to appear in any entertainment medium. Maybe it is a New York, Jewish thing and I am not getting his humor but he is the worst example of an entertainer that I have ever seen in all of my 71 years on this earth. He is just not funny.]]> Wed, 29 Feb 2012 10:50:31 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5521&PID=50086#50086 Forum DISCUSSION & Add'l INFO on JACK & JILL : Consider This a RAZZIEŽ Two-for-One Offer! http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5521&PID=49477#49477 Author: ZKath
Subject: Consider This a RAZZIEŽ Two-for-One Offer!
Posted: January 25 2012 at 9:50am

My son Jay saw this at a birthday party (does the b'day boy want everyone to avoid his party next year?).  Jay is 13, so the ideal demographic for this, ahem, movie, but he HATED it.  And this is the kid who actually liked "I Am Number 4" and "The Darkest Hour."  
 
I'm not proud of Jay's lack of cinematic taste, but at least the kid has some standards.
]]> Wed, 25 Jan 2012 09:50:49 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5521&PID=49477#49477 Forum DISCUSSION & Add'l INFO on JACK & JILL : Consider This a RAZZIEŽ Two-for-One Offer! http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5521&PID=49335#49335 Author: Vits
Subject: Consider This a RAZZIEŽ Two-for-One Offer!
Posted: January 16 2012 at 7:37am

Sandler always insists that his characters must have an attractve wife or girlfriend, even if it's not relevant to the plot. 

Originally posted by SchumacherH8ter

Katie Holmes: Man, she didn't do anything in this movie! Her role is very passive and she's just there for scenery dressing.
]]> Mon, 16 Jan 2012 07:37:51 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5521&PID=49335#49335 Forum DISCUSSION & Add'l INFO on JACK & JILL : Consider This a RAZZIEŽ Two-for-One Offer! http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5521&PID=49332#49332 Author: SchumacherH8ter
Subject: Consider This a RAZZIEŽ Two-for-One Offer!
Posted: January 15 2012 at 4:28pm

Well, I'm back from the suffering known as this movie. My dad was nice enough to come with me and pay for it. I have to pay for Underworld: Awakening next weekend. So, I got off easy.LOL Because this is SO bad, it's not a nine worst moments list; it's a 12 worst moments list!
 
12.) Nick Swardson: Swardson isn't as bad here as he was in Just Go With It, but that's like saying that being beaten with rocks is being better than being beaten with maces. There's an unfunny sub-plot regarding his character's atheism. That being said, he has the second best scene in the movie. "God told me you had my feet on your desk." The best scene was when I daydreamed that the movie was actually the last act of Commando and Ah-nuld killed everyone. Jill was Bennett.
 
11.) Eugenio Derbez: Derbez plays Jack's gardener. His presence brings about a lot of racist jokes involving Hispanics.
 
10.) The cameos: There's a lot of idiotic cameos in the movie. Norm MacDOnald plays a potential suiter for Jill who eventually hides in the bathroom, a good idea for anyone forced to see this. Allen Covert plays the same homeless guy he played in Happy Gilmore. The Subway guy shows up in one scene. The ShamWow guy appears in a scene, presumably to regal the party of the time he beat the crap out of a hooker. And Sandler has embarrassing phots of Johnny Depp. That's the only explanation for Depp being seen in this.

9.) Katie Holmes: Man, she didn't do anything in this movie! Her role is very passive and she's just there for scenery dressing.

 
8.) David Spade as Monica: Why was (s)he here? His/Her scene is brief, but disturbing and illogical. Jill insults him, so (s)he attacks... Katie Holmes? Also, one of his/her friends is the guy from the Bucky Larson ads.
 
7.) Adam Sandler as Jack: I originally had him much lower, but he acts the most sane out of all of the unlikable characters. His acting is terrible, but he's the only one who seems to notice that Jill is a Satanic spawn. For noticing this, you're not in the top five.
 
6.) Jill's unfunny running gag: There's an impressively unfunny running gag involving Jill's poor memory skills when it comes to movie titiles. She forgets the names to It's A Wonderful Life, Pretty Woman, and Titanic.
 
5.) Al Pacino: Seriously, what the f*ck? Was he involved in the same photos that they have of Depp? His rap song near the end is spectacularily horrible!
 
4.) Dennis Dugan: What did our eyes do to deserve this guy? He makes horrible movies that intelligent people hate. His direction is easily his worst to date.
 
3.) The serious turn towards the end: Towards the end of the movie, the movie trys tug at your heartstrings. The only thing it tugs at is your gag reflex!
 
2.) The script: Steve Koren, Ben Zook, and Adam Sandler: look at yourselves in the mirror and ask yourself: "Why did I make this movie?"
 
1.) Adam Sandler as Jill: Jill is quite possibly the worst character on the history of cinema. She's worse than Jar Jar! She's worse than Skips and Mudflap! She's worse than Willie Scott! She's worse than Snails from D & D! She's worse than Christmas Jones! If they'd cast an actual actress as Jill, this movie wouldn't have been so horrific. But, Sandler was cast and we have the festering pile of sh*t before us now.
 
This is easily Sandler's worst movie. Let that sink in. Grade: Rotten Asshole
 
Next-up: Abduction!
]]> Sun, 15 Jan 2012 16:28:57 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5521&PID=49332#49332 Forum DISCUSSION & Add'l INFO on JACK & JILL : Consider This a RAZZIEŽ Two-for-One Offer! http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5521&PID=48281#48281 Author: mbh
Subject: Consider This a RAZZIEŽ Two-for-One Offer!
Posted: December 04 2011 at 9:36pm

"Box Office Guru! Breaking Dawn Threepeats Over Weak Frame

December 5, 2011 by SoCelebrities 

Finishing in sixth place was Adam Sandler's latest Razzie hopeful Jack and Jill which made an estimated $5.5M, down 45%, for a cume to date of $64.3M. The Sony release looks to end with $75-80M making it one of the actor's worst-performing broad comedies." 


"Sandler's latest Razzie hopeful!" It amuses me how the general public is starting to notice. Razzie-Buzz is kicking in.

]]> Sun, 04 Dec 2011 21:36:49 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5521&PID=48281#48281 Forum DISCUSSION & Add'l INFO on JACK & JILL : Consider This a RAZZIEŽ Two-for-One Offer! http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5521&PID=48221#48221 Author: SchumacherH8ter
Subject: Consider This a RAZZIEŽ Two-for-One Offer!
Posted: December 01 2011 at 4:00pm

I just had a potentially suicidal idea involving this movie: I have a free movie ticket and I'd like to try and see every Razzie movie before the big night.]]> Thu, 01 Dec 2011 16:00:37 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5521&PID=48221#48221 Forum DISCUSSION & Add'l INFO on JACK & JILL : Consider This a RAZZIEŽ Two-for-One Offer! http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5521&PID=48220#48220 Author: Dun-Ida
Subject: Consider This a RAZZIEŽ Two-for-One Offer!
Posted: December 01 2011 at 2:08pm

I think this movie deserves these Razzie nominations: 

Worst Picture; Worst Actor (Adam Sandler); Worst Actress (Adam Sandler as Jill); 

Worst Supporting Actor (Nick Swardson unfunny as usual); Worst Supporting Actress (David Spade as Monica (irritating to watch)), Katie Holmes should also get a nomination. 

; Worst Prequel, Remake, Rip-off or Sequel (seems to rip-off (better) movies of men dressing up as women); Dennis Dugan for Worst Director; Adam Sandler and Steve Koren for Worst Screenplay,
and Worst Screen Couple/Ensemble (Adam Sandler playing horrible twins). 
]]> Thu, 01 Dec 2011 14:08:53 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5521&PID=48220#48220