The Official RAZZIE® Forum : Forum Members' Discussion of SCREAM 4...

The Official RAZZIE® Forum : Forum Members' Discussion of SCREAM 4... http://www.razzies.com/forum/ This is an XML content feed of; The Official RAZZIE® Forum : DISCUSSION & ADD'L INFO on SCREAM 4 : Forum Members' Discussion of SCREAM 4... Wed, 19 Jun 2013 18:28:26 +0000 Mon, 19 Sep 2011 10:02:16 +0000 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss Web Wiz Forums 9.70 360 www.razzies.com/forum/RSS_post_feed.asp?TID=4950 The Official RAZZIE® Forum http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_images/RazzieLogo02.gif http://www.razzies.com/forum/ Forum Members' Discussion of SCREAM 4... : The Scream series has always been... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4950&PID=46702#46702 Author: moviewizguy
Subject: 4950
Posted: September 19 2011 at 10:02am

The Scream series has always been funny. It's not just horror. It's a comedy/horror series that points out the conventions of other horror films. And I disagree, the opening scene was genius!

Originally posted by Vits

The opening scene was a major headache.To quote SOUTH PARK(sorry GTA)about INCEPTION "Just because an idea is very complex doesn't mean it's cool".By the end of the opening scene,I thought I was watching a spoof of SCREAM because they focus more on being cleverly funny than scary,and that remains that way the rest of the movie.

Well, I think it's a great thing. The sequels never really quite reached up the potential of the first. The whole mom plot got out of control since the third film.

The 2nd and 3rd movie tried to tie the events and the new killer to the backstory of the original movie.Here,they just talk about what we saw in the present of the 1st movie.No mentions of SIDNEY's mom or anything.Is that good or bad?That's up to you.

]]> Mon, 19 Sep 2011 10:02:16 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4950&PID=46702#46702 Forum Members' Discussion of SCREAM 4... : I am a huge fan of the first two... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4950&PID=45846#45846 Author: Lord Naseby
Subject: 4950
Posted: August 29 2011 at 12:56pm

I am a huge fan of the first two and despite its visible flaws 3 is a guilty pleasure for me. However, even critics these days are liking 4 more than 3 and it just barely missed out on a fresh rating on RT.
]]> Mon, 29 Aug 2011 12:56:02 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4950&PID=45846#45846 Forum Members' Discussion of SCREAM 4... : Oh...I didn't see that movie,I... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4950&PID=45449#45449 Author: Vits
Subject: 4950
Posted: August 18 2011 at 5:49pm

Oh...I didn't see that movie,I just assumed.]]> Thu, 18 Aug 2011 17:49:25 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4950&PID=45449#45449 Forum Members' Discussion of SCREAM 4... : Originally posted by Vits Originally... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4950&PID=45436#45436 Author: Vheid
Subject: 4950
Posted: August 18 2011 at 3:12pm

Originally posted by Vits

Originally posted by Vheid

I disagree... You said it yourself "She's not really lead here"... The movie is clearly told from Neve Campbell's p.o.v. and she doesn't even nearly has as much screentime as Neve... So.. She is is deffinetly not a lead actress...

Right,but she's the lead in the other movie.So it would make more sense if she's nominated for one lead and one semi-lead performance.

Freddie Highmore is the lead in The Art of Getting By.... The story is clearly told from his P.O.V. .... She's (as far sa I know) just the romantic interest... She's playing the same character that she played in It's Kind of a Funny Story...As far as I could see from the promotion of TAOGB.... I however have to get back with you on that after I've seen the movie...
]]> Thu, 18 Aug 2011 15:12:56 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4950&PID=45436#45436 Forum Members' Discussion of SCREAM 4... : Originally posted by VheidI... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4950&PID=45434#45434 Author: Vits
Subject: 4950
Posted: August 18 2011 at 2:57pm

Right,but she's the lead in the other movie.So it would make more sense if she's nominated for one lead and one semi-lead performance.

]]> Thu, 18 Aug 2011 14:57:31 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4950&PID=45434#45434 Forum Members' Discussion of SCREAM 4... : Originally posted by Vits,so... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4950&PID=45432#45432 Author: Vheid
Subject: 4950
Posted: August 18 2011 at 2:37pm

Originally posted by Vits

,so I wouldn't like that you just nominate Emma,only because she was in another movie.

What does that have to do with her acting?

I won't be voting for her just because she was in another movie...

I found her acting in this movie far bellow average.... and in that scene she was just all over the top... I'll be voting for her.... If she's on the ballot... and you can do nothing to stop that...

Originally posted by Vits

By the way,she's not really the lead here but she's very close,so if she does get nominated it should be up for Worst Actress and not Supp. Actress.

I disagree... You said it yourself "She's not really lead here"... The movie is clearly told from Neve Campbell's p.o.v. and she doesn't even nearly has as much screentime as Neve... So.. She is is deffinetly not a lead actress...

Originally posted by Vits

If she didn't check her pulse is because...well,she forgot.She's a psycho killer,and they always make mistakes.

That's no excuse... If she's is planning the PERFECT CRIME (as she said), she should have made sure that her victim is actually DEAD... You can't defend that... It's just an enormous gaping plot hole in the movie... and Wes Craven or Kevin Williamson should have noticed it when it was written...
]]> Thu, 18 Aug 2011 14:37:37 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4950&PID=45432#45432 Forum Members' Discussion of SCREAM 4... : I just saw it.Does anyone here... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4950&PID=45429#45429 Author: Vits
Subject: 4950
Posted: August 18 2011 at 2:02pm

I just saw it.

Does anyone here watches COMMUNITY?There's an episode where a character wants to make the ultimate meta movie,so he's constantly saying "we're inside a movie within a movie and we're making a movie" and stuff,and it helped me realize that being meta isn't that hard after all.The opening scene was a major headache.To quote SOUTH PARK(sorry GTA)about INCEPTION "Just because an idea is very complex doesn't mean it's cool".By the end of the opening scene,I thought I was watching a spoof of SCREAM because they focus more on being cleverly funny than scary,and that remains that way the rest of the movie.This is a horror movie.I'm glad it tries to be clever,but being scary and/or suspenseful it's the most important.All this movie has is the same cheap jump-scares that any bad horror movie you can mention(that wasn't mentioned in this movie).Also,I may be wrong,but here there are even more characters discussing horror movies,except they're more like statements from intelectual people.Kevin Williamson was talking through the characters,and all he really said was "I'm smarter than you,audience member".

The performances are...meh.They're all equal(except for Neve who's so uninspired),so I wouldn't like that you just nominate Emma,only because she was in another movie.By the way,she's not really the lead here but she's very close,so if she does get nominated it should be up for Worst Actress and not Supp. Actress.

I give this 4/10.

Originally posted by GTAHater767

Apparently, Scream 3 was released in February of 2000. It got mixed reviews, which is probably why it wasn't considered for the RAZZIES.

It got around 35%.That's negative.

Originally posted by Vheid

I want to suggest Emma Roberts for the Worst Supporting Actress-ballot.
*spoiler*
She is the killer. First of she stabs Sidney "to dead" without checking her pulse (which is plain dumb writing) and then you see 3 minutes of her cutting herself, stabbing herself and walking in to walls (so that she looks like the soul survivor) this looks extremely silly and is worth a Razzie-mention.
*end of spoiler*

What does that have to do with her acting?If she didn't check her pulse is because...well,she forgot.She's a psycho killer,and they always make mistakes.

]]> Thu, 18 Aug 2011 14:02:07 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4950&PID=45429#45429 Forum Members' Discussion of SCREAM 4... : All the Scary Movies are the... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4950&PID=44062#44062 Author: dmwj80
Subject: 4950
Posted: July 13 2011 at 11:09am

All the Scary Movies are the same, so I don't like Scary Movies much...

]]> Wed, 13 Jul 2011 11:09:46 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4950&PID=44062#44062 Forum Members' Discussion of SCREAM 4... : Being meta today isn't hard.But... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4950&PID=42045#42045 Author: Vits
Subject: 4950
Posted: May 23 2011 at 12:22pm

Being meta today isn't hard.But being good at it...]]> Mon, 23 May 2011 12:22:52 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4950&PID=42045#42045 Forum Members' Discussion of SCREAM 4... : Originally posted by moviewizguy You... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4950&PID=42002#42002 Author: BurnHollywoodBurn
Subject: 4950
Posted: May 22 2011 at 4:53pm

Originally posted by moviewizguy

You don't honestly think this is a $hit movie, do you?

Uh, YEAH! If I wanted a bad movie that self-parodies how Hollywood is obsessed with remakes and reboots these days while not giving us anything better on it's own merits, I would wait for Seltzerberg to do "Remake Movie".

]]> Sun, 22 May 2011 16:53:08 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4950&PID=42002#42002 Forum Members' Discussion of SCREAM 4... : Originally posted by moviewizguyYou... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4950&PID=41999#41999 Author: GTAHater767
Subject: 4950
Posted: May 22 2011 at 4:29pm

Originally posted by moviewizguy

[QUOTE=BurnHollywoodBurn]You don't honestly think this is a $hit movie, do you?

At least I don't think it's total sh(beep). I thought it was merely average from what I know about it. I don't agree with you that it's a very good movie, but I agree that it doesn't deserve any nominations. On the other hand, it was mostly my fault this forum was here. I drew attention to it back in February, thinking it would crash because it's a sequel to a movie from a decade ago, until the reviews turned out to be middling. Little as we need this sequel, it's simply not bad enough to be one of our prime targets.

]]> Sun, 22 May 2011 16:29:20 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4950&PID=41999#41999 Forum Members' Discussion of SCREAM 4... : Originally posted by BurnHollywoodBurnI... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4950&PID=41996#41996 Author: moviewizguy
Subject: 4950
Posted: May 22 2011 at 3:36pm

Originally posted by BurnHollywoodBurn

You don't honestly think this is a $hit movie, do you?

]]> Sun, 22 May 2011 15:36:25 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4950&PID=41996#41996 Forum Members' Discussion of SCREAM 4... : Originally posted by moviewizguy Scream... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4950&PID=41983#41983 Author: BurnHollywoodBurn
Subject: 4950
Posted: May 22 2011 at 11:42am

Originally posted by moviewizguy

Scream 4: 8/10 - Easily the best film in the franchise. I loved how they lampooned on remakes, reboots, and the recent wave of torture porn films. I also loved the fact that the film acknowledges its own pointlessness and how tedious the Scream series have become through the Stab series in the film. Come on. The opening scene was pretty genius. Only Kevin Williamson could have made that up. I also have to say the third act was pretty ingenious with a climax that is really fan-freakin'-tastic. Scream 4 proves to show that all sequels can't be bad and that there is still some life in this franchise.

I have a better thought, knowing how bad of a shape Hollywood is in due to the influx of remakes, reboots, and torture porn, how about instead of being a self-parody about all those scourages of modern day cinema, maybe they should NOT MAKE A 4TH INSTALLMENT TO A MOVIE THAT PEOPLE FORGOT ABOUT A DECADE AGO! No, this movie was s***, and they would be insane to waste money making a 5th movie, but hey, that's never stopped Hollywood before.]]> Sun, 22 May 2011 11:42:02 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4950&PID=41983#41983 Forum Members' Discussion of SCREAM 4... : My thoughts of the series:Scream:... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4950&PID=41977#41977 Author: moviewizguy
Subject: 4950
Posted: May 22 2011 at 9:48am

My thoughts of the series:

Scream: 7/10 - It's a pretty enjoyable slasher with intelligent characters and fresh dialogue.

Scream 2: 6/10 - I have to admit that it's a good sequel but there were so many flaws that kept me from enjoying the film a lot more, like the fact that the killer knows where the characters will be. For example, when the killer attacked the two cops, that was complete BS. I also hate the fact that the killer kept popping out of nowhere, as if a ghost itself (must be why they call him Ghostface).

Scream 3: 6/10 - While not a good film, it was an enjoyable one. Seriously, there were some stupid things in here, especially the killer reveal. However, putting Courteney Cox and Parker Posey together was genius. Their scenes provide some of the series' biggest laughs.

]]> Sun, 22 May 2011 09:48:51 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4950&PID=41977#41977 Forum Members' Discussion of SCREAM 4... : It's not the Oscar that Harvey... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4950&PID=41896#41896 Author: Michaels
Subject: 4950
Posted: May 19 2011 at 9:41pm

It's not the Oscar that Harvey wants (well, he does want it, but not for this movie), it's the payoff that he seeks!]]> Thu, 19 May 2011 21:41:18 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4950&PID=41896#41896 Forum Members' Discussion of SCREAM 4... : Vits, indeed but it would be crazy... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4950&PID=41836#41836 Author: Vheid
Subject: 4950
Posted: May 18 2011 at 8:14pm

Vits, indeed but it would be crazy to go through with those plans if Scream 4 is a box office bomb (what it technically is)]]> Wed, 18 May 2011 20:14:21 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4950&PID=41836#41836 Forum Members' Discussion of SCREAM 4... : I'm confused.I thought that... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4950&PID=41823#41823 Author: Vits
Subject: 4950
Posted: May 18 2011 at 12:36pm

I'm confused.I thought that before this movie was made a whole new trilogy was planned.]]> Wed, 18 May 2011 12:36:05 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4950&PID=41823#41823 Forum Members' Discussion of SCREAM 4... : It seem that Harvey Weinstein... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4950&PID=41820#41820 Author: Vheid
Subject: 4950
Posted: May 18 2011 at 11:39am

It seem that Harvey Weinstein REALLY wants a Razzie to display next to his many (undeserved) oscars... (link)]]> Wed, 18 May 2011 11:39:40 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4950&PID=41820#41820 Forum Members' Discussion of SCREAM 4... : Among the first three Scream movies,... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4950&PID=41609#41609 Author: stop_shop_peapod
Subject: 4950
Posted: May 11 2011 at 7:58pm

Among the first three Scream movies, I love the first one most -- don't know why. When I watched the second and third movies, there was no kind of "scary" feeling, everything seemed so flat and I didn't get that "heart-jumping" feeling. ]]> Wed, 11 May 2011 19:58:46 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4950&PID=41609#41609 Forum Members' Discussion of SCREAM 4... : Originally posted by VheidI... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4950&PID=41095#41095 Author: Michaels
Subject: 4950
Posted: April 26 2011 at 10:46am

Originally posted by Vheid

I would add Soairse Ronan to that list...

Right, her, too. And maybe Abigail Breslin, as well.]]> Tue, 26 Apr 2011 10:46:44 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4950&PID=41095#41095 Forum Members' Discussion of SCREAM 4... : I would add Soairse Ronan to that... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4950&PID=41089#41089 Author: Vheid
Subject: 4950
Posted: April 26 2011 at 8:46am

I would add Soairse Ronan to that list...]]> Tue, 26 Apr 2011 08:46:35 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4950&PID=41089#41089 Forum Members' Discussion of SCREAM 4... : Originally posted by mbhRight... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4950&PID=41085#41085 Author: Michaels
Subject: 4950
Posted: April 26 2011 at 8:17am

Originally posted by mbh

Right now I wouldn't be able to tell you one single name of an underaged actress, that I think has the potential to become a household name. Whatever is out there, is seriously lacking talent.
However, with a little more practise hopefully some will brake out.

Edit: Just thought of Dakota Fanning.

Well, there's Dakota, her sister Elle, and then AnnaSophia Robb. But outside of them, I don't think many underage actresses have that bright a future.]]> Tue, 26 Apr 2011 08:17:13 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4950&PID=41085#41085 Forum Members' Discussion of SCREAM 4... : Originally posted by mbhJust... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4950&PID=41079#41079 Author: Vits
Subject: 4950
Posted: April 26 2011 at 6:00am

Originally posted by mbh

Just thought of Dakota Fanning.

There we go!She is my type.
]]> Tue, 26 Apr 2011 06:00:59 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4950&PID=41079#41079 Forum Members' Discussion of SCREAM 4... : Ugh. No. Premature body types... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4950&PID=41075#41075 Author: mbh
Subject: 4950
Posted: April 25 2011 at 8:59pm

Ugh. No. Premature body types make me feel like a pedophile watching that. I have two daughters.
But maybe that's just me, going for the curvy ladies. But Robert's face is average. Has nothing on aunt Julie's when she was young. The blond one in the movie is a little more interesting. But she is already on the peek of her fame.
Right now I wouldn't be able to tell you one single name of an underaged actress, that I think has the potential to become a household name. Whatever is out there, is seriously lacking talent.
However, with a little more practise hopefully some will brake out.

Edit: Just thought of Dakota Fanning.
]]> Mon, 25 Apr 2011 20:59:57 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4950&PID=41075#41075 Forum Members' Discussion of SCREAM 4... : I actually liked this. It's... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4950&PID=41074#41074 Author: SchumacherH8ter
Subject: 4950
Posted: April 25 2011 at 8:25pm

I actually liked this. It's not perfect, but it gets the job done. The opening scene was a little over-the-top, though.]]> Mon, 25 Apr 2011 20:25:20 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4950&PID=41074#41074 Forum Members' Discussion of SCREAM 4... : Originally posted by VheidVits,... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4950&PID=41069#41069 Author: Vits
Subject: 4950
Posted: April 25 2011 at 3:51pm

Originally posted by Vheid

Vits, How old was she in that video? She looked like a 15 year old.

Does it matter?Like you said,she looked 15.

By the way,although I find her attractive she's not really my type.My whole point to post the video was that you see why others like her.

]]> Mon, 25 Apr 2011 15:51:55 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4950&PID=41069#41069 Forum Members' Discussion of SCREAM 4... : I don't get this whole thing... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4950&PID=41067#41067 Author: Michaels
Subject: 4950
Posted: April 25 2011 at 2:38pm

I don't get this whole thing with girls like Roberts, who are in their mid to late teens, appearing on-screen in their underwear. It's really not all that sexy, considering they still have premature looking body types. It comes across as the filmmakers wanting pedophiles to come see the movie. Yeah, I know it's a cliche of the girls-coming-of-age movie to show their "maturing bodies", but come on, it's not about art, it's just a quick peep show.]]> Mon, 25 Apr 2011 14:38:04 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4950&PID=41067#41067 Forum Members' Discussion of SCREAM 4... : Vits, How old was she in that... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4950&PID=41064#41064 Author: Vheid
Subject: 4950
Posted: April 25 2011 at 12:15pm

Vits, How old was she in that video? She looked like a 15 year old.

]]> Mon, 25 Apr 2011 12:15:02 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4950&PID=41064#41064 Forum Members' Discussion of SCREAM 4... : Actually...http://egotastic.co... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4950&PID=41062#41062 Author: Vits
Subject: 4950
Posted: April 25 2011 at 11:49am

Actually...

http://egotastic.com/entertainment/celebrities/emma-roberts/emma-roberts-in-bra-and-panties-in-4321-video-006219

]]> Mon, 25 Apr 2011 11:49:33 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4950&PID=41062#41062 Forum Members' Discussion of SCREAM 4... : What, you mean her larger-than... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4950&PID=41061#41061 Author: Michaels
Subject: 4950
Posted: April 25 2011 at 11:37am

What, you mean her larger-than-the-average-movie-starlet's facial features?

]]> Mon, 25 Apr 2011 11:37:14 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4950&PID=41061#41061