<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="RSS_xslt_style.asp" version="1.0" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:WebWizForums="http://syndication.webwiz.co.uk/rss_namespace/">
 <channel>
  <title>The Official RAZZIE&#174; Forum</title>
  <link>http://www.razzies.com/forum/</link>
  <description>This is an XML content feed of; The Official RAZZIE&#174; Forum : Last 10 Posts</description>
  <pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 06:31:59 +0000</pubDate>
  <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 06:02:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
  <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
  <generator>Web Wiz Forums 9.70</generator>
  <ttl>30</ttl>
  <WebWizForums:feedURL>www.razzies.com/forum/RSS_topic_feed.asp</WebWizForums:feedURL>
  
  <item>
   <title>HANGOVER III                                                                                                                                 : Forum Members&#039; Discussion of HANGOVER: 3...AUDS: 1</title>
   <link>http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=6173&amp;PID=54600#54600</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.razzies.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=3">HeadRAZZBerry</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> Forum Members&#039; Discussion of HANGOVER: 3...AUDS: 1<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> May 23 2013 at 6:02am<br /><br /><font size="4" face="Times New Roman, Times, serif"><b><font color="#cc0033">RESPONSE from Head RAZZberry:</font></b> I was suggesting that the very existence of this film is a "rip-off," as in: The idea of doing a third HANGOVER movie, when the second one sucked and a third one would exist only to take movie-goers' money, is inherently a "rip-off."&nbsp;</font><div><font face="Times New Roman, Times, serif" size="4"><span style="line-height: 25px;"><br></span></font></div><div><font face="Times New Roman, Times, serif" size="4"><span style="line-height: 25px;">As if further evidence were needed, here's the <a href="http://www.latimes.com/entertainment/movies/moviesnow/la-et-mn-hangover-part-iii-20130523,0,1785388.story" target="_blank"><font size="4" face="Times New Roman, Times, serif" color="#000000"><b><u>LINK</u></b></font></a> to read today's <i>L.A. Times</i> review of HANGOVER III, which declares "the comedy has left the building," and which (in the print edition)&nbsp;</span></font><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman', Times, serif; font-size: large; line-height: 25px;">has a sub-headline that&nbsp;</span><span style="line-height: 25px; font-family: 'Times New Roman', Times, serif; font-size: large;">refers to the film as "dismal"...</span></div><div><div><font face="Times New Roman, Times, serif" size="4"><span style="line-height: 25px;"><br></span></font></div><div><font face="Times New Roman, Times, serif" size="4"><span style="line-height: 25px;"><br></span></font><div><br></div><div><br></div></div></div>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 06:02:11 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=6173&amp;PID=54600#54600</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>HANGOVER III                                                                                                                                 : Forum Members&#039; Discussion of HANGOVER: 3...AUDS: 1</title>
   <link>http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=6173&amp;PID=54599#54599</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.razzies.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=8992">oiram</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> Forum Members&#039; Discussion of HANGOVER: 3...AUDS: 1<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> May 23 2013 at 3:16am<br /><br />Wait a minute, HeadRazz. The trailers for the movie make it clear it's more of a thriller/heist type of thing, AND there is NO actual Hangover this time. Therefore, I'd argue we cannot call this a rip-off of the first movie again (Unless you think it is ripping-off something else. If that's the case, please explain)...<div><br></div><div>&nbsp;<br><br><br></div>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 03:16:22 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=6173&amp;PID=54599#54599</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>GENERAL DISCUSSION of 2013 RELEASES...                                                                                                       : Member Discussion of 2013 LIST...</title>
   <link>http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=6066&amp;PID=54598#54598</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.razzies.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=9186">Vheid</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> Member Discussion of 2013 LIST...<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> May 22 2013 at 11:41pm<br /><br />I am not talking about Tree of Life being "booed," I am talking about the fact that the first 30 something reviews were almost exclusively negative. Even though it wasn't well-liked at Cannes, Tree of Life still received mostly positive reviews from the English-speaking critics at the festival (I heard that the French hated it).]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 23:41:11 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=6066&amp;PID=54598#54598</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>HANGOVER III                                                                                                                                 : Forum Members&#039; Discussion of HANGOVER: 3...AUDS: 1</title>
   <link>http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=6173&amp;PID=54597#54597</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.razzies.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=139188">moviecritic1994</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> Forum Members&#039; Discussion of HANGOVER: 3...AUDS: 1<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> May 22 2013 at 9:39pm<br /><br />I haven't seen the film yet but hope to soon. Have you seen it Head Razz? ]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 21:39:41 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=6173&amp;PID=54597#54597</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>HANGOVER III                                                                                                                                 : Forum Members&#039; Discussion of HANGOVER: 3...AUDS: 1</title>
   <link>http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=6173&amp;PID=54596#54596</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.razzies.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=3">HeadRAZZBerry</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> Forum Members&#039; Discussion of HANGOVER: 3...AUDS: 1<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> May 22 2013 at 9:15pm<br /><br /><font size="4" face="Times New Roman, Times, serif"><b><font color="#cc0033">RESPONSE from Head RAZZberry:</font></b> I'd say it's a definite for our 34th Annual Nominating Ballot as <i>Worst Remake/Rip-Off/Sequel</i> -- Since it technically qualifies as all three...</font>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 21:15:01 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=6173&amp;PID=54596#54596</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>GENERAL DISCUSSION of 2013 RELEASES...                                                                                                       : Member Discussion of 2013 LIST...</title>
   <link>http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=6066&amp;PID=54595#54595</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.razzies.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=8992">oiram</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> Member Discussion of 2013 LIST...<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> May 22 2013 at 6:52pm<br /><br />Here's the <a href="http://www.razzies.com/forum/parker_topic6076.html" target="_blank">LINK</a> for the Member-Started Forum on Parker -- &nbsp;<span style="line-height: 1.4;">Actually, I thought it was a remake/rip-off of Payback and Point Blank.&nbsp;</span><div><span style="line-height: 1.4;"><br></span></div>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 18:52:43 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=6066&amp;PID=54595#54595</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>HANGOVER III                                                                                                                                 : Forum Members&#039; Discussion of HANGOVER: 3...AUDS: 1</title>
   <link>http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=6173&amp;PID=54594#54594</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.razzies.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=139188">moviecritic1994</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> Forum Members&#039; Discussion of HANGOVER: 3...AUDS: 1<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> May 22 2013 at 6:27pm<br /><br />So do you think that Hangover 3 can officially be considered "one of ours"?? ]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 18:27:23 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=6173&amp;PID=54594#54594</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>GENERAL DISCUSSION of 2013 RELEASES...                                                                                                       : Member Discussion of 2013 LIST...</title>
   <link>http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=6066&amp;PID=54593#54593</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.razzies.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=139188">moviecritic1994</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> Member Discussion of 2013 LIST...<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> May 22 2013 at 6:26pm<br /><br />I know this might be way off topic, but do you guys think "Parker" should be a Razzie contender? It does seem like a 2013 Remake/Rip-Off of "Gigli"  <img src="http://www.razzies.com/forum/smileys/smiley36.gif" border="0" align="middle" /> ]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 18:26:13 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=6066&amp;PID=54593#54593</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>GENERAL DISCUSSION of 2013 RELEASES...                                                                                                       : Member Discussion of 2013 LIST...</title>
   <link>http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=6066&amp;PID=54592#54592</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.razzies.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=8803">Vits</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> Member Discussion of 2013 LIST...<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> May 22 2013 at 5:56pm<br /><br /><div><font ="apple-style-span"="" face="'Courier New', Courier, mono" size="3"><a href="http://www.teenchoiceawards.com/" target="_blank">The Teen Choice Awards voting is now open. Among the nominees, there are 4 movies that were Razzie nominees/winners. And there's also a bunch of possible contenders for next year's ceremony.</a></font></div><div><font ="apple-style-span"="" face="'Courier New', Courier, mono" size="3"><a href="http://www.teenchoiceawards.com/" target="_blank"><br></a></font></div><div><font ="apple-style-span"="" face="'Courier New', Courier, mono" size="3"><a href="http://www.teenchoiceawards.com/" target="_blank">For the first time in... ever, I'm satisfied with the nominees for the best in drama movies... even if teens probably didn't see most of them. But, for some reason, they've nominated some of 2013 most forgettable titles, such as PEEPLES. Oh, and since when is <i>LES MIS</i> a romantic movie?</a></font></div><table width="99%"><tr><td class="BBquote"><strong><em>Originally posted by oiram</strong></em><br /><br />Wasn't Tree of Life booed at Cannes?</td></tr></table><div><font ="apple-style-span"="" size="3" face="'Courier New', Courier, mono">I think you're confusing Cannes with my house.</font></div><div><font ="apple-style-span"="" size="3" face="'Courier New', Courier, mono"><img src="http://www.razzies.com/forum/smileys/smiley36.gif" border="0" alt="LOL" title="LOL" /><br></font></div><div><font ="apple-style-span"="" size="3" face="'Courier New', Courier, mono">Seriously, though, I don't know.</font></div>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 17:56:33 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=6066&amp;PID=54592#54592</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>HANGOVER III                                                                                                                                 : Forum Members&#039; Discussion of HANGOVER: 3...AUDS: 1</title>
   <link>http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=6173&amp;PID=54591#54591</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.razzies.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=8803">Vits</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> Forum Members&#039; Discussion of HANGOVER: 3...AUDS: 1<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> May 22 2013 at 5:42pm<br /><br /><span style="font-family: 'Courier New', Courier, mono; font-size: medium; line-height: 19px;">The R.T.</span><span style="font-family: 'Courier New', Courier, mono; font-size: medium; line-height: 1.4;">&nbsp;consensus reads "Less a comedy than an angrily dark action thriller, the film diverges from the second installment's rote formula... but offers nothing compelling to replace it, lacking even enough madcap energy to compensate for its lazily constructed story-line."&nbsp;</span><div><span style="font-family: 'Courier New', Courier, mono; font-size: medium; line-height: 1.4;"><br></span></div><div><span style="font-family: 'Courier New', Courier, mono; font-size: medium; line-height: 1.4;"><br></span></div>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 17:42:10 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=6173&amp;PID=54591#54591</guid>
  </item> 
 </channel>
</rss>