The Official RAZZIE® Forum : Give This One the Ol’ STEVE-Ho!

The Official RAZZIE® Forum : Give This One the Ol’ STEVE-Ho! http://www.razzies.com/forum/ This is an XML content feed of; The Official RAZZIE® Forum : ALL ABOUT STEVE : Give This One the Ol’ STEVE-Ho! Sat, 18 May 2013 15:10:31 +0000 Wed, 05 Jan 2011 16:32:58 +0000 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss Web Wiz Forums 9.70 360 www.razzies.com/forum/RSS_post_feed.asp?TID=3833 The Official RAZZIE® Forum http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_images/RazzieLogo02.gif http://www.razzies.com/forum/ Give This One the Ol’ STEVE-Ho! : My review:IF THIS IS "ALL... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=3833&PID=38023#38023 Author: Vits
Subject: 3833
Posted: January 05 2011 at 4:32pm

My review:

IF THIS IS "ALL ABOUT "STEVE"",WHY ARE 2 ACTORS CREDITED BEFORE HIM?(***/*****):

Spoilers ahead!

This has to be one the most unfocused scripts ever.It goes from comedy to romantic comedy to drama,which is a shame because,separately,it does good in the former and latter aspects.But it sucks as a romantic movie.I mean it's about a stalker thinking she's in love!Who's idea was to market this as a rom-com?! First we have to root for this character(which is very hard)to get her man.Then we have to believe he understands her only because she could die.Then we have to accept she accepted what she did with no problem.I can't really blame writer Kim Barker,since there are so many complains about modern movies not having character development.

The first half of the movie it shows MARY as a crazy person,and then all of the sudden we have to look at her as a good person who's just different and we(the audience)are bad people for thinking she was crazy? Sandra Bullock is miscast.However,she does what she can with the role and she does O.K..The only reason she won a Razzie was because they knew she'd win an Oscar the next day.

Grades: C- in the U.S. and 4,5 in Chile.

]]> Wed, 05 Jan 2011 16:32:58 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=3833&PID=38023#38023 Give This One the Ol’ STEVE-Ho! : I just saw this and gave it 5/10.It... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=3833&PID=38004#38004 Author: Vits
Subject: 3833
Posted: January 05 2011 at 10:40am

I just saw this and gave it 5/10.It did't deserve to be nominated for "Actress","Director" nor "Picture".But it deserved to win "Screenplay" and "Couple". ]]> Wed, 05 Jan 2011 10:40:11 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=3833&PID=38004#38004 Give This One the Ol’ STEVE-Ho! : Wow, how did this movie get... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=3833&PID=32673#32673 Author: BurnHollywoodBurn
Subject: 3833
Posted: July 04 2010 at 6:33pm

Wow, how did this movie get greenlit? I just watched it on HBO and was left wondering "Who thought it would be a good idea to write/direct/produce this unfunny movie about Sandra Bullock spending all her screen time either ranting on about unless knowledge or comparing all aspects of life to crossword puzzles ... while she's stalking Bradley Cooper across America"?

Just writing that description makes my head hurt, let alone having to watch it!

]]> Sun, 04 Jul 2010 18:33:33 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=3833&PID=32673#32673 Give This One the Ol’ STEVE-Ho! : I respect your opinion, kelemenmarc.... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=3833&PID=28192#28192 Author: Michaels
Subject: 3833
Posted: January 24 2010 at 7:39am

I respect your opinion, kelemenmarc. I believe you meant to say "she's wasn't good, but she wasn't THAT bad either". I'm not sure if Razzie voters will listen to you, since Sandra is such a high profile star and as such, it's very tempting to vote for her. I, on the other hand, believe we have bigger fish to fry, like Megan Fox, Kate Hudson/Anne Hathaway, and Beyonce.]]> Sun, 24 Jan 2010 07:39:31 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=3833&PID=28192#28192 Give This One the Ol’ STEVE-Ho! : In off! Sandra wasn't good... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=3833&PID=28191#28191 Author: kelemenmarc
Subject: 3833
Posted: January 24 2010 at 2:59am

In off! Sandra wasn't good in this film, but she wasn't good. She made everything what she can with this wrong charachter. Dont hurt her, thinking about Blid Side and Proposal and forget All About Steve. If somebody can do a performance like Blind Side - NOT A RAZZIE WORTHY!]]> Sun, 24 Jan 2010 02:59:08 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=3833&PID=28191#28191 Give This One the Ol’ STEVE-Ho! : Who knows, between Bullock's... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=3833&PID=28006#28006 Author: Michaels
Subject: 3833
Posted: January 18 2010 at 7:24pm

Who knows, between Bullock's role in this movie and her role in "The Blind Side", this might be one of those rare years when someone wins both a Razzie and an Oscar.]]> Mon, 18 Jan 2010 19:24:56 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=3833&PID=28006#28006 Give This One the Ol’ STEVE-Ho! : After watching coverage on these... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=3833&PID=28005#28005 Author: GTAHater767
Subject: 3833
Posted: January 18 2010 at 6:57pm

After watching coverage on these forums all through 2009, I believe this movie deserves to win Worst Picture for 2009. Sandra Bullock's resume is a mess! Besides, if you shelf a movie THIS bad for 1.9 years before releasing it, the out-of-date factor is the least of your worries. Cinema gods forbid the stalker chick flick subgenre from taking over, because it sounds bad!

]]> Mon, 18 Jan 2010 18:57:42 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=3833&PID=28005#28005 Give This One the Ol’ STEVE-Ho! : Wunderbar. http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=3833&PID=27777#27777 Author: dEd Grimley
Subject: 3833
Posted: January 04 2010 at 1:36pm

Wunderbar.]]> Mon, 04 Jan 2010 13:36:06 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=3833&PID=27777#27777 Give This One the Ol’ STEVE-Ho! : Based on what I have been reading... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=3833&PID=27767#27767 Author: Michaels
Subject: 3833
Posted: January 04 2010 at 7:08am

Based on what I have been reading around here, "All About Steve", "Pink Panter 2", and "Miss March" might be giving "Trannies 2" and "GI Joe" a run for their money in the Worst Picture catagory.]]> Mon, 04 Jan 2010 07:08:17 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=3833&PID=27767#27767 Give This One the Ol’ STEVE-Ho! : Critics: Best and Worst of 2009... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=3833&PID=27763#27763 Author: dEd Grimley
Subject: 3833
Posted: January 03 2010 at 5:22pm

Critics: Best and Worst of 2009

A little thingy I found on Rotten Tomatoes: 9 fairly well-known critics choose their favorite (and least favorite) movies of last year. All About Steve appears 4 times as a least favorite. Miss March was the second least liked, with 2.
Bearing this in mind, I think we may want to look a little more closely at this movie, which may have been OBVIOUSLY bad enough to be almost entirely unnoticed by Razzie members. I'd be willing to bet less than 10% of those who may vote have seen it.

RESPONSE from Head RAZZberry: Not to worry, I recently saw ALL ABOUT STEVE on Pay-per-View, and it will be listed all over this year's RAZZIE® Nominating Ballot, as will our PreVue Nite feature, MISS MARCH (Forum LINK)...

]]> Sun, 03 Jan 2010 17:22:55 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=3833&PID=27763#27763 Give This One the Ol’ STEVE-Ho! : Or at least better R-rated movies...and... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=3833&PID=26456#26456 Author: Michaels
Subject: 3833
Posted: September 14 2009 at 4:20am

Or at least better R-rated movies...and pornos!

]]> Mon, 14 Sep 2009 04:20:48 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=3833&PID=26456#26456 Give This One the Ol’ STEVE-Ho! : Men clearly make better movies,... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=3833&PID=26386#26386 Author: dEd Grimley
Subject: 3833
Posted: September 10 2009 at 6:43am

Men clearly make better movies, then.]]> Thu, 10 Sep 2009 06:43:34 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=3833&PID=26386#26386 Give This One the Ol’ STEVE-Ho! : Sometimes it depends on who writes... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=3833&PID=26382#26382 Author: Michaels
Subject: 3833
Posted: September 10 2009 at 2:22am

Sometimes it depends on who writes the script. If a woman writes or directs a movie, the women are role model citizens and the men are all beer drinking, emotionless, sports obsessed cavemen. If a man writes or directs, the men are as cool as can be and the women are horny, half naked, big boobed sex machines. Such is the way it may allways be.]]> Thu, 10 Sep 2009 02:22:17 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=3833&PID=26382#26382 Give This One the Ol’ STEVE-Ho! : I wouldn't really say all... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=3833&PID=26333#26333 Author: dEd Grimley
Subject: 3833
Posted: September 07 2009 at 11:50am

I wouldn't really say all that. Look at Fatal Attraction for example. And then consider for a moment all of the teen sex comedies where the nerdy guy stalks a girl, and it's just considered cute or whatever you want to call it.
But if you want to talk double standards, yes, they definitely exist. And probably always will.]]> Mon, 07 Sep 2009 11:50:07 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=3833&PID=26333#26333 Give This One the Ol’ STEVE-Ho! : Sorry, wetbandit, but if you want... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=3833&PID=26330#26330 Author: Michaels
Subject: 3833
Posted: September 07 2009 at 11:42am

Sorry, wetbandit, but if you want a major motion picture in which there's no sexism, than you're going to have to write your own screenplay and enter it in contests in hopes of a studio picking it up and producing it, because H-Wood is not going to make one on its own any time soon.]]> Mon, 07 Sep 2009 11:42:02 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=3833&PID=26330#26330 Give This One the Ol’ STEVE-Ho! : So, when a man stalks a woman... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=3833&PID=26320#26320 Author: wetbandit82
Subject: 3833
Posted: September 07 2009 at 3:43am

So, when a man stalks a woman in the movies, he's automatically the worst kind of scum to walk the earth (and in many ways that is true in the real world, to be fair), but when a woman stalks a man, it's automatically hilarious, even though she may exhibit frightening signs? That's sexism pure and simple, and a strong reflection of Hollywood's horrible sex relations. Just once in one of these films, I'd like to see said woman--if and only if she truly deserves it, for chivalry DOES state firmly that woman are to be treated with the utmost respect at all times unless they give you good reason not to--be rewarded for her really sins with a fist to the face, for it wouldn't be as monstrous as they'd make it out to be in today's politically correct Hollywood (although better the man be horrified he's capable of that anyway so the audience retains sympathy with him). ]]> Mon, 07 Sep 2009 03:43:46 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=3833&PID=26320#26320 Give This One the Ol’ STEVE-Ho! : Originally posted by dEd GrimleyWell... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=3833&PID=26316#26316 Author: Michaels
Subject: 3833
Posted: September 07 2009 at 3:18am

Originally posted by dEd Grimley

Well that's exactly my point, though. They make the purest of crap, and yet it inexplicably makes money.
With Bay, you can at least chalk it up to the fact that people love to see things blow up.

Yeah, with Seltzerberg and Bay, it's the one-two punch of no talent hack writers/directors who the studios back and stupid movie goers who are willing to shell out their money to watch pop culture "jokes" and stuff blowing up because they are so starved for entertainment, regardless if it's good or not.

]]> Mon, 07 Sep 2009 03:18:36 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=3833&PID=26316#26316 Give This One the Ol’ STEVE-Ho! : Well that's exactly my point,... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=3833&PID=26311#26311 Author: dEd Grimley
Subject: 3833
Posted: September 06 2009 at 5:13pm

Well that's exactly my point, though. They make the purest of crap, and yet it inexplicably makes money.
With Bay, you can at least chalk it up to the fact that people love to see things blow up.]]> Sun, 06 Sep 2009 17:13:39 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=3833&PID=26311#26311 Give This One the Ol’ STEVE-Ho! : Originally posted by dEd GrimleySeltzerberg's... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=3833&PID=26304#26304 Author: Michaels
Subject: 3833
Posted: September 06 2009 at 12:00pm

Originally posted by dEd Grimley

Seltzerberg's track record is not to be trifled with. No one makes movies that consistently that are so constantly horrible and make so much money. At least in the way that they do. I guess you can at least credit Bay with exploding things well. They do NOTHING of value.

Oh, I don't know, Uwe Boll's track record is pretty neck and neck with Seltzerberg's, minus the making money part.

]]> Sun, 06 Sep 2009 12:00:47 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=3833&PID=26304#26304 Give This One the Ol’ STEVE-Ho! : Seltzerberg's track record... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=3833&PID=26286#26286 Author: dEd Grimley
Subject: 3833
Posted: September 05 2009 at 2:43pm

Seltzerberg's track record is not to be trifled with. No one makes movies that consistently that are so constantly horrible and make so much money. At least in the way that they do. I guess you can at least credit Bay with exploding things well. They do NOTHING of value.]]> Sat, 05 Sep 2009 14:43:29 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=3833&PID=26286#26286 Give This One the Ol’ STEVE-Ho! : Originally posted by MiguelAntilsu If... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=3833&PID=26278#26278 Author: Berrynoia
Subject: 3833
Posted: September 03 2009 at 1:43pm

Originally posted by MiguelAntilsu

If that's the case, then its RT ratings will not exceed 2% after 50 reviews. Of course, the possibility of that happening is 250 to 1.

Well, we are just over halfway there (26 reviews) and have a nice pair of goose eggs on the Tomatometer.

Do you think things might go Ballistic here?

Maybe this will be the Front-Runner that G. I. BLOW was originally thought to be. Could this outstink Seltzerberg?

]]> Thu, 03 Sep 2009 13:43:09 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=3833&PID=26278#26278 Give This One the Ol’ STEVE-Ho! : I've got something you might... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=3833&PID=26271#26271 Author: MiguelAntilsu
Subject: 3833
Posted: September 02 2009 at 2:30pm

I've got something you might be interested in: Roger Moore of the Orlando Sentinel has posted his case that the Razzie for Worst Actress isn't going to Cyrus, Heigl, Hudson, or Stewart (LINK). Considering his words, this movie could be worse than Speed 2: Cruise Control.

If that's the case, then its RT ratings will not exceed 2% after 50 reviews. Of course, the possibility of that happening is 250 to 1.

RESPONSE from Head RAZZberry: I hit Miguel's link above, expecting to read a review at least mentioning The RAZZIES. Instead, while Moore does call STEVE "the worst movie in Bullock's career," he not only fails to mention our Awards, but also makes no comparison between the chances of Bullock and those of Hiegl, Cyruss, et al. Yes, it looks like Bullock does belong on our Worst Actress list for this film...but no, Moore's review was not handicapping the race as Antilsu's entry suggests...

]]> Wed, 02 Sep 2009 14:30:42 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=3833&PID=26271#26271 Give This One the Ol’ STEVE-Ho! : I thought this was going to... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=3833&PID=26266#26266 Author: moviewizguy
Subject: 3833
Posted: September 01 2009 at 2:13pm

I thought this was going to be a tragedy where Bullock is killed in a tragic accident in the end of the movie and the guys in the film eventually find out what a great and optimistic person she was, even though they were annoyed by her. They didn't know how much she was meant to their lives, mostly Cooper's life. And if you think this is a joke, I really am not kidding. I don't know why I thought of that but that idea was taken from Bridge to Terabithia, a really great film. Maybe I just like those movies where you think something of one person but when that person dies that you feel something that you haven't felt for them before.

In fact, I would love to see this movie if it ends like that, which I really doubt. However, I have a feeling somewhere in the third act that something similar will happen that will eventually break Bullock's heart and Cooper feeling sad for her.
]]> Tue, 01 Sep 2009 14:13:07 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=3833&PID=26266#26266 Give This One the Ol’ STEVE-Ho! : Brilliant. http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=3833&PID=26265#26265 Author: dEd Grimley
Subject: 3833
Posted: September 01 2009 at 1:29pm

Brilliant.]]> Tue, 01 Sep 2009 13:29:03 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=3833&PID=26265#26265 Give This One the Ol’ STEVE-Ho! : This movie should've been... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=3833&PID=26263#26263 Author: Movie Man
Subject: 3833
Posted: September 01 2009 at 11:19am

This movie should've been called "The Hangover" --- Bradley Cooper was so drunk that he forgot that he met Sandra Bullock.]]> Tue, 01 Sep 2009 11:19:33 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=3833&PID=26263#26263 Give This One the Ol’ STEVE-Ho! : I saw the trailer for this ...... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=3833&PID=26251#26251 Author: Michaels
Subject: 3833
Posted: August 31 2009 at 1:24pm

I saw the trailer for this ... and I didn't laugh once. In fact, the entire time I was thinking "who thought this was going to be funny and threw millions of dollars away to have it made?".]]> Mon, 31 Aug 2009 13:24:46 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=3833&PID=26251#26251 Give This One the Ol’ STEVE-Ho! : Sandra Bullock is like the female... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=3833&PID=26250#26250 Author: dEd Grimley
Subject: 3833
Posted: August 31 2009 at 1:19pm

Sandra Bullock is like the female Nic Cage.]]> Mon, 31 Aug 2009 13:19:29 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=3833&PID=26250#26250 Give This One the Ol’ STEVE-Ho! : EVERYONE KNOWS THAT WHEN a STUDIO... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=3833&PID=26244#26244 Author: HeadRAZZBerry
Subject: 3833
Posted: August 31 2009 at 5:17am

EVERYONE KNOWS THAT WHEN a STUDIO HAS ANY FAITH in a FILM's PROSPECTS, THEY DON'T TEND to HOLD IT from RELEASE for TWO YEARS...

BUT in the TWO YEARS SINCE PRODUCTION WAS COMPLETED on ALL ABOUT STEVE, 3-TIME RAZZIE® NOMINEE SANDRA BULLOCK HAS FINALLY HAD a PAIR of BIG HIT MOVIES (AFTER a LONG ROUGH PATCH) and 3rd-BILLED BRADLEY COOPER STARRED in 2009's BIGGEST-GROSSING HIT COMEDY.

SO NOW, SUDDENLY, WHAT 23 MONTHS AGO WAS NOT CONSIDERED RELEASABLE...IS??

CRITICS and MOVIE-GOERS VEHEMENTLY DIS-AGREED: STEVE SUFFERED SAVAGE REVIEWS, and BOX OFFICE COLLAPSED as WORD-of-MOUTH QUICKLY SPREAD...

AGRESSIVELY IN-YOUR-FACE UN-FUNNY, THIS ONE's ONLY POSITIVE IS THAT IT MAY START a WEIRD NEW MOVIE SUB-GENRE: THE STALKER CHICK FLICK...

BULLOCK: "So, like, what producer do I have to f**k to get off this picture...Oh, wait...I'M one of the producers. So, in a bunch of waze, no matter what I do, Ill end up f**king myself..."

]]> Mon, 31 Aug 2009 05:17:07 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=3833&PID=26244#26244