The Official RAZZIE® Forum : Just How FOCKing Awful IZ It?!?!? http://www.razzies.com/forum/ This is an XML content feed of; The Official RAZZIE® Forum : LITTLE FOCKERS : Just How FOCKing Awful IZ It?!?!? Mon, 17 Jun 2013 22:01:29 +0000 Mon, 04 Jul 2011 10:57:48 +0000 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss Web Wiz Forums 9.70 360 www.razzies.com/forum/RSS_post_feed.asp?TID=4721 The Official RAZZIE® Forum http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_images/RazzieLogo02.gif http://www.razzies.com/forum/ Just How FOCKing Awful IZ It?!?!? : THAT'S WHAT THEY ARE FOR... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4721&PID=43723#43723 Author: Vits
Subject: 4721
Posted: July 04 2011 at 10:57am

THAT'S WHAT THEY ARE FOR THINKING IT'S SPELLED WITH AN "O" INSTEAD OF A "U"(**/*****).


Starring:Ben Stiller as the father of the LITTLE FOCKERS,and Robert DeNiro as the grandfather of the LITTLE FOCKERS.


The 1st one was the perfect example on how to make a comedy.The 2nd one did repeat a lot of the jokes,but it was still funny,and it opened the door to having fans.But even the fans won't like this one.

So what is the problem with this movie?Simple:after knowing each other for so many years,JACK still doesn't trust GREG?!And how many more times will they make up,only to start all over again?!I'm not an expert in family relationships,but when two in-laws meet and don't like each other,and years later they have an actual fight...well,after that either they like each other or not,but there's no way they can go back to just putting up with the other's presence,which will be the case if they make a 4th movie.

Since they couldn't go any further with the "His name is FOCKER" joke,this time they use "The God-FOCKER".It's barely funny the first time,and they repeat that word 5 times in 30 seconds.And when your "Presentation card" joke fails,the rest of the jokes are destined to fail.It feels as if they just wrote a bunch of gags and pasted them together trying to create the plot,which is twice as predictable as before,and this time you can't overlook that.

There are many types of comedy,and this movie fails mainly because the comedy is different from the other 2 movies.I know that someone backing up a truck and getting people covered in poop seems the same as throwing up on someone,and that a dog humping a cat seems the same as injecting a needle on someone else's penis.Well,it's not.

Like in a lot of modern comedies,there are plot holes through out the movie you only spot if you're trying to look for them(like how bad was JACK at following GREG despite being a former CIA agent),and then when it's about to finish they increase(like the fact that no one seems to care that GREG and JACK are fighting)to the point that even the character's reactions make no sense whatsoever(like ROZ smiling when BERNIE caught her with KEVIN),and it's just painful to watch.

Among the easiest things to write in a comedy is having children acting like adults and/or cursing.We have both of those in this movie,and even they are only mildly amusing in a movie that generates mostly forced laughs.

Stiller sleepwalks through this movie.The only time he changes his face expression and actually tries it's when he pretends to be a hamster,which obviously isn't funny.I know stars prefer to do that to grab a quick buck,specially in sequels,but I didn't expect it from him.He didn't change his face in NIGHT AT THE MUSEUM 2,but he was doing deadpan comedy(there's a difference),and he was funny in that one.Aside from him,there aren't bad performances.It's just that the characters have become such cartoons(specially JACK and ROZ FOCKER)that there's no way to play them without being over-the-top.


Grades: D- in the U.S. and 3,0 in Chile.
]]> Mon, 04 Jul 2011 10:57:48 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4721&PID=43723#43723 Just How FOCKing Awful IZ It?!?!? : Originally posted by SchumacherH8terThey... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4721&PID=43711#43711 Author: Michaels
Subject: 4721
Posted: July 03 2011 at 7:07pm

Originally posted by SchumacherH8ter

They showed this at Le Moyne on March 25th. I know this because I saw Suckey Punch earlier in the day and that was better. Alba wasn't very good, but not as bad as, say Nicola Peltz or Bryce Dallas Howard.
Yeah, but Alba was LONG overdue for a razzing.]]> Sun, 03 Jul 2011 19:07:33 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4721&PID=43711#43711 Just How FOCKing Awful IZ It?!?!? : They showed this at Le Moyne on... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4721&PID=43702#43702 Author: SchumacherH8ter
Subject: 4721
Posted: July 03 2011 at 4:47pm

They showed this at Le Moyne on March 25th. I know this because I saw Suckey Punch earlier in the day and that was better. Alba wasn't very good, but not as bad as, say Nicola Peltz or Bryce Dallas Howard.]]> Sun, 03 Jul 2011 16:47:24 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4721&PID=43702#43702 Just How FOCKing Awful IZ It?!?!? : I just saw it,and I gave it 3/10(I... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4721&PID=43697#43697 Author: Vits
Subject: 4721
Posted: July 03 2011 at 2:27pm

I just saw it,and I gave it 3/10(I gave the other two 9 and 8).Review coming soon.]]> Sun, 03 Jul 2011 14:27:33 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4721&PID=43697#43697 Just How FOCKing Awful IZ It?!?!? : Nowhere as good as the first,... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4721&PID=41259#41259 Author: sizzel
Subject: 4721
Posted: May 02 2011 at 6:14pm

Nowhere as good as the first, very disappointing. The first was awesome and I continue to watch it over and over.

Thanks,
Mark
]]> Mon, 02 May 2011 18:14:11 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4721&PID=41259#41259 Just How FOCKing Awful IZ It?!?!? : I Went to see this in the theater... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4721&PID=38359#38359 Author: Natendowii
Subject: 4721
Posted: January 17 2011 at 8:57am

I Went to see this in the theater with my Parents. Dear Lord I just wanted to walk out, but I couldn't because I was with my Family. It was Boring, predictable, and was so painful I wanted to take out a 9mm to put myself out my misery. the jokes were stupid and predictable, the writing was awful, and I Haven't seen Robert DeNiro slog through Material this bad since Rocky and Bullwinkle! I Nominate this for worst Sequel.]]> Mon, 17 Jan 2011 08:57:20 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4721&PID=38359#38359 Just How FOCKing Awful IZ It?!?!? : Originally posted by HeadRAZZBerry HOFFMAN:... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4721&PID=37810#37810 Author: moorlock2003
Subject: 4721
Posted: January 02 2011 at 11:55am

Originally posted by HeadRAZZBerry


HOFFMAN: "So, Babs, this could get me  my berry 
first RAZZIE® Nomination..."

BABS: "And me my third!  Thank God they don't have 
a category for Worst Frazzle-Haired Fright Wig..."  


I'd like to see both of these "fockers" with Razzie nominations in the supporting categories.]]> Sun, 02 Jan 2011 11:55:38 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4721&PID=37810#37810 Just How FOCKing Awful IZ It?!?!? : Sandler is pretty much one-note.... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4721&PID=37746#37746 Author: BurnHollywoodBurn
Subject: 4721
Posted: December 30 2010 at 2:56pm

Sandler is pretty much one-note. As we mentioned with all the movies above, he can try to be serious, but acting like a moron is just too natural for him -- his "inner moron" is always lurking just below the surface, ready to jump out. You can almost hear his thoughts, as if he is thinking: "This isn't fun, I wanna come out and play!"  

]]> Thu, 30 Dec 2010 14:56:49 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4721&PID=37746#37746 Just How FOCKing Awful IZ It?!?!? : SPANGLISH, which I gave 2/10,... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4721&PID=37732#37732 Author: Vits
Subject: 4721
Posted: December 30 2010 at 6:44am

SPANGLISH, which I gave 2/10, doesn't count. It's a more serious role, and during the dramatic scenes he gets his act together. But most of the movie is a comedy, and he acts the same way as always.  

]]> Thu, 30 Dec 2010 06:44:17 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4721&PID=37732#37732 Just How FOCKing Awful IZ It?!?!? : No, there were one or two quick... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4721&PID=37720#37720 Author: BurnHollywoodBurn
Subject: 4721
Posted: December 29 2010 at 9:07pm

No, there were one or two quick moments in Spanglish when his moronic side was getting ready to pounce, but didn't fully emerge.  

 
]]> Wed, 29 Dec 2010 21:07:21 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4721&PID=37720#37720 Just How FOCKing Awful IZ It?!?!? : You don't see that in Spanglish,... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4721&PID=37716#37716 Author: cvcjr13
Subject: 4721
Posted: December 29 2010 at 8:04pm

You don't see that in Spanglish, but then again, that movie dragged in parts.
]]> Wed, 29 Dec 2010 20:04:12 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4721&PID=37716#37716 Just How FOCKing Awful IZ It?!?!? : PUNCH DRUNK LOVE and REIGN OVER... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4721&PID=37695#37695 Author: BurnHollywoodBurn
Subject: 4721
Posted: December 29 2010 at 3:47pm

PUNCH DRUNK LOVE and REIGN OVER ME are nice efforts on Sandler's part, but in the end, they prove that acting like an idiot is all he is really good at. Even in those movie, you can see his "inner moron" desperatly wants to come out and wreak havoc.
]]> Wed, 29 Dec 2010 15:47:27 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4721&PID=37695#37695 Just How FOCKing Awful IZ It?!?!? : Speaking of Sandler, what about... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4721&PID=37685#37685 Author: Vits
Subject: 4721
Posted: December 29 2010 at 2:51pm

Speaking of Sandler, what about PUNCH DRUNK LOVE and/or REIGN OVER ME?  

Originally posted by GTAHater767

At least Will Ferrell succeeded with Stranger Than Fiction, but we don't know what Adam Sandler would be good in if not comedy or toilet humor.
]]> Wed, 29 Dec 2010 14:51:58 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4721&PID=37685#37685 Just How FOCKing Awful IZ It?!?!? : Ah, yeah -- adult diaper humoris... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4721&PID=37678#37678 Author: BurnHollywoodBurn
Subject: 4721
Posted: December 29 2010 at 11:19am

Ah, yeah -- adult diaper humor is equally distasteful...not to mention disrespectful to those who "depend" on them.]]> Wed, 29 Dec 2010 11:19:19 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4721&PID=37678#37678 Just How FOCKing Awful IZ It?!?!? : I know we are lost in translation.... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4721&PID=37676#37676 Author: GTAHater767
Subject: 4721
Posted: December 29 2010 at 10:28am

I know we are lost in translation. As for people being offended by jokes about sex... I would agree that Sandler is too fascinated with the male genitalia for his own good. I'm (beep)ed off because despite the appalling reviews on Grown-Ups, many people my age STILL eat his movies up! At least Will Ferrell succeeded with Stranger Than Fiction, but we don't know what Adam Sandler would be good in if not comedy or toilet humor.
 
And I was talking about these, not condoms.
]]> Wed, 29 Dec 2010 10:28:00 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4721&PID=37676#37676 Just How FOCKing Awful IZ It?!?!? : I think we have a "lost in... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4721&PID=37674#37674 Author: BurnHollywoodBurn
Subject: 4721
Posted: December 29 2010 at 9:49am

I think we have a "lost in translation" thing going on. Are you talking about condoms? I was talking about people being offended by jokes about sex (example: "Funny People" and Adam Sandler's strange obsession with a certain male organ in that movie).  

Originally posted by GTAHater767

If you're talking personal opinions on sex, one of my college underclassmen agrees that wearing the absorbent article in question feels better than sex. Bluntly put, it renders sex redundant.
]]> Wed, 29 Dec 2010 09:49:19 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4721&PID=37674#37674 Just How FOCKing Awful IZ It?!?!? : If you're talking personal... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4721&PID=37653#37653 Author: GTAHater767
Subject: 4721
Posted: December 28 2010 at 8:38pm

If you're talking personal opinions on sex, one of my college underclassmen agrees that wearing the absorbent article in question feels better than sex. Bluntly put, it renders sex redundant.

]]> Tue, 28 Dec 2010 20:38:58 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4721&PID=37653#37653 Just How FOCKing Awful IZ It?!?!? : I'm guessing you're... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4721&PID=37649#37649 Author: BurnHollywoodBurn
Subject: 4721
Posted: December 28 2010 at 6:24pm

I'm guessing you're just joking here, since I figured you had such a strong stance about sex, you would be one of the people who would be offended by jokes and humor that's all about sex.  

Originally posted by GTAHater767

Body functions and fluids? Do the words "8.6 Courics" mean anything to you?

And private parts and sexual fetishes? Since I was young, I've known about one of them. It was for something absorbent worn on the genitalia.

]]> Tue, 28 Dec 2010 18:24:22 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4721&PID=37649#37649 Just How FOCKing Awful IZ It?!?!? : Body functions and fluids? Do... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4721&PID=37643#37643 Author: GTAHater767
Subject: 4721
Posted: December 28 2010 at 12:52pm

Body functions and fluids? Do the words "8.6 Courics" mean anything to you?

And private parts and sexual fetishes? Since I was young, I've known about one of them. It was for something absorbent worn on the genitalia.

]]> Tue, 28 Dec 2010 12:52:08 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4721&PID=37643#37643 Just How FOCKing Awful IZ It?!?!? : Well, you can't get any more... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4721&PID=37621#37621 Author: BurnHollywoodBurn
Subject: 4721
Posted: December 27 2010 at 8:59pm

Well, you can't get any more low-brow than jokes about bodily fuctions and body fluids, or private parts and sexual fetishes ... stuff that is common place in Sandler movies. That's the kind of low-brow humor I'm taking about, or "bathroom/locker room" humor, if that is a better definition for it.  

Originally posted by saturnwatcher

Definitons can get a bit tricky. I loved Weird Al Yankovich's UHF, which a lot of people might consider low brow. But compared to most of what one would see in the average Adam Sandler film, it probably fails to meet the definition.
]]> Mon, 27 Dec 2010 20:59:28 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4721&PID=37621#37621 Just How FOCKing Awful IZ It?!?!? : Definitons can get a bit tricky.... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4721&PID=37615#37615 Author: saturnwatcher
Subject: 4721
Posted: December 27 2010 at 3:04pm

Definitons can get a bit tricky. I loved Weird Al Yankovich's UHF, which a lot of people might consider low brow. But compared to most of what one would see in the average Adam Sandler film, it probably fails to meet the definition.]]> Mon, 27 Dec 2010 15:04:06 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4721&PID=37615#37615 Just How FOCKing Awful IZ It?!?!? : Based on past posts made by members... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4721&PID=37610#37610 Author: BurnHollywoodBurn
Subject: 4721
Posted: December 27 2010 at 2:29pm

Based on past posts made by members here, that's how I know. Like a picture of Stiller dressed as "Navi" from the last Oscars with the caption "Not funny on any planet", or the fact saturnwatcher doesn't take to low-brow humor. Members give hints to their personal tastes and personalities within their posts.]]> Mon, 27 Dec 2010 14:29:57 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4721&PID=37610#37610 Just How FOCKing Awful IZ It?!?!? : How can I ask them if you keep... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4721&PID=37603#37603 Author: Vits
Subject: 4721
Posted: December 27 2010 at 2:00pm

How can I ask them if you keep talking for them?]]> Mon, 27 Dec 2010 14:00:58 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4721&PID=37603#37603 Just How FOCKing Awful IZ It?!?!? : 1. Well, we're explaining... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4721&PID=37602#37602 Author: BurnHollywoodBurn
Subject: 4721
Posted: December 27 2010 at 1:43pm

1. Well, we're explaining why the first movie was popular at that time, but I wouldn't say it was worthy of a sequel based on the lack of anyway for the story to continue besides just doing it all over again while using Stiller's character's parents.  

2. Yes, but then there's just recycling jokes from the first two movies all over again.  

3. Then ask saturnwatcher or anyone else here what they think of Ben Stiller's tiresome, decade-old "I'm funny because I wear funny costumes" routine. If no one agress that it's gotten old, then I guess it's just me.  

Originally posted by Vits

 1)I thought we were talking about why the first one was good.
2)Comedy really is subjective.Some people enjoy a certain type of jokes,and some not.Because of the success of the first one,I think it's fair to say people really like comedies of errors.
3)Regardless of what I wrote,what I really asked was "Why doyou say he's not funny anymore?".Your answer only tells me that only you don't find him funny anymore.
]]> Mon, 27 Dec 2010 13:43:41 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4721&PID=37602#37602 Just How FOCKing Awful IZ It?!?!? : 1) I thought we were talking about... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4721&PID=37584#37584 Author: Vits
Subject: 4721
Posted: December 27 2010 at 10:23am

1) I thought we were talking about why the first one was good. 

2)Comedy really is subjective. Some people enjoy a certain type of jokes, and some not. Because of the success of the first one, I think it's fair to say people really like comedies of errors. 

3)Regardless of what I wrote, what I really asked was "Why do you say he's not funny anymore?" Your answer only tells me that only you don't find him funny anymore. 
]]> Mon, 27 Dec 2010 10:23:40 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4721&PID=37584#37584 Just How FOCKing Awful IZ It?!?!? : Responding to Vits (see below):1.... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4721&PID=37557#37557 Author: BurnHollywoodBurn
Subject: 4721
Posted: December 26 2010 at 5:01pm

Responding to Vits (see below): 

1. But of course, because as we have been saying all this year, Hollywood must milk a cash cow for all it's worth. Frankly, we really didn't need a "Meet The Fockers". It was pretty much the same movie all over again, except now we're being introduced to Stiller's Type B parents instead of his wife's Type A parents. Oh, and a baby instead of a cat. 
 
2. That's what I meant by a "comedy of errors". I mean only in the movies would a man set a house or lawn on fire from smoking on the roof of the house. Although, you never know these days with the kind of stupid people in the world. Then there's the outragous things like a potty trained cat peeing on grandma's ashes or losing the cat and painting a stray cat's tail to replace him with.
 
3. Well, "Modern Family" is a series that is designed to last for 24 episodes a year with a wide range of events for them to be put through, and it has a large writing cast. Not to mention there's not one but THREE families to work with. As for Stiller not being funny, he's been doing the same routine for the past 10 years at every award show, be it the MTV Movies or the Oscar. "Oh look at me, I'm dressed in an weird costume, isn't that funny!". It's gotten old.

Originally posted by Vits

 
1. I'm sorry if you didn't liked it,but the box office results and reviews it got are enough to call it a good remake.
 
2. Aside from what Burn said,it's the fact that the movie is filled with those funny situations that at first sight seem like you only find them in movies,yet,if you think about it you can relate to most of the movie.
 
3. Not that I have a problem with you stating facts like you're automatically right,but...well,yeah.

The act only got tired because the sequels weren't funny enough.But I can assure you if you see that in other movies or shows it can still work.For example MODERN FAMILY(JAY & PHIL).

It's true that DeNiro's latest movies seem like he just does it for the money.At list Harrison Ford admits it.But what makes you say nobody thinks Stiller is funny anymore?
 
]]> Sun, 26 Dec 2010 17:01:40 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4721&PID=37557#37557 Just How FOCKing Awful IZ It?!?!? : Originally posted by BurnHollywoodBurnYes,... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4721&PID=37540#37540 Author: Vits
Subject: 4721
Posted: December 26 2010 at 1:49pm

Originally posted by BurnHollywoodBurn

Yes, I was talking about the 2000 remake with Stiller and De Niro, which was funny at times, but not funny enough -- nor did it have a story that should have gone on to be the trilogy it has become.
I'm sorry if you didn't liked it,but the box office results and reviews it got are enough to call it a good remake.
Originally posted by Vheid

So could someone tell me what the charm of that first film was, because I could never understand why so many people liked it??
Aside from what Burn said,it's the fact that the movie is filled with those funny situations that at first sight seem like you only find them in movies,yet,if you think about it you can relate to most of the movie.
Originally posted by BurnHollywoodBurn

However, Stiller and De Niro being all awkward around each other has lost it's appeal, now 10 years later, in which no one considers Stiller to be funny any more, and De Niro just seems to be going from paycheck to paycheck these days.
Not that I have a problem with you stating facts like you're automatically right,but...well,yeah.

The act only got tired because the sequels weren't funny enough.But I can assure you if you see that in other movies or shows it can still work.For example MODERN FAMILY(JAY & PHIL).

It's true that DeNiro's latest movies seem like he just does it for the money.At list Harrison Ford admits it.But what makes you say nobody thinks Stiller is funny anymore?
]]> Sun, 26 Dec 2010 13:49:22 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4721&PID=37540#37540 Just How FOCKing Awful IZ It?!?!? : Originally posted by VheidSo... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4721&PID=37534#37534 Author: BurnHollywoodBurn
Subject: 4721
Posted: December 26 2010 at 10:55am

Originally posted by Vheid


So could you tell me what the charm of this first film was, because I could never understand why so many people like it.
Well, it's all about timing. Around 1998/1999, Ben Stiller became a star with "Something About Mary" and Robert De Niro was just starting to dip his toes in (successful) comedy with "Analyze This". So for 2000, we had the then-new and popular comedy act of Stiller, joined with the usually serious, now doing light comedy De Niro. Basically, the entire movie is, as I have pointed out before, Stiller doing something awkward that De Niro doesn't aprove of, which results in Stiller being all embrassed and having to explain himself. Also added onto this was the ever relatable "meeting my future parent-inlaws and extended family routine" that every future husband or wife has to go through, in this case, resulting in a comedy of errors. So the succes of the first movie was all in the timing. However, Stiller and De Niro being all awkward around each other has lost it's appeal, now 10 years later, in which no one considers Stiller to be funny any more, and De Niro just seems to be going from paycheck to paycheck these days.]]> Sun, 26 Dec 2010 10:55:01 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4721&PID=37534#37534 Just How FOCKing Awful IZ It?!?!? : So could someone tell me what... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4721&PID=37531#37531 Author: Vheid
Subject: 4721
Posted: December 26 2010 at 9:38am

So could someone tell me what the charm of that first film was, because I could never understand why so many people liked it??  


]]> Sun, 26 Dec 2010 09:38:51 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4721&PID=37531#37531 Just How FOCKing Awful IZ It?!?!? : Yes, I was talking about the... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4721&PID=37529#37529 Author: BurnHollywoodBurn
Subject: 4721
Posted: December 26 2010 at 9:30am

Yes, I was talking about the 2000 remake with Stiller and De Niro, which was funny at times, but not funny enough -- nor did it have a story that should have gone on to be the trilogy it has become.]]> Sun, 26 Dec 2010 09:30:53 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4721&PID=37529#37529