<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="RSS_xslt_style.asp" version="1.0" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:WebWizForums="http://syndication.webwiz.co.uk/rss_namespace/">
 <channel>
  <title>The Official RAZZIE&#174; Forum : MEMBER DISCUSSION of 3 STOOGES...</title>
  <link>http://www.razzies.com/forum/</link>
  <description>This is an XML content feed of; The Official RAZZIE&#174; Forum : THE THREE STOOGES                                                                                                                            : MEMBER DISCUSSION of 3 STOOGES...</description>
  <pubDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 21:34:15 +0000</pubDate>
  <lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2013 09:52:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
  <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
  <generator>Web Wiz Forums 9.70</generator>
  <ttl>360</ttl>
  <WebWizForums:feedURL>www.razzies.com/forum/RSS_post_feed.asp?TID=5832</WebWizForums:feedURL>
  
  <item>
   <title>MEMBER DISCUSSION of 3 STOOGES... : Do I agree with its Razzie nomination?...</title>
   <link>http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5832&amp;PID=53520#53520</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.razzies.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=8803">Vits</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 5832<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> January 19 2013 at 9:52am<br /><br /><div style=": rgb233, 219, 177; margin-left: 1px; margin-top: 1px; margin-right: 1px; margin-bottom: 1px; font-family: Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; color: rgb0, 0, 0; font-weight: normal; font-size: 12px; line-height: 1.4; border-top-width: 0px; border-right-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px; border-style: initial; border-color: initial; -: n&#111;ne; "><font ="Apple-style-span" size="3" face="'Courier New', Courier, mono">Do I agree with its Razzie nomination? Skip to 05:15 to find out:</font><div><font ="Apple-style-span" size="3" face="'Courier New', Courier, mono"><br></font></div><div><font ="Apple-style-span" size="3" face="'Courier New', Courier, mono">&#091;TUBE&#093;nxQKthd3Swg&#091;/TUBE&#093;<br></font></div><div><font ="Apple-style-span" size="3" face="'Courier New', Courier, mono"><br></font></div><div><font ="Apple-style-span" size="3" face="'Courier New', Courier, mono">Any thoughts?</font></div></div>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2013 09:52:33 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5832&amp;PID=53520#53520</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>MEMBER DISCUSSION of 3 STOOGES... :   Well, I wouldn&amp;#039;t have...</title>
   <link>http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5832&amp;PID=53316#53316</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.razzies.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=708">cvcjr13</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 5832<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> December 30 2012 at 7:21pm<br /><br />Well, I wouldn't have expected this.&nbsp; The final critics total for The Three Stooges on <a href="http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/1205530-three_stooges/" target="_blank">Rotten Tomatoes is a whopping 52%</a>, while <a href="http://www.metacritic.com/movie/the-three-stooges" target="_blank">the Metacritic score is 56</a>.&nbsp; This seems rosy compared <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0383010/" target="_blank">to the IMDb&nbsp;rating of 5.1</a>, considering IMDb scores not only feature theater-goers' rating, but are also pumped up by the people who worked on the movie plus whoever the studios pay to pump up scores.&nbsp; But the biggest eyeopener is <a href="http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?page=main&amp;id=threestooges.htm" target="_blank">Box Office Mojo, showing a budget of $30 million and a worldwide take of $57 million</a>.&nbsp; It's doubtful there will be a sequel, but it probably will make money.&nbsp; <div>&nbsp;</div><div>Although I like the Stooges, their form of physical comedy is only funny when the behavior is considered ridiculous - no one acts like that.&nbsp; Unfortunately, although no one does Three Stooges moves on each other, people do assault and abuse each other.&nbsp; So I choose to set it aside, knowing that although it is funny to me, it is NOT at all funny to people who have lived that.&nbsp; Besides, it wasn't mainly the abuse I'd laugh at, but the situations they would either find themselves in or, more likely, put themselves in and all the people they would purposefully or unknowingly disrespect along the way that made it funny for me.&nbsp; Fortunately, I can get all that, and at a much higher calibre too, from the Marx Brothers, without the physically violent gags.&nbsp; </div><div>&nbsp;</div><div>What's more, I'm concerned about whether they actually captured the real Stooges, since it's supposed to be somewhat biographical.&nbsp; From the accounts I've read, they weren't all that happy.&nbsp; I recall also reading how Moe Howard in his latter days cared so much about his fans that he worked to answer his fan mail every day.&nbsp; With the physically violent jokes and the kind of people they actually were, there are some deep questions that could be addressed, and it doesn't seem they were really addressed at all.</div><div>&nbsp;</div><div>But that's all beside the point as far as this film goes.&nbsp; It apparently isn't bad enough for us.&nbsp; We have other films to&nbsp;poke, slap around and punch. . . .</div><div>&nbsp;</div>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Sun, 30 Dec 2012 19:21:35 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5832&amp;PID=53316#53316</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>MEMBER DISCUSSION of 3 STOOGES... : I just saw it. I think it should...</title>
   <link>http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5832&amp;PID=52711#52711</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.razzies.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=8803">Vits</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 5832<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> November 04 2012 at 12:23pm<br /><br /><font ="Apple-style-span" size="3" face="'Courier New', Courier, mono">I just saw it. I think it should be nominated for Worst Remake (if it counts), but <u>nothing</u> else. I know for a lot of people Worst Remake/Sequel and Worst Picture are the same, but I'm going with the "It's&nbsp;bad enough <u>only</u> among the remakes" card. And while some of the supporting performances are uninspired, none of them really stands out. And Worst Ensemble is out of the question because the 3 leads are good enough to save it. <b>Chris Diamantopoulos</b>&nbsp;in particular stands out.</font>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Sun, 04 Nov 2012 12:23:36 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5832&amp;PID=52711#52711</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>MEMBER DISCUSSION of 3 STOOGES... :   Review time. I just finished...</title>
   <link>http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5832&amp;PID=51962#51962</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.razzies.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=1568">SchumacherH8ter</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 5832<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> August 17 2012 at 8:54pm<br /><br />Review time. I just finished watching this and it's not as bad as it could have been, but that doesn't make it good.<div>&nbsp;</div><div>While the film is mostly unfunny, the scene with the Jersey Shore douches are kinda funny. Mainly because I enjoyed seeing them getting beaten. In addition, the three leads give semi-inspired performances. Sure, they annoyed me, but at least they're trying, which is more than I can say for the rest of the cast. Also, at the very end, Kate Upton wears a bikini. That may seem shallow, but you gotta appreciate the small things.</div><div>&nbsp;</div><div>Most of the actors seem to only be here for a paycheck. Jane Lynch shows up for a paycheck and only a paycheck. That being said, she does the best with her work. Which is more than can be said of Larry David as Sister Mary-Mengele. That's right, like Josef Mengele. Fun fact: the original Stooges were Ashkenazi Jews. That's not only creepy joke in the movie.</div><div>&nbsp;</div><div>At one point, we see a lion's nads. Yes, really. It's not as bad as the cricket rape from Mirror Mirror, but stuff like that doesn't belong in a PG-rated movie. There's one spectacularily gross scene involving babies. They use them as water guns, and I don't want to get into too many details about it. But, the worst part of the movie was Sofia Vergara. Sure, she's hot as Hell, but her performance is crappy.</div><div>&nbsp;</div><div>That being said, the only Razzie nod, I can see this getting is Worst Prequel, Remake, Rip-Off, or Sequel. Grade: C-</div><div>&nbsp;</div><div>Next-up: Gulliver's Travels '10!</div>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2012 20:54:21 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5832&amp;PID=51962#51962</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>MEMBER DISCUSSION of 3 STOOGES... : But the MetaCritic and Rotten...</title>
   <link>http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5832&amp;PID=50703#50703</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.razzies.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=10682">whatsthepoint</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 5832<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> April 18 2012 at 8:06am<br /><br /><div><span style="FONT-FAMILY: 'Times New Roman', Times, serif; FONT-SIZE: large">But the MetaCritic and Rotten Tomatoes scores are both higher for Three Stooges than they were for Twilight: Breaking Dawn or Dark of the Moon... &nbsp;<br></span></div><div><span style="FONT-FAMILY: 'Times New Roman', Times, serif; FONT-SIZE: large"><br></span></div><div><table width="99%"><tr><td class="BBquote"><strong><em>Originally posted by whatsthepoint</strong></em><br /><br /><div><font size="4" face="'Times New Roman', Times, serif"><b><font color="#cc0033">RESPONSE from Head RAZZberry:&nbsp;</font></b>You are forgetting that being "a hit" does&nbsp;<i>not</i>inoculate a movie from RAZZIE</font><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: 8pt; ">®</span><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman', Times, serif; font-size: large; ">&nbsp;Consideration -- Both TRANNIES #3 and TWILIGHT #4 were&nbsp;</span><i style="font-family: 'Times New Roman', Times, serif; font-size: large; ">huge</i><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman', Times, serif; font-size: large; ">&nbsp;international box office hits, and both were also nominated for multiple 2011 dis-honors...</span></td></tr></table></div></div>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 08:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5832&amp;PID=50703#50703</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>MEMBER DISCUSSION of 3 STOOGES... : Same story with 1992&amp;#039;s&amp;#039;The...</title>
   <link>http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5832&amp;PID=50702#50702</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.razzies.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=9051">Film Reel Redemption</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 5832<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> April 17 2012 at 10:34pm<br /><br />Same story with 1992's&nbsp;'The Bodyguard' (big hit with a massive number of Razzie nominations)... &nbsp;<div><br></div><div><table width="99%"><tr><td class="BBquote"><strong><em>Originally posted by whatsthepoint</strong></em><br /><br /><div><font size="4" face="'Times New Roman', Times, serif"><b><font color="#cc0033">RESPONSE from Head RAZZberry:&nbsp;</font></b>You are forgetting that being "a hit" does&nbsp;<i>not</i>inoculate a movie from RAZZIE</font><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: 8pt; ">®</span><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman', Times, serif; font-size: large; ">&nbsp;Consideration -- Both TRANNIES #3 and TWILIGHT #4 were&nbsp;</span><i style="font-family: 'Times New Roman', Times, serif; font-size: large; ">huge</i><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman', Times, serif; font-size: large; ">&nbsp;international box office hits, and both were also nominated for multiple 2011 dis-honors...</span></td></tr></table> &nbsp;</div></div><div><br></div><div><br></div>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2012 22:34:55 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5832&amp;PID=50702#50702</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>MEMBER DISCUSSION of 3 STOOGES... :   It had a production budget...</title>
   <link>http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5832&amp;PID=50696#50696</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.razzies.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=10682">whatsthepoint</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 5832<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> April 17 2012 at 7:37am<br /><br /><br>It had a production budget of 30 million, making 18 million more or less makes it a hit. <br><br>Plus comparing it to Uwe Boll is dumb, when his films (when they were released in theaters), would barely make 5 million on there opening weekends.<br><div><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman', Times, serif; font-size: large; "><br></span></div>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2012 07:37:02 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5832&amp;PID=50696#50696</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>MEMBER DISCUSSION of 3 STOOGES... : Excuse me? $18 million now constitutes...</title>
   <link>http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5832&amp;PID=50693#50693</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.razzies.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=14">saturnwatcher</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 5832<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> April 16 2012 at 8:30pm<br /><br />Excuse me? $18 million now constitutes a hit? That is going to come as incredibly good news for Uwe Boll. <img src="http://www.razzies.com/forum/smileys/smiley36.gif" height="17" width="17" border="0" alt="LOL" title="LOL" />]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2012 20:30:30 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5832&amp;PID=50693#50693</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>MEMBER DISCUSSION of 3 STOOGES... : Well it&amp;#039;s officially a hit...</title>
   <link>http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5832&amp;PID=50682#50682</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.razzies.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=10682">whatsthepoint</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 5832<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> April 15 2012 at 8:47am<br /><br />Well it's officially a hit -- it made about 18 million over the weekend, and more or less beat it's original box office predictions (as well as out-grossing Cabin in the Woods).<br><br>I won't be surprised if we get a sequel -- with Shemp! &nbsp;<br><div><br></div>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Sun, 15 Apr 2012 08:47:18 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5832&amp;PID=50682#50682</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>MEMBER DISCUSSION of 3 STOOGES... :  Yo, WTP -- You really have a...</title>
   <link>http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5832&amp;PID=50668#50668</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.razzies.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=14">saturnwatcher</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 5832<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> April 13 2012 at 6:49pm<br /><br /><div>Yo, WTP -- You really have a talent for putting words into the mouth of others, which is growing a bit tiresome. The overall rating has dropped to 44%, but in reading through several of the reviews, I get the distinct feeling that the positive reviews are coming from critics who, for whatever reason, liked the Stooges in the first place and don't really have much of a desire to tread on their legacy. In any event, whether this movie ended up with a 1% positive rating or a 100% positive rating doesn't make a squat bit of difference in how my life proceeds from here on out. Sorry to disappoint you. However, if this movie doesn't end up getting a single nomination, permit me to assure you that no one,&nbsp;<em>no one,&nbsp;</em>in this organization, or perhaps on the planet, will be happier than I am going to be. It will mean that I&nbsp;<em>never&nbsp;</em>have to sit through so much as one second of it.&nbsp;<img src="http://www.razzies.com/forum/smileys/smiley4.gif" height="17" width="17" border="0" alt="Big smile" title="Big smile" /></div><div><br></div><table width="99%"><tr><td class="BBquote"><strong><em>Originally posted by whatsthepoint</strong></em><br /><br /><br>Keep telling yourself that Saturn Watcher, the rating should at least end at 30-40%, if it doesn't end in the 50's, and not in the less than 10% that everyone seemed to be predicting. Not to mention that the weekly Rotten Tomatoes consensus says it's semi funny, and some of the top critics have given it positive reviews.<br><br>Isn't that a little shocking? <br><br>Plus that' 0% that Headrazzberry seemed to be predicting/hoping for didn't happen.</td></tr></table>&nbsp;<div></div><br>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2012 18:49:06 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5832&amp;PID=50668#50668</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>MEMBER DISCUSSION of 3 STOOGES... : vGb5gAj-ANMp4uIdZLFfB4   </title>
   <link>http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5832&amp;PID=50666#50666</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.razzies.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=8803">Vits</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 5832<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> April 13 2012 at 6:26pm<br /><br />&#091;TUBE&#093;vGb5gAj-ANM&#091;/TUBE&#093;&#091;TUBE&#093;p4uIdZLFfB4&#091;/TUBE&#093;]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2012 18:26:32 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5832&amp;PID=50666#50666</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>MEMBER DISCUSSION of 3 STOOGES... :   I noticed Lockout was not...</title>
   <link>http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5832&amp;PID=50663#50663</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.razzies.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=3423">tomsmo35</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 5832<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> April 13 2012 at 12:49pm<br /><br />I noticed Lockout was not bonus worst of the weak it's gotten 29% on RT ]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2012 12:49:11 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5832&amp;PID=50663#50663</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>MEMBER DISCUSSION of 3 STOOGES... : Oh. You read the concensus on...</title>
   <link>http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5832&amp;PID=50661#50661</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.razzies.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=8803">Vits</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 5832<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> April 13 2012 at 10:36am<br /><br /><font size="3" face="Courier New, Courier, mono">Oh. You read the concensus on the new releases' page. I read the concensus on the movie's page. But yeah, it seems it won't be nominated for Worst Picture. As for other categories...</font><br>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2012 10:36:34 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5832&amp;PID=50661#50661</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>MEMBER DISCUSSION of 3 STOOGES... : Critics Consensus: The Three Stooges...</title>
   <link>http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5832&amp;PID=50660#50660</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.razzies.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=10682">whatsthepoint</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 5832<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> April 13 2012 at 10:29am<br /><br /><br><h1>Critics Consensus: <em>The Three Stooges</em> Is Sometimes Funny, Sometimes Un-Soiten</h1><br>It doesn't say that it's laugh out loud funny, just that it's not terribly unfunny or a complete disaster. I don't think it will get any Razzie Nominations for worst picture.<br>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2012 10:29:56 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5832&amp;PID=50660#50660</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>MEMBER DISCUSSION of 3 STOOGES... :   Originally posted by whatsthepointKeep...</title>
   <link>http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5832&amp;PID=50657#50657</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.razzies.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=8803">Vits</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 5832<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> April 13 2012 at 9:36am<br /><br /><table width="99%"><tr><td class="BBquote"><strong><em>Originally posted by whatsthepoint</strong></em><br /><br />Keep telling yourself that Saturn Watcher, the rating should at least end at 30-40%, if it doesn't end in the 50's, and not in the less than 10% that everyone seemed to be predicting. Not to mention that the weekly Rotten Tomatoes consensus says it's semi funny, and some of the top critics have given it positive reviews.</td></tr></table><br><font size="3" face="Courier New, Courier, mono">The concensus literally says "While nowhere near as painful as it could have been, it fails to add fresh laughs to <b>The Stooges</b>' inestimable cinematic legacy".</font><br>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2012 09:36:33 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5832&amp;PID=50657#50657</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>MEMBER DISCUSSION of 3 STOOGES... : q9sWiym1IA8   </title>
   <link>http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5832&amp;PID=50656#50656</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.razzies.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=8803">Vits</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 5832<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> April 13 2012 at 9:35am<br /><br />&#091;TUBE&#093;q9sWiym1IA8&#091;/TUBE&#093;]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2012 09:35:03 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5832&amp;PID=50656#50656</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>MEMBER DISCUSSION of 3 STOOGES... : Keep telling yourself that Saturn...</title>
   <link>http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5832&amp;PID=50651#50651</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.razzies.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=10682">whatsthepoint</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 5832<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> April 12 2012 at 9:43pm<br /><br />Keep telling yourself that Saturn Watcher -- the rating should at least end up at 30-40%, if it doesn't end up in the 50's, and not in the "less than 10%" that everyone seemed to be predicting. Not to mention that the weekly Rotten Tomatoes consensus says it's semi funny, and some of the top critics have given it positive reviews. &nbsp;<br><br>Isn't that a little shocking? <br><br>Plus the ZERO% that HeadRAZZberry seemed to be predicting/hoping for obviously didn't happen.<br>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2012 21:43:35 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5832&amp;PID=50651#50651</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>MEMBER DISCUSSION of 3 STOOGES... : 38 reviews is about a third or...</title>
   <link>http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5832&amp;PID=50649#50649</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.razzies.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=14">saturnwatcher</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 5832<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> April 12 2012 at 9:38pm<br /><br />38 reviews is about a third or less of a typical RT sample, and the most positive reviews tend to appear early. This movie could still drop quite considerably.&nbsp;<div><br></div><div><br></div>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2012 21:38:22 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5832&amp;PID=50649#50649</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>MEMBER DISCUSSION of 3 STOOGES... :      Hey everyone it&amp;#039;s...</title>
   <link>http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5832&amp;PID=50648#50648</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.razzies.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=10682">whatsthepoint</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 5832<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> April 12 2012 at 8:57pm<br /><br /><br>Hey everyone it's at 53% based off 38 reviews on Rotten Tomatoes, so much for that single digit percentage rating. Maybe it's not THAT bad. Doesn't look like it'll get any Razzie nomination. No repeat of a thousand words either. <br><br>Perhaps we should have a bonus thread for Lockout, which is getting worse reviews than the Stooges.<br>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2012 20:57:35 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5832&amp;PID=50648#50648</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>MEMBER DISCUSSION of 3 STOOGES... : Roger Ebert gave it 2.5/4. </title>
   <link>http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5832&amp;PID=50645#50645</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.razzies.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=8803">Vits</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 5832<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> April 12 2012 at 10:40am<br /><br /><a href="http://rogerebert.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20120411/REVIEWS/120419999" target="_blank"><font size="3" face="'Courier New', Courier, mono"><b>Roger Ebert</b> gave it 2.5/4.</font></a>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2012 10:40:29 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5832&amp;PID=50645#50645</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>MEMBER DISCUSSION of 3 STOOGES... :  r0bcM7qWCQY    </title>
   <link>http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5832&amp;PID=50640#50640</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.razzies.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=8803">Vits</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 5832<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> April 12 2012 at 7:08am<br /><br /><div>&#091;TUBE&#093;r0bcM7qWCQY&#091;/TUBE&#093;</div>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2012 07:08:08 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5832&amp;PID=50640#50640</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>MEMBER DISCUSSION of 3 STOOGES... : I&amp;#039;ve always wondered what...</title>
   <link>http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5832&amp;PID=50638#50638</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.razzies.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=8803">Vits</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 5832<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> April 12 2012 at 6:15am<br /><br /><div><span style="font-family: 'Courier New', Courier, mono; line-height: 22px; font-size: medium; ">I've always wondered what would it be like if&nbsp;</span><u style="font-family: 'Courier New', Courier, mono; line-height: 22px; font-size: medium; ">all</u><span style="font-family: 'Courier New', Courier, mono; line-height: 22px; font-size: medium; ">&nbsp;</span><b style="font-family: 'Courier New', Courier, mono; line-height: 22px; font-size: medium; ">The </b><span style="font-family: 'Courier New', Courier, mono; line-height: 22px; font-size: medium; ">(various)</span><b style="font-family: 'Courier New', Courier, mono; line-height: 22px; font-size: medium; "> Stooges&nbsp;</b><span style="font-family: 'Courier New', Courier, mono; line-height: 22px; font-size: medium; ">were together in one movie. But... they have to be three. And of course, it ought to be the original trio.</span></div><div><br></div><table width="99%"><tr><td class="BBquote"><strong><em>Originally posted by JoeBacon</strong></em><br /><br />The burning question I have to ask is...<font ="apple-style-span"="" size="4">WHERE'S SHEMP?</font></td></tr></table>&nbsp;<div><br><div><font face="'Courier New', Courier, mono" size="3"><span style="line-height: 22px;"><br></span></font></div></div>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2012 06:15:54 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5832&amp;PID=50638#50638</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>MEMBER DISCUSSION of 3 STOOGES... : I think Worst Picture probably...</title>
   <link>http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5832&amp;PID=50637#50637</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.razzies.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=8992">oiram</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 5832<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> April 12 2012 at 5:46am<br /><br /><div>I think Worst Picture probably will end up being Battleship, if not 3 Stooges. I honestly don't see any other movie(s) winning...&nbsp;</div><div><br></div><table width="99%"><tr><td class="BBquote"><strong><em>Originally posted by saturnwatcher</strong></em><br /><br />What happens if the Three Stooges doesn't win worst picture (We have no idea)?</td></tr></table>&nbsp;<div><br>&nbsp;<div></div><br></div>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2012 05:46:19 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5832&amp;PID=50637#50637</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>MEMBER DISCUSSION of 3 STOOGES... :   I somehow knew JoeBacon was...</title>
   <link>http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5832&amp;PID=50636#50636</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.razzies.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=9875">jesse685</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 5832<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> April 12 2012 at 2:02am<br /><br />I somehow knew JoeBacon was going to say that.]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2012 02:02:07 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5832&amp;PID=50636#50636</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>MEMBER DISCUSSION of 3 STOOGES... : If The Three Stooges doesn&amp;#039;t...</title>
   <link>http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5832&amp;PID=50634#50634</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.razzies.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=14">saturnwatcher</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 5832<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> April 11 2012 at 9:56pm<br /><br /><div>If The Three Stooges doesn't win Worst Picture, something more deserving will. And I haven't the first clue what your question is even supposed to mean...</div><div><br></div>QUOTE=whatsthepoint&#093; <br>What happens if the Three Stooges doesn't win worst picture (We have no idea)? &#091;/QUOTE&#093;&nbsp;<div>&nbsp;&nbsp;<div></div><br></div>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2012 21:56:24 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5832&amp;PID=50634#50634</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>MEMBER DISCUSSION of 3 STOOGES... : That question pretty much sums...</title>
   <link>http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5832&amp;PID=50633#50633</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.razzies.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=14">saturnwatcher</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 5832<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> April 11 2012 at 9:30pm<br /><br /><div>That question pretty much sums up Shemp's career! &nbsp;<img src="http://www.razzies.com/forum/smileys/smiley2.gif" height="17" width="17" border="0" alt="Wink" title="Wink" /></div>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2012 21:30:36 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5832&amp;PID=50633#50633</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>MEMBER DISCUSSION of 3 STOOGES... : The burning question I have to...</title>
   <link>http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5832&amp;PID=50632#50632</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.razzies.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=22">JoeBacon</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 5832<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> April 11 2012 at 9:26pm<br /><br />The burning question I have to ask is...<div><br></div><div><font ="Apple-style-span" size="7">WHERE'S SHEMP?</font></div><div><font ="Apple-style-span" size="7"><span ="Apple-style-span" style="line-height: 67px;"><br></span></font></div><div><div><br></div><div><br></div></div>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2012 21:26:43 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5832&amp;PID=50632#50632</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>MEMBER DISCUSSION of 3 STOOGES... : After reading Head Razz&amp;#039;s...</title>
   <link>http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5832&amp;PID=50631#50631</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.razzies.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=14">saturnwatcher</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 5832<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> April 11 2012 at 6:11pm<br /><br /><div>After reading Head Razz's take on the original Stooges, my response is a heartfelt and enthusiastic&nbsp;<img src="http://www.razzies.com/forum/smileys/smiley32.gif" height="17" width="18" border="0" alt="Clap" title="Clap" />&nbsp;<div>&nbsp;</div><div>Sorry Whats, but the Stooges weren't funny. Their "comedy stylings" were lowbrow and insulting...appreciable only by 10 year-olds and drunken frat brothers. The word "deplorable" comes readily to mind. BTW, to answer a question posed earlier, just in case there is any lingering ambiguity...NO...I didn't care for the original Stooges.&nbsp;<img src="http://www.razzies.com/forum/smileys/smiley36.gif" height="17" width="17" border="0" alt="LOL" title="LOL" />&nbsp;And the fact that Snooki from&nbsp;Joisey Shore is making at least a cameo appearance in this movie cements its Razzie credentials.</div><div>&nbsp;</div><div>NOTE: I have to type in Joisey because if you type in the actual word, for some reason a rather vulgar characterization appears instead...try it and see.</div></div><div><br></div><table width="99%"><tr><td class="BBquote"><strong><em>Originally posted by oiram</strong></em><br /><br />I was actually hoping HeadRazz would answer if he even liked the Stooges in the first place. &nbsp;&nbsp; <div><b style="font-family: 'Times New Roman', Times, serif; font-size: large; "><font color="#cc0033">RESPONSE from Head RAZZberry: </font></b><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman', Times, serif; font-size: large; ">Yo, </span><b style="font-family: 'Times New Roman', Times, serif; font-size: large; ">Oiram</b><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman', Times, serif; font-size: large; "> -- Here's the </span><a href="http://www.razzies.com/forum/commentary-foto-funny_topic5831.html" target="_blank"><font color="#000000" size="4" face="'Times New Roman', Times, serif"><b><u>LINK</u></b></font></a><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman', Times, serif; font-size: large; "> to read my "Official Take" on THREE STOOGES, in which your query is answered...</span></td></tr></table>&nbsp;</div><div><br></div><div></div><br>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2012 18:11:48 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5832&amp;PID=50631#50631</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>MEMBER DISCUSSION of 3 STOOGES... : Really? Do we have to go through...</title>
   <link>http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5832&amp;PID=50629#50629</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.razzies.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=8803">Vits</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 5832<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> April 11 2012 at 4:02pm<br /><br /><font size="3" face="'Courier New', Courier, mono">Really? Do we have to go through it again?</font>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2012 16:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5832&amp;PID=50629#50629</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>MEMBER DISCUSSION of 3 STOOGES... : I don&amp;#039;t see why not, Vits....</title>
   <link>http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5832&amp;PID=50628#50628</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.razzies.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=8992">oiram</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 5832<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> April 11 2012 at 3:25pm<br /><br />I don't see why not, Vits.]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2012 15:25:39 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5832&amp;PID=50628#50628</guid>
  </item> 
 </channel>
</rss>