<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="RSS_xslt_style.asp" version="1.0" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:WebWizForums="http://syndication.webwiz.co.uk/rss_namespace/">
 <channel>
  <title>The Official RAZZIE&#174; Forum : MEMBER DISCUSSION of JOYFUL NOISE</title>
  <link>http://www.razzies.com/forum/</link>
  <description>This is an XML content feed of; The Official RAZZIE&#174; Forum : Discussion &amp; ADD'l Info on JOYFUL NOISE                                                                                                      : MEMBER DISCUSSION of JOYFUL NOISE</description>
  <pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 00:39:56 +0000</pubDate>
  <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2012 16:23:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
  <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
  <generator>Web Wiz Forums 9.70</generator>
  <ttl>360</ttl>
  <WebWizForums:feedURL>www.razzies.com/forum/RSS_post_feed.asp?TID=5695</WebWizForums:feedURL>
  
  <item>
   <title>MEMBER DISCUSSION of JOYFUL NOISE : I think that Joyful Noise might...</title>
   <link>http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5695&amp;PID=49941#49941</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.razzies.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=10669">jgman182</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 5695<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> February 24 2012 at 4:23pm<br /><br />I think that Joyful Noise might be pushing it <i>just </i>a bit here... I mean, it wasn't the BEST movie of the year so far, but you have to remember that the movie really only got a 34% on Rotten Tomatoes and a 44 on Metacritic- while not great, it's also not that terrible. Now, if Good Deeds had a discussion going, I think we could finally give Tyler Perry the Razzie his movies deserve (I think Madea's funny, but the filler certainly isn't, and since Madea's not even in this one, there's no point).&nbsp;<div><br></div><div>I rest my case at that, Head RAZZBerry, and I'm very much looking forward to your opinion on the matter.</div>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2012 16:23:14 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5695&amp;PID=49941#49941</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>MEMBER DISCUSSION of JOYFUL NOISE : Click hereto read the Movies With...</title>
   <link>http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5695&amp;PID=49357#49357</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.razzies.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=8803">Vits</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 5695<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> January 17 2012 at 5:16pm<br /><br /><font ="Apple-style-span" size="3" face="'Courier New', Courier, mono">Click <a href="http://movieswithmitch.squarespace.com/home/2012/1/17/joyful-noise-new-release.html" target="_blank"><font ="Apple-style-span" face="'Courier New', Courier, mono" size="3">here</font></a>&nbsp;to read the Movies With <b>Mitch</b> review.</font>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 17:16:29 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5695&amp;PID=49357#49357</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>MEMBER DISCUSSION of JOYFUL NOISE : For me it&amp;#039;s the other way...</title>
   <link>http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5695&amp;PID=49322#49322</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.razzies.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=8803">Vits</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 5695<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> January 14 2012 at 2:17pm<br /><br /><font ="Apple-style-span" size="3" face="'Courier New', Courier, mono">For me it's the other way around. While it's always interesting to hear new takes on songs, I didn't know it was a&nbsp;<span ="Apple-style-span" style="line-height: 19px; ">jukebox musical. Not that it's a bad thing, but it's obviously trying to attract the fans of GLEE, just like&nbsp;<b>ALVIN &amp; THE CHIPMUNKS</b>.</span></font>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Sat, 14 Jan 2012 14:17:20 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5695&amp;PID=49322#49322</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>MEMBER DISCUSSION of JOYFUL NOISE :   Roepers review believe it...</title>
   <link>http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5695&amp;PID=49321#49321</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.razzies.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=9426">billingsley</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 5695<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> January 14 2012 at 1:58pm<br /><br />Roepers review believe it or not.... made me want to see this film even more.&nbsp;<div>Honestly, I hate to say it, but I really do want to see Dolly Parton singing Chris Brown. not being sarcastic.&nbsp;<span ="apple-tab-span"="" style="white-space:pre">Honeslty, it looks like a cute movie. It's not going to be a profound character study, and it will probably be simplistic. but it looks cute. <span ="apple-tab-span"="" style="white-space:pre">	</span></span></div>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Sat, 14 Jan 2012 13:58:37 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5695&amp;PID=49321#49321</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>MEMBER DISCUSSION of JOYFUL NOISE : 2Pt4q-Av774   </title>
   <link>http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5695&amp;PID=49320#49320</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.razzies.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=8803">Vits</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 5695<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> January 14 2012 at 11:35am<br /><br />&#091;TUBE&#093;2Pt4q-Av774&#091;/TUBE&#093;]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Sat, 14 Jan 2012 11:35:03 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5695&amp;PID=49320#49320</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>MEMBER DISCUSSION of JOYFUL NOISE :   zo1hTPjyO4Q Originally posted...</title>
   <link>http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5695&amp;PID=49314#49314</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.razzies.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=8803">Vits</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 5695<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> January 13 2012 at 2:51pm<br /><br /><div>&#091;TUBE&#093;zo1hTPjyO4Q&#091;/TUBE&#093;&nbsp;</div><div><table width="99%"><tr><td class="BBquote"><strong><em>Originally posted by whatsthepoint</strong></em><br /><br />Not very descriptive.</td></tr></table></div><div><font size="3" face="'Courier New', Courier, mono">The video or the concensus? And why?</font></div>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 14:51:07 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5695&amp;PID=49314#49314</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>MEMBER DISCUSSION of JOYFUL NOISE : So, from the You-Didn&amp;#039;t -...</title>
   <link>http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5695&amp;PID=49311#49311</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.razzies.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=14">saturnwatcher</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 5695<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> January 13 2012 at 2:04pm<br /><br /><div>So, from the You-Didn't -Ask-M<em>e-B</em>ut-I'm-Going-to-Tell-You-Anyway corner: I have never really understood why a lot of people got so incredibly worked up over this whole series. I was never fond of&nbsp;<em>any&nbsp;</em>of the films (being old enough to have seen the first 3 in original release). At some level I suppose they are good "park your brains" entertainment, but there are glaring errors and nothing particularly original in any of them. I was personally appalled that after the mighty Empire managed to gain control over virtually the entire far, far away galaxy, the formidable forces of Darth Vader ultimately got their asses kicked by Teddy Bears. Yeah, right! &nbsp;</div><div><br></div><table width="99%"><tr><td class="BBquote"><strong><em>Originally posted by oiram</strong></em><br /><br />HeadRazz, what do you think of Star Wars (No, I'm not trying to be angry, I'm just asking a simple question).&nbsp; <div><br></div><div><br></div><div><font size="4" face="'Times New Roman', Times, serif"><b><font color="#cc0033">RESPONSE from Head RAZZberry:</font></b>&nbsp;Thanks for posting something positive -- and having the good sense of humor to joke about it! &nbsp;</font></div><div><font size="4" face="'Times New Roman', Times, serif"><br></font></div><div><font size="4" face="'Times New Roman', Times, serif">Of the six films <b>George Lucas</b> has made in the STAR WARS franchise, I would rate EMPIRE STRIKES BACK as my favorite, with the first film (EPISODE V) next, and RETURN OF THE JEDI&nbsp;</font><font size="4" face="'Times New Roman', Times, serif">third. But I'd have to say (given that they each received at least <i>nominations</i> for RAZZIES</font><span style="FONT-FAMILY: 'Times New Roman'"><font size="2">®</font></span><font size="4" face="'Times New Roman', Times, serif">) I thought all three of the "prequels" sucked to varying degrees. If you are asking where they rank among my <u>all-time</u> favorites, I don't think any of them would make my 100 Best of All Time list... </font>&nbsp;</div><div><br></div><div><br></div></td></tr></table> <div></div><div></div>So, from the you didn't ask <em>me, </em>but I'm going to tell you anyway corner, I have never really understood why a lot of people got so incredibly worked up over this whole series. I was never fond of <em>any </em>of the films (being old enough to have seen the first 3 in original release). At some level I suppose they are good "park your brains" entertainment, but there are glaring errors and nothing particularly original in any of them. I was personally appalled that after the mighty Empire managed to gain control over virtually the entire far, far away galaxy, the formidable forces of Darth Vader ultimately got their asses kicked by Teddy Bears. Yeah, right.]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 14:04:19 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5695&amp;PID=49311#49311</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>MEMBER DISCUSSION of JOYFUL NOISE : Not very descriptive.    </title>
   <link>http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5695&amp;PID=49309#49309</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.razzies.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=10682">whatsthepoint</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 5695<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> January 13 2012 at 1:41pm<br /><br /><br>Not very descriptive. <br>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 13:41:21 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5695&amp;PID=49309#49309</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>MEMBER DISCUSSION of JOYFUL NOISE : The concensus on this is: &amp;#034;The...</title>
   <link>http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5695&amp;PID=49303#49303</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.razzies.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=8803">Vits</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 5695<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> January 13 2012 at 10:08am<br /><br /><div><span style="font-family: 'Courier New', Courier, mono; line-height: 22px; font-size: medium; ">The concensus on this is: "The musical numbers are solidly entertaining, and it benefits from&nbsp;</span><b style="font-family: 'Courier New', Courier, mono; line-height: 22px; font-size: medium; ">Queen Latifah</b><span style="font-family: 'Courier New', Courier, mono; line-height: 22px; font-size: medium; ">&nbsp;and&nbsp;</span><b style="font-family: 'Courier New', Courier, mono; line-height: 22px; font-size: medium; ">Dolly Parton</b><span style="font-family: 'Courier New', Courier, mono; line-height: 22px; font-size: medium; ">'s sizable chemistry. Unfortunately, they aren't enough to make up for the rest of the film".</span></div><span style="line-height: 1.4; "><div><span style="line-height: 1.4; "><br></span></div>&#091;TUBE&#093;LKm54LMCd4A&#091;/TUBE&#093;</span><div><br></div><div><br><div><font face="'Courier New', Courier, mono" size="3"><span style="line-height: 22px;"><br></span></font></div></div>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 10:08:03 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5695&amp;PID=49303#49303</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>MEMBER DISCUSSION of JOYFUL NOISE :     OK, after seeing this...</title>
   <link>http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5695&amp;PID=49301#49301</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.razzies.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=8992">oiram</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 5695<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> January 13 2012 at 6:05am<br /><br />OK, after seeing this movie myself, I gotta say -- it's not <i>that</i> bad. Not great, obviously, but not <i>too</i> bad.&nbsp;If it only got one or two minor Razzie nominations (the biggest maybe being Worst Screen Couple for Latifah and Parton)&nbsp;I wouldn't mind. But really, I think we shouldn't spend too much time or energy on this one. &nbsp;<div><br></div><div><br></div>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 06:05:35 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5695&amp;PID=49301#49301</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>MEMBER DISCUSSION of JOYFUL NOISE : The fact of the matter is that...</title>
   <link>http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5695&amp;PID=49298#49298</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.razzies.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=8230">GTAHater767</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 5695<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> January 12 2012 at 6:12pm<br /><br /><div>The fact of the matter is that re-releases are not eligible! I don't even know why this is even up for discussion! And if we should present our points as to why the Star Wars Prequel Trilogy did or didn't deserve any RAZZIES, that's a slew of different forums. We have "Movies in General", "Talk Amongst Yourselves", and the forums for the 1999, 2<font color="#ff0000">002</font>, and 2<font color="#ff0000">005</font> RAZZIES for that!</div><div>&nbsp;</div><div>By the way, if I should suggest a film to keep our watch on for 2-10-012, it's <em>Journey 2: The Mysterious Island</em>. This sequel to <em>A Journey to the Center of the Earth 3D</em> (2<font color="#ff0000">008</font>)&nbsp;is from the director of <em>Cats &amp; Dogs: The Revenge of Kitty Galore</em> (Bottom 40 Films of 2<font color="#ff0000">010</font>, #14).</div><div>&nbsp;</div><div>And <em>Joyful Noise</em> is down to a 39% approval rating. That's the <strong>peak maximum</strong> where I don't mind that it's a contender for our awards. But it has a below average score at Metacritic, so this should be limited to no more than 1 nomination, not for Worst Picture. Assuming the next review will be negative, the approval rating will lose another some 2%, and I'll have to eat some of my earlier words. &nbsp;</div><div><br></div><div><table width="99%"><tr><td class="BBquote"><strong><em>Originally posted by whatsthepoint</strong></em><br /><br />Star Wars would be a lousy choice. None of the prequels even got bad reviews for godsakes (the nominations other than worst sequel - prequel and possibly worst screenplay were unwarranted in the first place). Maybe that week they should actually pick a movie with bad reviews?</td></tr></table></div><div><br></div><div><br></div>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 18:12:04 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5695&amp;PID=49298#49298</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>MEMBER DISCUSSION of JOYFUL NOISE : Star Wars would be a lousy choice....</title>
   <link>http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5695&amp;PID=49296#49296</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.razzies.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=10682">whatsthepoint</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 5695<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> January 12 2012 at 12:56pm<br /><br /><div>Star Wars would be a lousy choice. None of the prequels even got bad reviews for godsakes (the nominations other than worst sequel - prequel and possibly worst screenplay were unwarranted in the first place). Maybe that week they should actually pick a movie with bad reviews?</div><div><br></div><table width="99%"><tr><td class="BBquote"><strong><em>Originally posted by oiram</strong></em><br /><br />HeadRazz, what do you think of Star Wars (No, I'm not trying to be angry, I'm just asking a simple question).&nbsp;<div><br></div><div><b style="font-family: 'Times New Roman', Times, serif; font-size: large; "><font color="#cc0033">RESPONSE from Head RAZZberry:</font></b><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman', Times, serif; font-size: large; ">&nbsp;Thanks for posting something positive -- and having the good sense of humor to joke about it! &nbsp;</span></div><div><font face="'Times New Roman', Times, serif" size="4"><br></font></div><div><font face="'Times New Roman', Times, serif" size="4">Of the six films <b>George Lucas</b> has made in the STAR WARS franchise, I would rate EMPIRE STRIKES BACK as my favorite, with the first film (EPISODE V) next, and RETURN OF THE JEDI&nbsp;</font><font face="'Times New Roman', Times, serif" size="4">third. But I'd have to say (given that they each received at least <i>nominations</i> for RAZZIES</font><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'; "><font size="2">®</font></span><font face="'Times New Roman', Times, serif" size="4">) I thought all three of the "prequels" sucked to varying degrees. If you are asking where they rank among my <u>all-time</u> favorites, I don't think any of them would make my 100 Best of All Time list...</font></td></tr></table></div><br><br>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 12:56:45 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5695&amp;PID=49296#49296</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>MEMBER DISCUSSION of JOYFUL NOISE :  Roger Ebert gave this 1.5/4. Originally...</title>
   <link>http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5695&amp;PID=49291#49291</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.razzies.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=8803">Vits</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 5695<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> January 12 2012 at 8:47am<br /><br /><a href="http://www.rogerebert.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20120111/REVIEWS/120109980/-1/RSS" target="_blank"><font size="3" face="'Courier New', Courier, mono"><b>Roger Ebert</b> gave this 1.5/4.</font></a><div><table width="99%"><tr><td class="BBquote"><strong><em>Originally posted by GTAHater767</strong></em><br /><br />Oh, and I vote <font color="#ff0000">NO</font> on a forum for <em>Contraband</em>. The first 11 reviews on both sites&nbsp;say it's slightly above average.</td></tr></table><div><font size="3" face="'Courier New', Courier, mono">I think we should wait until after CONTRABAND is released and then, if it's bad, it could be the Bonus Worst New Movie.</font></div></div>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 08:47:23 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5695&amp;PID=49291#49291</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>MEMBER DISCUSSION of JOYFUL NOISE :     HeadRazz, what do you...</title>
   <link>http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5695&amp;PID=49288#49288</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.razzies.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=8992">oiram</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 5695<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> January 12 2012 at 3:33am<br /><br />HeadRazz, what do you think of Star Wars (No, I'm not trying to be angry, I'm just asking a simple question).&nbsp;<div><br></div><div><br></div><div><font size="4" face="'Times New Roman', Times, serif"><b><font color="#cc0033">RESPONSE from Head RAZZberry:</font></b>&nbsp;Thanks for posting something positive -- and having the good sense of humor to joke about it! &nbsp;</font></div><div><font size="4" face="'Times New Roman', Times, serif"><br></font></div><div><font size="4" face="'Times New Roman', Times, serif">Of the six films <b>George Lucas</b> has made in the STAR WARS franchise, I would rate EMPIRE STRIKES BACK as my favorite, with the first film (EPISODE V) next, and RETURN OF THE JEDI&nbsp;</font><font size="4" face="'Times New Roman', Times, serif">third. But I'd have to say (given that they each received at least <i>nominations</i> for RAZZIES</font><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'; "><font size="2">®</font></span><font size="4" face="'Times New Roman', Times, serif">) I thought all three of the "prequels" sucked to varying degrees. If you are asking where they rank among my <u>all-time</u> favorites, I don't think any of them would make my 100 Best of All Time list... </font>&nbsp;</div><div><br></div><div><br></div>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 03:33:49 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5695&amp;PID=49288#49288</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>MEMBER DISCUSSION of JOYFUL NOISE : So far it&amp;#039;s tied 7 to 7 at...</title>
   <link>http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5695&amp;PID=49286#49286</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.razzies.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=8230">GTAHater767</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 5695<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> January 11 2012 at 7:39pm<br /><br />So far it's tied 7 to 7 at Rotten Tomatoes, and has a 52% at Metacritic based on 8 reviews. I doubt it'll sink much lower than that. I forget who suggested giving <EM>Joyful Noise</EM> a forum, but I feel like it's Watashi: 1, Anata: 0 after the crash of <EM>The Devil Inside</EM>. I knew by the fact that a recent film starring her non-majesty Queen Latifah, <EM>Just Wright</EM> (released on 5-14-<FONT color=#999999>010</FONT>) got in the 50's in approval rating and review scores. I conclude this is not one of ours. <DIV>&nbsp;</DIV><DIV>Next week, we have an obvious contender in <EM>Underworld: Awakening</EM>. <EM>Underworld</EM> was simply bad (as opposed to a severe monstrosity), but for starting a long-running franchise of films that were never good, it was named #25 on the Bottom 40 Films of 2<FONT color=#ff0000>003</FONT>. I found an old list of contenders for that year, and <EM>Underworld</EM> was caps-locked. Underworld: Evolution was horrific, and earned a Dishonorable Mention on my Top &amp; Bottom 40 Films of 2<FONT color=#ff0000>006</FONT>. Rise of the Lycans was simply bad just like <EM>Underworld</EM> 1, but against the overwhelming competition, it only got a Dishonorable Mention as well, but&nbsp;for 2<FONT color=#ff0000>009</FONT>. I sincerely hope <EM>Awakening</EM> will be one of ours...</DIV><DIV>&nbsp;</DIV><DIV>EDIT: Oh, and I vote <FONT color=#ff0000>NO</FONT> on a forum for <EM>Contraband</EM>. The first 11 reviews on both sites&nbsp;say it's slightly above average.</DIV>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 19:39:42 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5695&amp;PID=49286#49286</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>MEMBER DISCUSSION of JOYFUL NOISE :  I don&amp;#039;t alwayspost angry...</title>
   <link>http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5695&amp;PID=49266#49266</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.razzies.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=8992">oiram</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 5695<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> January 10 2012 at 3:41pm<br /><br /><div><div>I don't <i>always</i>&nbsp;post angry "screeds" -- Usually, I just post links to certain trailers or movie news if no one else has yet.&nbsp;</div><div><br></div><div>I only get angry when I feel something needs to be said -- and the something I was trying to say is that sometimes you completely ignore what other people have to say, and just go by what YOU say.</div><div>&nbsp;</div><div>PS: I still see no reason as to why you would leave someone off the ballot who has been suggested by many Forum members to be a possible nominee...&nbsp;</div></div><div><br></div><table width="99%"><tr><td class="BBquote"><strong><em>Originally posted by oiram</strong></em><br /><br />&nbsp;<b style="font-family: 'Times New Roman', Times, serif; font-size: large; "><font color="#cc0033">RESPONSE from Head RAZZberry:</font> Oiram</b><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman', Times, serif; font-size: large; "> -- Could you please, even if it's only once in a while, </span><i style="font-family: 'Times New Roman', Times, serif; font-size: large; ">occasionally</i><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman', Times, serif; font-size: large; "> offer up a post that is not some kind of angry screed?? Also, I am getting tired of having to clarify that there is NO bribery involved in our Awards -- If there were, I'd be driving a 2012 BMW instead of a 2007 Pontiac Vibe.&nbsp;</span><div><span style="font-family: &quot;Times New Roman&quot;, Times, serif; font-size: large;"><br></span></div><div><span style="font-family: &quot;Times New Roman&quot;, Times, serif; font-size: large;">While I realize the very nature of the RAZZIES</span><span style="font-family: &quot;Times New Roman&quot;;"><font size="2">®</font></span><span style="font-family: &quot;Times New Roman&quot;, Times, serif; font-size: large;">&nbsp;invites some degree of cynicism from those attracted to it, your near total lack of perspective, and over-use of invective, are both, quite honestly, tiresome.</span></td></tr></table> &nbsp;</div><div><br></div><div><br></div>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 15:41:11 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5695&amp;PID=49266#49266</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>MEMBER DISCUSSION of JOYFUL NOISE : Oiram, the only Razzie credential...</title>
   <link>http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5695&amp;PID=49261#49261</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.razzies.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=1568">SchumacherH8ter</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 5695<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> January 10 2012 at 8:54am<br /><br />Oiram, the only Razzie credential that I think Contraband has might be for Kate Beckinsale...&nbsp;]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 08:54:33 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5695&amp;PID=49261#49261</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>MEMBER DISCUSSION of JOYFUL NOISE :  HeadRAZZ said he doesn&amp;#039;t...</title>
   <link>http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5695&amp;PID=49258#49258</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.razzies.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=8803">Vits</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 5695<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> January 10 2012 at 6:49am<br /><br /><div><span style="font-family: 'Courier New', Courier, mono; line-height: 22px; font-size: medium; "><b>HeadRAZZ </b>said he doesn't like talking about the contenders listed on the ballot during the nomination process. Besides, you know that his answer will be "Not every movie can be nominated, and you can write-in anything that isn't in the ballot".</span></div><table width="99%"><tr><td class="BBquote"><strong><em>Originally posted by oiram</strong></em><br /><br />Maybe this'll be the time I also ask about the ballots. First off, why still the lack of Zookeeper? What, the possibility of all four of the Happy Madison produced movies (Other three being Bucky, Just Go With It, and Jack &amp; Jill) being Worst Picture contenders does not sound exciting enough for you?</td></tr></table>&nbsp;<div><div><b style="font-family: 'Courier New', Courier, mono; line-height: 22px; font-size: medium; ">Aykroyd</b><span ="apple-style-span"="" style="font-family: 'Courier New', Courier, mono; line-height: 22px; font-size: medium; ">&nbsp;has already won 2 Razzies, giving him credentials. Maybe&nbsp;</span><b style="font-family: 'Courier New', Courier, mono; line-height: 22px; font-size: medium; ">Perry</b><span style="font-family: 'Courier New', Courier, mono; line-height: 22px; font-size: medium; ">&nbsp;and&nbsp;</span><b style="font-family: 'Courier New', Courier, mono; line-height: 22px; font-size: medium; ">Gervais</b><span style="font-family: 'Courier New', Courier, mono; line-height: 22px; font-size: medium; ">&nbsp;weren't mentioned enough. Also, what does his work at the Golden Globes (which in a way was praised) have to do with his eligibility for a Razzie?</span></div><div><div style=": rgb233, 219, 177; margin-left: 1px; margin-top: 1px; margin-right: 1px; margin-bottom: 1px; font-family: Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; color: rgb0, 0, 0; font-weight: normal; font-size: 12px; line-height: 1.4; border-top-width: 0px; border-right-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px; border-style: initial; border-color: initial; -: n&#111;ne; "><table width="99%"><tr><td class="BBquote"><strong><em>Originally posted by oiram</strong></em><br /><br />Second, I noticed that anyone that did a voice over role is completely shot out of the ballots. So&nbsp;it was fine to nominate Dan Aykroyd, a man who has not really been in the public&nbsp;eye for a while,&nbsp;last year for Yogi Bear, but it's not ok to nominate Katy Perry, one of the women all over the radio (Serious, Katy Perry made Smurfette sound like a bored Lindsay Lohan, and this is from a non-fan's point of view) or Ricky Gervais, who spent last Golden Globes bashing everyone else, yet does something ten-times worse which&nbsp;he doesn't&nbsp;even try to make it passable? (Ricky's voice sounded literally phoned-in in Spy Kids 4.)</td></tr></table></div></div><div style="margin-left: 1px; margin-top: 1px; margin-right: 1px; margin-bottom: 1px; border-top-width: 0px; border-right-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px; border-style: initial; border-color: initial; "><span style="font-family: 'Courier New', Courier, mono; font-size: medium; line-height: 22px; ">Yeah, that is odd, because his name was mentioned by many Forum users, but... ummm... breathe!</span></div><div style="margin-left: 1px; margin-top: 1px; margin-right: 1px; margin-bottom: 1px; border-top-width: 0px; border-right-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px; border-style: initial; border-color: initial; "><div style="margin-left: 1px; margin-top: 1px; margin-right: 1px; margin-bottom: 1px; font-family: Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-weight: normal; font-size: 12px; line-height: 1.4; border-top-width: 0px; border-right-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px; border-style: initial; border-color: initial; "><table width="99%"><tr><td class="BBquote"><strong><em>Originally posted by oiram</strong></em><br /><br />Lastly, I don't know if you were too tired at the time, but why in *bleep*'s name is Don Johnson given a "get out of jail free" card? Instead, you replace him with an actor no one gives two *bleep*s about except you,&nbsp;and a guy who was not even in Bucky Larson (He was associated with it, yes, but if he doesn't *bleep*ing show up in the actual movie, he should not really count.) I was not the only one that thought Don Johnson deserved a Razzie, he was basically the Razzie version of Burt Reynolds from Boogie Nights. Yet, despite most others saying Don&nbsp;deserves a Razzie, you basically to them all "Nope, Don doesn't deserve one."&nbsp;What, did&nbsp;Don dump a truckload of movie on your front lawn to make sure he doesn't make it in?</td></tr></table></div><div style="margin-left: 1px; margin-top: 1px; margin-right: 1px; margin-bottom: 1px; font-weight: normal; border-top-width: 0px; border-right-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px; border-style: initial; border-color: initial; "><b style="font-family: 'Courier New', Courier, mono; line-height: 22px; font-size: medium; ">Vergara</b><span ="apple-style-span"="" style="font-family: 'Courier New', Courier, mono; line-height: 22px; font-size: medium; ">&nbsp;was never taken seriously until that show, where she started being treated like an actress. 2 seasons later, she appears in 2 of the worst movies of the year. As for&nbsp;</span><b style="font-family: 'Courier New', Courier, mono; line-height: 22px; font-size: medium; ">Winer</b><span style="font-family: 'Courier New', Courier, mono; line-height: 22px; font-size: medium; ">, he's not really the face of the show. But it&nbsp;</span><u style="font-family: 'Courier New', Courier, mono; line-height: 22px; font-size: medium; ">is</u><span style="font-family: 'Courier New', Courier, mono; line-height: 22px; font-size: medium; ">&nbsp;odd because I don't remember any users mentioning him.</span></div><div style="margin-left: 1px; margin-top: 1px; margin-right: 1px; margin-bottom: 1px; border-top-width: 0px; border-right-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px; border-style: initial; border-color: initial; "><div style="margin-left: 1px; margin-top: 1px; margin-right: 1px; margin-bottom: 1px; font-family: Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-weight: normal; font-size: 12px; line-height: 1.4; border-top-width: 0px; border-right-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px; border-style: initial; border-color: initial; "><table width="99%"><tr><td class="BBquote"><strong><em>Originally posted by oiram</strong></em><br /><br />I knew Ms. Vergara and Mr. Winer would be in the ballots based on your hatred of Modern Family.</td></tr></table></div></div></div></div>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 06:49:11 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5695&amp;PID=49258#49258</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>MEMBER DISCUSSION of JOYFUL NOISE :                What...</title>
   <link>http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5695&amp;PID=49254#49254</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.razzies.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=8992">oiram</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 5695<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> January 10 2012 at 2:45am<br /><br />What about Contraband? I would like to point out that Mark Whalberg and Giovanni Ribisi, two of the stars of Contraband, are also going to be in a movie called Ted, which will be written by, directed by, and featuring the voice of Seth MacFarlane, creator of Family Guy, involving a killer teddy bear. Kate Beckinsale, who's also in Contraband, will also star in Underworld 4 and Total Remake- I mean, Recall. So, no, don't lose Contraband.<div>&nbsp;</div><div>&nbsp;</div>Maybe this'll be the time I also ask about the ballots. First off, why still the lack of Zookeeper? What, the possibility of all four of the Happy Madison produced movies (Other three being Bucky, Just Go With It, and Jack &amp; Jill) being Worst Picture contenders does not sound exciting enough for you?<div>&nbsp;</div><div>&nbsp;</div>Second, I noticed that anyone that did a voice over role is completely shot out of the ballots. So&nbsp;it was fine to nominate Dan Aykroyd, a man who has not really been in the public&nbsp;eye for a while,&nbsp;last year for Yogi Bear, but it's not ok to nominate Katy Perry, one of the women all over the radio (Serious, Katy Perry made Smurfette sound like a bored Lindsay Lohan, and this is from a non-fan's point of view) or Ricky Gervais, who spent last Golden Globes bashing everyone else, yet does something ten-times worse which&nbsp;he doesn't&nbsp;even try to make it passable? (Ricky's voice sounded literally phoned-in in Spy Kids 4.)<div>&nbsp;</div><div>Lastly, I don't know if you were too tired at the time, but why in *bleep*'s name is Don Johnson given a "get out of jail free" card? Instead, you replace him with an actor no one gives two *bleep*s about except you,&nbsp;and a guy who was not even in Bucky Larson (He was associated with it, yes, but if he doesn't *bleep*ing show up in the actual movie, he should not really count.) I was not the only one that thought Don Johnson deserved a Razzie, he was basically the Razzie version of Burt Reynolds from Boogie Nights. Yet, despite most others saying Don&nbsp;deserves a Razzie, you basically to them all "Nope, Don doesn't deserve one."&nbsp;What, did&nbsp;Don dump a truckload of movie on your front lawn to make sure he doesn't make it in?</div><div>&nbsp;</div><div>Sidenote: I knew Ms. Vergara and Mr. Winer would be in the ballots based on your hatred of Modern Family. &nbsp;</div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><font size="4" face="'Times New Roman', Times, serif"><b><font color="#cc0033">RESPONSE from Head RAZZberry:</font> Oiram</b> -- Could you please, even if it's only once in a while, <i>occasionally</i> offer up a post that is not some kind of angry screed?? Also, I am getting tired of having to clarify that there is NO bribery involved in our Awards -- If there were, I'd be driving a 2012 BMW instead of a 2007 Pontiac Vibe.&nbsp;</font></div><div><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman', Times, serif; font-size: large; "><br></span></div><div><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman', Times, serif; font-size: large; ">While I realize the very nature of the RAZZIES</span><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'; "><font size="2">®</font></span><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman', Times, serif; font-size: large; ">&nbsp;invites some degree of cynicism from those attracted to it, your near total lack of perspective, and over-use of invective, are both, quite honestly, tiresome.&nbsp;</span></div><div><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman', Times, serif; font-size: large; "><br></span></div><div><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman', Times, serif; font-size: large; ">There, HeadRAZZ has finished with hiz "screed" for the day...&nbsp;</span></div><div><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman', Times, serif; font-size: large; "><br></span></div><div><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman', Times, serif; font-size: large; ">&nbsp;</span></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 02:45:02 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5695&amp;PID=49254#49254</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>MEMBER DISCUSSION of JOYFUL NOISE :  WANNA MAKE SOME NOISE ABOUT...</title>
   <link>http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5695&amp;PID=49242#49242</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.razzies.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=3">HeadRAZZBerry</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 5695<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> January 09 2012 at 8:12am<br /><br /><font size="4"><b><font color="#ff6600">WANNA MAKE SOME NOISE ABOUT HOW HOAKY and FORGETTABLE the FORMULAIC MUSICAL </font><a href="http://www.razzies.com/forum/discussi&#111;n-addl-info-&#111;n-joyful-noise_forum596.html" target="_blank"><font size="4" color="#6600ff"><b><u>JOYFUL NOISE</u></b></font></a><font color="#ff6600"> IS?? &nbsp;HERE's WHERE to DO SO... </font>&nbsp;</b></font><div><font size="4"><b><br></b></font></div><div><font size="4"><b><font color="#cc0033">AND, JUST in CASE YER CURIOUS to SEE WHAT "YE OLDE HEAD RAZZ-BERRY" HAD to SAY ABOUT THIS ONE, HERE's the </font><a href="http://www.razzies.com/forum/head-razzberry-goes-all-not-joyful-&#111;n-noise_topic5690.html" target="_blank"><font size="4" color="#000000"><b><u>LINK</u></b></font></a><font color="#cc0033"> to CHECK THAT OUT...</font> &nbsp;</b></font></div><div>&nbsp;</div><div><br></div>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 08:12:23 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5695&amp;PID=49242#49242</guid>
  </item> 
 </channel>
</rss>