Speaking of zero box office, to cap off the discussion of its dismal box office "record", for some reason someone allowed this movie to play for 23 days, and it somehow managed to cough up just over $1 million.  

"The Cat in the Hat" was so inappropriate that it prompted the widow Seuss to ban live action film adaptations of Dr. Seuss's works.

In "Son of the Mask", Jamie Kennedy impregnates his wife while wearing the Mask.  As a result, the baby has the same powers as the Mask.  This was an opening for a lot of disgusting jokes.

5. The Garbage Pail Kids Movie - Some animated characters should not be made into live action.  Case in point: these trading card characters/Cabbage Patch Kids knockoffs.  They look absolutely hideous in this movie.

4. Zoom - Cashing in on the recent successes of "The Incredibles" and "Sky High", this movie tried hard to continue the trend of superhuman kids/families.  It failed.

3. North - Infamously being named the Worst Movie of 1994 by both Gene Siskel and Roger Ebert, this movie puts kids in the limelight and bashes parents to the point of ridiculousness.  Furthermore, it made less than 20% of its $40M budget back in its entire run.

2. Mac and Me - When you choose to imitate a successful film like "E.T.: The Extra Terrestrial", don't expect to get good results.  This film made less than half its budget back and it was criticized for being a cheap imitation of "E.T.: The Extra Terrestrial".

1. Baby Geniuses (I and II) - In the early 90s, the TV series "Rugrats" introduced us to the concept of intelligent babies getting into mischief.  These two movies blew that concept out of proportion not only by making the babies too intelligent, but also by making them do things considered ridiculously impossible for normal babies to do.  I imagine most of the DVD copies of these two movies probably ended up in bargain bins (or diaper pails).  

Whoa man. I did not mean to offend you. I'm sorry -- I just really hate Barney's Great Adventure.

 

Vheid mentioned the movie too.

 

Fixed. Calling that film a "classic" is WAY too much credit

 

One more question: How does this compare, in both bad film making, and sugary wimpiness, to Barney's Great Adventure, a 1998 RAZZIE nominee?

 

EDIT: Fine, oiram! I won't use "RAZZIE classic" anymore!  Sor-RY for overcrediting it! I just wanted an answer: Is this worse than Barney's Great Adventure?!

 

Though the reviews are surprisingly kind, it failed miserably with everyone else who happened to see it (a measly 25% of the audience approved of it!) I'm sure that once those few breeders who took their 2011s and 2012s to see it are through with it, the rest of the critics can go to town on this tattered fluff toy! Pardon my bluntness, but my anti-fertility attitudes well up when sugary babies' films rear their ugly heads our way!

 

My only question now is: Is there ANY way on Earth we can get through to Hollywood and prove our kodomo under 5 are NOT these total sugar-slamming dumba****?!

 

I've had people tell me I looked like I was as young as 14 years old despite turning 22 in a week (College students say I look as young as 33% my own junior!). For or against your intuitions, I feel tightly entitled to my opinion: I of all people have every right to be offended at this film! Even wimps have to have some standards; Butters Stotch, who played Hello Kitty Island Adventure instead of World of Warcraft, would likely say The Oogieloves is waaay to sugary and wimpy for him!

Yeah, has Cloris Leachman been in ANY good movie in the past few decades? Heck, she was in Scary Movie 4 of all things. Maybe she should just return that Oscar...