The Official RAZZIE® Forum : Member Discussion of TWILIGHT: S.B.D. #1 http://www.razzies.com/forum/ This is an XML content feed of; The Official RAZZIE® Forum : DISCUSSION & Add'l INFO on TWILIGHT SBD PART 1 : Member Discussion of TWILIGHT: S.B.D. #1 Wed, 22 May 2013 10:56:31 +0000 Sat, 11 Feb 2012 10:10:36 +0000 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss Web Wiz Forums 9.70 360 www.razzies.com/forum/RSS_post_feed.asp?TID=5545 The Official RAZZIE® Forum http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_images/RazzieLogo02.gif http://www.razzies.com/forum/ Member Discussion of TWILIGHT: S.B.D. #1 : YYIV7Kdq3Tw http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5545&PID=49696#49696 Author: Vits
Subject: 5545
Posted: February 11 2012 at 10:10am

[TUBE]YYIV7Kdq3Tw[/TUBE]]]> Sat, 11 Feb 2012 10:10:36 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5545&PID=49696#49696 Member Discussion of TWILIGHT: S.B.D. #1 : It's been a while since I've... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5545&PID=49692#49692 Author: Dun-Ida
Subject: 5545
Posted: February 11 2012 at 5:06am

It's been a while since I've seen this movie (since it's really bad you can't blame me for avoiding it). However I still remember I terrible it is. This crapola is still on my short-list on who I'll vote for in all categories. So unless my top two (or three) preferred candidatesin each category fail to get nominated I'll be voting for the candidates of this sh!tfest. ]]> Sat, 11 Feb 2012 05:06:19 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5545&PID=49692#49692 Member Discussion of TWILIGHT: S.B.D. #1 : Would you mind listing some of... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5545&PID=49137#49137 Author: Vits
Subject: 5545
Posted: January 03 2012 at 2:08pm

Would  you mind listing some of the reasons why you think this one is better?

Originally posted by rwdsvb

first off i'm not a huge twilight fan or something but i still think that Breaking Dawn was a very good movie , i believe that New Moon and Eclipse sucked so bad .

Originally posted by rwdsvb

the razzies awards are based on the opinions of the potterheads , so this is really stupid

What makes you think that? "If someone hates TWILIGHT they automatically love HARRY POTTER and viceversa"?
Originally posted by rwdsvb

director bill condon and catherine hardwicke were the best directors for the twilight series

That may be true, but that's not saying much.
Originally posted by rwdsvb

the razzies are for the actors that can't for sh*t

The main contender is Taylor Lautner because he was in a movie outside the saga and he was still bad.

Originally posted by rwdsvb

kristen was in 20 movies before twilight , she've never won any razzie and so the others , so i don't think they all sucked at the same time .

What do her other movies have to do with this discussion? Also, have you heard of the Worst Ensemble category? 

Originally posted by rwdsvb

bill condon is an oscar winnner

Making it all the more dissapointing.
Originally posted by rwdsvb

check out peuple's opinions http://oscar.go.com/

Not that I have a problem with Twitter, but when it comes to discussing a movie, I prefer reading reviews. And I don't think I'm the only one.
]]> Tue, 03 Jan 2012 14:08:09 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5545&PID=49137#49137 Member Discussion of TWILIGHT: S.B.D. #1 : WTH ? Twilight Breaking Dawn ?... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5545&PID=49136#49136 Author: rwdsvb
Subject: 5545
Posted: January 03 2012 at 1:37pm

WTH ? Twilight Breaking Dawn ? this razzies awards became a joke since 2010 ! 
first off i'm not a huge twilight fan or something but i still think that Breaking Dawn was a very good movie , i believe that New Moon and eclipse sucked so bad .
1- Kristen Stewart was so good in Breaking Dawn
2- Pattinson and lautner were OK 
3- the razzies awards are based on the opinions of the potterheads , so this is really stupid
4- director bill condon and catherine hardwicke were the best directors for the twilight series 
5- also i know that you hate twilight but you should be fair with the actors and the directors , you hate anything related to twilight and you love Harry potter , this is really not fair at all , the twilight actors are not bad but not great , the razzies are for the actors that can't for sh*t , kristen was in 20 movies before twilight , she've never won any razzie and so the others , so i don't think they all sucked at the same time . 
bill condon is an oscar winnner , stop making fun of twilight and the directors just because you hate the series 
i also agree that jack and jill was the worst movie of the year but Breaking Dawn ? Hell no ... 
check out peuple's opinions http://oscar.go.com/ 
]]> Tue, 03 Jan 2012 13:37:33 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5545&PID=49136#49136 Member Discussion of TWILIGHT: S.B.D. #1 : I just now saw the below. That... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5545&PID=48781#48781 Author: mbh
Subject: 5545
Posted: December 22 2011 at 11:11pm

I just now saw the below. That is incorrect. Basically everybody of the tribe in Twilight is Native American or at least to a certain percentage. In 2003 the mini series "Dreamkeeper" aired on TV and had Chaske Spencer and Gil Birmingham in lead- and supporting roles. The movie received several nominations and won the American Indian Film Award. It is a very cool movie which gives you a lot of insight into the culture. I enjoyed it very much.
Graham Greene is probably best known for "Die Hard" and "Dances with Wolves".
The Native Indian nation welcomed the possibility for their young actors to be exposed in Twilight.  

Originally posted by SuperTeenTopia

I know Julia Jones, who stars as the lone female werewolf in "Twilight" is actually Native American. I think everyone else in the "werewolf tribe" is actually Hispanic in real life (which, of course, is pissing off people of actual Native American descent!).
]]> Thu, 22 Dec 2011 23:11:36 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5545&PID=48781#48781 Member Discussion of TWILIGHT: S.B.D. #1 : Miguel... We could give this... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5545&PID=48314#48314 Author: saturnwatcher
Subject: 5545
Posted: December 07 2011 at 12:17pm

Miguel...Disapprove We could give this movie a truckload of Razzies, and it's still going to be a box-office success, and will then make another kajillion in video rentals. And the next installment will still get made. You are tilting at windmills, Senor Quixote!  ]]> Wed, 07 Dec 2011 12:17:53 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5545&PID=48314#48314 Member Discussion of TWILIGHT: S.B.D. #1 : For the third week in a row, this... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5545&PID=48278#48278 Author: MiguelAntilsu
Subject: 5545
Posted: December 04 2011 at 8:18pm

For the third week in a row, this untalented farce reigns at the box office.  Give them the Razzie now!]]> Sun, 04 Dec 2011 20:18:52 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5545&PID=48278#48278 Member Discussion of TWILIGHT: S.B.D. #1 : 6/10 or B-. Originally posted... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5545&PID=48265#48265 Author: moviewizguy
Subject: 5545
Posted: December 03 2011 at 6:35pm

6/10 or B-.
Originally posted by Vits

What's your rating?
]]> Sat, 03 Dec 2011 18:35:39 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5545&PID=48265#48265 Member Discussion of TWILIGHT: S.B.D. #1 : What's your rating? Originally... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5545&PID=48261#48261 Author: Vits
Subject: 5545
Posted: December 03 2011 at 2:49pm

What's your rating?
Originally posted by moviewizguy

While watch the film, I wonder why the filmmakers thought it was a good idea to leave some obvious unintentionally funny scenes in the film, like the scene with the wolves talking through telepathy. WHO THOUGHT THAT WAS A GOOD IDEA? Seriously, it boggles my mind.
When twi-hards watch scenes like that, they usually don't notice, just as they don't notice the errors. If they do, they'll pretend like they didn't notice or just won't care.

Before watching this movie, 2 friends at college who happen to be twi-hards asked me if I've seen them. I told them my ratings of 6,3 and 6 respectively, and one of them answered "I'll never speak to you again". She was joking about not speaking to me, but not about my ratings, even though I said I sort of liked 2 out of 3. But I guess that I have to love them to get their aproval.
]]> Sat, 03 Dec 2011 14:49:43 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5545&PID=48261#48261 Member Discussion of TWILIGHT: S.B.D. #1 : I thought this film wasn't... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5545&PID=48260#48260 Author: moviewizguy
Subject: 5545
Posted: December 03 2011 at 2:35pm

I thought this film wasn't that bad. The last 20 minutes, in particular, is very shocking and disturbing, even for a non-Twilight film. Apart from those amazing final minutes, the film has its shares of good and bad scenes. While watching the film, I wondered why the filmmakers thought it was a good idea to leave some obviously (unintentionally) funny scenes in the film, like the one with the wolves talking through telepathy. WHO THOUGHT THAT WAS A GOOD IDEA? Seriously, it boggles my mind. I feel like if these films were in the hands of a more competent director, like David Cronenberg, the films would be a lot better and more twisted, because some of the subject material presented in the series is fairly dark. It's just that the execution is sometimes so damn cheesy. But I digress. Maybe what I find to be cheesy and melodramatic could be better appreciated by the fangirls. Still, as stated earlier, it's not bad at all. I was left hooked with the cliffhanger ending and am interested to see how it all ends. I also liked the family dynamics that was brought in here due to the wedding and Bella getting pregnant. The performances by the cast are fairly good too, imo.]]> Sat, 03 Dec 2011 14:35:09 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5545&PID=48260#48260 Member Discussion of TWILIGHT: S.B.D. #1 : This was included here:eHsmju8qkv0Any... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5545&PID=48230#48230 Author: Vits
Subject: 5545
Posted: December 02 2011 at 8:53am

This was included here:
[TUBE]eHsmju8qkv0[/TUBE]
Any thoughts?
]]> Fri, 02 Dec 2011 08:53:17 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5545&PID=48230#48230 Member Discussion of TWILIGHT: S.B.D. #1 : My reaction to WFE was similar.... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5545&PID=48183#48183 Author: saturnwatcher
Subject: 5545
Posted: November 29 2011 at 7:02pm

My reaction to WFE was similar. I actually enjoyed the book, although it isn't usually the type of thing I read. As is usually the case, the movie wasn't as good as the novel, but it was a decent adaptation.  

Originally posted by SchumacherH8ter

Done watching it and my verdict... is the same. It's a decent movie, not especially good, but not bad. Same goes for Pattinson. Grade: B-.
]]> Tue, 29 Nov 2011 19:02:02 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5545&PID=48183#48183 Member Discussion of TWILIGHT: S.B.D. #1 : Actually, if memory serves correctly... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5545&PID=48182#48182 Author: saturnwatcher
Subject: 5545
Posted: November 29 2011 at 6:58pm

Actually, if memory serves correctly there was some discussion of Water for Elephants prior to its release, although it never had its own forum. There were a few here that seemed to think that Pattinson's appearance alone was enough to sink the movie. A few of us who actually saw it ultimately chimed in and credited his performance. He wasn't exceptional by any means, but at least he was adequate in the role. So I think there would be no reason whatsoever to tie together his performance in Breaking Wind with WFE.  

RESPONSE from Head RAZZberry: At this point, it looks likely that Pattinsonwill be listed on our Nominating Ballot only for BREAKING DAWN #1 (since ELEPHANTS was never even discussed on our Forum, and is currently rated "Fresh" w/a 61% Positive rating: R.T. LINK).
]]> Tue, 29 Nov 2011 18:58:59 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5545&PID=48182#48182 Member Discussion of TWILIGHT: S.B.D. #1 : Done watching it and my verdict...... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5545&PID=48181#48181 Author: SchumacherH8ter
Subject: 5545
Posted: November 29 2011 at 3:45pm

Done watching it and my verdict... is the same. It's a decent movie, not especially good, but not bad. Same goes for Pattinson. Grade: B-.]]> Tue, 29 Nov 2011 15:45:40 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5545&PID=48181#48181 Member Discussion of TWILIGHT: S.B.D. #1 : I'm watching Water For Elephants... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5545&PID=48177#48177 Author: SchumacherH8ter
Subject: 5545
Posted: November 29 2011 at 2:14pm

I'm watching Water For Elephants right now and so far it's... "OK." Pattinson isn't too bad, but I'm not done with it yet and that may change.]]> Tue, 29 Nov 2011 14:14:42 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5545&PID=48177#48177 Member Discussion of TWILIGHT: S.B.D. #1 : I know WATER FOR ELEPHANTS isn't... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5545&PID=48168#48168 Author: Vits
Subject: 5545
Posted: November 29 2011 at 5:42am

I know WATER FOR ELEPHANTS isn't really Razzie material, but I didn't like it, so that's why I listed it so many times. Also, I was using the Razzie rules that an actor can be nominated for more than one movie if they gave a bad performance and/or was in a bad movie. However, in ELEPHANTS, Pattinson was in the same level as Reese Witherspoon and Christoph Waltz (I blame the material.  

Actually, if you choose not to list ELEPHANTS, it'll be easier for me. You see, I thought that Pattinson was better than Lautner in this movie, while Lautner in ABDUCTION was much worse than Pattinson in ELEPHANTS. 

Originally posted by Head RAZZberry

At this point, it looks likely that Pattinson will be listed on our Nominating Ballot only for BREAKING DAWN #1 (since ELEPHANTS was never even discussed on our Forum, and is currently rated "Fresh" w/a 61% Positive rating: R.T. LINK). Lautner, however, looks likely to be listed for both this film and ABDUCTION (Forum LINK).
]]> Tue, 29 Nov 2011 05:42:05 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5545&PID=48168#48168 Member Discussion of TWILIGHT: S.B.D. #1 : I think that they tried real hard... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5545&PID=48166#48166 Author: SchumacherH8ter
Subject: 5545
Posted: November 29 2011 at 4:24am

I think that they tried real hard to make a good movie with the first one. After it was a big success, they fired Hardwicke and hired one of the directors of American Pie, who crapped out a bad movie, but the fans ate it up. They realized that they didn't need to make goods movie to make money, and that's where we are now. Interestingly, the first one didn't get any Razzie nods, while New Moon had four nods and Eclipse had 9.  

Originally posted by mbh

I agree, it's mostly Meyer's fault, her crappy story drags everybody down.  But the more I think about it, the more I believe that the people, who had a chance to change it for the better, didn't, and that makes them very deserving of a Razzie. Imagine, they even thought their work was good!
]]> Tue, 29 Nov 2011 04:24:01 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5545&PID=48166#48166 Member Discussion of TWILIGHT: S.B.D. #1 : Wow and I thought Warren Beatty's... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5545&PID=48165#48165 Author: Film Reel Redemption
Subject: 5545
Posted: November 28 2011 at 11:14pm

Wow and I thought Warren Beatty's ego was massive...  

Originally posted by SchumacherH8ter

**She actually said she thinks she's a better writer than Shakespeare!
]]> Mon, 28 Nov 2011 23:14:59 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5545&PID=48165#48165 Member Discussion of TWILIGHT: S.B.D. #1 : Thanks for reconfirming, HeadRazz!... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5545&PID=48164#48164 Author: mbh
Subject: 5545
Posted: November 28 2011 at 9:34pm

Thanks for reconfirming, HeadRazz! Sounds good.

SchumacherH8er, Condon won an Oscar for "Best Screenplay". I agree, it's mostly Meyer's fault, her crappy story drags everybody down.  But the more I think about it, the more I believe that the people, who had a chance to change it for the better, didn't, and that makes them very deserving of a Razzie. Imagine, they even thought their work was good! If somebody had told me "You did this!" when my wife was pregnant, I would have punched him. Who on earth came up with that crap, and more importantly, why did nobody realize how absolutely brainless that sounds? Two renowned writers, and out comes crap x 10000000. Unbelievable.
]]> Mon, 28 Nov 2011 21:34:24 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5545&PID=48164#48164 Member Discussion of TWILIGHT: S.B.D. #1 : Time to bite the bullet and... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5545&PID=48163#48163 Author: SchumacherH8ter
Subject: 5545
Posted: November 28 2011 at 7:58pm

Time to bite the bullet and review this. 
 
The good: 
 
Billy Burke: Burke is one of the few people here who escapes with his dignity. He plays Bella's dad, Officer Pornstache. Bella treats him like crap because he's concerned about her immense stupidity. 
 
Gil Birmingham: Birmingham plays Jacob's dad, Chief Spining Wheels. His acting isn't too bad and with the crap acting on display, that counts for something here. Same goes for Peter Facinelli who's "OK" as Dr. Bloodbath. 
 
The Brazilian locales: The shots of Brazil are beautiful. No word if it's on the West Coast or not. The whole movie should have been Officer Pornstache, Chief Spining Wheels, and Dr. Bloodbath getting drunk in Brazil and solving crimes. 
 
The bad: 
 
Robert Pattinson: Pattinson's stiff here. He's not as bad as he was in the first three, but that's not saying much. 
 
Kristen Stewart: Much like Pattinson, she not as bad as she was in the first three. And, again, that's not saying much. 
 
Bill Condon: Condon, you have an Oscar! What the f*ck are you doing here?!?!? 
 
The ugly: 
 
Taylor Lautner: The movie doesn't take it's time to get him shirtless. Unlike Stewart and Pattinson, his acting has regressed! This amuses me because his performances in the first two trumped the two love-bats' performances. 
 
The screenplay: The writing has always been the downfall of the Twatlight films. But this isn't a problem of Melissa Rosenberg, who's worked on Dexter. No, the problem goes back to the source, Stephenie Meyer! She can't write to save her life, she doesn't do any research*, has a massive ego**, and is an overall dumbass. In fact, I believe that the Twilight films could be quality movies if they weren't based on the writings of a deranged Mormon! 
 
Renesmee: Renesmee is Edward and Bella's Satanic spawn of a baby. She slowly drains Bella of her blood. And, worst of all, Jacob imprints on her. That means that they're destined to be in love forever because Stephenie Meyer has f*cked-up ideas about romance. Seriously, she thinks that Heathcliff from Wuthering Heights is the ideal romantic hero!
 
I was able to go thoughout the whole review with mentioning the issue of "sparkling." Grade: D
 
Next-up: Human Centipede II!
 
*That comment about the West Coast of Brazil wasn't a pointless joke; she actually wrote that! She, also, thinks that bankers had an awesome time during the Great Depression, 17th century London had sewers, etc.
**She actually said she thinks she's a better writer than Shakespeare!
]]> Mon, 28 Nov 2011 19:58:15 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5545&PID=48163#48163 Member Discussion of TWILIGHT: S.B.D. #1 : Right now is at 27 and 72.... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5545&PID=48162#48162 Author: mbh
Subject: 5545
Posted: November 28 2011 at 4:50pm

Right now is at 27 and 72. Coincidence?

Normal. All the fans flock in and got what they wanted, rating it high. So the general public gets curious, takes a chance and gets a reality check. Rating sinks way down. It's still not as low as I thought it would go.

Vits, "Water for elephants" is not Razzie material. Seeing that movie (including Patt's performance) on any kind of list here would shake my faith in the Razzies representing the worst.

I stand by my saying that this year could be Twilight's year for a Razzie, and for me it would be very satisfying. But I beg to differ. I was pleading for a Razzie for Stewart for over a year, but she has gotten better. And I just don't see a point in giving a Razzie to an obnoxious character. Same goes for the stiff, brooding Cullen character. It's like giving a Razzie to a book character, or to Meyers. I don't know how much sense that makes or what consequence should come out of it, though. It would also not hold back the masses of teenage girls.
Saying that, I do feel the need to punish whoever was writing the dialogue:
"Hi." "Thank you." "They made it?" "Yes." "Good."
Even if this was taken out of the book, why did they not fix it? Same goes for that ridiculous line saying "You did this!" to the husband when he sees the pregnant girl.

Miguel, I didn't dislike "Breaking Dawn" overall as much as "J&J" or "The Smurfs", "Red Riding Hood", "Season of the witch" or "Abduction", but I think it has a serious shot at "worst screenplay". I will watch all the nominees again back to back when the list comes out, so I can compare them directly.  


RESPONSE from Head RAZZberry: At this point, it looks likely that Pattinson will be listed on our Nominating Ballot only for BREAKING DAWN #1 (since ELEPHANTS was never even discussed on our Forum, and is currently rated "Fresh" w/a 61% Positive rating: R.T. LINK). Lautner, however, looks likely to be listed for both this film and ABDUCTION (Forum LINK). And if she were to be a Worst Actress nominee, Stewart would probably lose to the obvious front-runner in that category, Adam Sandler in drag in JACK & JILL (Forum LINK)... 


]]> Mon, 28 Nov 2011 16:50:33 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5545&PID=48162#48162 Member Discussion of TWILIGHT: S.B.D. #1 : I just saw it.F.Y.C.:-Actor... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5545&PID=48156#48156 Author: Vits
Subject: 5545
Posted: November 28 2011 at 11:49am

I just saw it.

F.Y.C.:
-Actor for Pattinson (also for WATER FOR ELEPHANTS) and Lautner (also for ABDUCTION); Supp. Actor for Billy Burke (also for DRIVE ANGRY and RED RIDING HOOD): Yes.
-Screenplay; Worst Excuse For A Horror Movie*: Maybe.
-Actress for Stewart; Supp. Actress; Director; Couple/Ensemble; Picture: No.

*If you've seen it, you'll understand why I listed it there.
Originally posted by saturnwatcher

I'm guessing that when Spielberg made Shindler's List, it was more about getting the story told from his perspective than making a lot of money. But if some young, relatively unknown director walked into a major studio production office with the same script tomorrow, he'd get his hind end tossed out onto the street. Spielberg was at a point in his career where simply having his name attached to that movie guaranteed that it would be a cash cow. So, lest we forget, this IS still America and most films are created to make money, not necessarily to raise consciousness about the horrifying religious wars going on between Muslims and Christians in Nigeria. Those stories are left to be told by documentary film makers who are typically lucky if 500 people ever see their films.

What people forget is that film is art and entertainment, but it's also a job. And one works to earn money.
Originally posted by SchumacherH8ter

Also, for anyone else feeling masochistic, there's an end-credit scene.

Based on how the movie ends, that scene has the only reason to watch PART 2.
Originally posted by mbh

"Breaking Wind" is amongst other record holders: biggestdifference in percentage of critical reviews (26%) compared to audiencereviews (92%) on RT.

Right now is at 27 and 72. Coincidence?
]]> Mon, 28 Nov 2011 11:49:53 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5545&PID=48156#48156 Member Discussion of TWILIGHT: S.B.D. #1 : 1) Actually, it does have a... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5545&PID=48150#48150 Author: Vits
Subject: 5545
Posted: November 28 2011 at 8:21am

1) Actually, it does have a lot of chances to win. Each installment gets more nominations, and since this is the worst reviewed... Also, because it was released berry recently, it's fresh on the voters' memory.
2) Writing frontrunners here is based on what we want, not what will win.
]]> Mon, 28 Nov 2011 08:21:36 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5545&PID=48150#48150 Member Discussion of TWILIGHT: S.B.D. #1 : Let me spell it out for you,... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5545&PID=48148#48148 Author: MiguelAntilsu
Subject: 5545
Posted: November 28 2011 at 7:58am

Let me spell it out for you, Vits:  My heart wants "The Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn Part 1" to win big at the Razzie Awards, but my brain doesn't think it will.  That's why my list of predictions for front-runners is different from the results I would rather see.   


]]> Mon, 28 Nov 2011 07:58:14 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5545&PID=48148#48148 Member Discussion of TWILIGHT: S.B.D. #1 : Wow, Miguel! I thought that... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5545&PID=48146#48146 Author: Vits
Subject: 5545
Posted: November 28 2011 at 5:12am

Wow, Miguel! I thought that when you came back, you'd post several things, instead of just repeating the exact same thing. 

So now Twilight #4 is your choice only for Worst Screenplay? I am confused again.  
]]> Mon, 28 Nov 2011 05:12:10 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5545&PID=48146#48146 Member Discussion of TWILIGHT: S.B.D. #1 : This series has already done enough... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5545&PID=48142#48142 Author: MiguelAntilsu
Subject: 5545
Posted: November 27 2011 at 3:25pm

This series has already done enough damage to earn a number of Razzie Awards, but the package still needs to be delivered.  And with Happy Madison barring the way, it won't be easy.]]> Sun, 27 Nov 2011 15:25:55 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5545&PID=48142#48142 Member Discussion of TWILIGHT: S.B.D. #1 : My sister look forward watching... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5545&PID=48130#48130 Author: tomdale23
Subject: 5545
Posted: November 26 2011 at 12:07am

My sister look forward watching this movie. But I gotta tell her about the gruesome scene on Breaking Dawn II. I don't think she'll still be a fanatic.
]]> Sat, 26 Nov 2011 00:07:45 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5545&PID=48130#48130 Member Discussion of TWILIGHT: S.B.D. #1 : Miguel, Miguel, Miguel....I hate... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5545&PID=48017#48017 Author: saturnwatcher
Subject: 5545
Posted: November 21 2011 at 6:56pm

Miguel, Miguel, Miguel....I hate to say I told you so...but no matter what you may think of these movies, no matter what I may think of these movies and no matter what the critics may think of these movies, they have a loyal audience. Further, we could give these movies every Razzie on the board this year and Breaking Wind 2 will do just as well at the box-office. This is yet another reason why our giving any attention to these movies whatsoever is as productive as pissing up a rope. The audience this license has established is going to go see them. Period. The people that don't care won't be particularly interested that we Razzed them. They will continue to take the appropriate course of action and ignore them, while probably scorning us a bit for not picking on something more deserving.  

Originally posted by MiguelAntilsu

I just saw the weekend box office numbers for this movie and I am appalled. These gullible moviegoers decided to waste perfectly good money on crap when they could've spent it on something that's actually worth their time.
]]> Mon, 21 Nov 2011 18:56:57 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5545&PID=48017#48017 Member Discussion of TWILIGHT: S.B.D. #1 : Oh, dont worry! Come nomination... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5545&PID=48009#48009 Author: Mayhem5185
Subject: 5545
Posted: November 21 2011 at 2:17pm

Oh, dont worry! Come nomination time, you'll get your chance -- in fact, I have a feeling most of the people on this Forum are eagerly waiting for for them to show up:

Bring it, Twi-Hards!!  Wink   

Originally posted by saturnwatcher

I am, however, surprised that we haven't seen the legion of apologists show up so far. It kind of disappoints me. I was locked and loaded LOL
]]> Mon, 21 Nov 2011 14:17:12 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5545&PID=48009#48009 Member Discussion of TWILIGHT: S.B.D. #1 : Miguel, all three of those movies... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5545&PID=48003#48003 Author: SchumacherH8ter
Subject: 5545
Posted: November 21 2011 at 12:11pm

Miguel, all three of those movies you mentioned were worse than this. I gave all three of them F's. ]]> Mon, 21 Nov 2011 12:11:33 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5545&PID=48003#48003