-The next 3 deaths focus less on scarying and more on having things jump to the screen,the fatal mistake in the 4th movie.

I still thought the deaths had a sense of uneasiness to them. Anything dealing with things going into an eye makes me really uncomfortable, along with needles in the body. I liked how they made it squeamish. However, the results of the deaths are less worse than the build up to them. Also, they were really effective to see in 3D.

Originally posted by Vits But during the middle I felt they were actually following the format step by step,and it made me glad that the movie is only 90 minutes long.I mean,the "We weren't meant to survive" speech is said at least 3 times!After it was over,I realized that I didn't had a bad time,but it was just more of the same.

But "more of the same" isn't really a complaint is it? Those who go watch these films (especially for the fifth time) will expect more of the same. However, the addition of "killing someone saves yourself" aspect of it made it more different from the rest of the sequels. The way it played out in the climax was very satisfying and different from your usual Final Destination climax.

 

1. The whole thing with RT is a joke anyway. MWG treats it like some kind of seal of approval. It's like "so long as it's 60% or higher, it's okay to say it's a good movie and that I enjoyed it, because professional critics agree with me". It's like gay couples in a parade due to New York now accepting gay marriage, it's okay to come out of the closet because it's now socially acceptable. Same thing here with MWG and his beloved RT ratings. He did the same thing with "Orphan" last year when he was counting down it just barely reaching 59%. It's just stupid bulls*** he does. The kid sees things or qualities in movies that just aren't there or he wants to see there, and it's clear professional critics who know what a good is see the movie for what it is, a piece of s***. And we did the RT discussion with 27Years and her quest to protect "Twilight" with the "we shouldn't razz movies with higher than 60%". Point being, RT should not be the measuring stick; we're giving them way too much power. The Razzies worked fine for 15 years without the site, and it can still function just fine without it. RT = overrated. And no, I'm not saying that because it's at 60%, I'm just saying it because it's true. Razzies voters don't need RT to know what a bad movie is, all they have to do is watch it.

 

2. GPA numbers don't impress me. Your GPA is NOT your IQ. A 3.5 GPA doesn't mean you will be the next Stephen Hawkings. To take a quote from "Good Will Hunting", even the Unabomber did very well for himself in school, and look what happened to him. Hell, when I was in high school, I was on the Honor Roll five times in a row, won the Presidental Award for Excellence In Education, and was invited to join the National Honor Society. So it makes me laugh inside when MWG says "Oh, I'm smart because of my GPA". Kid, having a 3.5 GPA is nothing impossible. All you have to do is hand in your work on time and in a proper manner and study hard for tests, that's it. In fact, the only reasons why not everyone is a straight A student are 1. A failing school system, 2. the student has a learning disability, 3. the student is undisciplined and unmotivated.

 

3. And this goes back to #2, just because you're book smart, doesn't mean you're street smart, which you have proven time and time again that you're not. MWG gets owned in just about every argument you make here against members who are clearly smarter than him, and all he his to offer are lame and prejudgemental insults that are no where even close to being true. And back to 27Years, at least he/she take a hint that he/she wasn't being accepted and walked away for good. I wish MWG would take that hint, too, that his opinion is not accepted or welcomed and that he's a f***ing joke and he should just go away for good. But the kid is a social retard and he will always come back for more punishment. But hey, every village has its idiot, and every forum has it's running joke, and that's all MWG is good for.

 

End of rant. Good bye.

2. I'll believe that when I see a scanned photo of your report cards. If your debates and posts are as half-assed and illogical as your essays, this must be a college of low standards.

Responding to SuperTeenTopia:

1. Welcome to the Forum!  

2. I try to be as on topic as I can.

1. Frankly, I don't care about this movie, whether it gets 60% or 6%, what you think of it or what critics think of it. I'm just feeling this forum out and seeing what everyone's opinions and relationships are like. I'm just trying to get into discussions. 

2. Then you should probably discuss those movies, rather than defending the ones that are targeted by the Razzies, because it makes you look like a poor judge of movies, which seems to be the popular opinion around here.

2. Contrary to popular belief, I am capable of watching and liking films such as The Red Shoes, The Wicker Man (1973), All About Eve, The Killing, Peeping Tom, Sunset Blvd, Mulholland Dr, Star Wars (the original trilogy), among others. I just don't discuss those films here.

I think the franchise has come to an end. After 2 weeks, this film has already dropped out of the top 10, grossing the least of the series.  

4. There's also ther gee-whiz nickname he has given to you, and the time he mocked you posting video more than once just because no one was replying to it (which was also called out by other members). Again, not the highest form of flattery.

5. See #1.

 

In the end, you get what you want, which is this franchise not ending, even though many believe it has run its course. But we are living in a time where all movie franchises are rehashed, rebooted, and remade well into a dozen installments, so this is nothing new. And besides, horror movies don't seem to get much love from the Razzie anyway, as they are just too easy a target, like fish in a barrel.

2. I highly doubt 2 people is considered a "wide opinion." I am not a child. I go to college with A's and (unfortunately) some B's. I have a GPA higher than 3.5. I am not dumb as you think I am. I can pull out more credentials if you want me to. 

3. Metacritic is another site where they only collect professional critics and it has a 50. Although not anything to scream about, 10 professional critics (out of around 24) actually liked it with another 11 giving it a mixed review. There are rarely any negative reviews on this film, negative meaning strong dislike. But in the end, as one critic pointed out, these films are critic proof. People (fans) will watch them no matter what the critics say. 

4. The picture was meant to be a humorous joke not to be taken seriously if you actually read through his post.

5. There are no fanboys on RT. If there were, RT would lose their credibility. As stated before, it's not as if anyone can post their review up there. Be practical. Go to RT right now and look through the reviews for FD5. There are no horror movie bloggers in sight.

 

1. I WAS NOT talking about you, I was talking about the "good" reviews for FD5. What WE have been pointing out to you, is that the the good reviews are coming from HORROR MOVIE BLOGGERS, which means their opinions are BIAS and should not count. They are no professional critics, they are fans who will love horror movies no matter what. And due to your fanboy-ism, I cannot take your opinon of this movie seriously. 

 

2. Good, because it seems no one here considers your reviews all that good. Sorry, but that seems to be the wide opinion here.

 

3. However, after you claimed to hate the last installment, you are glad this one was at least better. It's the same as Batman fans with "The Dark Knight"; after the embrassment of "Batman & Robin", they were overjoyed with Nolan's vision. This is the same with you. You're just glad a movie you love is being accepted as good, HOWEVER, it is being accepted NOT by professional critics, but by more FANS. So it's not a true victory, unlike when "Dark Knight" got 90% or more from PROFESSIONAL critics.

 

4. You completely missed the point of the picture, Mayhem posted it as an insult. That image is what he thinks of you, frankly, a troll or rather stupid little boy. Again, sorry, but it seems you only have yourself to blame for this image.

 

5. Yeah, from a BIAS FANBOY, not a professional critic. Again, it's a hollow victory.