Originally posted by Sanndman228715 I saw it this weekend, it was actually a big improvement over the first two MI films and way better than War of the Worlds. The entire cast was good in this film (Yes, that includes Cruise.).

My boyfriend yelled into an open movie theater during "War of the Worlds" that it was a shame that Tom Cruise dies at the end...which cracked up everyone leaving who went to see "Wedding Crashers."

Allison :-)

During the summer of 2005, I interned at a television station in Philadelphia, PA (CBS-3/KYW-TV).  The top two topics of the summer of '05 at CBS-3: Tom Cruise and Terrell "T.O." Owens.  One an international celebrity expressing his otherwordly ideas, the other a local (thankfully, no longer local) celebrity expressing his disgust for everyone who isn't him.  I don't know what was more painful to listen to.  However, the AP wire was full of Cruise stories, and our producers loved nothing more than to get the next Tom Cruise story on the air, which was always giggle worthy during the 4 o'clock news.

The couch jumping bonanza was a laugh-riot at the station, but we ladies all agreed - he was hot in "Top Gun."  Yeah.

Allison :-)

Since this has been a slow topic I will give my opinion:

I don't like Tom Cruise as a person, but he is not the celebrity I hate most. I can't stand a group of women I call "the sluts" which includes Paris Hilton, Britney Spears, Jessica Simpson, etc. Unlike other people I am able to separate him as a person and as an actor and watch his movies (if they are good). 

I haven't seen M:I:2 but M:I:3 is much better than the original. The original wasn't Razzie worthy, but its plot was way to convoluted. M:I:3 had a plot that worked, some eye-popping location, and better action sequences. It had a likable supporting cast and they didn't let Tom Cruise hog all of the screen time. Philip Hoffman was very good as the villain (no sign of the Oscar curse yet). The only problem was Tom Cruise showing off by doing two larger than life stunts that reminded me of his real life self.

Response from Head RAZZberry: I recently rented M-I-3 from Netflix, and while I didn't find Tom Cruise's performance Oscar or RAZZIE-worthy, I certainly found the screenplay -- which was hard to follow, full of Buick-sized plot-holes and regularly featured technology (like the latex-rubber-mask-making machine) that was outright laughable -- deserving of possible RAZZIE attention...

He didn't even refer to something like artistic differences. He plainly said that Crui$emeister's conduct in public had been unbearable.

Was anyone else as satisfied as I was?