The Official RAZZIE® Forum : MOVIE 43 http://www.razzies.com/forum/ This is an XML content feed of; The Official RAZZIE® Forum : MEMBER-STARTED FORUMS on 2013 TITLES : MOVIE 43 Wed, 22 May 2013 01:14:27 +0000 Mon, 13 May 2013 02:15:14 +0000 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss Web Wiz Forums 9.70 360 www.razzies.com/forum/RSS_post_feed.asp?TID=6078 The Official RAZZIE® Forum http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_images/RazzieLogo02.gif http://www.razzies.com/forum/ MOVIE 43 : Yeah true, but at the same time... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=6078&PID=54412#54412 Author: moviecritic1994
Subject: 6078
Posted: May 13 2013 at 2:15am

Yeah true, but at the same time these films just outright (and for no reason) offend and make fun of various minority groups and people with disabilities. Like you said, there is no wit, and I think there should be a disclaimer or something on these films. 

Also, I think comedians like Chris Rock and Seth Macfarlane don't really mean what they're saying when doing "offensive jokes" in their stand up routines or on Family Guy. Like what happened at this years Oscars: Seth sang the song "We saw your Boobs" just for shock value...   

]]> Mon, 13 May 2013 02:15:14 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=6078&PID=54412#54412 MOVIE 43 : Actually, while MOVIE 43 has remained... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=6078&PID=54404#54404 Author: Vits
Subject: 6078
Posted: May 12 2013 at 7:24pm

Actually, while MOVIE 43 has remained in the audiences' minds, IN-APP-PROPRIATE COMEDY grossed very little money, to the point where it has only been remembered by a few of the members here.

Originally posted by moviecritic1994

Well after seeing the trailers for both Movie 43 and Inappropriate Comedy, I can now say that it will be hard to forget two horrible offensive "comedies".

Originally posted by moviecritic1994

Why would the creators of these films even make movies like that? What's the point or the joke? I don't see how being offensive, racist, sexist or homophobic is funny at all.
 

It can be, but it requires wit. Just look at the stand-up of Eddie Murphy, Chris Rock and Sarah Silverman. And also the works of Trey Parker & Matt Stone, and, some of the works of Seth MacFarlane.
]]> Sun, 12 May 2013 19:24:52 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=6078&PID=54404#54404 MOVIE 43 : Well after seeing the trailers... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=6078&PID=54401#54401 Author: moviecritic1994
Subject: 6078
Posted: May 12 2013 at 6:41pm

Well after seeing the trailers for both Movie 43 and Inappropriate Comedy, I can now say that it will be hard to forget two horrible offensive "comedies". Side note: Why would the creators of these films even make movies like that? What's the point or the joke? I don't see how being offensive, racist, sexist or homophobic is funny at all. ]]> Sun, 12 May 2013 18:41:49 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=6078&PID=54401#54401 MOVIE 43 : I don't know. Unlike movies... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=6078&PID=54385#54385 Author: Vits
Subject: 6078
Posted: May 12 2013 at 2:10pm

I don't know. Unlike movies like THE CALL and DEAD MAN DOWN, people all over the internet have expressed lots of hate for this movie. In fact, several months ago, it was added to this list. I know, it's Wikipedia. But my point is that, several months later, no one has deleted it...meaning that the majority agrees?  

]]> Sun, 12 May 2013 14:10:21 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=6078&PID=54385#54385 MOVIE 43 : If anything, this film should... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=6078&PID=54364#54364 Author: moviecritic1994
Subject: 6078
Posted: May 12 2013 at 4:50am

If anything, this film should receive a "Worst Screen Ensemble" Razzie Award. I might even suggest Worst Picture, but I fear it might be a film best forgotten by year's end... ]]> Sun, 12 May 2013 04:50:23 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=6078&PID=54364#54364 MOVIE 43 : Categories this pile of $h!^... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=6078&PID=53803#53803 Author: Dun-Ida
Subject: 6078
Posted: March 02 2013 at 5:01am

Categories this pile of $h!^ should get nominated for: 

Worst Picture: There's much to hate about this movie. This will be discussed in other categories the movie is worthy of getting nominated. 

Worst Director: Elizabeth Banks, Steven Brill, Steve Carr, Rusty Cundieff, James Duffy, Griffin Dunne, Peter Farrelly, Patrik Forsberg, James Gunn, Bob Odenkirk, Brett Ratner & Jonathan VanTulleken. 
All the directors should be condemned. Their combined "effort" resulted in this poorly-structured pile-of-$h!^. 

Worst Screenplay: Steve Baker, Will Carlough, Jacob Fleisher, Patrik Forsberg, Matt Portenoy, Greg Pritikin, Rocky Russo, Jeremy Sosenko & Elizabeth Wright Shapiro. 
What were these writers on when they were working on this? The "story" doesn't make much sense. 

Worst Screen Ensemble: The cast combination just doesn't work. The movie's poor structure just made the the entire cast unlikable.  

Worst Screen Couple: Many pairings in this movie deserve nominations.  


]]> Sat, 02 Mar 2013 05:01:07 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=6078&PID=53803#53803 MOVIE 43 : Check out this "collage"... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=6078&PID=53674#53674 Author: oiram
Subject: 6078
Posted: February 10 2013 at 6:14am

Check out this "collage" of really nasty reviews on this film: LINK...OUCH!!


]]> Sun, 10 Feb 2013 06:14:04 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=6078&PID=53674#53674 MOVIE 43 : GRAND HOTEL is actually close... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=6078&PID=53625#53625 Author: Vits
Subject: 6078
Posted: January 29 2013 at 10:44am

GRAND HOTEL is actually close enough for comparison, but BABEL isn't star-studded. Besides, BABEL and CRASH have a lot of content.

Originally posted by cvcjr13

I say Grand Hotel, Crash and Babel.

Originally posted by cvcjr13

As for explaining what "subplot" means, you first need to understand a subplot before you can explain it.  See, you have a main plot, and then you have a subplot.  You can't have a subplot without a main plot.  That's different from having many main plots intertwine with each other.  However, you don't see that because you don't know what a main plot is, because if you knew what a main plot was, you wouldn't be using "subplot" to describe Valentine's Day or New Year's Eve.
No, no, because... Well... Ummm... Huh. That's actually accurate. Crap!

Anyway, this started because you were comparing MOVIE 43 to those movies. Now we know they're comparable in quality, but not in format (as I said from the beginning).
Originally posted by cvcjr13

Okay, Vits, if you'll stop pretending you know something when you don't, I'll be your friend. . . 

1) I was saying something, thinking it was right -- not pretending to know something I don't, Mr. Semantics.

2) I thought we were already friends. I've got you on my Buddy List, and Oiram too -- though I might have to eliminate Oiram for his taste in music.
LOL 
]]> Tue, 29 Jan 2013 10:44:16 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=6078&PID=53625#53625 MOVIE 43 : oiram, I like that song!... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=6078&PID=53622#53622 Author: cvcjr13
Subject: 6078
Posted: January 28 2013 at 7:39pm

oiram, I like that song!  
 
Okay, Vits, if you'll stop pretending you know something when you don't, I'll be your friend. . .   


 
]]> Mon, 28 Jan 2013 19:39:29 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=6078&PID=53622#53622 MOVIE 43 : You say New York Stories, I... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=6078&PID=53621#53621 Author: cvcjr13
Subject: 6078
Posted: January 28 2013 at 7:38pm

You say New York Stories, I say Grand Hotel, Crash and Babel.
 
As for explaining what "subplot" means, you first need to understand a subplot before you can explain it.  See, you have a main plot, and then you have a subplot.  You can't have a subplot without a main plot.  That's different from having many main plots intertwine with each other.  However, you don't see that because you don't know what a main plot is, because if you knew what a main plot was, you wouldn't be using "subplot" to describe Valentine's Day or New Year's Eve.
 
Speaking of portmanteau films, anybody seen Blame It On The Bellboy?
 
Originally posted by Vits

Those are the same point. And I've seen plenty of Anthology Films made by famous directors that don't have just stars. For example: NEW YORK STORIES.

Originally posted by cvcjr13

1)  They both "hire many actors"
4)  They both are excuses to reunite actors (stars only - take, well, Movie 43 for example)
 

I really don't wanna sound condescending, but do I have to explain the difference between a short film and a sub-plot?

Originally posted by cvcjr13

2)  They both have "many short films", or to be more accurate, many short stories - one intertwines, the other keeps them separate
 



]]> Mon, 28 Jan 2013 19:38:07 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=6078&PID=53621#53621 MOVIE 43 : Oh, come on guys -- Why Can't... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=6078&PID=53615#53615 Author: oiram
Subject: 6078
Posted: January 27 2013 at 7:46pm

Oh, come on guys -- Why Can't We Be Friends, and forget about this little hissy-fit here??  

[TUBE]5DmYLrxR0Y8[/TUBE]]]> Sun, 27 Jan 2013 19:46:30 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=6078&PID=53615#53615 MOVIE 43 : Those are the same point. And... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=6078&PID=53613#53613 Author: Vits
Subject: 6078
Posted: January 27 2013 at 4:59pm

Those are the same point. And I've seen plenty of Anthology Films made by famous directors that don't have just stars. For example: NEW YORK STORIES.

Originally posted by cvcjr13

1)  They both "hire many actors"
4)  They both are excuses to reunite actors (stars only - take, well, Movie 43 for example)
 

I really don't wanna sound condescending, but do I have to explain the difference between a short film and a sub-plot?

Originally posted by cvcjr13

2)  They both have "many short films", or to be more accurate, many short stories - one intertwines, the other keeps them separate
 



]]> Sun, 27 Jan 2013 16:59:44 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=6078&PID=53613#53613 MOVIE 43 : I disagree, because you're... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=6078&PID=53612#53612 Author: cvcjr13
Subject: 6078
Posted: January 27 2013 at 3:51pm

I disagree, because you're not considering:
 
1)  They both "hire many actors"
2)  They both have "many short films", or to be more accurate, many short stories - one intertwines, the other keeps them separate
3)  They both tend to have "half-assed ideas"
4)  They both are excuses to reunite actors (stars only - take, well, Movie 43 for example)
 
Once you stop disregarding the similarities, we can discuss the only real difference between them.
Originally posted by Vits

Originally posted by cvcjr13

A.k.a. a "portmanteau film".  Okay, so instead of intertwining the multiple storylines like those other films, Movie 43 keeps them separate.  Would you like another hair to split?
LOL
Well, I think that there's a big difference between hiring many actors for many short films (where there are big chances that they'll be mostly stars) for practical reasons (you can't make a Portmanteau Film with a few actors*), and, coming up with half-assed ideas as an excuse to reunite actors (stars only) for commercial reasons.

*AMERICAN HORROR STORY is a valid exception.
]]> Sun, 27 Jan 2013 15:51:17 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=6078&PID=53612#53612 MOVIE 43 : Well, I think that there's... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=6078&PID=53609#53609 Author: Vits
Subject: 6078
Posted: January 27 2013 at 1:07pm

Well, I think that there's a big difference between hiring many actors for many short films (where there are big chances that they'll be mostly stars) for practical reasons (you can't make a Portmanteau Film with a few actors*), and, coming up with half-assed ideas as an excuse to reunite actors (stars only) for commercial reasons. LOL

*AMERICAN HORROR STORY is a valid exception.  

Originally posted by cvcjr13

A.k.a. a "portmanteau film".  Okay, so instead of intertwining the multiple storylines like those other films, Movie 43 keeps them separate.  Would you like another hair to split?
]]> Sun, 27 Jan 2013 13:07:27 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=6078&PID=53609#53609 MOVIE 43 : A.k.a. a "portmanteau film".... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=6078&PID=53608#53608 Author: cvcjr13
Subject: 6078
Posted: January 27 2013 at 12:41pm

A.k.a. a "portmanteau film".  Okay, so instead of intertwining the multiple storylines like those other films, Movie 43 keeps them separate.  Would you like another hair to split?
 
And while you're busy splitting hairs, let's talk about something more important, like everybody who squandered their career on this portmanteau film:
 
Dennis Quaid, Greg Kinnear, Common, Hugh Jackman, Kate Winslett, Naomi Watts, Anna Faris, Emma Stone, Richard Gere, Kate Bosworth, Uma Thurman, Gerard Butler, Halle Berry, Snooki, Terrence Howard, and way too many other names. . . .  

Originally posted by Vits

Originally posted by cvcjr13

Come and ponder the cast & crew for Movie 43 at IMDb for awhile.  Doesn't this strike you as the excretable (take that any way you want) version of Valentine's Dayand New Year's Eve?
As I said in the other forum (which I'm guessing you didn't read), this has nothing to do with NYE, VD, WHAT TO EXPECT WHEN YOU'RE EXPECTING, THINK LIKE A MAN, HE'S JUST NOT THAT INTO YOU nor LOVE ACTUALLY. It's an Anthology Movie.


 
]]> Sun, 27 Jan 2013 12:41:11 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=6078&PID=53608#53608 MOVIE 43 : As I said in another forum (which... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=6078&PID=53603#53603 Author: Vits
Subject: 6078
Posted: January 27 2013 at 9:53am

As I said in another forum (which I'm guessing you didn't read), this has nothing to do with NEW YEAR'S EVE, VALENTINE'S DAY, WHAT TO EXPECT WHEN YOU'RE EXPECTING, THINK LIKE A MAN, HE'S JUST NOT THAT INTO YOU nor LOVE ACTUALLY. It's an Anthology Movie. 

Originally posted by cvcjr13

Come and ponder the cast & crew for Movie 43 at IMDb for awhile.  Doesn't this strike you as the excretable (take that any way you want) version of Valentine's Day and New Year's Eve?
]]> Sun, 27 Jan 2013 09:53:30 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=6078&PID=53603#53603 MOVIE 43 : ...and don't forget Adam... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=6078&PID=53602#53602 Author: oiram
Subject: 6078
Posted: January 27 2013 at 4:02am

...and don't forget Adam Sandler's Grown Ups 2! 


]]> Sun, 27 Jan 2013 04:02:55 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=6078&PID=53602#53602 MOVIE 43 : Boy! This film is setting the... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=6078&PID=53600#53600 Author: MiguelAntilsu
Subject: 6078
Posted: January 26 2013 at 9:12pm

Boy!  This film is setting the bar pretty low.  Richard Roeper called it 'the "Citizen Kane" of awful' and referenced "Showgirls," "Howard the Duck," and "Freddy Got Fingered" in his review: http://rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20130123/REVIEWS/130129973

"Pain and Gain," "After Earth," and "The Host" may have their work cut out for them.
]]> Sat, 26 Jan 2013 21:12:03 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=6078&PID=53600#53600 MOVIE 43 : Come and ponder the cast &... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=6078&PID=53599#53599 Author: cvcjr13
Subject: 6078
Posted: January 26 2013 at 6:30pm

Come and ponder the cast & crew for Movie 43 at IMDb for awhile.  Doesn't this strike you as the excretable (take that any way you want) version of Valentine's Day and New Year's Eve?
 
You may also ponder the excretable box office for Movie 43 at Box Office Mojo while you're at it.
 
Then you may continue to revisit the excretable Tomatometer at Rotten Tomatoes, as well as the excretable Metascore at Metacritic.
 
There's only one conclusion.  This movie has been flushed down the crapper, which makes this movie ours for the WHIZZING RAZZING!
 
 
]]> Sat, 26 Jan 2013 18:30:43 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=6078&PID=53599#53599 MOVIE 43 : R.T. (5%): "A star-studded... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=6078&PID=53595#53595 Author: Vits
Subject: 6078
Posted: January 26 2013 at 12:02pm

R.T. (5%): "A star-studded turkey loaded with gleefully offensive and often scatological gags, but largely bereft of laughs".
Originally posted by oiram

Originally posted by Vits

It wouldn't be the first time something like that happens.

That was for Worst Screenplay.
I know, that's why I said "like". The point is that, unlike the Oscars which have a rule about the number of nominees per category, the Razzies have no problem in awarding dozens of people.
]]> Sat, 26 Jan 2013 12:02:11 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=6078&PID=53595#53595 MOVIE 43 : So, according to IMDb, among... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=6078&PID=53593#53593 Author: oiram
Subject: 6078
Posted: January 26 2013 at 4:20am

So, according to IMDb, among the people who managed to avoid involvement in this fiasco are George Clooney, Colin Farrell, and, in the directors' chair, Trey Parker and Matt Stone (It'd be "The End Times" if Trey and Matt got Razzie nominations)...  


]]> Sat, 26 Jan 2013 04:20:55 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=6078&PID=53593#53593 MOVIE 43 : It's also worth noting that... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=6078&PID=53590#53590 Author: travis112096
Subject: 6078
Posted: January 25 2013 at 11:31pm

It's also worth noting that Hugh Jackman and Naomi Watts are in this movie, and they are both nominated for Oscars this year. Being in a movie this crappy could hurt their chances of winning, kinda how Eddie Murphy being in Norbit (which came out during the time he was Oscar-nominated for Dreamgirls) supposedly caused him to lose... ]]> Fri, 25 Jan 2013 23:31:05 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=6078&PID=53590#53590 MOVIE 43 : It's only January, and... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=6078&PID=53589#53589 Author: JackdaMan171
Subject: 6078
Posted: January 25 2013 at 7:57pm

It's only January, and I already have my worst film of the year! This should be up for Worst Picture, Worst Screen Ensemble, Worst Screenplay, and for Worst Director -- with an (s) in parentheses!   

I didn't laugh at all, except for a couple times when the dumb audience did, and only because laughter is contagious. Any good traits this film has? It's easily forgettable...and that's it!  

 
]]> Fri, 25 Jan 2013 19:57:52 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=6078&PID=53589#53589 MOVIE 43 : Originally posted by Vits<span... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=6078&PID=53587#53587 Author: oiram
Subject: 6078
Posted: January 25 2013 at 3:30pm

Originally posted by Vits

<span style="font-family: 'Courier New', Courier, mono; font-size: medium; line-height: 22px;">It is starting off with 0% at R.T.!</span>

Originally posted by GTAHater767

<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="4">
IT WOULD PROBABLY SERVE US WELL TO CONSIDER MOVIE 43 FOR A JOINT NOMINATION FOR WORST DIRECTOR.



<font face="Courier New, Courier, mono" size="3">
<font face="Courier New, Courier, mono" size="3">It wouldn't be the first time something like that happens.



That was for Worst Screenplay.]]> Fri, 25 Jan 2013 15:30:07 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=6078&PID=53587#53587 MOVIE 43 : It is starting off with 0% at... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=6078&PID=53578#53578 Author: Vits
Subject: 6078
Posted: January 25 2013 at 11:09am

It is starting off with 0% at R.T.!

Originally posted by GTAHater767

IT WOULD PROBABLY SERVE US WELL TO CONSIDER MOVIE 43 FOR A JOINT NOMINATION FOR WORST DIRECTOR.


It wouldn't be the first time something like that happens.
]]> Fri, 25 Jan 2013 11:09:15 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=6078&PID=53578#53578 MOVIE 43 : Yep, they&#039;re going on my... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=6078&PID=53577#53577 Author: oiram
Subject: 6078
Posted: January 25 2013 at 10:49am

Yep, they're going on my list...all of them!]]> Fri, 25 Jan 2013 10:49:32 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=6078&PID=53577#53577 MOVIE 43 : IN OCTOBER2012, A TRAILER FOR... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=6078&PID=53575#53575 Author: GTAHater767
Subject: 6078
Posted: January 25 2013 at 10:43am

IN OCTOBER 2012, A TRAILER FOR A STRANGE-LOOKING ENSEMBLE COMEDY DEBUTED ONLINE. IT WENT ON FOR AT LEAST 10 MINUTES, BUT I CAN'T RECALL HOW LONG IT WAS EXACTLY. THE FIRST CLIP SHOWED A PICNIC, WHERE ONE MAN AND ONE WOMAN SOUND LIKE THEY'RE ABOUT TO PROPOSE TO EACH OTHER, BUT INSTEAD, SHE SAYS, "WILL YOU POOP ON ME?" ANOTHER TRAILER RELEASED IN LATE NOVEMBER/EARLY DECEMBER SHOWED A BASKETBALL TEAM, WHERE ONE PLAYER TOLD ANOTHER TO USE HIS GENITALS TO KNOCK OVER HIS RIVALS -- IN A GAME OF BASKETBALL. I NOW HEARD EVERYTHING I NEEDED TO HEAR TO KNOW THAT MOVIE 43 WAS GOING TO EMBODY EVERYTHING WRONG WITH SCATOLOGICAL COMEDY IN A POST-Y2K WORLD.
 
BY JANUARY, I WAS WARNING EVERYONE ABOUT MOVIE 43, COMING AT THE END OF THE MONTH. THERE WERE ONLY A FEW PEOPLE WHO DIDN'T SWEEP IT UNDER THE RUG. ONLY A HANDFUL OF US EVEN TALKED ABOUT THIS FILM. IT WAS NOT PRE-SCREENED FOR CRITICS, AND IT DIDN'T HAVE ANY REVIEWS ON ROTTEN TOMATOES (UNTIL OPENING MORNING). I THOUGHT THE APPROVAL RATING WOULD BE LOW, BUT I SHOULD'VE KNOWN THAT ALL of THE FIRST 6 REVIEWS WOULD BE NEGATIVE. THE ENSEMBLE CAST INCLUDES SOME FAMILIAR FACES TO THE RAZZIES, INCLUDING HALLE BERRY, GERARD BUTLER, AND KATE BOSWORTH. BUT MOST INTRIGUING OF ALL IS THE 11 DIRECTORS. THIS HAS TO AT LEAST MAKE OUR 2013 NOMINATING BALLOT FOR WORST ENSEMBLE CAST -- AND IT WOULD PROBABLY SERVE US WELL TO CONSIDER MOVIE 43 FOR A JOINT NOMINATION FOR WORST DIRECTOR. 
 
BUT DON'T LET ME BE THE ONLY ONE MASHING MOVIE 43. VENT AT THIS 43-POUND BLOB OF MUCK BELOW!
 
 
VERY CLEVER, ALL OF YOU INVOLVED IN THIS *H**FEST! 
A LEMON-LIME COLORED SORCERESS DRESSED ONLY IN 
BLUE WRITING? I CAN TASTE THE MEDICINE-FLAVORED 
CITRUS DRINKS JUST THINKING ABOUT IT! THE SCATOLOGY 
SMELLS FILTHIER THAN EVER BEFORE! 


]]> Fri, 25 Jan 2013 10:43:57 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=6078&PID=53575#53575