The Official RAZZIE® Forum : Official RAZZIE® Take on TRANNIES 3

Author: HeadRAZZBerry
Subject: 5152
Posted: June 24 2011 at 1:35pm

WE WEREN'T BIG FANS of 2007's TRANNIES #1, but WHEN OUR SKULLS STOPPED RINGING from the HORRIBLY OVER-CRANKED SOUND, AT LEAST WE DIDN'T FEEL TOTALLY RIPPED OFF.

TRANNIES #2, THOUGH, WAS a BERRY DIFFERENT STORY. LOUD, OVER-LONG, with a PLOT NO ONE COULD (OR SHOULD BOTHER to) FOLLOW and a CAST of WHINY, SCREAMING, INDEFENSIBLY DENSE CHARACTERS, #2 "WON" 3 of OUR TOP AWARDS for 2009.

AND MANY of OUR VOTING MEMBERS HAD BEEN WAITING EVER SINCE to SINK THEIR TEETH INTO the TURD -- OOPS, THIRD -- FILM in THIS SORRY SERIES.

YES, MAIN CHARACTER SHIA LeBEOUF and RAZZIE® "WINNING" DIRECTOR (and 4-TIME NOMINEE) MICHAEL BAY DID BOTH ACKNOWLEDGE THAT the PREVIOUS ENTRY ALL BUT SUCKED. BUT ALL THAT GUARANTEED WAS THAT THIS "NEW" ONE WOULDN'T SUCK as MUCH...

AND, YES, the MOST PITIFUL ACTRESS from the FIRST TWO FILMS (RAZZIE® PERENNIAL MEGAN FOX) IS GONE -- BUT BAY REPLACED HER with a VICTORIA's EGRET MODEL WHO CAME ACROSS JUST as BADLY as FOX...

AND WHEN YOU ADD the HEADACHE-INDUCING POTENTIAL of THIS BEING in 3-D to the ALREADY EAR-NUMBING SOUND WE ALL KNEW IT WAS GONNA HAVE, YOU HAVE a POSSIBLE REPLACEMENT for WATER-BOARDING WHEN IT COMES to TORTURE DEVICES to BREAK DOWN AMERICA's ENEMY COMBATANTS.

SO, YES, JUST ABOUT EVERYTHING (INCLUDING ITs EXCESSIVE 154-MINUTE RUNNING TIME!) INDICATES THAT TRANNIES 3 IS PRE-DESTINED to BE ANOTHER MAJOR RAZZIE® CONTENDER...

BUT WHAT SAY YOU?? HERE's the LINK to JOIN OUR ALREADY in PROGRESS DISCUSSION of WHAT IS, at the BERRY LEAST, ONE of 2011's MOST UNPLEASANT MOVIE-GOING EXPERIENCES.

THE REAL REASON CRAP LIKE THIS GETS MADE:

TO SELL TOYS!

]]>