<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="RSS_xslt_style.asp" version="1.0" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:WebWizForums="http://syndication.webwiz.co.uk/rss_namespace/">
 <channel>
  <title>The Official RAZZIE&#174; Forum : THE OOGIELOVES IN BIG BALLOON ADVENTURE                                                                                                     </title>
  <link>http://www.razzies.com/forum/</link>
  <description>This is an XML content feed of; The Official RAZZIE&#174; Forum : THE OOGIELOVES IN BIG BALLOON ADVENTURE                                                                                                      : Last 10 Posts</description>
  <pubDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 16:06:04 +0000</pubDate>
  <lastBuildDate>Sun, 30 Dec 2012 15:20:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
  <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
  <generator>Web Wiz Forums 9.70</generator>
  <ttl>30</ttl>
  <WebWizForums:feedURL>www.razzies.com/forum/RSS_topic_feed.asp?FID=643</WebWizForums:feedURL>
  
  <item>
   <title>THE OOGIELOVES IN BIG BALLOON ADVENTURE                                                                                                      : Member Discussion of PUKIELOVES</title>
   <link>http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5956&amp;PID=53302#53302</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.razzies.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=708">cvcjr13</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> Member Discussion of PUKIELOVES<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> December 30 2012 at 3:20pm<br /><br />Actually, based on the trailer, this seems to be more intelligent that <strong><em>Teletubbies</em></strong>, but worse than <strong><em>Doogal</em></strong>.&nbsp; This could be this year's <strong><em>Bucky Larson</em></strong>&nbsp;, and&nbsp;pile on the Razzie noms&nbsp;for Most Hideous Low Budget/Zero Box Office Release.<div>&nbsp;</div><div>Speaking of zero box office, to cap off the discussion of its dismal box office "record", for some reason <a href="http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=oogieloves.htm" target="_blank">someone allowed this movie to play for 23 days, and it somehow managed to cough up just over $1 million</a>. &nbsp;</div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><font size="4" face="Times New Roman, Times, serif"><b><font color="#cc0033">RESPONSE from Head RAZZberry:</font></b> Only problem w/your theory: OOGIELOVES wasn't exactly "low budget," with a production cost of about $20 million and a marketing budget of several million more. As an lifelong loather of lousy "Kiddie Movies," I do hope this gets a nod or two...&nbsp;</font></div><div><br></div><div><br></div>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Sun, 30 Dec 2012 15:20:01 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5956&amp;PID=53302#53302</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>THE OOGIELOVES IN BIG BALLOON ADVENTURE                                                                                                      : Member Discussion of PUKIELOVES</title>
   <link>http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5956&amp;PID=52158#52158</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.razzies.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=1568">SchumacherH8ter</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> Member Discussion of PUKIELOVES<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> September 04 2012 at 2:55pm<br /><br />Here's a <a href="http://filmdrunk.uproxx.com/2012/09/oogieloves-movie-worst-opening-ever" target="_blank">LINK</a> to read an incredibly funny story about this movie's amazingly bad box office numbers...<div><br></div><div><br></div>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2012 14:55:13 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5956&amp;PID=52158#52158</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>THE OOGIELOVES IN BIG BALLOON ADVENTURE                                                                                                      : Member Discussion of PUKIELOVES</title>
   <link>http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5956&amp;PID=52153#52153</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.razzies.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=8803">Vits</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> Member Discussion of PUKIELOVES<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> September 03 2012 at 2:07pm<br /><br /><font size="3" face="'Courier New', Courier, mono"><b>Kenn Viselman</b>, creator of the characters, said he's happy that the movie is a flop, because it gives it notoriety. He thinks it will help with the DVD sales. Sounds like this was his plan all along. Yeah, right.</font><div><font size="3" face="'Courier New', Courier, mono"><br></font></div><div><font size="3" face="'Courier New', Courier, mono">Although a lot of people watch flops out of morbid curiosity, those tend to be film fans, not parents who want their kids to be <strike>entertained</strike> busy while they rest. I think that the number of DVD sales won't be affected. If it's a home video hit, it will be a coincidence, and it will mean it would've been a hit no matter what.</font></div>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2012 14:07:26 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5956&amp;PID=52153#52153</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>THE OOGIELOVES IN BIG BALLOON ADVENTURE                                                                                                      : Member Discussion of PUKIELOVES</title>
   <link>http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5956&amp;PID=52152#52152</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.razzies.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=3360">MiguelAntilsu</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> Member Discussion of PUKIELOVES<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> September 03 2012 at 10:49am<br /><br />I may need to edit the countdown because "The Cat in the Hat" and "Son of the Mask" are also pretty infamous children's movies. &nbsp;<div><br></div><div>"The Cat in the Hat" was so inappropriate that it prompted the widow Seuss to ban live action film adaptations of Dr. Seuss's works.</div><div><br></div><div>In "Son of the Mask", Jamie Kennedy impregnates his wife while wearing the Mask. &nbsp;As a result, the baby has the same powers as the Mask. &nbsp;This was an opening for a lot of disgusting jokes.</div>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2012 10:49:12 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5956&amp;PID=52152#52152</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>THE OOGIELOVES IN BIG BALLOON ADVENTURE                                                                                                      : Member Discussion of PUKIELOVES</title>
   <link>http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5956&amp;PID=52151#52151</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.razzies.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=8803">Vits</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> Member Discussion of PUKIELOVES<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> September 03 2012 at 10:03am<br /><br /><table width="99%"><tr><td class="BBquote"><strong><em>Originally posted by MiguelAntilsu</strong></em><br /><br />In honor of its demise, here are my Top 5 Worst Children's Movies of All Time</td></tr></table><br><font size="3" face="Courier New, Courier, mono">Here are mine (excluding Animated Movies and movies that mix animation with live-action):<br><br>5) ARE WE DONE YET?<br>4) Tie between SNOW DAY and SON OF THE MASK</font><font size="3" color="#00CC00" face="Courier New, Courier, mono">*</font><font size="3" face="Courier New, Courier, mono">.<br>3) Tie between SEE <b>SPOT </b>RUN and THE SPY NEXT DOOR.<br>2) ZOOKEEPER.<br>1) BABY GENIUSES (I still haven't seen the sequel).<br><br></font><font size="3" color="#00CC00" face="Courier New, Courier, mono">*</font><font size="3" face="Courier New, Courier, mono">A review for this is in line.</font><br>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2012 10:03:43 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5956&amp;PID=52151#52151</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>THE OOGIELOVES IN BIG BALLOON ADVENTURE                                                                                                      : Member Discussion of PUKIELOVES</title>
   <link>http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5956&amp;PID=52150#52150</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.razzies.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=3">HeadRAZZBerry</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> Member Discussion of PUKIELOVES<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> September 03 2012 at 8:44am<br /><br /><font size="4" face="Times New Roman, Times, serif"><b><font color="#cc0033">UPDATE from Head RAZZberry:</font></b> As I posted yesterday on the B.O. MoJo #s page for this film, OOGIELOVES is now rated the #1 LOWEST Wide Opening Gross of All Time (<a href="http://www.boxofficemojo.com/alltime/weekends/worstopenings.htm?page=WRSTOPN20&amp;p=.htm" target="_blank"><font size="4" face="Times New Roman, Times, serif" color="#000000"><b><u>LINK</u></b></font></a>) with a Per Screen Average of just $207(!) -- Meaning that, where the box office element of qualifying as a RAZZIE</font><span style="font-size:8.0pt;mso-bidi-font-size:12.0pt;  font-family:Arial;mso-fareast-font-family:&quot;Times New Roman&quot;;mso-bidi-font-family:  &quot;Times New Roman&quot;;mso-ansi-:EN-US;mso-fareast-:EN-US;  mso-bidi-:AR-SA">®</span><font size="4" face="Times New Roman, Times, serif">&nbsp;Contender is concerned, this one ranks above/below GIGLI!! &nbsp;</font>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2012 08:44:06 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5956&amp;PID=52150#52150</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>THE OOGIELOVES IN BIG BALLOON ADVENTURE                                                                                                      : Member Discussion of PUKIELOVES</title>
   <link>http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5956&amp;PID=52149#52149</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.razzies.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=9143">Grounder the Critic</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> Member Discussion of PUKIELOVES<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> September 03 2012 at 8:33am<br /><br />I was thinking the same.]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2012 08:33:45 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5956&amp;PID=52149#52149</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>THE OOGIELOVES IN BIG BALLOON ADVENTURE                                                                                                      : Member Discussion of PUKIELOVES</title>
   <link>http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5956&amp;PID=52148#52148</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.razzies.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=1568">SchumacherH8ter</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> Member Discussion of PUKIELOVES<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> September 03 2012 at 7:15am<br /><br />No The Cat In The Hat or Son Of The Mask?]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2012 07:15:22 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5956&amp;PID=52148#52148</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>THE OOGIELOVES IN BIG BALLOON ADVENTURE                                                                                                      : Member Discussion of PUKIELOVES</title>
   <link>http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5956&amp;PID=52146#52146</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.razzies.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=3360">MiguelAntilsu</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> Member Discussion of PUKIELOVES<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> September 02 2012 at 8:11pm<br /><br />This really bombed at the box office this past weekend, only making 3% of its $20M budget back after five days. &nbsp;In honor of its demise, here are my Top 5 Worst Children's Movies of All Time:<div><br></div><div>5. <b>The Garbage Pail Kids Movie</b> - Some animated characters should not be made into live action. &nbsp;Case in point: these trading card characters/Cabbage Patch Kids knockoffs. &nbsp;They look absolutely hideous in this movie.</div><div><br></div><div>4. <b>Zoom</b> - Cashing in on the recent successes of "The Incredibles" and "Sky High", this movie tried hard to continue the trend of superhuman kids/families. &nbsp;It failed.</div><div><br></div><div>3. North - Infamously being named the Worst Movie of 1994 by both Gene Siskel and Roger Ebert, this movie puts kids in the limelight and bashes parents to the point of ridiculousness. &nbsp;Furthermore, it made less than 20% of its $40M budget back in its entire run.</div><div><br></div><div>2. <b>Mac and Me</b> - When you choose to imitate a successful film like "E.T.: The Extra Terrestrial", don't expect to get good results. &nbsp;This film made less than half its budget back and it was criticized for being a cheap imitation of "E.T.: The Extra Terrestrial".</div><div><br></div><div>1. <b>Baby Geniuses (I and II)</b> - In the early 90s, the TV series "Rugrats" introduced us to the concept of intelligent babies getting into mischief. &nbsp;These two movies blew that concept out of proportion not only by making the babies too intelligent, but also by making them do things considered ridiculously impossible for normal babies to do. &nbsp;I imagine most of the DVD copies of these two movies probably ended up in bargain bins (or diaper pails). &nbsp;</div><div><br></div><div><br></div>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Sun, 02 Sep 2012 20:11:27 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5956&amp;PID=52146#52146</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>THE OOGIELOVES IN BIG BALLOON ADVENTURE                                                                                                      : B.O. MoJo #s for OOH! NOBODY-LOVES-THIS ONE...</title>
   <link>http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5962&amp;PID=52143#52143</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.razzies.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=3">HeadRAZZBerry</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> B.O. MoJo #s for OOH! NOBODY-LOVES-THIS ONE...<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> September 02 2012 at 4:23pm<br /><br /><font size="4" face="Times New Roman, Times, serif" style=": rgb244, 242, 191; "><b><font color="#cc0033"><u>BERRY IMPORTANT HISTORIC NOTE</u>:</font></b>&nbsp;With exceptional word-of-mouth, OOGIELOVES "built" from an Opening Night gross of&nbsp;<font color="#cc0033">$47 per theatre</font>(!) all the way up to where, by Sunday of its opening weekend, it was making over 55% MORE...or&nbsp;<font color="#cc0033">$72 BUX</font>&nbsp;per theatre(!).&nbsp;</font><div style=": rgb244, 242, 191; "><font size="4" face="Times New Roman, Times, serif"><br></font></div><div style=": rgb244, 242, 191; "><font size="4" face="Times New Roman, Times, serif">It now has the dis-STINK-tion of ranking as B.O. MoJo's&nbsp;<b>#1 Lowest Grossing Per-Screen Wide Opening of All Time</b>&nbsp;(<a href="http://www.boxofficemojo.com/alltime/weekends/worstopenings.htm?page=WRSTOPN20&amp;p=.htm" target="_blank"><font size="4" face="Times New Roman, Times, serif" color="#cc0033"><b><u>LINK</u></b></font></a>).... &nbsp;</font></div>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Sun, 02 Sep 2012 16:23:06 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5962&amp;PID=52143#52143</guid>
  </item> 
 </channel>
</rss>