The Official RAZZIE® Forum : Our Take on THE UNDEFEATED...

Author: HeadRAZZBerry
Subject: 5198
Posted: July 08 2011 at 4:54pm

NOTE: THE L.A. TIMES' GOSSIP BLOG "GOLD DERBY" HAS RUN an ITEM on the POTENTIAL of OUR NOMINATING SARAH PALIN as WORST ACTRESS -- HERE's the LINK to READ the ARTICLE...

IT REALLY DOESN'T MATTER WHAT WE SAY or DO ABOUT THIS FILM -- FANS of MIZZ PALIN WILL THINK IT BRILLIANT, and CRITICS (WHO AT THIS POINT SEEM to BE ABOUT 65% of the AMERICAN PUBLIC) WILL SEE IT AS BALD-FACED PROPAGANDA.

THAT the FILM's TITLE "THE UNDEFEATED" IS NOT INTENDED to BE IRONIC SPEAKS VOLUMES ABOUT WHERE the FILM-MAKERS ARE COMING FROM: CLEARLY IT'S MEANT as a KIND of CINEMATIC LOVE LETTER to the HALF-TERM/HALF-BAKED ALASKA GOVERNOR WHOSE RECENT EAST COAST BUS TOUR DID MORE to CONFUSE CHILDREN ABOUT AMERICAN HISTORY THAN THAT TEXAS TEXTBOOK "VETTING" PANEL EVER DID. WHO KNEW, BEFORE PALIN TOLD US, THAT PAUL REVERE WAS ONE of the FOUNDERS of the N.R.A.??

PERSONALLY, THOUGH WE FIND PALIN to BE DANGEROUS, WE ALSO FIND HER WILDLY AMUSING -- HER ONLY REAL COMPETITION as AMERICA's DUMBEST NON-BLONDE POLITICIAN IS MICHELE BACHMANN (WHOSE OWN ODDBALL SENSE of HISTORY HAD HER DECLARING the 8-YEAR-OLD JOHN QUINCY ADAMS to be a "FOUNDING FATHER" and CONFUSING JOHN WAYNE the MOVIE STAR with JOHN WAYNE GACY the MASS MURDERER).

BUT the BOTTOM LINE HERE IS NOT WHETHER WE LIKE PALIN or DESPISE HER -- THE BOTTOM LINE IS...SHOULD WE NOMINATE HER as WORST ACTRESS for THIS FILM? THOUGH SHE MAY BE FORGOTTEN by the TIME OUR NOMINATIONS ARE ANNOUNCED in EARLY 2012, with G.W. BUSH's 2004 WORST ACTOR "WIN" for FAHRENHEIT 9/11 as a PRECEDENT, WE CERTAINLY COULD NOMINATE HER.

TO EXPRESS IF YOU THINK WE SHOULD (OR SHOULDN'T) CLICK HERE...

RAZZIE® ELIGIBLE? YOU BETCHA!

]]>