The Official RAZZIE® Forum : PLAYING FOR KEEPS http://www.razzies.com/forum/ This is an XML content feed of; The Official RAZZIE® Forum : PLAYING FOR KEEPS : Last 10 Posts Fri, 24 May 2013 08:30:15 +0000 Sun, 30 Dec 2012 15:56:55 +0000 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss Web Wiz Forums 9.70 30 www.razzies.com/forum/RSS_topic_feed.asp?FID=655 The Official RAZZIE® Forum http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_images/RazzieLogo02.gif http://www.razzies.com/forum/ PLAYING FOR KEEPS : Member Discussion: PLAYING FOR KEEPS http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=6040&PID=53304#53304 Author: cvcjr13
Subject: Member Discussion: PLAYING FOR KEEPS
Posted: December 30 2012 at 3:56pm

You know, this is one of those movies so deserving that no one has ever seen.  When you mention the title, say who stars in it, give a summation and show a trailer, it doesn't inspire moviegoers to groan and escape like Oogieloves or Bucky Larson do.  That all said, Gerard Butler is an actor who can act who is squandering his career on P.S. I Love You, Nim's Island, The Ugly Truth, The Bounty Hunter and now this movie.
 
I blame Andrew Lloyd Webber for miscasting him in Phantom Of The Opera, but hey, that's just me. . . .
 
The lameness of this movie points to the lameness in general of romantic movies overall.   I wonder if in a day and age where you're likely to be asked to show your credit score and your STD test before any serious dating goes on, romance seems to be valued very lowly.  If so, then why do people complain about being in a boring marriage?  Yeah, that's another story. . . .
]]> Sun, 30 Dec 2012 15:56:55 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=6040&PID=53304#53304 PLAYING FOR KEEPS : Member Discussion: PLAYING FOR KEEPS http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=6040&PID=53069#53069 Author: Odyssey
Subject: Member Discussion: PLAYING FOR KEEPS
Posted: December 10 2012 at 5:30pm

I never thought this one would be THAT bad. Dead]]> Mon, 10 Dec 2012 17:30:33 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=6040&PID=53069#53069 PLAYING FOR KEEPS : Member Discussion: PLAYING FOR KEEPS http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=6040&PID=53057#53057 Author: HeadRAZZBerry
Subject: Member Discussion: PLAYING FOR KEEPS
Posted: December 09 2012 at 12:18pm

UPDATE from Head RAZZBerry: Not only did this bomb with crix (it's one of the year's Berry Worst-Reviewed Titles) it also bombed at the box office -- So spectacularly that the headline on today's L.A. Times article about weekend grosses gave this film's bombing equal space with SKYFALL's impressive climb up the Grosses Chart. Here's the LINK to read the Times' story...  


]]> Sun, 09 Dec 2012 12:18:39 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=6040&PID=53057#53057 PLAYING FOR KEEPS : Member Discussion: PLAYING FOR KEEPS http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=6040&PID=53054#53054 Author: JoeBacon
Subject: Member Discussion: PLAYING FOR KEEPS
Posted: December 08 2012 at 10:16pm

Gosh, the R.T. Rating on this has gotten all the way up to...

2%!  LOL      




]]> Sat, 08 Dec 2012 22:16:53 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=6040&PID=53054#53054 PLAYING FOR KEEPS : Member Discussion: PLAYING FOR KEEPS http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=6040&PID=53050#53050 Author: Vits
Subject: Member Discussion: PLAYING FOR KEEPS
Posted: December 08 2012 at 8:06am

Yeah, specially since BREAKING DAWN PART 2 isn't a clear shoo-in anymore. Sorry, Miguel.]]> Sat, 08 Dec 2012 08:06:33 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=6040&PID=53050#53050 PLAYING FOR KEEPS : Member Discussion: PLAYING FOR KEEPS http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=6040&PID=53049#53049 Author: MiguelAntilsu
Subject: Member Discussion: PLAYING FOR KEEPS
Posted: December 08 2012 at 7:05am

Peter Travers gave it ZERO stars, Richard Roeper gave it an F -- this movie is making a strong case for getting a Worst Picture nomination...]]> Sat, 08 Dec 2012 07:05:11 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=6040&PID=53049#53049 PLAYING FOR KEEPS : Member Discussion: PLAYING FOR KEEPS http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=6040&PID=53044#53044 Author: Vits
Subject: Member Discussion: PLAYING FOR KEEPS
Posted: December 07 2012 at 5:35pm

[TUBE]Ji-A7LHuoqA[/TUBE]
[TUBE]eidOKmQH5a8[/TUBE]
]]> Fri, 07 Dec 2012 17:35:48 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=6040&PID=53044#53044 PLAYING FOR KEEPS : Member Discussion: PLAYING FOR KEEPS http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=6040&PID=53043#53043 Author: Vits
Subject: Member Discussion: PLAYING FOR KEEPS
Posted: December 07 2012 at 5:32pm


Also, I've got another potential nominee: Dennis Quaid for this and WHAT TO EXPECT WHEN YOU'RE EXPECTING.]]> Fri, 07 Dec 2012 17:32:13 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=6040&PID=53043#53043 PLAYING FOR KEEPS : Member Discussion: PLAYING FOR KEEPS http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=6040&PID=53034#53034 Author: Vits
Subject: Member Discussion: PLAYING FOR KEEPS
Posted: December 06 2012 at 5:17pm

Whoa! Aside from 1000 WORDS, this is the only movie this year with a 0% (and a consensus) on RT: "A witless, unfocused, arguably misogynistic, dispiriting, lowest-common-denominator Hollywood rom-com". Although the rating might go up a few notches, if it stays below 5%, it seems like it should be considered for multiple categories. ]]> Thu, 06 Dec 2012 17:17:52 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=6040&PID=53034#53034 PLAYING FOR KEEPS : Member Discussion: PLAYING FOR KEEPS http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=6040&PID=53032#53032 Author: Vheid
Subject: Member Discussion: PLAYING FOR KEEPS
Posted: December 06 2012 at 2:40pm

GTAhater, it's a football (or soccer in America)-movie not a baseball-movie....]]> Thu, 06 Dec 2012 14:40:33 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=6040&PID=53032#53032