Lets just say they all sucked bad, but Paris really sucked bad.

Paris should stick to her boyfriends video-taping her.

Wait a minute...Paris is an actress?? I don't think so...

Katie is in her best moment, is her relationship her worst perfomance.

The others females makes many honors for that title, but my vote is for Natalie...its a shame, Sith happens . Lucas you pay for this!!

I don't think Katie's performance was bad, nor was it all that good. 

I think it looked worse considering the quality of what was around her.  You had Christian Bale (very much an underrated actor), Michael Caine (he's done a few bad films, but he's still a master of the craft), Morgan Freeman, Liam Neeson and so on... and of course the girl who is mostly famous for Dawson's Creek is going to come off looking like total amatuer hour.

I think she was horribly miscast for this even given that it was a "look pretty as you scream" role for half the movie.  To say nothing of the fact that she looks 14 and that every time she kissed Christian Bale, I wanted to call the cops.  But does all this make her a bad actress?  No.  She's a bad actress because she is a bad actress.  Period.

That said... I'm doing a write in vote for the actress who played Trillian in Hitchhikers Guide.  It's my token protest vote this year.

Shame there's not a Razzie for ensembles.  Then I could just nominate everyone involved with Hitchhikers Guide the the Galaxy in one go.

I must go to Paris, but still the Simpson sisters must be nominated in this particular category (Ashlee might have a saving card: she made us believe she was somehow talented).

Turning away from the subject: HeadRazz, I´m checking out the Razzie history forum and I found the worst movie trend of the year category, would you mind to make a poll/thread about it, since 2005 rivals 1998 in worst movie-going year ever?

Originally posted by Jo Craig Berko as Max Baer in CINDERELLA MAN! What does the Razzie audience think of Ron Howard and his habit of turning real people into fictional characters for the sake of drama? CINDERELLA MAN takes humanitarian and role model boxer Max Baer and turns him into a psychopathic killer, in the name of drama. A BEAUTIFUL MIND takes John Forbes Nash and changes his character as well, to make the story "better." Each screenplay lists Akiva Goldman as a screenwriter.  Each changes feelings about Jews (the first, a Jewish hero is changed into a villain, in the second, Nazi sympathizing is erased). Here are some links.  Is this dishonest story-telling Razzie worthy?  When is it okay to make true life into fiction? http://www.slate.com/id/2120151/ http://unrepentant.blogspot.com/2005/06/cinderella-man .htm http://www.clocktowerfiction.com/Reviews/feb02review.shtml http://www.nytimes.com/packages/html/movies/bestpictures /mind-re.html l Maybe the Razzies should put Craig Berko as Max Baer on the Worst Supporting Actor list?  I don't know what could be worse than purposely mis-portraying a real person!  Maybe Jethro would show up to accept the award?

the answer to your question, "When is it ok to make true life into fiction" is when it is made into a movie.  Movie are, by nature, fiction. Yes, even the ones based on real events.  Facts are for print, movies are about feelings and emotions.  I notice you have stated that "Cinderella Man" deserves a Razzie, but haven't said much about the actual movie.  The movie's purpose was to create a portrait of a truly good man centering on a sympathetic portrayal of its hero.  I think it succeeded at least adequately. don't you?

This time I had to pick from two lousy performances from Son of the Mask. I hope my hard work pays off. This film deserves to be burned.