The Official RAZZIE® Forum : PREDATORS http://www.razzies.com/forum/ This is an XML content feed of; The Official RAZZIE® Forum : PREDATORS : Last 10 Posts Wed, 22 May 2013 20:50:19 +0000 Tue, 12 Apr 2011 12:49:29 +0000 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss Web Wiz Forums 9.70 30 www.razzies.com/forum/RSS_topic_feed.asp?FID=447 The Official RAZZIE® Forum http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_images/RazzieLogo02.gif http://www.razzies.com/forum/ PREDATORS : Reviews on PREDATORS http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4404&PID=40695#40695 Author: Vits
Subject: Reviews on PREDATORS
Posted: April 12 2011 at 12:49pm

R.T. gave it 64%:"After a string of subpar sequels,this bloody,action-packed reboot takes the franchise back to its testosterone-fueled roots".
 
Roger Ebert gave it **/****:"It lacks the quiet suspense of the first PREDATOR,and please don't even mention the ALIEN VS. PREDATOR pictures,which lacked the subtlety of MOTHRA VS. GODZILLA".
]]> Tue, 12 Apr 2011 12:49:29 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4404&PID=40695#40695 PREDATORS : a.k.a. BUNGLE IN THE JUNGLE?!? http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4405&PID=37393#37393 Author: oiram
Subject: a.k.a. BUNGLE IN THE JUNGLE?!?
Posted: December 23 2010 at 4:44am

If this gets worst anything, I'll be sad, because this isn't that bad, especially compared to the other *bleep* we had the swim through.]]> Thu, 23 Dec 2010 04:44:26 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4405&PID=37393#37393 PREDATORS : a.k.a. BUNGLE IN THE JUNGLE?!? http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4405&PID=33650#33650 Author: BurnHollywoodBurn
Subject: a.k.a. BUNGLE IN THE JUNGLE?!?
Posted: August 05 2010 at 11:31am

Please, in another day or two, this kid will forget this forum even exists. Mindlessly loyal fanboys have short attention spans like that.]]> Thu, 05 Aug 2010 11:31:45 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4405&PID=33650#33650 PREDATORS : a.k.a. BUNGLE IN THE JUNGLE?!? http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4405&PID=33637#33637 Author: cvcjr13
Subject: a.k.a. BUNGLE IN THE JUNGLE?!?
Posted: August 04 2010 at 8:57pm

I'm guessing a fanboy/hater.
]]> Wed, 04 Aug 2010 20:57:21 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4405&PID=33637#33637 PREDATORS : a.k.a. BUNGLE IN THE JUNGLE?!? http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4405&PID=33635#33635 Author: GTAHater767
Subject: a.k.a. BUNGLE IN THE JUNGLE?!?
Posted: August 04 2010 at 6:06pm

Ugggh... Another attacker??]]> Wed, 04 Aug 2010 18:06:23 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4405&PID=33635#33635 PREDATORS : a.k.a. BUNGLE IN THE JUNGLE?!? http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4405&PID=33623#33623 Author: cvcjr13
Subject: a.k.a. BUNGLE IN THE JUNGLE?!?
Posted: August 04 2010 at 7:59am

And I feel instead that the movie studios should stop putting out blatantly bad movies.  John Wilson provides us movie fans a much needed outlet to counter all these bad movies.
 
Originally posted by razziessuckass

Angry John Wilson should leave movies alone because im sick and tired of him and his stupid Razzie arwards! >:(

]]> Wed, 04 Aug 2010 07:59:25 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4405&PID=33623#33623 PREDATORS : a.k.a. BUNGLE IN THE JUNGLE?!? http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4405&PID=33618#33618 Author: razziessuckass
Subject: a.k.a. BUNGLE IN THE JUNGLE?!?
Posted: August 03 2010 at 11:23pm

i give this movie a 100/100 beacuse i love the Predator movies!Smile]]> Tue, 03 Aug 2010 23:23:52 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4405&PID=33618#33618 PREDATORS : a.k.a. BUNGLE IN THE JUNGLE?!? http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4405&PID=33617#33617 Author: razziessuckass
Subject: a.k.a. BUNGLE IN THE JUNGLE?!?
Posted: August 03 2010 at 11:21pm

Angry John Wilson should leave movies alone because im sick and tired of him and his stupid Razzie arwards! >:(  

RESPONSE from Head RAZZberry: Please define the word "arwards." I am unfamiliar with it...  



]]> Tue, 03 Aug 2010 23:21:48 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4405&PID=33617#33617 PREDATORS : a.k.a. BUNGLE IN THE JUNGLE?!? http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4405&PID=33240#33240 Author: BurnHollywoodBurn
Subject: a.k.a. BUNGLE IN THE JUNGLE?!?
Posted: July 23 2010 at 8:25pm

Um, no, I went in with an open mind thinking they would do an original movie that just happened to be a sequel, but I was sadly mistaken. And what is wrong with thinking the actors should be more buffed up like the ones in the original movie? That would make sense since they would look like real killesr who could stand a chance with the Predators. These people look like lambs that should have been killed off within a matter fo seconds. Danny Trejo was the only one who looked like he belonged. Oh, and nitpicking is what a critic is suppose to do, not just sit there and except everything is without fails. I mean if your car's tires blow out, do you just keep driving and say to yourself "Oh, that's no big deal, the sparks are suppose to be coming out of the wheels"?  

Originally posted by scoobs23

 
Ah, in the first film, Arnold used mud in order to avoid the Predator's heat senses. Not nearly as much of a "rip-off" as it is the lead character just using something to his advantage. What you're doing here is nitpicking. You were probably waiting for one these lines to pop off so you could yell "rip-off!...". This film, while retaining some elements from the original, clearly didn't want it to follow it and wanted to offer something different, which is why the actors aren't as "big and strong", and fyi, Brody's physical appearance for this film is very similar to that of a mercenary, cut and lean, because it fits the character. Oh and you may want to work on not contradicting yourself, on hand you criticize the film for "ripping off" the original, while on the other hand you criticize it for not having similar built actors from the original.
]]> Fri, 23 Jul 2010 20:25:31 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4405&PID=33240#33240 PREDATORS : a.k.a. BUNGLE IN THE JUNGLE?!? http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4405&PID=33237#33237 Author: scoobs23
Subject: a.k.a. BUNGLE IN THE JUNGLE?!?
Posted: July 23 2010 at 6:48pm

Originally posted by BurnHollywoodBurn


Well, I had a free movie pass and I gave the movie a try. Sure enough, yet another worthless remake that adds NOTHING to the series. No, it doesn't pay "homage" to the first movie, it copies and pastes everywhere ... the being covered in mud, the lines like "What the hell are you" and "I'm right here, come kill me", etc. Not to mention the first movie had a rag-tag team of big, strong, well-armed marines that could be a match for the Predators ... here, we have a team of skinny, little twigs as opponents! I say "guilty pleasure" at best ... with way more "guilt" than pleasure to it! 


Ah, in the first film, Arnold used mud in order to avoid the Predator's heat senses. Not nearly as much of a "rip-off" as it is the lead character just using something to his advantage. What you're doing here is nitpicking. You were probably waiting for one these lines to pop off so you could yell "rip-off!...". This film, while retaining some elements from the original, clearly didn't want it to follow it and wanted to offer something different, which is why the actors aren't as "big and strong", and fyi, Brody's physical appearance for this film is very similar to that of a mercenary, cut and lean, because it fits the character. Oh and you may want to work on not contradicting yourself, on hand you criticize the film for "ripping off" the original, while on the other hand you criticize it for not having similar built actors from the original.]]> Fri, 23 Jul 2010 18:48:25 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4405&PID=33237#33237