The Official RAZZIE® Forum : Reviews on PREDATORS http://www.razzies.com/forum/ This is an XML content feed of; The Official RAZZIE® Forum : PREDATORS : Reviews on PREDATORS Fri, 24 May 2013 10:34:47 +0000 Tue, 12 Apr 2011 12:49:29 +0000 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss Web Wiz Forums 9.70 360 www.razzies.com/forum/RSS_post_feed.asp?TID=4404 The Official RAZZIE® Forum http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_images/RazzieLogo02.gif http://www.razzies.com/forum/ Reviews on PREDATORS : R.T. gave it 64%:"After a... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4404&PID=40695#40695 Author: Vits
Subject: 4404
Posted: April 12 2011 at 12:49pm

R.T. gave it 64%:"After a string of subpar sequels,this bloody,action-packed reboot takes the franchise back to its testosterone-fueled roots".
 
Roger Ebert gave it **/****:"It lacks the quiet suspense of the first PREDATOR,and please don't even mention the ALIEN VS. PREDATOR pictures,which lacked the subtlety of MOTHRA VS. GODZILLA".
]]> Tue, 12 Apr 2011 12:49:29 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4404&PID=40695#40695 Reviews on PREDATORS : Critics are even likelier than... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4404&PID=32568#32568 Author: HeadRAZZBerry
Subject: 4404
Posted: July 02 2010 at 12:18pm

Critics are even likelier than movie-goers to be scratching their heads and asking, "Why does this movie even exist??"  

Here's a Meta Critic LINK, and an R.T. LINK , to see if reviews of PREDATOR come up with any answer besides the obvious one: "To make money..." 

]]> Fri, 02 Jul 2010 12:18:21 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4404&PID=32568#32568