http://www.razzies.com/forum/ This is an XML content feed of; The Official RAZZIE® Forum : EARLIER DISCUSSIONS, LISTED ALPHABETICALLY: THE BACK-UP PLAN : Reviews on SHACK-UP PLAN Wed, 22 May 2013 09:32:37 +0000 Mon, 11 Apr 2011 17:33:18 +0000 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss Web Wiz Forums 9.70 360 www.razzies.com/forum/RSS_post_feed.asp?TID=4252 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_images/RazzieLogo02.gif http://www.razzies.com/forum/ http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4252&PID=40681#40681 Author: Vits
Subject: 4252
Posted: April 11 2011 at 5:33pm

R.T. gave it 20%:"Jennifer Lopez is as appealing as ever, but the film smothers it's star with unrelatable characters and a predictable plot".

Roger Ebert gave it */****:"Jennifer Lopez has never looked better.That's about all she does here,is look better.She is talented and deserves more than this bird-brained plot about characters who have no relationship to life as it is lived by,you know,actual people.".

Richard Roeper gave it a D+:"Why even bother?A better back-up plan:junk the script and start all over again".

]]> Mon, 11 Apr 2011 17:33:18 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4252&PID=40681#40681 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4252&PID=30950#30950 Author: HeadRAZZBerry
Subject: 4252
Posted: April 16 2010 at 11:57am

Will crix "be nice" to the pregnant lady -- Or treat Lopez and her BACK-UP PLAN with their usual disdain?  

Here's an R.T. LINK and a MetaCritic LINK to see for yourself...  

]]> Fri, 16 Apr 2010 11:57:53 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4252&PID=30950#30950