The Official RAZZIE® Forum : SAW V http://www.razzies.com/forum/ This is an XML content feed of; The Official RAZZIE® Forum : SAW V : Last 10 Posts Sat, 25 May 2013 04:54:19 +0000 Fri, 21 Oct 2011 08:33:07 +0000 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss Web Wiz Forums 9.70 30 www.razzies.com/forum/RSS_topic_feed.asp?FID=316 The Official RAZZIE® Forum http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_images/RazzieLogo02.gif http://www.razzies.com/forum/ SAW V : SAW Off My Head NOW, Please!!! http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=3173&PID=47479#47479 Author: Vits
Subject: SAW Off My Head NOW, Please!!!
Posted: October 21 2011 at 8:33am

Originally posted by SchumacherH8ter

The A-story of this is BORING! It follows Agent Strahm trying to expose Hoffman as the Jigsaw apprentice. I think that the reason this is the A-story was because they got criticism for how bland the A-stories was in the last two compared to the B-stories.
I think that,because it received a fanbase,they thought they could make a filler episode with no problem.I admit that the admiration for the previous installents is what got me through that boring storyline.
Originally posted by SchumacherH8ter

Is it me, or are fifth sequels in horror series usually the worst?
Fifth sequels in general are the worst...unless they were made in 2011.
]]> Fri, 21 Oct 2011 08:33:07 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=3173&PID=47479#47479 SAW V : SAW Off My Head NOW, Please!!! http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=3173&PID=47474#47474 Author: SchumacherH8ter
Subject: SAW Off My Head NOW, Please!!!
Posted: October 20 2011 at 8:33pm

Time to review the worst Saw movie and that says a lot!
 
The good:
 
The main trap: The main trap of Saw V has characters that are actually interesting. They try to think of alternative ways to solve the trap that don't end up working, but it's nice to see them try something different. Unfortunately, they get little screen-time compared to the A-story.
 
The bad:
 
The A-story: The A-story of this is BORING! It follows Agent Strahm trying to expose Hoffman as the Jigsaw apprentice. I think that the reason this is the A-story was because they got criticism for how bland the A-stories was in the last two compared to the B-stories. The A-story is flawed for one reason that'll be exposed in the ugly and...
 
Strahm himself: I've give Strahm this: his opening scene where he breaks out of Jigsaw's trap was pretty cool. After that, he gets more and more boring, before he mercifully gets himself killed by one of Hoffman's traps. Scott Patterson's stiff performance doesn't help.
 
Meagan Good: She's bland as Luba, one of the members of the main trap.
 
The ugly:
 
Director David Hackl: One good thing about Hackl: his name isn't false-advertising!
 
The script: I already pointed out how lop-sided the A and B stories are in terms of quality, but that's not the only problem with this. The ending, in particular, was poorly written.
 
Costas Mandylor: Why is he the main villain? He can't act! Jigsaw's corpse could make a better villain!
 
Is it me, or are fifth sequels in horror series usually the worst? This, Friday The 13th, Child's Play, etc. Grade: D-
 
Next-up: Saw VI!
]]> Thu, 20 Oct 2011 20:33:46 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=3173&PID=47474#47474 SAW V : SAW Off My Head NOW, Please!!! http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=3173&PID=33718#33718 Author: Vits
Subject: SAW Off My Head NOW, Please!!!
Posted: August 09 2010 at 12:59pm

[Post deleted]
]]> Mon, 09 Aug 2010 12:59:37 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=3173&PID=33718#33718 SAW V : SAW Off My Head NOW, Please!!! http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=3173&PID=30507#30507 Author: BurnHollywoodBurn
Subject: SAW Off My Head NOW, Please!!!
Posted: March 24 2010 at 5:04pm

Originally posted by Vits

I just watched again,and I noticed another error.At the beginnin',JIGSAW's lawyer gives JILL a box.Although I accidentally saw in the site of SAW VI that JILL is listed as an antagonist,that was so obvious.
Can we please not talk about past "Saw" movies until the 7th one comes out. We can bash and/or defend them then.]]> Wed, 24 Mar 2010 17:04:04 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=3173&PID=30507#30507 SAW V : SAW Off My Head NOW, Please!!! http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=3173&PID=30499#30499 Author: Vits
Subject: SAW Off My Head NOW, Please!!!
Posted: March 24 2010 at 4:35pm

I just watched again,and I noticed another error.At the beginnin',JIGSAW's lawyer gives JILL a box.Although I accidentally saw in the site of SAW VI that JILL is listed as an antagonist,that was so obvious.]]> Wed, 24 Mar 2010 16:35:25 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=3173&PID=30499#30499 SAW V : SAW Off My Head NOW, Please!!! http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=3173&PID=30047#30047 Author: Vits
Subject: SAW Off My Head NOW, Please!!!
Posted: March 13 2010 at 1:42pm

I just rated it on Rotten Tomatoes.

http://www.rottentomatoes.com/user/812172/ratings
]]> Sat, 13 Mar 2010 13:42:30 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=3173&PID=30047#30047 SAW V : SAW Off My Head NOW, Please!!! http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=3173&PID=29138#29138 Author: BurnHollywoodBurn
Subject: SAW Off My Head NOW, Please!!!
Posted: February 13 2010 at 3:23pm

Originally posted by Vits


I just read PARANORMAL ACTIVITY 2 is on the way.
Yep, just hope it doesn't turn out to be another "Blair Witch 2" thing.
]]> Sat, 13 Feb 2010 15:23:40 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=3173&PID=29138#29138 SAW V : SAW Off My Head NOW, Please!!! http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=3173&PID=29131#29131 Author: Vits
Subject: SAW Off My Head NOW, Please!!!
Posted: February 13 2010 at 1:18pm

Originally posted by BurnHollywoodBurn

Originally posted by Vits

Is not about closure.Is just SAW I was excellent'cuz it seemed like a typical horror flick,but it was independent,and ev'ryone could relate to it,bot to mention the deep parts.
Ah, but the same can be said about "Paranormal Activity", but it was so good, I do not wish for Hollywood to ruin it by making countless sequels of it every year. Let it to Hollywood to take something good and ruin it for a profit. But I agree with a statement above, we should wait for Halloween, when "Saw 7" gets its own forum, rather than rant on about a movie from two years ago.

I just read PARANORMAL ACTIVITY 2 is on the way.
]]> Sat, 13 Feb 2010 13:18:53 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=3173&PID=29131#29131 SAW V : SAW Off My Head NOW, Please!!! http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=3173&PID=29123#29123 Author: Vits
Subject: SAW Off My Head NOW, Please!!!
Posted: February 13 2010 at 9:45am

They're not idiots.They know if they pull a stunt like that,no one will see SAW VIII.

And I don't think they can,even if they want.There's a lot of loose ends(especially what hapenned to DR. GORDON(Cary Elwes)),and the last one is supossed to solve them all.If they decide to mak another one,what could happen?A whole new story?

SAW VI was a flop compared to the others,but not in general.It did good.

The thing is they never really cared'bout critics,but this one had bad response from fans too.
]]> Sat, 13 Feb 2010 09:45:46 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=3173&PID=29123#29123 SAW V : SAW Off My Head NOW, Please!!! http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=3173&PID=29119#29119 Author: BurnHollywoodBurn
Subject: SAW Off My Head NOW, Please!!!
Posted: February 13 2010 at 5:15am

Originally posted by Vits

I just read they're gon'na make SAW VII the last one.
Well, that's a comforting thought. However, if it does well at the B.O. (no doubt because it's 3-D and will have surcharges), don't be surprised if Lionsgate suddenly go "Well, we said it was going to be the last, but look at those box office numbers! We have to make another!". Hollywood, man, it's like sequels are drugs to them and they can't the monkey off their back.]]> Sat, 13 Feb 2010 05:15:14 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=3173&PID=29119#29119