The IMDB board and the Razzie board have rather different purposes. IMDB offers posting boards for virtually every movie released. We, on the other hand, are more specifically focused on discussion of bad cinema. To be sure, there is a free form thread on this board which permits discussion of good movies, as well as whatever may be on a given member's mind.

In other words, if you wish to participate in broad range discussions of the paranormal, going to a board which offers that sort of topic is a good idea. On the other hand, if you go to a board which specializes in discussions of Sasquatch, it's a little disingenuous to criticize the members for their general lack of enthusiasm for discussing ghosts. (In point of fact, many of the members on the board may be very interested in ghosts, but they go to other forums to discuss them.)

Nonetheless, all points of view are welcome. If you think a film is Razzie worthy, we always welcome having it brought to our attention. If you disagree that a particular film is worthy of Razzie consideration, you should feel free to post in its defense (hopefully without any characterizations implying "closed-mindedness" on the part of those with a different opinion).  

Response from Head RAZZberry: And while we're on the subject, jb razz, YES, postings on the Forum DO indeed have an effect. You were not alone in pointing out the Razzie-worthiness of DATE MOVIE. After several postings questioning the lack of attention it appeared to be getting, I was prompted to check it out on RT, the IMDb, and elsewhere, and came to the conclusion that DATE MOVIE should be among those films listed on our Nominating Ballot (it was released in mid-February of 2006, when I was bizzy putting together last year's ceremonies, and it disappeared from theatres so quickly I never got a chance to see it). If you are a dues-paying, actual Voting Member, jb razz, you'll find DATE MOVIE listed in several places when you receive your 27th Annual Nominating Ballot in about a week or so. If you're NOT a dues-paying, formal Voting RAZZIE Member, here's a LINK to rectify that situation.....

Thank you saturnwatcher.

I am new here, and was not informed of the customs of the Razzie Forum cult. I thought it was an open-minded Forum, like the IMDb message boards. I am sorry I rocked the boat by questioning the traditions of the Razzie Forum cult.        

Will anything that is say on this forum have any outcome on this year's nominees? The main reason I joined was to campaign to get Date Movie nominated.

And what is HCE?

Okay, let's take this point by point.

First of all, the guess here is that most of the regular posters on this board are probably well aquainted with this year's crop of indies...I'd guess better informed than the average movie goer. In another thread I took a tongue-in-cheek poke at Babel and it certainly appears that perhaps the majority of this year's Oscar nominees may well be indies. Typically, we don't spend a lot of time discussing the year's better films in this forum. On the other hand, there hasn't been a lot to discuss this year.

Second, if you take a few moments to browse through the thread specifically devoted to The Pink Panther, you might be surprised to see that the film had its defenders. Certainly, not every post about it was negative. The majority, the large majority were negative, reflecting the consensus at IMDB and RT where the critical and public response to the film was mostly negative.

Third, on a board where the majority of discussion centers on the identification and celebration of bad cinema (and a lot of our discussion is tongue-in-cheek) it shouldn't be particularly surprising that presentations will tend to be made "in the worst way possible."

Finally, if anything, I would generally regard this year's fall and holiday season as even more disappointing than a very lackluster summer season. Typically, this is the time of year when the Oscar heavyweights roll into the theaters, and we just haven't seen clear favorites emerge this year. Box-office numbers have also been pretty unimpressive for the holiday season, reflecting a general suspicion that Hollywood no longer has a very firm grasp on what movie goers want to see. As further evidence, as has already been noted, the year's strongest Oscar contenders are likely to come from independents.

You guys are the most pessimistic people I have ever heard!

There are plenty of films that have received Oscar buzz, but many of them are art-house films that no one else has heard about. This fall there have been a lot of films that were trying to achieve Oscar status. Some of them have been misses, but none of them are Razzie worthy.

This year there have been many movies that are just plain bad (i. e. bloodrayne, the benchwarmers, date movie), but there have been even more films that are so-so, that could be seen in either a positive or a negative way, and Razzie members always see them in the most negative way possible. For example I thought that the Pink Panther sequel was fine -- okay, but not great -- but every other person who posted thought it was very bad, and Razzie worthy.

I agree that this summer was kind of slow. With The Prestige, Casino Royale, The Departed, and Blood Diamond this fall movie season has been much more exiting than the summer "blockbuster" season. 

I'm trying to figure out where 5 Best Picture nominees are going to come from. Quite honestly, I haven't seen ONE really Oscar winning film so far. We have a couple weeks to go, but there isn't really anything in the next few weeks that jumps out as the 800 pound gorilla on the horizon. If I were an Oscar voter and I had to pick right now, I'd be seriously tempted to vote for Happy Feet.

We certainly won't face a similar problem. So many Razzie deserving films have come out that this year that I'm really having a tough time trying to decide what is going to get checked on my ballot.

As bad as this summer's movies were, I actually think this year's crop of crappy Christmas movies is worse.  Not just SANTA CLAUSE 3 and DECK THE HALLS (which were, specifically, crappy Christmas movies) but December movies in general (VAN WILDER 2, anyone??). And ROCKY BALBOA has yet to be released!

Can't wait to see how desperate the Academy gets, come time for their nominations -- How on Earth can they come up with FIVE Best Actress nominees for 2006 that anyone will take seriously??

Overall the 2006 Summer was was more of what I would have classified as a "Big Disappointment, witch had a lot of potential". I hate to say it but Mission Impossible III I think pretty much set the tone for most of the Summer. The sure fired choices barely ended up paying their production cost, and the ones that looked like Razzie contenders ended coming out on top. Just a lot of mixed feeling on the whole "Summer of 2006".

I'll definitely say, there were hardly any good movies this summer. PIRATES right now has made more money at the box office. If George Lucas' prediction is true, then it looks like the Blockbuster is DEAD!!!

Also, for the US B.O. No., well, here they are by far of the Labor Day Weekend.

1. Pirates of the Caribbean: Dead Man's Chest-$414 Million
2. Cars-$241 Million
3. X-Men: The Last Stand-$234 Million
4. THE DA VINCI CODE-$217 Million
5. SUPERMAN RETURNS-$196 Million
6. Ice Age: The Metdown-$195 Million
7. Over the Hedge-$155 Million
8. TALLADEGA NIGHTS: THE BALLAD OF RICKY BOBBY-$138 Million
9. CLICK-$136 Million
10. MISSION: IMPOSSIBLE III-$133 Million
11. The Devil Wears Prada-$121 Million
12. THE BREAK-UP-$118 Million

NOTE: The titles in THIS are titles discussed in the forums of likely 2006 Possible RAZZIE contenders.

Biggest rip-off so Far?

Try watching Material Girls for 2 hours and then tell me if Hilary Duff does not deserve to booted off from the silver screen

On the whole, the fare this summer was numbingly mediocre. There weren't a lot of bright spots, but not a huge list of real dogs either. For me, the highlights included A Prairie Home Companion and Little Miss Sunshine. Pirates 2 was a near miss, just a little too long and I just didn't feel that Captain Jack Sparrow came off as the same character. I was also somewhat in the minority in finding The DaVinci Code entertaining. Beyond that, I'd have to agree that it was an endless string of formulaic crud.

As someone who loves a good movie, I found this summer's cinema fare incredibly depressing. I can't think of even one good movie that came out all year (among the dozens I've seen, anyway).

Why can't Hollywood make anything exciting, original and actually entertaining any more??  Thank God my Netflix membership gives me access to thousands of good old movies...

I had to vote "Totally Sucked." I can't think of one GOOD movie I saw all summer. Even the big block-busters, like PIRATES 2 and X-MEN 3, were disappointing. And original thought seems all but DEAD in Hollywood right now...WHAT A SHAME!

Response from Head RAZZberry: A shame for Hollywood...a BOON for us (except that having so MANY contenders makes it harder on our Voters to choose just FIVE in each category!)...

AS USUAL WHEN SUMMER IS WINDING DOWN, WE'RE HEARING THAT THIS IS "THE WORST YEAR for MOVIES EVER!" ...BUT IS IT REALLY??  WE'LL ADMIT THERE WAS NO LACK of RAZZIE® CONTENDERS, BUT THERE WERE SOME GOOD MOVIES AS WELL.

HERE'S YOUR CHANCE to TELL US, HOW WOULD YOU RATE SUMMER 2006, COMPARED to SUMMERS PAST??

VOTE in OUR POLL ABOVE, THEN FEEL FREE to SHARE YOUR THOUGHTS, OPINIONS and CETERA BELOW...