The Official RAZZIE® Forum : THE OTHER BOLEYN GIRL http://www.razzies.com/forum/ This is an XML content feed of; The Official RAZZIE® Forum : THE OTHER BOLEYN GIRL : Last 10 Posts Thu, 23 May 2013 14:46:44 +0000 Fri, 26 Dec 2008 15:51:12 +0000 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss Web Wiz Forums 9.70 30 www.razzies.com/forum/RSS_topic_feed.asp?FID=260 The Official RAZZIE® Forum http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_images/RazzieLogo02.gif http://www.razzies.com/forum/ THE OTHER BOLEYN GIRL : Off with Their Hedz!! http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2531&PID=19875#19875 Author: Michaels
Subject: Off with Their Hedz!!
Posted: December 26 2008 at 3:51pm

Originally posted by Mrs. Magnatech

I can't believe Natalie and Scarlett aren't on the ballot! They were just as bad as many of the "actresses" who made the cut

I guess that's what the write-in vote is for. Let's face it, Paris Hilton and Kim Kardashian are much more tempting to Razzies voters than Natalie and Scarlett.

]]> Fri, 26 Dec 2008 15:51:12 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2531&PID=19875#19875 THE OTHER BOLEYN GIRL : Off with Their Hedz!! http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2531&PID=19860#19860 Author: Mrs. Magnatech
Subject: Off with Their Hedz!!
Posted: December 26 2008 at 9:27am

I can't believe Natalie and Scarlett aren't on the ballot! They were just as bad as many of the "actresses" who made the cut]]> Fri, 26 Dec 2008 09:27:39 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2531&PID=19860#19860 THE OTHER BOLEYN GIRL : Off with Their Hedz!! http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2531&PID=19085#19085 Author: Queen_of_Toad
Subject: Off with Their Hedz!!
Posted: November 23 2008 at 12:04am

No, this is just a deliberate campaign against bad acting. Porkman happens to play a major role. ]]> Sun, 23 Nov 2008 00:04:30 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2531&PID=19085#19085 THE OTHER BOLEYN GIRL : Off with Their Hedz!! http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2531&PID=19041#19041 Author: MiguelAntilsu
Subject: Off with Their Hedz!!
Posted: November 21 2008 at 3:03am

Is this all part of a campaign against Natalie Portman?  In my book, this film is this close () to getting snubbed from the Razzies. ]]> Fri, 21 Nov 2008 03:03:08 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2531&PID=19041#19041 THE OTHER BOLEYN GIRL : Off with Their Hedz!! http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2531&PID=18942#18942 Author: Queen_of_Toad
Subject: Off with Their Hedz!!
Posted: November 18 2008 at 9:55am

Originally posted by ITbeast


In defense of Natalie Portman, The only reason why she ended up with those 2 Razzie noms (As always, HeadRAZZ, please correct me if I am wrong) was due to her being guilty by association by being stuck with Hayden "I can't act" Christensen for the Worst couple screen couple category. As far as the movie goes I will reserve judgment until I rent the DVD, However at this point I really do not see it making our bottom 10 for any of the 2009 category Razzie catagory's. Of course I could be wrong. 

Response from Head RAZZBerry: Actually, two of Portman's 3 RAZZIE Nominations were in our Worst Screen Couple category -- Alongside Jake Lloyd in STAR WARS: EPISODE I and with Hayden Christensen in EPISODE 2:CLONE WARS. But her third nomination was all her own, as Worst Supporting Actress for CLONE WARS. She didn't "win" any of the three. To see who she "lost" to for Supporting Actress, here's a LINK to Portman's "Awards" page on the IMDb... 

 



Porkman sucks. She only started to show how much she sucks in Star Wars. That was just the beginning of a decline.
Let me plead in short the case of Shortman here, the very site where it belongs: She peeked at 12 in "The Professional" and she hasn’t really been that great since.

She got an Oscar nomination for "Closer" although I never understood what the hell that was for. That part was nothing else but playing or an extension of her public image. I don't see what the acting challenge in that was. She was actually rather weak in that film, all of her co-stars were better than her, including Julia Roberts. And mind that the role of Alice was actually the most complicated one - at least I thought.

Her career has been more about nose jobs, Vogue covers and such brilliant statements like "violence is bad" - although she won't stop to shove it down people's throats she went to "Hahvaaad". She is just another Hollywood Lolita who once was full of promise and it now turned out that she's not that talented at all. The list of her kind is long. There is nothing unusual about that.

What is unusual however is how she still keeps getting credited for being the best actress of her generation etc. That's what I don't understand.

I could, of course, deliver you a much longer version of what I wrote here. This is just the beginning.
 
]]> Tue, 18 Nov 2008 09:55:33 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2531&PID=18942#18942 THE OTHER BOLEYN GIRL : Off with Their Hedz!! http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2531&PID=18045#18045 Author: Mrs. Magnatech
Subject: Off with Their Hedz!!
Posted: September 12 2008 at 7:02am

Wow, terrible movie. Boring and not even close to being historically accurate. I agree that Natalie was awful. I can definitely see a Worst Actress Razzie in her future... ]]> Fri, 12 Sep 2008 07:02:47 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2531&PID=18045#18045 THE OTHER BOLEYN GIRL : Off with Their Hedz!! http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2531&PID=16946#16946 Author: Michaels
Subject: Off with Their Hedz!!
Posted: July 01 2008 at 1:14pm

I saw the trailer. It looks like a Lifetime Movie Channel period piece.]]> Tue, 01 Jul 2008 13:14:18 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2531&PID=16946#16946 THE OTHER BOLEYN GIRL : Off with Their Hedz!! http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2531&PID=16917#16917 Author: myworksucks
Subject: Off with Their Hedz!!
Posted: June 30 2008 at 4:19am

I agree with everyone who said it was boring. It really was, not to mention completely historically incorrect. Anne Boylen was actually a pretty relgious person and wouldn't sleep with the king because she was married. It drove the King to madness to want her and did all he could to get her to be his wife and in his bed. The real story would have made it a lot more interesting. ]]> Mon, 30 Jun 2008 04:19:08 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2531&PID=16917#16917 THE OTHER BOLEYN GIRL : Off with Their Hedz!! http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2531&PID=16605#16605 Author: SchumacherH8ter
Subject: Off with Their Hedz!!
Posted: June 10 2008 at 12:33pm

Wow, what a boring movie! The film has one thing going for it: Scarlet Johansson. She shines in (almost) every one of her scenes. (The bad scenes were the ultra t/lame PG-13 "sex-scenes"). The other actors don't fare too well. Eric Bana came off as annoying, Natalie Portman would be a Worst Supporting Actress contender if the Razzies were held right now, but there's bound to be worse performances later this year. But, the worst performance comes from David Morrissey. Morrissey, easily one of the most shameless actors out there, plays the dull-yns asshole uncle, who starts all of this crap. While this is a step up from Morrissey's usual drek, considering that his other movies include (from most watchable to least): "Capt. Coreli's Mandolin", "The Reaping", and "Basic Instinct 2". Truly, the man has no shame! ]]> Tue, 10 Jun 2008 12:33:24 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2531&PID=16605#16605 THE OTHER BOLEYN GIRL : Off with Their Hedz!! http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2531&PID=15672#15672 Author: ramsde
Subject: Off with Their Hedz!!
Posted: March 05 2008 at 7:23am

The Other Boleyn Girl was not bad in my opinion. It was a little bit historically inaccurate. There are definitely parts that needed a little more of something (don't know what), but something. I do see how it can be a contender though.
]]> Wed, 05 Mar 2008 07:23:19 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2531&PID=15672#15672