http://www.razzies.com/forum/ This is an XML content feed of; The Official RAZZIE® Forum : Last 10 Posts Thu, 23 May 2013 19:28:28 +0000 Thu, 23 May 2013 19:13:24 +0000 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss Web Wiz Forums 9.70 30 www.razzies.com/forum/RSS_topic_feed.asp http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_images/RazzieLogo02.gif http://www.razzies.com/forum/ http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=6066&PID=54615#54615 Author: Vits
Subject: Member Discussion of 2013 LIST...
Posted: May 23 2013 at 7:13pm

Actually, according to Vin Diesel, F&F PART 6 is more than that.]]> Thu, 23 May 2013 19:13:24 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=6066&PID=54615#54615 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=6178&PID=54614#54614 Author: Vits
Subject: An inconvenient truth Ep 1: Friday the 13th (1980
Posted: May 23 2013 at 7:12pm

I never saw it. I saw one or two of the sequels when I was younger. Now, I don't really want to because I'm one of those who feel the need of watching entire franchises. So, I'd have to watch the 10 films, the remake, and FREDDY VS JASON, which would make me feel obligated to watch the 7 NIGHTMARE films and the remake.

Anyway, keep in mind that there were very few voters in the 1st Razzie ceremony. I'm sure HeadRAZZ and his friends didn't like watching a HALLOWEEN rip-off during the craze of slasher flicks.

]]> Thu, 23 May 2013 19:12:09 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=6178&PID=54614#54614 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=6173&PID=54613#54613 Author: SchumacherH8ter
Subject: Forum Members' Discussion of HANGOVER: 3...AUDS: 1
Posted: May 23 2013 at 6:42pm

McCarthy has less than 10 minutes of screen time and she's one of the funnier parts of the film.]]> Thu, 23 May 2013 18:42:20 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=6173&PID=54613#54613 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=6173&PID=54612#54612 Author: oiram
Subject: Forum Members' Discussion of HANGOVER: 3...AUDS: 1
Posted: May 23 2013 at 6:30pm

How long was Melissa McCarthy in it?

Originally posted by SchumacherH8ter I don't personally see it as a Worst Picture contender (for me, movies that get a D+ or lower are Worst Picture contenders), but I could see a less forgiving person wanting it to be a Worst Picture contender.

]]> Thu, 23 May 2013 18:30:58 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=6173&PID=54612#54612 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=6173&PID=54611#54611 Author: SchumacherH8ter
Subject: Forum Members' Discussion of HANGOVER: 3...AUDS: 1
Posted: May 23 2013 at 5:09pm

I don't personally see it as a Worst Picture contender (for me, movies that get a D+ or lower are Worst Picture contenders), but I could see a less forgiving person wanting it to be a Worst Picture contender.]]> Thu, 23 May 2013 17:09:40 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=6173&PID=54611#54611 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=6178&PID=54610#54610 Author: moviecritic1994
Subject: An inconvenient truth Ep 1: Friday the 13th (1980
Posted: May 23 2013 at 5:00pm

I have been a long time fan of the Razzie Awards. So much so, I love to look back on previous nominees and "Winners" whether it be last year or the very 1st Razzie Awards. Of course, the first film to ever be given the dishonor of Worst Picture was "Can't Stop the Music". I haven't seen the film and quite frankly I don't want to .

However, when looking through the other nominees for the first Razzie awards, I did see a movie that I do love and own on DVD. That film is the first and original "Friday the 13th" (1980). It got nominated not only for Worst Picture but nominated for Worst Supporting Actress (Betsy Palmer). At first, I tried to rationalize it and mainly forget it was even nominated (it was 33 years ago after all). But at the same time, the fan in me was still a little shocked. Looking back at it now, I feel stupid for even not looking at the many mistakes in the first "Friday the 13th". So... here goes nothing.

I recently re watched the first film, and I noticed that the acting was SO LAME. Granted, for a lot of these kids back then it was their first film but I must mention we never really see them in other projects after the movie. In fact, the only person to get a film career after this movie was Kevin Bacon.

Another flaw... the film is supposed to be 95 minutes long but it does feel like a full 2 hour movie. Why? After the first two kills at the beginning of the film, it takes a REALLY LONG TIME for something to happen. Yes, we do have to introduce the characters and have the story develop but it doesn't take what it feels like.. 30 minutes. Even when we get to the next kill, we have to wait another 20 minutes for the movie to actually start getting good.

Finally, a flaw that came to me by actually watching the "Behind the Scenes" feature on the DVD of the film. I believe one of the Producers or screen writers of the film talked about the idea behind the "Friday the 13th" movie. Well he and his buddy had just seen "Halloween" and said since it was making a lot of movie they should "Rip it off". What a stupid thing to say! I knew the movie was a rip off of Halloween but why in the world would a guy who made the film even admit that to other people? I lost my respect for the film a little bit because of that statement.

So, I will close this topic with this thought. I still love Friday the 13th Part 1 and Part 2 (the series kind of goes down hill from there). However, I do see why the film got nominated for Worst Picture. So leave your thoughts down below. DO you think I am over thinking this? Do you like the 1st Friday the 13th movie too? Comment and leave feedback    ]]> Thu, 23 May 2013 17:00:07 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=6178&PID=54610#54610 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=6173&PID=54609#54609 Author: moviecritic1994
Subject: Forum Members' Discussion of HANGOVER: 3...AUDS: 1
Posted: May 23 2013 at 4:01pm

This might be a long shot, but do you think it could also be up for Worst Picture? ]]> Thu, 23 May 2013 16:01:08 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=6173&PID=54609#54609 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=6173&PID=54608#54608 Author: SchumacherH8ter
Subject: Forum Members' Discussion of HANGOVER: 3...AUDS: 1
Posted: May 23 2013 at 3:56pm

Here's what I think The Hangover Part III should be on the ballot for: Worst Supporting Actor for both Zach and Ken, Worst Screenplay, Worst Screen Couple for Zach and Ken (if you see the film, you'll understand why I have them under here), Worst Screen Ensemble, and Worst Remake, Rip-off, or Sequel.]]> Thu, 23 May 2013 15:56:16 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=6173&PID=54608#54608 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=6173&PID=54607#54607 Author: moviecritic1994
Subject: Forum Members' Discussion of HANGOVER: 3...AUDS: 1
Posted: May 23 2013 at 3:18pm

Vits what I think Head Razz means is this: Ever since the first Hangover, the studio behind the film has really just wanted people to buy into the sequels because of the popularity of that first film. Since the first film, they pretty much repeated the same formula in the 2nd Hangover film (don't know about the 3rd). But from #3's 23% rating on RT (and the horrible reviews it's getting in other places) it seems to be another repeat of the first and second films, just in a different setting and with a different tone. Instead of a comedy, Hangover 3 seems like an action/thriller. Do the writers and studio executives really think they can fool us just by changing the place and tone of a film and we won't know it's just the same S**t happening over and over again??  ]]> Thu, 23 May 2013 15:18:05 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=6173&PID=54607#54607 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=6173&PID=54606#54606 Author: Vits
Subject: Forum Members' Discussion of HANGOVER: 3...AUDS: 1
Posted: May 23 2013 at 3:10pm

So then every sequel to a bad movie would be a rip-off?

Originally posted by HeadRAZZberry NO -- Please re-read my post above. I was speaking specifically about this film -- and the fact that almost everyone loathed the 2nd entry in this franchise. Yet here they are, back again, looking to swipe yet another ticket's worth of bucks from our pockets.

Originally posted by SchumacherH8ter It's definitely a Razzie contender.

For which categories? 

]]> Thu, 23 May 2013 15:10:03 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=6173&PID=54606#54606