<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="RSS_xslt_style.asp" version="1.0" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:WebWizForums="http://syndication.webwiz.co.uk/rss_namespace/">
 <channel>
  <title>The Official RAZZIE&#174; Forum : WILD HOGS                                                                                                                                   </title>
  <link>http://www.razzies.com/forum/</link>
  <description>This is an XML content feed of; The Official RAZZIE&#174; Forum : WILD HOGS                                                                                                                                    : Last 10 Posts</description>
  <pubDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 00:59:40 +0000</pubDate>
  <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Aug 2011 11:11:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
  <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
  <generator>Web Wiz Forums 9.70</generator>
  <ttl>30</ttl>
  <WebWizForums:feedURL>www.razzies.com/forum/RSS_topic_feed.asp?FID=176</WebWizForums:feedURL>
  
  <item>
   <title>WILD HOGS                                                                                                                                    : Is WILD HOGS as Bad as It LOOKS?!?!?!?</title>
   <link>http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1714&amp;PID=45880#45880</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.razzies.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=8803">Vits</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> Is WILD HOGS as Bad as It LOOKS?!?!?!?<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> August 30 2011 at 11:11am<br /><br /><font face="Courier New, Courier, mono" size="3">This movie was funny,but also cliched and predictable.We get a great performance from <b>Macy</b>,but with <b>Travolta</b>...it's the other way around.Ultimately it's so forgettable,like the kind of movie you watch once,and then re-watch it on Sunday afternoons out of boredom.<br><br>I give it 5/10.</font><br><table width="99%"><tr><td class="BBquote"><strong><em>Originally posted by moviewizguy</strong></em><br /><br />Memento gets so worn out after the second viewing, along with other overrated films.</td></tr></table><br><font face="Courier New, Courier, mono" size="3">Gasp!<br><br>Actually,you bring up a very good point.MEMENTO is my all time favorite <u>because</u> I can't watch it again.I mean,I have to so I can connect all the dots but it's not like I'll be entertained watching it again.Every movie is less good the 2nd viewing.The 1st time I saw <b>BORAT </b>I couldn't stop laughing,but since the 2nd time I don't laugh that much.</font><br>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Tue, 30 Aug 2011 11:11:23 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1714&amp;PID=45880#45880</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>WILD HOGS                                                                                                                                    : Is WILD HOGS as Bad as It LOOKS?!?!?!?</title>
   <link>http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1714&amp;PID=14578#14578</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.razzies.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=973">bruin_522</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> Is WILD HOGS as Bad as It LOOKS?!?!?!?<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> December 15 2007 at 2:06pm<br /><br /><P>John Travolta, as I have heard, teamed up with WILD HOGS director Walt Becker, and have just finished filming the movie. Now, it's in post-production, and the movie is called OLD DOGS. The plot is about two friends and business partners find their lives turned upside down when strange circumstances lead to them being placed in the care of 7-year-old twins. The film will also star 2000 Worst Supporting Actress RAZZIE Winner Kelly Preston, 2-time RAZZIE nominee Robin Williams, along with Matt Dillon, Bernie Mac, Dax Shepherd, and Seth Green.</P>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Sat, 15 Dec 2007 14:06:45 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1714&amp;PID=14578#14578</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>WILD HOGS                                                                                                                                    : Is WILD HOGS as Bad as It LOOKS?!?!?!?</title>
   <link>http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1714&amp;PID=13566#13566</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.razzies.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=14">saturnwatcher</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> Is WILD HOGS as Bad as It LOOKS?!?!?!?<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> September 24 2007 at 5:18pm<br /><br /><P>No argument about <strong>Every Which Way But Loose, </strong>which I cited specifically to demonstrate just how low on the food chain&nbsp;<strong>Wild Hogs</strong>&nbsp;was. You are somewhat more enthusiastic about Eastwood than I, but he has made some movies I liked... </P><P><table width="99%"><tr><td class="BBquote"><strong><em>Originally posted by SchumacherH8ter</strong></em><br /><br />"Every Which Way But Lose" was crap, and a waste of Clint Eastwood, my # 2 favorite actor behind Jack Nicholson.</td></tr></table> </P>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2007 17:18:19 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1714&amp;PID=13566#13566</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>WILD HOGS                                                                                                                                    : Is WILD HOGS as Bad as It LOOKS?!?!?!?</title>
   <link>http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1714&amp;PID=13562#13562</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.razzies.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=1568">SchumacherH8ter</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> Is WILD HOGS as Bad as It LOOKS?!?!?!?<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> September 24 2007 at 8:28am<br /><br /><P>moviewizguy, you are dumb! "Stomp The Yard" was derivative, "Daddy's Little Girls" was manipulative crap, and "Norbit" makes "Epic Movie" look good!<IMG src="http://www.razzies.com/forum/smileys/smiley5.gif" border="0">&nbsp;Also, "Zodiac" was better than "Wild Hogs". Admittedly,&nbsp;I did kinda enjoy "Wild Hogs". But, the low point of your post was your defamation of "Memento", the best movie of 2001. "Harry Potter" was great, but not on the same level as "Memento". I'm a proud owner of it... </P><P><table width="99%"><tr><td class="BBquote"><strong><em>Originally posted by moviewizguy</strong></em><br /><br /></P><P>Well, I never get tired of it and you blame on films you haven't even watch like the inspirational Stomp the Yard. People hate it because it's a black movie. That's what IMDb ratings are leaning toward. Look at Daddy's Little Girls which also has a low rating and so as Norbit. Hmmm...oh, they are all black films! If you haven't noticed the trend, then I just pointed them out from you.</P><P>If have heard so many people talk so much crap about Stomp the Yard because it's another black film or dance film. At least is has a moral and is like Freedom Writers, which has a high rating. I wonder why. Both are unique films with a moral and both are inspirational. I don't see why color makes the difference. Future black films would soon get low rating.</P><P>Even my friend who saw Zodiac (which in your opinion was "great") hated it. She said it was too long and people in the theaters are irritated and just wanted to know the ending, which she spelled out, and I got mad at her. She said don't waste my money to see it.</P><P>See, people (or at least I) would rather watch films that are fun and easy to follow, unlike films that you have to think about (which I don't have a problem with). I would rather watch Harry Potter 20 times than Memento 3 times. Why? Memento gets so worn out after the second viewing, along with other overrated films. Films like Harry Potter, War of the Worlds, Meet the Parents, and so on are films I would rather watch more than once. See, all films critics like (and all Oscar nominated films) are so boring, an average movie goer would rather see something "stupid". I would even have to admit it. Million Dollar Baby was very good, but thinking about watching it a second time kinda makes me think I'm wasting my life. Although Oscar films may&nbsp;made my top 50 list, other films are much more entertaining but still, don't reach my top 50 list. </P><P><FONT face="Times New Roman, Times, serif" size=3><strong>Response from Head RAZZberry:</strong> If your point is that average movie-goers prefer not to think while watching a movie, then you've basically validated <strong>Vidiot</strong>'s point. As for bagging on MEMENTO, it's one of my Berry Favorite Movies of the last few years -- Precisely because it <EM>demands</EM> that you think and pay attention while watching it... </FONT></P><P><FONT face="Times New Roman" size=3>Also, assuming that critics dislike something because it's "a black movie" is a bit much. Why can't people criticize movies of any kind, if they don't like them? Suggesting that having Black characters somehow makes a movie immune from criticism is pandering and insulting. Any film-maker willing to put his or her vision on screen ought also to be willing to allow it to be fairly criticized. And even if STOMP THE YARD <EM>was</EM> a big box office hit, it was clearly also a re-hash of about 27 previous movies. Popular success, as your own posting inadvertently makes clear, has <EM>nothing </EM>to do with artistic merit.</FONT></P></td></tr></table> &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; ]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2007 08:28:06 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1714&amp;PID=13562#13562</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>WILD HOGS                                                                                                                                    : Is WILD HOGS as Bad as It LOOKS?!?!?!?</title>
   <link>http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1714&amp;PID=13337#13337</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.razzies.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=1568">SchumacherH8ter</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> Is WILD HOGS as Bad as It LOOKS?!?!?!?<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> September 09 2007 at 10:55am<br /><br /><P>"Every Which Way But Lose" was crap, and a waste of Clint Eastwood, my # 2 favorite actor behind Jack Nicholson. </P><P><table width="99%"><tr><td class="BBquote"><strong><em>Originally posted by saturnwatcher</strong></em><br /><br />I saw this movie yesterday. For about the first 15 minutes, it wasn't particularly painful. Then it suddenly turned into a low rent <strong><EM>Every Which Way But Loose </EM></strong>without the charms of Clyde, the orangutan. Here is a bit of a plot spoiler though: If, sometime in the first 15 minutes of the film, you happen to find yourself wondering, "Gee, how long until Peter Fonda makes a cameo?"...the answer is 94 minutes. (the film runs 99 minutes).</P><P>William H. Macy is entirely wasted in this film...I kept wondering, "Who has pictures of him embarrassing enough to get him to do&nbsp;this?"&nbsp;Macy and Tim Allen should have switched roles.</td></tr></table> &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; </P>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Sun, 09 Sep 2007 10:55:43 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1714&amp;PID=13337#13337</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>WILD HOGS                                                                                                                                    : Is WILD HOGS as Bad as It LOOKS?!?!?!?</title>
   <link>http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1714&amp;PID=13336#13336</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.razzies.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=1568">SchumacherH8ter</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> Is WILD HOGS as Bad as It LOOKS?!?!?!?<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> September 09 2007 at 10:53am<br /><br /><P>"Zodiac" was great it's number 9 on my favorite movies of the year. "300", however is the BEST MOVIE OF THE YEAR, <EM>and</EM> #7 on my list of best movies ever! </P><P><table width="99%"><tr><td class="BBquote"><strong><em>Originally posted by Sanndman228715</strong></em><br /><br />300 will rule. Zodiac is getting awesome reviews, with the cast being called great ( With most of the praise in the reviews I've read&nbsp;going to Robert Downey Jr. and Brian Cox......all hail the Cox-master........that sounds so dirty) <IMG src="http://www.razzies.com/forum/smileys/smiley1.gif" border="0"></td></tr></table> &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; </P>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Sun, 09 Sep 2007 10:53:22 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1714&amp;PID=13336#13336</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>WILD HOGS                                                                                                                                    : #1 Comedy of 2007???</title>
   <link>http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2088&amp;PID=13104#13104</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.razzies.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=973">bruin_522</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> #1 Comedy of 2007???<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> August 24 2007 at 3:10pm<br /><br />It definitely looks like more people went to see movies this year than they did last year...This year, by far, as I said earlier, 14 movies made it past the $100 Million mark, plus Rush Hour 3 after this weekend, Superbad, in a couple weeks, and Evan Almighty, if possible. As of Thursday's results, Evan is standing at $98.6 Million, so, it just has less than $1.4 Million to go to reach that mark.]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2007 15:10:36 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2088&amp;PID=13104#13104</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>WILD HOGS                                                                                                                                    : #1 Comedy of 2007???</title>
   <link>http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2088&amp;PID=13091#13091</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.razzies.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=708">cvcjr13</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> #1 Comedy of 2007???<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> August 23 2007 at 4:42pm<br /><br /><P>Three more summer movies will probably break the $100 million mark before their run is over -- <EM>Rush Hour 3</EM>, <EM>Superbad</EM> and, eventually, <EM>Evan Almighty.&nbsp; </EM>In the case of <EM>Evan Almighty</EM>, it might take several more weeks, but it seems likely to just break $100 million.</P>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2007 16:42:51 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2088&amp;PID=13091#13091</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>WILD HOGS                                                                                                                                    : #1 Comedy of 2007???</title>
   <link>http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2088&amp;PID=13090#13090</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.razzies.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=973">bruin_522</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> #1 Comedy of 2007???<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> August 23 2007 at 4:01pm<br /><br /><P>And now, as of Wednesday's results, Wild Hogs went to #9 after THE BOURNE ULTIMATUM passed it, and it will go down to #10 tomorrow when THE SIMPSONS MOVIE will pass that movie. However, you have to admit, looking at this year's Box Office results, it looks like people are starting to go see movies this year, we've had 4 movies pass the $100 Million mark this spring, and now, all 4 of them are no longer in theaters and now are on DVD. And as of 8/23/07, there is a total of 14 movies this summer that made it passed the $100 Million mark, the most recent one as of now is Hairspray.</P><P>Plus, if we are talking about comedies, i think you left out SHREK THE TURD. Yes, that movie didn't get well reviews, but i still call it an OK movie, and not to mention it qualifies as a comedy. Plus, it has beat off PURATES III at the&nbsp; US Box Office, but SPIDER-MAN 3 still remains the top Box Office Movie of 2007...</P>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2007 16:01:56 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2088&amp;PID=13090#13090</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>WILD HOGS                                                                                                                                    : Is WILD HOGS as Bad as It LOOKS?!?!?!?</title>
   <link>http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1714&amp;PID=13051#13051</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.razzies.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=1495">ZookGuy</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> Is WILD HOGS as Bad as It LOOKS?!?!?!?<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> August 20 2007 at 5:15am<br /><br /><table width="99%"><tr><td class="BBquote"><strong><em>Originally posted by moviewizguy</strong></em><br /><br /><P>Well, I never get tired of it and you blame on films you haven't even watch like the inspirational Stomp the Yard. People hate it because it's a black movie. That's what IMDb ratings are leaning toward. Look at Daddy's Little Girls which also has a low rating and so as Norbit. Hmmm...oh, they are all black films! If you haven't noticed the trend, then I just pointed them out from you.</P><P><P><FONT face="Times New Roman" size=3></FONT></P></td></tr></table> </P><P>That's not true actually, War of the Worlds (all-white cast) was panned by critics, but was a box office hit! And if you are speaking out against racism, why are you using the term 'black people'?</P>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Mon, 20 Aug 2007 05:15:18 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1714&amp;PID=13051#13051</guid>
  </item> 
 </channel>
</rss>