Official RAZZIE® Forum Homepage
Forum Home Forum Home > DISCUSSIONS & POLLS on 2010 RELEASES > PREDATORS
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed: a.k.a. BUNGLE IN THE JUNGLE?!?
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Calendar   Register Register  Login Login

a.k.a. BUNGLE IN THE JUNGLE?!?

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 345
Author
Message
scoobs23 View Drop Down
Berry New Comer
Berry New Comer


Joined: March 28 2010
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 7
Post Options Post Options   Quote scoobs23 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: a.k.a. BUNGLE IN THE JUNGLE?!?
    Posted: July 23 2010 at 6:48pm
Originally posted by BurnHollywoodBurn


Well, I had a free movie pass and I gave the movie a try. Sure enough, yet another worthless remake that adds NOTHING to the series. No, it doesn't pay "homage" to the first movie, it copies and pastes everywhere ... the being covered in mud, the lines like "What the hell are you" and "I'm right here, come kill me", etc. Not to mention the first movie had a rag-tag team of big, strong, well-armed marines that could be a match for the Predators ... here, we have a team of skinny, little twigs as opponents! I say "guilty pleasure" at best ... with way more "guilt" than pleasure to it! 


Ah, in the first film, Arnold used mud in order to avoid the Predator's heat senses. Not nearly as much of a "rip-off" as it is the lead character just using something to his advantage. What you're doing here is nitpicking. You were probably waiting for one these lines to pop off so you could yell "rip-off!...". This film, while retaining some elements from the original, clearly didn't want it to follow it and wanted to offer something different, which is why the actors aren't as "big and strong", and fyi, Brody's physical appearance for this film is very similar to that of a mercenary, cut and lean, because it fits the character. Oh and you may want to work on not contradicting yourself, on hand you criticize the film for "ripping off" the original, while on the other hand you criticize it for not having similar built actors from the original.
Back to Top
BurnHollywoodBurn View Drop Down
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum


Joined: February 03 2010
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3557
Post Options Post Options   Quote BurnHollywoodBurn Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 23 2010 at 8:25pm
Um, no, I went in with an open mind thinking they would do an original movie that just happened to be a sequel, but I was sadly mistaken. And what is wrong with thinking the actors should be more buffed up like the ones in the original movie? That would make sense since they would look like real killesr who could stand a chance with the Predators. These people look like lambs that should have been killed off within a matter fo seconds. Danny Trejo was the only one who looked like he belonged. Oh, and nitpicking is what a critic is suppose to do, not just sit there and except everything is without fails. I mean if your car's tires blow out, do you just keep driving and say to yourself "Oh, that's no big deal, the sparks are suppose to be coming out of the wheels"?  

Originally posted by scoobs23

 
Ah, in the first film, Arnold used mud in order to avoid the Predator's heat senses. Not nearly as much of a "rip-off" as it is the lead character just using something to his advantage. What you're doing here is nitpicking. You were probably waiting for one these lines to pop off so you could yell "rip-off!...". This film, while retaining some elements from the original, clearly didn't want it to follow it and wanted to offer something different, which is why the actors aren't as "big and strong", and fyi, Brody's physical appearance for this film is very similar to that of a mercenary, cut and lean, because it fits the character. Oh and you may want to work on not contradicting yourself, on hand you criticize the film for "ripping off" the original, while on the other hand you criticize it for not having similar built actors from the original.
The Four Horsemen of the Moviepocalypse: uncalled for sequels/remakes/reboots, 3-D surcharges, untalented "celebrities", and anything with Michael Bay's name attached to it.
Back to Top
razziessuckass View Drop Down
Berry New Comer
Berry New Comer


Joined: August 03 2010
Location: Texas
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2
Post Options Post Options   Quote razziessuckass Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 03 2010 at 11:21pm

Angry John Wilson should leave movies alone because im sick and tired of him and his stupid Razzie arwards! >:(  

RESPONSE from Head RAZZberry: Please define the word "arwards." I am unfamiliar with it...  



Razzies suck
Back to Top
razziessuckass View Drop Down
Berry New Comer
Berry New Comer


Joined: August 03 2010
Location: Texas
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2
Post Options Post Options   Quote razziessuckass Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 03 2010 at 11:23pm
i give this movie a 100/100 beacuse i love the Predator movies!Smile
Back to Top
cvcjr13 View Drop Down
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum


Joined: September 01 2006
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1190
Post Options Post Options   Quote cvcjr13 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 04 2010 at 7:59am
And I feel instead that the movie studios should stop putting out blatantly bad movies.  John Wilson provides us movie fans a much needed outlet to counter all these bad movies.
 
Originally posted by razziessuckass

Angry John Wilson should leave movies alone because im sick and tired of him and his stupid Razzie arwards! >:(

Back to Top
GTAHater767 View Drop Down
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum


Joined: October 25 2009
Location: I shall not say
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1334
Post Options Post Options   Quote GTAHater767 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 04 2010 at 6:06pm
Ugggh... Another attacker??
Possible Unofficial Forums, given <35% approval: Ags. 27; The November Man.
Back to Top
cvcjr13 View Drop Down
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum


Joined: September 01 2006
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1190
Post Options Post Options   Quote cvcjr13 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 04 2010 at 8:57pm
I'm guessing a fanboy/hater.
Back to Top
BurnHollywoodBurn View Drop Down
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum


Joined: February 03 2010
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3557
Post Options Post Options   Quote BurnHollywoodBurn Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 05 2010 at 11:31am
Please, in another day or two, this kid will forget this forum even exists. Mindlessly loyal fanboys have short attention spans like that.
The Four Horsemen of the Moviepocalypse: uncalled for sequels/remakes/reboots, 3-D surcharges, untalented "celebrities", and anything with Michael Bay's name attached to it.
Back to Top
oiram View Drop Down
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum


Joined: June 28 2010
Location: America
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2443
Post Options Post Options   Quote oiram Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 23 2010 at 4:44am
If this gets worst anything, I'll be sad, because this isn't that bad, especially compared to the other *bleep* we had the swim through.
Elizabeth Hartman and Judith Barsi are more talented and beautiful than Scarlett Johansson and Chloe Grace Moretz. Fact.

Worst Supporting Actor: Brendan Fraser/Gimme Shelter and The Nut Job


Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 345

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down