Official RAZZIE® Forum Homepage
Forum Home Forum Home > 2005/26th RAZZIE® Awards Discussions & Forums > DEUCE BIGALOW: EUROPEAN GIGOLO
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed: Amercia’s FUNNIEST Working Actor...NOT!!!
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Calendar   Register Register  Login Login

Amercia’s FUNNIEST Working Actor...NOT!!!

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <123
Author
Message
bruin_522 View Drop Down
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum


Joined: January 30 2007
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 360
Post Options Post Options   Quote bruin_522 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: Amercia’s FUNNIEST Working Actor...NOT!!!
    Posted: March 06 2007 at 6:25pm
Ok guys, this was definitely one of the worst films I've ever seen. Rob Schneider deserved this 2005 RAZZIE for this. I think of him as one of the most annoying actors in Hollywood history. Oh well, he didn't win a second RAZZIE for Benchwarmers (along with Little Man). That award deservingly went to the Wayans brothers for Little Man.
Back to Top
bruin_522 View Drop Down
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum


Joined: January 30 2007
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 360
Post Options Post Options   Quote bruin_522 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 21 2007 at 11:56am
I've been looking at Rob's latest film called BIG STAN. Now I don't feel interested at all.
Back to Top
Anitram View Drop Down
Berry New Comer
Berry New Comer


Joined: January 14 2008
Location: Czech Republic
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1
Post Options Post Options   Quote Anitram Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 14 2008 at 7:01am

I really don't understand you guys. OK, I could understand that DB:EG wasn't as good as the 1st one, and had differend kind of humor, but the worst movie?? It's comedy, for cryin' out loud.. imo it's not about effects and all those stuff as long as you laugh even just a little. But what really got me was nomination of Benchwarmers -.- seriously the men who nominated it have something personal against Rob, or are just weird. I loved this movie, and all my friends who saw it like it too. And also I heard he was nominated for his role in Big Daddy (Nazzo was my fav char since the 1st time I've seen it). Gee, there's really something wrong.. I wonder how do you chose those nominees?


And one last thing about Rob Schneider (yep, I like him, it's true). I could never ever pick on some1 who is just trying to make other people laugh. If you don't like comedies, or if you're some kind of pesimistic moron, why do you watch those movies? I doubt you've ever amended so many sour moods, or lightened up so many faces, as he does in one single year.


Oh, and if you have your own head ppl, you'd rate movies by yourself, not just read smth and and say you have the same opinion all the time.. there're not many unprejudiced people nowadays (seriously don't tell me you've never seen a movie with bad review that you like in the end)...

Back to Top
wetbandit82 View Drop Down
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum


Joined: November 10 2006
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 297
Post Options Post Options   Quote wetbandit82 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 07 2008 at 12:01pm
You can enjoy him if you do; we don't infringe, and we respect others' opinions.  The only problem is, as I see it, that Schneider for whatever reason seems bent on antagonizing audiences, that he seems to see them as simply sheep to exploit for his gain, and everyone who says otherwise is a fool in his own right (case in point:  his rambling and rather antagonistic exchange with Ebert following this one where he clearly had no respect for Roger's opinion, or any other critic's--while this may be OK in some respects to stand up for one's feelings, I think he went about it the wrong way).  Why thus he seems to feel the need to anger the audience rather than entertain them mystifies me, and if he's not careful it'll come back on him in a bad way, if it hasn't already.  But at least we'll always have Home Alone 2, where he put in a reasonable effort (even if it was largely due to Mac getting the better of him all through the picture).     
Back to Top
Vits View Drop Down
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum


Joined: February 01 2010
Location: Chile
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 6614
Post Options Post Options   Quote Vits Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 08 2010 at 9:10am

The thing is the 1st was better'cuz it had "heart".It focused more in the romance than in the gross humour.This time,is the other way around.

I admit I laugh a few times,but it doesn't make it good,nor even O.K..

You want a proof that Rob deserves the Razzie?Remember the scene with the chick with the penis-nose?He said "I'll go talk with the penist.I mean the pianist!".Between those sentences,there was a pause,and if he had said it imediately,it would've been funny.Did he expect us to laugh out lout,and wanted to wait for us to finish so he could keep talkin'?
 
I saw this movie with my dad on DVD,and he said he didn't like Rob anymore when we saw he making of,and he was ev'rywhere bossin'aroun'people,even though he wasn't the director nor a producer.
You can follow me @Vits_Chile
Back to Top
BurnHollywoodBurn View Drop Down
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum


Joined: February 03 2010
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3557
Post Options Post Options   Quote BurnHollywoodBurn Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 08 2010 at 1:56pm
Yes! Yes! Yes! And that is what's wrong with sequels. The first movie might have had "heart", but the sequel is just Hollywood riding the gravy train. And in most cases, the train derails because no one competent is conducting it.  
The Four Horsemen of the Moviepocalypse: uncalled for sequels/remakes/reboots, 3-D surcharges, untalented "celebrities", and anything with Michael Bay's name attached to it.
Back to Top
Vits View Drop Down
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum


Joined: February 01 2010
Location: Chile
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 6614
Post Options Post Options   Quote Vits Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 12 2010 at 1:48pm

Yes.There should've never been a sequel in the 1st. place.

At the end of the first one,it said "DEUCE & KATE lived happily ever after".
 
At the end of this one,it said "DEUCE & EVA got married,and they're expecting gigolo twins",so they wouldn't risk another plot hole if there's a threequel.
You can follow me @Vits_Chile
Back to Top
Vits View Drop Down
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum


Joined: February 01 2010
Location: Chile
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 6614
Post Options Post Options   Quote Vits Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 14 2010 at 1:12pm
I've finally decided on a rating:3/10.I algo gave 5/10 to the first one.
You can follow me @Vits_Chile
Back to Top
BurnHollywoodBurn View Drop Down
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum


Joined: February 03 2010
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3557
Post Options Post Options   Quote BurnHollywoodBurn Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 14 2010 at 1:45pm
Well, that's a bit high for my taste,  but at least high ratings aren't common place in EVERY review you post...
The Four Horsemen of the Moviepocalypse: uncalled for sequels/remakes/reboots, 3-D surcharges, untalented "celebrities", and anything with Michael Bay's name attached to it.
Back to Top
Vits View Drop Down
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum


Joined: February 01 2010
Location: Chile
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 6614
Post Options Post Options   Quote Vits Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 22 2010 at 10:49am
I've made a list of what I consider the 18 worst performances of all time @ R.T. -- and Rob Schneider (in this movie) is on it. Here's the LINK...


You can follow me @Vits_Chile
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <123

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down