Official RAZZIE® Forum Homepage
Forum Home Forum Home > DISCUSSIONS & POLLS on 2010 RELEASES > PREDATORS
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed: B.O. MoJo #s for PREDATORS
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Calendar   Register Register  Login Login

B.O. MoJo #s for PREDATORS
 Post Reply Post Reply
Author
Message
  Share Topic Share Topic  Topic Search Topic Search  Topic Options Topic Options
HeadRAZZBerry View Drop Down
Berry Important MODERATOR
Berry Important MODERATOR


Joined: April 23 2005
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 4498 		Post Options Post Options   Quote HeadRAZZBerry Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: B.O. MoJo #s for PREDATORS
    Posted: July 11 2010 at 3:49pm
Everyone seems to be arguing on this Forum that PREDATORS is actually a good movie (or at the berry least not a likely RAZZIE® Contender). How then do they explain that on its opening weekend, its grosses dropped over 35% from Friday to Sunday??  

Here's a B.O. MoJo LINK to check its day-to-day figures, and confirm that claim...
Ye Olde Head RAZZberry
Back to Top
Mayhem5185 View Drop Down
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum


Joined: October 10 2007
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 259 		Post Options Post Options   Quote Mayhem5185 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 11 2010 at 8:12pm
Its called stiff competition genius, Look at what happens pretty much every time a action movie goes up against a family friendly one. 9 times out of 10 the family movie will dominate even if the family movie is bad. Now in this case Despicable Me turned out to be good, so Predators stood no chance. Then you got the fledgling, but still powerhouse Twilight eating up a chunk of the movie going audience. The third problem was the still popular Toy Story 3, it's been out for about 4 weeks now, and it is still raking in solid numbers (Over 350 million to date) Add in the fact that it was playing at 1000, or in some cases 2000 less theaters than anyone else in the top 5.

I must ask what are you implying here?
Back to Top
BurnHollywoodBurn View Drop Down
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum


Joined: February 03 2010
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3557 		Post Options Post Options   Quote BurnHollywoodBurn Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 11 2010 at 10:18pm

And Mayhem's point is why I'm worried about "Inception" being smacked down by a certain family friendly movie starring one Nick Cage. The competition is fierce and it looks like all the movies are suffering because of it. Well, the ones without 3-D surcharges are.

Oh, and Mayhem, I think HeadRazz is implying that the movie sucks ... in his humble opinion.
The Four Horsemen of the Moviepocalypse: uncalled for sequels/remakes/reboots, 3-D surcharges, untalented "celebrities", and anything with Michael Bay's name attached to it.
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down