DISCUSSION/SUGGESTIONS for WORST ACTOR

Another reason why Rourke should be considered: he's an Oscar-nominated actor. I could kind of understand Megan Fox being in this since her career's pretty much dead and she needs money, but Rourke still has a career. He was in two movies that crossed the $100 million mark last year.

Yeah, but they were all so terrible and there are only 5 Worst Actor spots. We need to leave room for the Vampire and the Wolf, Tyler Perry, Nick Swardson, Nick Cage, Kevin James, Adam Sandler, Alex Pettyfer.

There are too many contenders!

P.S. What do you mean all hell broke loose?   

Why do you douche bags always have to nominate Robert Pattinson? He is a great actor!
Mbh, which one line or one scene did you like in his performance?  

SPOILERS!


Hello Guest, I did like how Pattinson delivered the line "Do you honestly think I could love it, or even tolerate it?" That sounded cold and distant. I also liked the scene where he has to leave the corps to go and fight, he's not even saying anything, but his body language alone told me that the character was about to go mental. I understood that even without having read the book. These two points tell me he has potential and keeps me from actually voting for him as "Worst Actor".

I'm also willing to answer your other question: As a grown man I don't have any motherly feelings towards his persona, and I couldn't care less about his looks, so has to impress me with his acting skills. So far, he hasn't really done that, and if he stopped acting today I would not miss him as an actor. To be more specific, I don't like his overacting. An example of that was the infamous boardroom scene in Remember Me. Less so in Water for Elephants, but it still shows every now and then. In Breaking Dawn the character is very wooden, but even there Patts acting doesn't come across as natural. It looks untrained. Remember, his sex appeal doesn't apply to me, so it's hard for me to watch, just like Pettyfer and Fernandez look fake to me.

Originally posted by Vits The whole point of having that new category was so there could be a way to award as many people as possible, and at the same time, to award individually those who deserve it. It's pointless to have 2 awards that basically do the same thing, which is kind of how I felt with the 2003 Worst Excuse For A Movie category. The difference is that this time most people agreed with me. And what does Eigenberg accepting the award have to do with it?

          

My point/complaint is that Worst Actress could've been better used for something else. The 4 gal pals and the 8 other cast members could've best been encapsulated by winning only Worst Ensemble Cast for all 12 of them, and that should've been the end of the RAZZing for Sex & the City 2. It would've been a fairly big step in the right direction had Worst Actress of 2010 been given to Jonah Hex for Megan Fox instead.

I just got the Green Lanturd from Netflix.