I still disagree with you awarding the Four Gal Pals "Worst Actress",because then "Worst Ensemble" seems pointless.
My point exactly. The Worst Ensemble was suppose to rid the Razzies of the whole leading cast winning the single actor/actress awards.
The Four Horsemen of the Moviepocalypse: uncalled for sequels/remakes/reboots, 3-D surcharges, untalented "celebrities", and anything with Michael Bay's name attached to it.
The reason they had all four jointly nominated for worst actress was so that there would be more room for the worst supporting actress section, and I personally have no problem with that.
Elizabeth Hartman and Judith Barsi are much more talented and beautiful than Scarlett Johansson and Chloe Grace Moretz. Fact.
The reason they had all four jointly nominated for worst actress was so that there would be more room for the worst supporting actress section, and I personally have no problem with that.
I understand that, but most people feel only Parker and Cattrall were the only ones worthy of a Razzing, and lumping the other actresses into one category didn't seem right, and then them winning Worst Ensemble was just beating a dead horse with a stick.
The Four Horsemen of the Moviepocalypse: uncalled for sequels/remakes/reboots, 3-D surcharges, untalented "celebrities", and anything with Michael Bay's name attached to it.
Remeber when I suggest Kim Cattrall for Worst Supp. Actress?I hated her performance in THE GHOST WRITER,and it could've been an excuse for her to also win for SEX & THE CITY 2.It was established the Four Gal Pals were equally leading in the movie.If she had been considered apart form the other 3,would she have been up for Actress orSupp. Actress?
Originally posted by Vits
Does anyone here thinks Sarah Jessica Parker would've been nominated alone?And would she had won?
I know I answered my own question, but I still can't believe "Vapmpires Suck Balls" didn't win. I have seen them both, and I would rather watch/buy "Last Airbender" than "Vampires Suck Balls." I can see "LAB" becoming a guilty pleasure in years to come, whilst "VSB" has no redeeming qualities at all.
I can very nearly guarantee you that if Freidberg and Seltzer ever win a Razzie, within 24 hours they will hold an enormous press conference and joyously announce, "FINALLY! Someone understands our work!" These are the only two guys in Hollywood who would consider winning a Razzie to be a vindication, which is precisely why they should never win one.
Nine times out of ten, in art as in life, there is no truth to be discovered, only an error to be exposed.--H.L. Menken
I can very nearly guarantee you that if Freidberg and Seltzer ever win a Razzie, within 24 hours they will hold an enormous press conference and joyously announce, "FINALLY! Someone understands our work!" These are the only two guys in Hollywood who would consider winning a Razzie to be a vindication, which is precisely why they should never win one.
So, what you're implying is that Seltzerberg have talent, they just make bad movies on purpose so that they can win a Razzie because only award is better than no awards?
The Four Horsemen of the Moviepocalypse: uncalled for sequels/remakes/reboots, 3-D surcharges, untalented "celebrities", and anything with Michael Bay's name attached to it.
And is the problem with those two retarded retards, saturnwatcher, they won't understand or do, the concept of "the razzies".
To use a quote from a leading film critic in Britain...(some words have changed but the point is the same)
"how do you know if you are watching a comedy? you laugh at least six times in the entire movie"
As I never laughed once in "Vampires Suck Balls" I can safely say that it is not a comedy in the true sense of the word and that these guys are hacks of the highest order, but as there seems to be a market for these two f**kholes in the world there is not much we can do.
But as I have said before, I can see "Last Airbender" becoming a "Showgirls" and "Battlefield Earth" being seen as a so bad is good movie, and I know which movie I would prefer to buy out of "Vampires Suck Balls" & "The Last Airbender"
So, what you're implying is that Seltzerberg have talent, they just make bad movies on purpose so that they can win a Razzie because only award is better than no awards?
I never meant to imply for a second that they have talent, merely that they are achieving what they intend to achieve. Essentially, they set out to create crap and they succeed in doing it. It doesn't take nearly as much talent or effort to burn down a barn as it does to build one. These two guys are just a couple of morons with a book of matches and a hope that someone out there will appreciate, or at least pay attention to their brand of pyromania. I don't think we need to be the ones to reward intentional bad behavior.
I'll bet you dollars to donuts that if these guys ever win a Razzie, for the rest of their careers they'll wear it like a badge of honor. Every film they make there after will carrry the tagline, "From the Razzie winning directors of (insert the title of one of their future efforts).
Nine times out of ten, in art as in life, there is no truth to be discovered, only an error to be exposed.--H.L. Menken
I never meant to imply for a second that they have talent, merely that they are achieving what they intend to achieve. Essentially, they set out to create crap and they succeed in doing it. It doesn't take nearly as much talent or effort to burn down a barn as it does to build one. These two guys are just a couple of morons with a book of matches and a hope that someone out there will appreciate, or at least pay attention to their brand of pyromania. I don't think we need to be the ones to reward intentional bad behavior.
I'll bet you dollars to donuts that if these guys ever win a Razzie, for the rest of their careers they'll wear it like a badge of honor. Every film they make there after will carrry the tagline, "From the Razzie winning directors of (insert the title of one of their future efforts).
Ah, so they are just attention whores. Okay then.
The Four Horsemen of the Moviepocalypse: uncalled for sequels/remakes/reboots, 3-D surcharges, untalented "celebrities", and anything with Michael Bay's name attached to it.
I thought the main kid (Noah Ringer) in Airbender was pretty good for being a first time actor. You're right, the movie kind of blew. However, anything with Justin Kutcher is about 100 times worse, so I'd give my vote to his movies everytime.
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You can vote in polls in this forum
Share Topic
Printable Version
Delicious
Digg
Facebook
Furl
Google Boomarks
Google Buzz
MySpace
Newsvine
reddit
StumbleUpon
Twitter
Windows Live
Yahoo Bookmarks
Topic Search 
Topic Options
Post Options
Quote 
Topic: FORUM DISCUSSION of OUR 2010 CHOICES...
